包管理最多做成一个组吧，有必要上升成一个委员会吗？Fedora
也就是一个组而已。
另外，需要明确一下具体的工作内容和职责
我个人初步建议
1．
纳入新包、建仓PR的审核
2．
新包打包spec的审核，包括license的合法性审核
重点应该是选包和合规的检查
发件人: Huxinwei via Tc [mailto:tc@openeuler.org]
发送时间: 2020年4月2日
11:02
收件人: 杨丽 <rainbow1981@163.com>; tc@openeuler.org
主题: [Tc] Re: [新sig提案]申请成立openEuler包管理委员会
我个人感觉是需要梳理TC活动，完善流程。
似乎没有必要单独成立新的委员会？
能不能澄清下成立新的“Package Comittee”的理由？
From:
杨丽 [mailto:rainbow1981@163.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2020 10:45 AM
To: tc@openeuler.org
Subject: [Tc] [新sig提案]申请成立openEuler包管理委员会
hi all
This time, we specially applied to TC for establishing the "Package-Committee" on 8 April Meeting.
The responsibilities of the Package-Committee are as follows:
[1]. Release and maintain the packaging specifications, packaging principles and dependency specifications of the community.
[2]. Implement the package introduction and exit mechanism of the TC, and preview the application of releasing the software package in community.
[3]. Coordinate the division of software, and dependency conflict
[4]. Work with the release manager and sig-QA team to support the release process of the community release
[5]. Establish and maintain the Package Management TOOL solution to support automation and traceability of package management
PR application link :
Thank you for your opinions.
|
|
杨丽 |
|
华为技术有限公司 |
|
签名由
网易邮箱大师
定制