April 2020 - Dev - mailweb.openeuler.org

[summit]openEuler Virtual Summit 2020 will be held on Apr. 17th and 18th
by Fred Li 13 Apr '20

13 Apr '20

Hi all, I am exited to announce that openEuler Virtual Summit is coming! Due to COVID-19, we have to hold the first summit virtually, and I believe this is good to all the members' health. Please stay healthy and strong. Please visit https://openeuler.org/zh/summit/2020-virtual-summit.html (Chinese) or https://openeuler.org/en/summit/2020-virtual-summit.html (English) for details. As you can find on the page, there are several pases: 1. From now on to April 9th, it is call for speakers. To emphasize, this is only for Design summit, and please developers to start planning your design summit. 2. From Apr. 10th to 15th, it is open for registration. 3. The summit will be on Apr. 17th and 18th. There will be 2 parts. The first one is summit, and the second one is design summit. On Design summit, the contributors will have a virtual face to face meeting to discuss what we will develop for next release, which is openEuler 20.09 here. openEuler SIGs maintainers, please start to plan the design summit for your SIG with your team. Please note that you will have 2 hours for the meeting. Once confirmed, please send the following information to marketing(a)openeuler.org. Make sure you have subscribed [1]. - group name (SIG name): - chair: - BIO of the chair: - Brief introduction to the meeting: [1] https://mailweb.openeuler.org/postorius/lists/marketing@openeuler.org/ -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐)

7 10

[infra][docs]Quality improvement for joint docs and infrastructure
by Fred Li 12 Apr '20

12 Apr '20

Hi infra and docs team, Please visit [1] to get the details. The issue was that one link in docs was wrong, which is understandable, but the impact is that the build of website failed but nobody knew until checking the final result. We need improve the integration and test. Any thoughts? [1] https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1E9ZD -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐)

2 1

openEuler峰会议题-RaspberryPi
by 方亚芬 11 Apr '20

11 Apr '20

老师，您好。以下是 RaspberryPi SIG 组参与的议题。烦请查收，谢谢。- 组名：树莓派 - 主持人：方亚芬 - 主持人简介：树莓派 SIG 组负责人 - 会议议程简介：本次会议主要介绍如下内容： 1、RaspberryPi SIG 组的背景介绍 2、RaspberryPi SIG 组的当前工作进展包括 openEuler 移植到树莓派的方法、当前存在问题及解决方案 3、后续发展规划 - group name (SIG name): RaspberryPi - chair: YaFen Fang - BIO of the chair: RaspberryPI SIG maintainer. - Brief introduction to the meeting: 1. Background of RaspberryPi SIG group. 2. Current progress of RaspberryPi SIG Include how to migrate openEuler to Raspberry Pi, and how to tackle current problems. 3. Future plan 祝工作顺利，生活愉快。 ------------------------------------------ 方亚芬中国科学院软件研究所智能软件研究中心邮箱：yafen(a)iscas.ac.cn 地址：北京市海淀区中关村南四街4号5楼

2 1

关于优化社区文档的阅读体验，欢迎您的反馈/Optimized the reading experience of document in the community document.Your feedback is welcome
by Junqi?Xie 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

关于优化社区文档的阅读体验，欢迎您的反馈： https://gitee.com/openeuler/website/issues/I1E208?from=project-issue issue内容如下：关于文档阅读体验，有如下issue反馈： 1、https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1CTZ8?from=project-issue 2、https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1CPWY?from=project-issue 3、https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1CPXV?from=project-issue 主要问题点在于： 1、目录结构不易展开 2、文档内容不连续，层级太多且无法顺畅翻页阅读。每次都需要在左侧导航切换希望提供pdf、single page、multi page不同阅读体验 sigle page：一个页面显示一个章节的所有内容，且能够提供页内的索引、目录或者浮动目录 multi page：一个页面内显示一个手册的所有内容。针对这些问题，请大家体验下mindspore资料阅读方式，如果大家认可该方式，openEuler社区文档就按照该框架优化资料阅读内容： https://www.mindspore.cn/tutorial/zh-CN/master/index.html 您是否认可mindspore的阅读体验？或者有更好的建议参考? 【English】 The following issues have been reported regarding document reading experience: 1.https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1CTZ8?from=project-issue 2.https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1CPWY?from=project-issue 3.https://gitee.com/openeuler/docs/issues/I1CPXV?from=project-issue The main problems are as follows: 1.The directory structure is difficult to expand. 2.The document content is not continuous. There are too many layers and pages cannot be turned smoothly. You need to switch between the navigation tree on the left each time. Different reading experience for PDF, single page, and multi page. sigle page: All contents of a chapter are displayed on a page. In addition, indexes, directories, or floating directories can be provided on the page. multi page: displays all contents of a manual on a page. To solve these problems, please experience the MindSpore documentation reading mode. If you agree with this mode or have made improvements based on this mode, the documentation of the OpenEuler community will be optimized based on this mode. **https://www.mindspore.cn/tutorial/zh-CN/master/index.html ** Do you recognize mindspore's reading experience? Or do you have any better suggestions?

1 0

openeuler kmod drivers compile support
by Xin.Yan＠microchip.com 08 Apr '20

08 Apr '20

Loop more, if any one can help, thanks. From: Xin Yan - A50803 Sent: 2020年4月8日 11:49 To: contact(a)openeuler.org Subject: openeuler kmod drivers compile support Hi openeuler team, I am having problems finding macros necessary to build kmod driver rpm packages. For instance, our spec file calls kernel_module_package that is missing form openEuler. It will be hard to support drivers well on openEuler without kmod packing support. I can see below macro in centos: [root@rhel7u7e-s1 rpm]# grep -ri kernel_module_package /usr/lib/rpm /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/kmodtool:# generally called only by the %kernel_module_package RPM macro /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:%global redhat_kernel_module_package 1 /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:%global kernel_module_package_release 1 /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:#kernel_module_package [ -n name ] [ -v version ] [ -r release ] [ -s script ] /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:%kernel_module_package_buildreqs %global kmodtool_generate_buildreqs 1 \ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros:%kernel_module_package(n:v:r:s:f:xp:) %{expand:%( \ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/macros: echo "%%global kernel_module_package_moddir() extra" \ [root@rhel7u7e-s1 rpm]# But I can not find anything in openeuler: [root@openeuler2003test]# grep -ri kernel_module_package /usr/lib/rpm [root@openeuler2003test]# Best regards, Bob

1 0

Re: Chinese Fedora packager is here
by handsome_feng 07 Apr '20

07 Apr '20

Hi, Robin, I'm one of the UKUI maintainers, we are very happy to learned that you are instersted in porting UKUI to Fedora, and that's exactly what we want to do. :) So, what can we do and how to coporate? We don’t have much experience in this. Thanks, handsome_feng

3 2

订阅
by Sober 05 Apr '20

05 Apr '20

1 0

Chinese Fedora packager is here
by Robin Lee 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

Hi, all I learned about openeuler is packaging Ukui from news. Any chance we can also submit the packages to Fedora? Or any openeuler packager also want to be Fedora packager? I can help if anyone is interested. -robin

4 6

Re: [A-tune] Glad to join a-tune group and need more information
by Fred Li 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

+ dev(a)openeuler.org and community(a)openeuler.org. Hi Zhangmiao, Glad to hear that your are interested in A-Tune project. You are right, there is not so much information on website(I mean openeuler.org) The design idea is that the project content will be stored in gitee only. If you haven't visited [1], please visit it. And you can also leave issues in [1] or email here. Thanks [1] https://gitee.com/openeuler/A-Tune On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:21 PM zhangmiao via A-tune <a-tune(a)openeuler.org> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I am from iscas(Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Science, > 中科院软件所) > > we are very interested in a-tune project. and would like to join it with > our effort. > > but information from home website is very limited, and not in time. > > would you please share your recent progress? > _______________________________________________ > A-tune mailing list -- a-tune(a)openeuler.org > To unsubscribe send an email to a-tune-leave(a)openeuler.org -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐)

1 0

[Docs]Please check the 2 PRs for the same(perhaps) purpose
by Fred Li 03 Apr '20

03 Apr '20

Hi Docs team, community, To add one committer to Docs team, @amyMaYun submitted [1], and I put -1 comment with reason, but I haven't got any reply so far. @Rudy_Tan submitted another one [2], and it got approved immediately. I am not against the nominated committer himself/herself, but I am against the process. I propos to revert [2] if there is not a reasonalbe explanation. [1] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/321 [2] https://gitee.com/openeuler/community/pulls/300 -- Regards Fred Li (李永乐)

3 4