- Community - mailweb.openeuler.org

help
by gopanic 29 Mar '20

29 Mar '20

Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.

1 0

help
by Bruce 28 Mar '20

28 Mar '20

发自我的iPhone

2 1

jackbrucezw@163.com
by Bruce 28 Mar '20

28 Mar '20

发自我的iPhone

1 0

撤回: [community governance]Nonimate @blueskycs2c as committer
by Haolijuan 28 Mar '20

28 Mar '20

Haolijuan 将撤回邮件“[Community] [community governance]Nonimate @blueskycs2c as committer”。

1 0

Re: [Tc] SIG组工作审视
by Fred Li 27 Mar '20

27 Mar '20

Happy to see technical committee members will mentor us. Many thanks in advance. On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 7:54 PM myeuler <myeuler(a)163.com> wrote: > > Hi, All tc members, Please do the SIG work review according to this list: > 1. xinwei hu : Virt, system-tool, storage, sig-kernel, sig-community > 2. hong xie : sig-bounds_checking_function, sig-ai-bigdata, security-committee, Runtime, Programming-language > 3. hanjun guo : Private, Packaging, oVirt, Others, Networking, > 4. xiuqi Xie : Kernel, kae, iSulad, Infrastructure, doc > 5. hailiang Zhang : Desktop, DB, Container, Computing > 6. Xun Wang : Compiler, Base-service, A-Tune, atune > 7 Wei Xiong : dev-util, Application, sig-template, sig-mate-desktop > > 请各位委员按照上述的分组对SIG组进行审视，审视的内容包含： > 1. SIG组是否正常运作。是否有明确的负责人。 > 2. 相关的项目是否已经有输出，相关软件是否已经进入gitee仓。 > 3. 相关SIG的主页面是否有明确的介绍信息和完善的说明。 > > 下次TC meeting我们审视一下这些SIG的运作，一些SIG是否需要保留或者合并请各位委员给出建议和意见。 > > 谢谢。 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tc mailing list -- tc(a)openeuler.org > To unsubscribe send an email to tc-leave(a)openeuler.org -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐)

1 0

Re: [Tc] [RFC] crystal-ci test as service
by Yang Li 25 Mar '20

25 Mar '20

6 9

[tc][package]About how to manage and maintain packages/dependencies
by Fred Li 25 Mar '20

25 Mar '20

Hi TC members, Infrastructure team and community members, Recently there are many issues about adding dependencies or new packages [1][2][3]. As a linux operating system, it is extremely critical to manage the dependencies. As we know, Technical committee is managing the packages management policy, however who maintain the new packages is not clear. I have draft idea on this. Please give your advice, opinions on how to maintain the dependencies. - policy. Dependencies are still packages, thus they follow the flow on how to introduce the packages into openEuler community. - Who to maintain: if the packages are new and only dependencies, probably one specific team is an option to do this. - How to automate: Infrastructure should provide a function on getting update from upstream automatically - Dependencies management: an expert should maintain the detailed work on how to choose for ISO and yum for each specific version of release. [1] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community-issue/issues/I1CBYV?from=project-issue [2] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community-issue/issues/I1BHND?from=project-issue [3] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community-issue/issues/I1CBW5?from=project-issue -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐)

2 1

[新SIG提案]申请成立UKUI SIG
by Joey Ma 25 Mar '20

25 Mar '20

Hi Dear TC, We are so pleased to propose to apply a new SIG UKUI, please check it out at PR https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/291 . Please let me have a brief introduction on UKUI for you. UKUI is designed by KylinSoft Co., Ltd. UKUI is a lightweight desktop environment based on pluggable framework for Linux and other Unix-like Distributions. It provides a simpler and more enjoyable experience for browsing, searching, and managing your computer.It is developed using GTK and Qt. It's comprised of ukui-panel, ukui-sidecar and many other components. Please see the official site http://ukui.org/ for more information. The UKUI SIG will work on making UKUI available to all of openEuler users. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks and take care. Regards, Joey

4 6

openEuler Community Governance Weekly meeting
by Liyongle (Fred) 22 Mar '20

22 Mar '20

Please join the weekly meeting and discuss how to improve the community governance. - Time 10:00-11:00 am, Tuesday, Beijing Time; 2:00-3:00 am, Tuesday, UTC. - Meeting link: https://welink-meeting.zoom.us/j/152428852 [1] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/blob/master/meeting_records/README.md [2] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/wikis/All%20the%20open%20tasks%20abou…

1 0

Introduction to the new commentable and rename_from features supported in ci-bot
by joey 20 Mar '20

20 Mar '20

Hi all: I’m Joey and from infrastructure team of openEuler. So glad to see you guys and hope everybody is doing well. I’m writing here to have a brief introduction to the new features provided by ci-bot. We believe they would be helpful for your repository management. As it’s known to us, ci-bot is an automation system to handle lots of infrastructure stuff, such as gitee web hook events, repository management, owner management and etc. For more details about our lovely ci-bot, please refer to https://gitee.com/openeuler/ci-bot <https://gitee.com/openeuler/ci-bot>. For now, please let me elaborate how you can make use of the two features to ease the repository management. 1. Add commentable property for repository definition in openeuler.yaml or src-openeuler.yaml under openeuler/community. PR is: https://gitee.com/openeuler/ci-bot/pulls/26 <https://gitee.com/openeuler/ci-bot/pulls/26> . > Previously users could leave a comment at the index page of the project, which is a great feature provided by Gitee. While as we all know, the more conventional way is posting an issue request for questions/bugs/features. So after discussion, we finally consider to disable the comment-to-repository feature for all repositories. So here comes to this functionality, which adds an extra commentable property. If it’s not specified, the default value is false of boolean type. > Actually, you DO NOT need to pay any attention to this new property since non-commentable repository is strongly recommended. Just think it never exists. The example is shown as below, ```yaml community: openeuler repositories: - name: A-Tune description: "" type: public commentable: false # User CAN NOT see or leave comment to repository - name: ci-bot description: "" type: public commentable: true # Users CAN see and leave comment to repository - name: community description: "" type: public # User CAN NOT see or leave comment to repository ``` 2. Add rename_from property for repository definition in openeuler.yaml or src-openeuler.yaml under openeuler/community. PR is: https://gitee.com/openeuler/ci-bot/pulls/27 <https://gitee.com/openeuler/ci-bot/pulls/27> . > Please let me take a real case for example. In PR https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/128 <https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/128>, iSulad team wants to change the names of three repositories: iSulad-kit ===> iSulad-img iSulad-lxcfs-toolkit ===> lxcfs-tools iSulad-tools ===> syscontainer-tools > As the PR is shown to us, the code diff is as below, which leaded ci-bot to completely remove the old repository and create a new empty one with the new name, causing loss of all the existing issues and PRs. ```diff - - name: iSulad-kit + - name: iSulad-img description: "" - - name: iSulad-lxcfs-toolkit + - name: lxcfs-toolkit description: "" - - name: iSulad-tools + - name: syscontainer-tools description: "" ``` > While after the PR has been merged, the diff would be like the following. This could make use of the newly supported renaming-repository Gitee OpenAPI to keep all the issues and PRs unchanged. ```diff - - name: iSulad-kit + - name: iSulad-img description: "" + rename_from: iSulad-kit - - name: iSulad-lxcfs-toolkit + - name: lxcfs-toolkit description: "" + rename_from: iSulad-lxcfs-toolkit - - name: iSulad-tools + - name: syscontainer-tools description: "" + rename_from: iSulad-tools ``` > While it should noted that rename_from is not declarative but imperative cause it will take effect only for once and not stored in DB. So if we remove it from repository definition after renaming operation has been finished, nothing will happen. Hopefully I have explained clear enough. Currently the new functionalities are not in production yet and your feedback is rather important to us. So please reply this email for further discussion as soon as you have any doubt. Looking forward to your feedback. Take care! Best regards, Joey

3 2