Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl. Only cleanup and no function changes.
Differences from v2 to v3: - Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
Differences from v1 to v2: - Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15. - Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
Xiaofei Tan (12): ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++--- drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 - drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++ drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 +++ drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++-------- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++---- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +- drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 ++ drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++--- drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++-- 12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
Fix the following coding style issue reported by checkpatch.pl. WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line +/** +* Create platform device during acpi scan attach handle.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c index 39359ce..0ec5b3f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c @@ -176,10 +176,10 @@ static const struct apd_device_desc hip08_spi_desc = {
#endif
-/** -* Create platform device during acpi scan attach handle. -* Return value > 0 on success of creating device. -*/ +/* + * Create platform device during acpi scan attach handle. + * Return value > 0 on success of creating device. + */ static int acpi_apd_create_device(struct acpi_device *adev, const struct acpi_device_id *id) {
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including following types:
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: labels should not be indented
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++++------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c index fc89f3a..2d5bd2a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c @@ -25,10 +25,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors); EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors);
-/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Errata Handling - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ - +/* Errata Handling */ struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly; EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(errata);
@@ -151,10 +148,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_errata(void) return result; }
-/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Initialization - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ - +/* Initialization */ #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU int __weak acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id, int *pcpu) @@ -306,6 +300,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device) */ if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) { int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr); + if (ret) return ret; } @@ -431,10 +426,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device, }
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU -/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Removal - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ - +/* Removal */ static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device) { struct acpi_processor *pr; @@ -892,7 +884,7 @@ int acpi_processor_evaluate_cst(acpi_handle handle, u32 cpu,
info->count = last_index;
- end: +end: kfree(buffer.pointer);
return ret;
Remove useless return statement for void function, reported by checkpatch.pl.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful FILE: drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c:482: + return; +}
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c index 9d6c0fc..bbd00d9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c @@ -478,7 +478,6 @@ static void ipmi_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev) ipmi_dev_release(ipmi_device); err_ref: put_device(smi_data.dev); - return; }
static void ipmi_bmc_gone(int iface)
Add a missed blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c index be73974..ca742f1 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c @@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_lpss_device_ids[] = { static int is_memory(struct acpi_resource *res, void *not_used) { struct resource r; + return !acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r); }
@@ -1200,6 +1201,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev) if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) { /* This is analogous to the acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq() case. */ int ret = acpi_lpss_do_poweroff_late(dev); + if (ret) return ret; }
Add a missed blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c index b84ab72..df4adeb 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void round_robin_cpu(unsigned int tsk_index) static void exit_round_robin(unsigned int tsk_index) { struct cpumask *pad_busy_cpus = to_cpumask(pad_busy_cpus_bits); + cpumask_clear_cpu(tsk_in_cpu[tsk_index], pad_busy_cpus); tsk_in_cpu[tsk_index] = -1; } @@ -265,6 +266,7 @@ static ssize_t rrtime_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { unsigned long num; + if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &num)) return -EINVAL; if (num < 1 || num >= 100) @@ -286,6 +288,7 @@ static ssize_t idlepct_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { unsigned long num; + if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &num)) return -EINVAL; if (num < 1 || num >= 100) @@ -307,6 +310,7 @@ static ssize_t idlecpus_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count) { unsigned long num; + if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &num)) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(&isolated_cpus_lock);
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including following types:
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations ERROR: spaces required around that '?' (ctx:WxV) WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c index b822f77..dae91f9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c @@ -74,16 +74,17 @@ enum { ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT, ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_PERCENTAGE_CAPACITY, /* On Lenovo Thinkpad models from 2010 and 2011, the power unit - switches between mWh and mAh depending on whether the system - is running on battery or not. When mAh is the unit, most - reported values are incorrect and need to be adjusted by - 10000/design_voltage. Verified on x201, t410, t410s, and x220. - Pre-2010 and 2012 models appear to always report in mWh and - are thus unaffected (tested with t42, t61, t500, x200, x300, - and x230). Also, in mid-2012 Lenovo issued a BIOS update for - the 2011 models that fixes the issue (tested on x220 with a - post-1.29 BIOS), but as of Nov. 2012, no such update is - available for the 2010 models. */ + * switches between mWh and mAh depending on whether the system + * is running on battery or not. When mAh is the unit, most + * reported values are incorrect and need to be adjusted by + * 10000/design_voltage. Verified on x201, t410, t410s, and x220. + * Pre-2010 and 2012 models appear to always report in mWh and + * are thus unaffected (tested with t42, t61, t500, x200, x300, + * and x230). Also, in mid-2012 Lenovo issued a BIOS update for + * the 2011 models that fixes the issue (tested on x220 with a + * post-1.29 BIOS), but as of Nov. 2012, no such update is + * available for the 2010 models. + */ ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_THINKPAD_MAH, /* for batteries reporting current capacity with design capacity * on a full charge, but showing degradation in full charge cap. @@ -371,9 +372,7 @@ static enum power_supply_property energy_battery_full_cap_broken_props[] = { POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SERIAL_NUMBER, };
-/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Battery Management - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ +/* Battery Management */ struct acpi_offsets { size_t offset; /* offset inside struct acpi_sbs_battery */ u8 mode; /* int or string? */ @@ -431,6 +430,7 @@ static int extract_package(struct acpi_battery *battery, { int i; union acpi_object *element; + if (package->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) return -EFAULT; for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) { @@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static int extract_package(struct acpi_battery *battery, element = &package->package.elements[i]; if (offsets[i].mode) { u8 *ptr = (u8 *)battery + offsets[i].offset; + if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING || element->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) strncpy(ptr, element->string.pointer, 32); @@ -497,10 +498,12 @@ static int extract_battery_info(const int use_bix, battery->design_capacity_warning * 10000 / battery->design_voltage; /* Curiously, design_capacity_low, unlike the rest of them, - is correct. */ + * is correct. + */ /* capacity_granularity_* equal 1 on the systems tested, so - it's impossible to tell if they would need an adjustment - or not if their values were higher. */ + * it's impossible to tell if they would need an adjustment + * or not if their values were higher. + */ } if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_DEGRADED_FULL_CHARGE, &battery->flags) && battery->capacity_now > battery->full_charge_capacity) @@ -532,8 +535,8 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_info(struct acpi_battery *battery) if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { acpi_handle_info(battery->device->handle, "%s evaluation failed: %s\n", - use_bix ?"_BIX":"_BIF", - acpi_format_exception(status)); + use_bix ? "_BIX":"_BIF", + acpi_format_exception(status)); } else { result = extract_battery_info(use_bix, battery, @@ -648,6 +651,7 @@ static ssize_t acpi_battery_alarm_show(struct device *dev, char *buf) { struct acpi_battery *battery = to_acpi_battery(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); + return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", battery->alarm * 1000); }
@@ -657,6 +661,7 @@ static ssize_t acpi_battery_alarm_store(struct device *dev, { unsigned long x; struct acpi_battery *battery = to_acpi_battery(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); + if (sscanf(buf, "%lu\n", &x) == 1) battery->alarm = x/1000; if (acpi_battery_present(battery)) @@ -743,7 +748,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_register); * This function gets called right after the battery sysfs * attributes have been added, so that the drivers that * define custom sysfs attributes can add their own. -*/ + */ static void battery_hook_add_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery) { struct acpi_battery_hook *hook_node, *tmp; @@ -872,10 +877,12 @@ static void find_battery(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *private) { struct acpi_battery *battery = (struct acpi_battery *)private; /* Note: the hardcoded offsets below have been extracted from - the source code of dmidecode. */ + * the source code of dmidecode. + */ if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_PORTABLE_BATTERY && dm->length >= 8) { const u8 *dmi_data = (const u8 *)(dm + 1); int dmi_capacity = get_unaligned((const u16 *)(dmi_data + 6)); + if (dm->length >= 18) dmi_capacity *= dmi_data[17]; if (battery->design_capacity * battery->design_voltage / 1000 @@ -917,6 +924,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_quirks(struct acpi_battery *battery)
if (battery->power_unit && dmi_name_in_vendors("LENOVO")) { const char *s; + s = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION); if (s && !strncasecmp(s, "ThinkPad", 8)) { dmi_walk(find_battery, battery); @@ -1013,10 +1021,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_refresh(struct acpi_battery *battery) sysfs_add_battery(battery); }
-/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Driver Interface - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ - +/* Driver Interface */ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) { struct acpi_battery *battery = acpi_driver_data(device); @@ -1026,11 +1031,11 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event) return; old = battery->bat; /* - * On Acer Aspire V5-573G notifications are sometimes triggered too - * early. For example, when AC is unplugged and notification is - * triggered, battery state is still reported as "Full", and changes to - * "Discharging" only after short delay, without any notification. - */ + * On Acer Aspire V5-573G notifications are sometimes triggered too + * early. For example, when AC is unplugged and notification is + * triggered, battery state is still reported as "Full", and changes to + * "Discharging" only after short delay, without any notification. + */ if (battery_notification_delay_ms > 0) msleep(battery_notification_delay_ms); if (event == ACPI_BATTERY_NOTIFY_INFO)
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including following types:
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c index 85e5e03..f25bd33 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/button.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c @@ -156,10 +156,7 @@ static unsigned long lid_report_interval __read_mostly = 500; module_param(lid_report_interval, ulong, 0644); MODULE_PARM_DESC(lid_report_interval, "Interval (ms) between lid key events");
-/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - FS Interface (/proc) - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ - +/* FS Interface (/proc) */ static struct proc_dir_entry *acpi_button_dir; static struct proc_dir_entry *acpi_lid_dir;
@@ -348,9 +345,7 @@ static int acpi_button_remove_fs(struct acpi_device *device) return 0; }
-/* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Driver Interface - -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ +/* Driver Interface */ int acpi_lid_open(void) { if (!lid_device)
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline ERROR: spaces required around that '>=' ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c index ae53740..3dbaf47 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static int send_pcc_cmd(int pcc_ss_id, u16 cmd) if (unlikely(ret)) { for_each_possible_cpu(i) { struct cpc_desc *desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, i); + if (!desc) continue;
@@ -777,7 +778,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr) cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER; memcpy(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.reg, gas_t, sizeof(*gas_t)); } else { - pr_debug("Err in entry:%d in CPC table of CPU:%d \n", i, pr->id); + pr_debug("Err in entry:%d in CPC table of CPU:%d\n", i, pr->id); goto out_free; } } @@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ void acpi_cppc_processor_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr) void __iomem *addr; int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, pr->id);
- if (pcc_ss_id >=0 && pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]) { + if (pcc_ss_id >= 0 && pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]) { if (pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]->pcc_channel_acquired) { pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]->refcount--; if (!pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]->refcount) { @@ -954,22 +955,22 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val) val, reg->bit_width);
switch (reg->bit_width) { - case 8: - *val = readb_relaxed(vaddr); - break; - case 16: - *val = readw_relaxed(vaddr); - break; - case 32: - *val = readl_relaxed(vaddr); - break; - case 64: - *val = readq_relaxed(vaddr); - break; - default: - pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u bit width from PCC for ss: %d\n", - reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id); - ret_val = -EFAULT; + case 8: + *val = readb_relaxed(vaddr); + break; + case 16: + *val = readw_relaxed(vaddr); + break; + case 32: + *val = readl_relaxed(vaddr); + break; + case 64: + *val = readq_relaxed(vaddr); + break; + default: + pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u bit width from PCC for ss: %d\n", + reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id); + ret_val = -EFAULT; }
return ret_val; @@ -993,23 +994,23 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val) val, reg->bit_width);
switch (reg->bit_width) { - case 8: - writeb_relaxed(val, vaddr); - break; - case 16: - writew_relaxed(val, vaddr); - break; - case 32: - writel_relaxed(val, vaddr); - break; - case 64: - writeq_relaxed(val, vaddr); - break; - default: - pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n", - reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id); - ret_val = -EFAULT; - break; + case 8: + writeb_relaxed(val, vaddr); + break; + case 16: + writew_relaxed(val, vaddr); + break; + case 32: + writel_relaxed(val, vaddr); + break; + case 64: + writeq_relaxed(val, vaddr); + break; + default: + pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n", + reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id); + ret_val = -EFAULT; + break; }
return ret_val;
Fix the following coding style issue reported by checkpatch.pl
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" FILE: drivers/acpi/custom_method.c:22: +static ssize_t cm_write(struct file *file, const char __user * user_buf,
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c b/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c index 7b54dc9..443fdf62 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static struct dentry *cm_dentry;
/* /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/custom_method */
-static ssize_t cm_write(struct file *file, const char __user * user_buf, +static ssize_t cm_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos) { static char *buf;
Add a missed blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c index 0961537..16c0fe8 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c @@ -966,6 +966,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resume); int acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) { int ret = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev); + return ret ? ret : acpi_dev_suspend(dev, true); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend); @@ -980,6 +981,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend); int acpi_subsys_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) { int ret = acpi_dev_resume(dev); + return ret ? ret : pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_runtime_resume); @@ -1171,6 +1173,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_freeze); int acpi_subsys_restore_early(struct device *dev) { int ret = acpi_dev_resume(dev); + return ret ? ret : pm_generic_restore_early(dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_restore_early);
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c index da4ff2a..a07d4ad 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static const struct sysfs_ops acpi_data_node_sysfs_ops = { static void acpi_data_node_release(struct kobject *kobj) { struct acpi_data_node *dn = to_data_node(kobj); + complete(&dn->kobj_done); }
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ static void acpi_hide_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data) * Return: 0: no _HID and no _CID * -EINVAL: output error * -ENOMEM: output is truncated -*/ + */ static int create_pnp_modalias(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *modalias, int size) { @@ -431,7 +432,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(path); /* sysfs file that shows description text from the ACPI _STR method */ static ssize_t description_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - char *buf) { + char *buf) +{ struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev); int result;
@@ -456,7 +458,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(description);
static ssize_t sun_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - char *buf) { + char *buf) +{ struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev); acpi_status status; unsigned long long sun; @@ -471,7 +474,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sun);
static ssize_t hrv_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - char *buf) { + char *buf) +{ struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev); acpi_status status; unsigned long long hrv; @@ -485,7 +489,8 @@ hrv_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hrv);
static ssize_t status_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, - char *buf) { + char *buf) +{ struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev); acpi_status status; unsigned long long sta;
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations ERROR: spaces required around that ':' WARNING: Statements should start on a tabstop
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com --- drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c index 0937cea..7cf9215 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ static void hotplug_dock_devices(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event)
if (!acpi_device_enumerated(adev)) { int ret = acpi_bus_scan(adev->handle); + if (ret) dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "scan error %d\n", -ret); } @@ -502,6 +503,7 @@ static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data; + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", dock_station->flags);
} @@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static ssize_t undock_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, begin_undock(dock_station); ret = handle_eject_request(dock_station, ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST); acpi_scan_lock_release(); - return ret ? ret: count; + return ret ? ret : count; } static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(undock);
@@ -535,10 +537,11 @@ static ssize_t uid_show(struct device *dev, { unsigned long long lbuf; struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data; + acpi_status status = acpi_evaluate_integer(dock_station->handle, "_UID", NULL, &lbuf); if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) - return 0; + return 0;
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llx\n", lbuf); }
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com wrote:
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl. Only cleanup and no function changes.
Differences from v2 to v3:
- Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
Differences from v1 to v2:
- Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15.
- Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
Xiaofei Tan (12): ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++--- drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 - drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++ drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 +++ drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++-------- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++---- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +- drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 ++ drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++--- drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++-- 12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
--
Can you please stop sending new versions of this for a while?
You've sent three of them over the last weekend and honestly I haven't had a chance to look at the first one even.
Hi Rafael,
On 2021/3/29 20:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com wrote:
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl. Only cleanup and no function changes.
Differences from v2 to v3:
- Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
Differences from v1 to v2:
- Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15.
- Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
Xiaofei Tan (12): ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++--- drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 - drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++ drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 +++ drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++-------- drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++---- drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +- drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 ++ drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++--- drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++-- 12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
--
Can you please stop sending new versions of this for a while?
OK.
You've sent three of them over the last weekend and honestly I haven't had a chance to look at the first one even.
I tried to fix a low-level mistake as quickly as possible. I'm sorry for that
Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan tanxiaofei@huawei.com wrote:
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl. Only cleanup and no function changes.
Differences from v2 to v3:
- Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
Differences from v1 to v2:
- Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15.
- Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
Xiaofei Tan (12): ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
All applied as 5.13 material, thanks!