March 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 20704/21850] kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:84:31: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'v'
by kernel test robot 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518 commit: ce35ded5d5774f055f6850b15032066ff4936414 [20704/21850] sched: smart grid: init sched_grid_qos structure on QOS purpose config: x86_64-randconfig-161-20240313 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240313/202403130506.ha6K0yEi-lkp@…) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240313/202403130506.ha6K0yEi-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403130506.ha6K0yEi-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:19: kernel/sched/grid/qos.c: In function 'sched_grid_preferred_interleave_nid': >> kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:84:31: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'v' 84 | if (nodes_equal(policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask)) | ^~ include/linux/nodemask.h:202:41: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_equal' 202 | __nodes_equal(&(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES) | ^~~~ kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:91:32: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'v' 91 | nodes_and(nmask, policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask); | ^~ include/linux/nodemask.h:162:47: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_and' 162 | __nodes_and(&(dst), &(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES) | ^~~~ >> kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:95:31: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'il_prev' 95 | next = next_node_in(me->il_prev, nmask); | ^~ include/linux/nodemask.h:278:46: note: in definition of macro 'next_node_in' 278 | #define next_node_in(n, src) __next_node_in((n), &(src)) | ^ kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:97:19: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'il_prev' 97 | me->il_prev = next; | ^~ In file included from kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:20: include/linux/mempolicy.h: At top level: include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 329 | static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, | ^~~~~~~~~~ vim +84 kernel/sched/grid/qos.c 68 69 /* dynamic select a more appropriate preferred interleave nid for process */ 70 int sched_grid_preferred_interleave_nid(struct mempolicy *policy) 71 { 72 nodemask_t nmask; 73 unsigned int next; 74 struct task_struct *me = current; 75 nodemask_t *preferred_nmask = NULL; 76 77 if (likely(me->grid_qos)) 78 preferred_nmask = 79 &me->grid_qos->affinity.mem_preferred_node_mask; 80 81 if (!preferred_nmask || !policy) 82 return NUMA_NO_NODE; 83 > 84 if (nodes_equal(policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask)) 85 return NUMA_NO_NODE; 86 /* 87 * We perceive the actual consumption of memory bandwidth 88 * in each node and post a preferred interleave nid in 89 * more appropriate range. 90 */ 91 nodes_and(nmask, policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask); 92 if (nodes_empty(nmask)) 93 return NUMA_NO_NODE; 94 > 95 next = next_node_in(me->il_prev, nmask); 96 if (next < MAX_NUMNODES) 97 me->il_prev = next; 98 return next; 99 } 100 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 13427/21850] kernel/watchdog_hld.c:123:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_hardlockup'
by kernel test robot 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518 commit: 818ac22d9d2f02632b39ef1a4f472e6dbe0d417a [13427/21850] sdei_watchdog: fix compile error when CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR is not set config: arm64-randconfig-001-20240312 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240313/202403130340.177twYMV-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240313/202403130340.177twYMV-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403130340.177twYMV-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/watchdog_hld.c: In function 'watchdog_hardlockup_check': >> kernel/watchdog_hld.c:123:13: error: implicit declaration of function 'is_hardlockup' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 123 | if (is_hardlockup()) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/watchdog_hld.c:142:21: error: 'sysctl_hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace' undeclared (first use in this function) 142 | if (sysctl_hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace && | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/watchdog_hld.c:142:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_sdei.c: In function 'watchdog_nmi_enable': >> arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_sdei.c:38:42: error: 'watchdog_thresh' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'proc_watchdog_thresh'? 38 | sdei_api_set_secure_timer_period(watchdog_thresh); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | proc_watchdog_thresh arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_sdei.c:38:42: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_sdei.c: In function 'watchdog_nmi_probe': arch/arm64/kernel/watchdog_sdei.c:119:46: error: 'watchdog_thresh' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'proc_watchdog_thresh'? 119 | if (sdei_api_set_secure_timer_period(watchdog_thresh)) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | proc_watchdog_thresh Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=n] && !S390 && (HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF [=n] || HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH [=y]) Selected by [y]: - SDEI_WATCHDOG [=y] && <choice> && ARM_SDE_INTERFACE [=y] && !HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP [=n] vim +/is_hardlockup +123 kernel/watchdog_hld.c 7edaeb6841dfb2 Thomas Gleixner 2017-08-15 106 b8163908982cff Xiongfeng Wang 2019-01-28 107 void watchdog_hardlockup_check(struct pt_regs *regs) 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 108 { 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 109 if (__this_cpu_read(watchdog_nmi_touch) == true) { 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 110 __this_cpu_write(watchdog_nmi_touch, false); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 111 return; 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 112 } 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 113 7edaeb6841dfb2 Thomas Gleixner 2017-08-15 114 if (!watchdog_check_timestamp()) 7edaeb6841dfb2 Thomas Gleixner 2017-08-15 115 return; 7edaeb6841dfb2 Thomas Gleixner 2017-08-15 116 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 117 /* check for a hardlockup 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 118 * This is done by making sure our timer interrupt 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 119 * is incrementing. The timer interrupt should have 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 120 * fired multiple times before we overflow'd. If it hasn't 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 121 * then this is a good indication the cpu is stuck 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 122 */ 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 @123 if (is_hardlockup()) { 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 124 int this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 125 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 126 /* only print hardlockups once */ 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 127 if (__this_cpu_read(hard_watchdog_warn) == true) 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 128 return; 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 129 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 130 pr_emerg("Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu %d", this_cpu); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 131 print_modules(); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 132 print_irqtrace_events(current); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 133 if (regs) 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 134 show_regs(regs); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 135 else 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 136 dump_stack(); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 137 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 138 /* 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 139 * Perform all-CPU dump only once to avoid multiple hardlockups 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 140 * generating interleaving traces 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 141 */ 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 @142 if (sysctl_hardlockup_all_cpu_backtrace && 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 143 !test_and_set_bit(0, &hardlockup_allcpu_dumped)) 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 144 trigger_allbutself_cpu_backtrace(); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 145 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 146 if (hardlockup_panic) 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 147 nmi_panic(regs, "Hard LOCKUP"); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 148 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 149 __this_cpu_write(hard_watchdog_warn, true); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 150 return; 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 151 } 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 152 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 153 __this_cpu_write(hard_watchdog_warn, false); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 154 return; 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 155 } 6c19c0e5140a24 Xiongfeng Wang 2019-04-20 156 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(watchdog_hardlockup_check); 73ce0511c43686 Babu Moger 2016-12-14 157 :::::: The code at line 123 was first introduced by commit :::::: 73ce0511c43686095efd2f65ef564aab952e07bc kernel/watchdog.c: move hardlockup detector to separate file :::::: TO: Babu Moger <babu.moger(a)oracle.com> :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 21846/21850] drivers/dma/pl330.c:2598:22: warning: 'dst' may be used uninitialized
by kernel test robot 13 Mar '24

13 Mar '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518 commit: 0299853c014aa0eecf7fb85ac2f1ebd0a9a6ba73 [21846/21850] dmaengine: fix is_slave_direction() return false when DMA_DEV_TO_DEV config: arm64-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240313/202403130014.Z6L6BJzl-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240313/202403130014.Z6L6BJzl-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403130014.Z6L6BJzl-lkp@intel.com/ Note: it may well be a FALSE warning. FWIW you are at least aware of it now. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In function 'fill_px', inlined from 'pl330_prep_dma_cyclic' at drivers/dma/pl330.c:2716:3: >> drivers/dma/pl330.c:2598:22: warning: 'dst' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 2598 | px->dst_addr = dst; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ drivers/dma/pl330.c: In function 'pl330_prep_dma_cyclic': drivers/dma/pl330.c:2656:20: note: 'dst' was declared here 2656 | dma_addr_t dst; | ^~~ In function 'fill_px', inlined from 'pl330_prep_dma_cyclic' at drivers/dma/pl330.c:2716:3: >> drivers/dma/pl330.c:2599:22: warning: 'src' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 2599 | px->src_addr = src; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ drivers/dma/pl330.c: In function 'pl330_prep_dma_cyclic': drivers/dma/pl330.c:2657:20: note: 'src' was declared here 2657 | dma_addr_t src; | ^~~ drivers/dma/pl330.c:297: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct pl330_reqcfg ' vim +/dst +2598 drivers/dma/pl330.c b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2593 b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2594 static inline void fill_px(struct pl330_xfer *px, b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2595 dma_addr_t dst, dma_addr_t src, size_t len) b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2596 { b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2597 px->bytes = len; b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 @2598 px->dst_addr = dst; b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 @2599 px->src_addr = src; b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2600 } b3040e40675ec2 Jassi Brar 2010-05-23 2601 :::::: The code at line 2598 was first introduced by commit :::::: b3040e40675ec2c43542331cd30d4ee3dae797e8 DMA: PL330: Add dma api driver :::::: TO: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar(a)samsung.com> :::::: CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams(a)intel.com> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS] BUILD REGRESSION c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518
by kernel test robot 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

tree/branch: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS branch HEAD: c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518 !5133 CVE-2021-46926 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403122233.J2ozeWSt-lkp@intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403122249.xsnDebIP-lkp@intel.com Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) mm/share_pool.c:2263:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'hugetlb_alloc_hugepage'; did you mean 'vmalloc_hugepage'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] mm/share_pool.c:2263:61: error: 'HUGETLB_ALLOC_NONE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'HUGETLB_ANON_FILE'? Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs: gcc_recent_errors `-- arm64-randconfig-003-20240312 |-- mm-share_pool.c:error:HUGETLB_ALLOC_NONE-undeclared-(first-use-in-this-function) `-- mm-share_pool.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-hugetlb_alloc_hugepage clang_recent_errors `-- x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240312 `-- drivers-platform-x86-.tmp_dell-smbios-wmi.o:warning:objtool:missing-symbol-for-section-.text elapsed time: 741m configs tested: 34 configs skipped: 147 tested configs: arm64 allmodconfig gcc arm64 allnoconfig gcc arm64 defconfig gcc arm64 randconfig-001-20240312 gcc arm64 randconfig-002-20240312 gcc arm64 randconfig-003-20240312 gcc arm64 randconfig-004-20240312 gcc x86_64 allnoconfig clang x86_64 allyesconfig clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-001-20240312 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-002-20240312 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-003-20240312 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-004-20240312 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-005-20240312 gcc x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-006-20240312 gcc x86_64 defconfig gcc x86_64 randconfig-001-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-002-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-003-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-004-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-005-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-006-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-011-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-012-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-013-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-014-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-015-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-016-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-071-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-072-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-073-20240312 clang x86_64 randconfig-074-20240312 gcc x86_64 randconfig-075-20240312 gcc x86_64 rhel-8.3-rust clang -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 280/30000] arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:1232:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'hw_nmi_get_sample_period'
by kernel test robot 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 4fa7099066983597bd415dde5a3e416bf2bd8f7c commit: 22a589ef7833a36ba116897ac86e671290b86f2b [280/30000] arm64: Add support for hard lockup by using pmu counter config: arm64-randconfig-002-20240312 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403122352.tvX5nEio-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403122352.tvX5nEio-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403122352.tvX5nEio-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c: In function 'smp_prepare_cpus': arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:786:30: error: 'cpu_madt_gicc' undeclared (first use in this function) 786 | if ((cpu_madt_gicc[cpu].flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:786:30: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c: At top level: arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:844:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_irq_work_raise' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 844 | void arch_irq_work_raise(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:864:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'panic_smp_self_stop' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 864 | void panic_smp_self_stop(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c:1232:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'hw_nmi_get_sample_period' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1232 | u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/hw_nmi_get_sample_period +1232 arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c 1231 > 1232 u64 hw_nmi_get_sample_period(int watchdog_thresh) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 18183/21850] mm/share_pool.c:2263:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'hugetlb_alloc_hugepage'; did you mean 'vmalloc_hugepage'?
by kernel test robot 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518 commit: 4a280fac30d27ae2aff096f9f99aa12d50f83426 [18183/21850] ascend: share_pool: support share pool features for ascend platform config: arm64-randconfig-003-20240312 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403122233.J2ozeWSt-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403122233.J2ozeWSt-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403122233.J2ozeWSt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/share_pool.c: In function 'sp_hugetlb_entry': mm/share_pool.c:1542:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'huge_ptep_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 1542 | pte_t pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:1542:21: error: invalid initializer mm/share_pool.c: In function 'sp_alloc_pages': >> mm/share_pool.c:2263:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'hugetlb_alloc_hugepage'; did you mean 'vmalloc_hugepage'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 2263 | return hugetlb_alloc_hugepage(NUMA_NO_NODE, HUGETLB_ALLOC_NONE); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | vmalloc_hugepage >> mm/share_pool.c:2263:61: error: 'HUGETLB_ALLOC_NONE' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'HUGETLB_ANON_FILE'? 2263 | return hugetlb_alloc_hugepage(NUMA_NO_NODE, HUGETLB_ALLOC_NONE); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | HUGETLB_ANON_FILE mm/share_pool.c:2263:61: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in mm/share_pool.c:2266:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] 2266 | } | ^ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +2263 mm/share_pool.c 2257 2258 2259 struct page *sp_alloc_pages(struct vm_struct *area, gfp_t mask, 2260 unsigned int page_order, int node) 2261 { 2262 if (area->flags & VM_HUGE_PAGES) > 2263 return hugetlb_alloc_hugepage(NUMA_NO_NODE, HUGETLB_ALLOC_NONE); 2264 else 2265 return alloc_pages_node(node, mask, page_order); 2266 } 2267 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 21699/21850] drivers/platform/x86/.tmp_dell-smbios-wmi.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text
by kernel test robot 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: c38cc0a3be12e5c70b9a2a015cbee44014a52518 commit: 14dbb7913c699931c3e0314f650058dacdaf566b [21699/21850] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Fix oops on rmmod dell_smbios config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20240312 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403122249.xsnDebIP-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403122249.xsnDebIP-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403122249.xsnDebIP-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/platform/x86/.tmp_dell-smbios-wmi.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/1] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
by Zhou Shuai 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

*** BLURB HERE *** Zhou Shuai (1): net/hinic: Update Huawei Intelligent Network Card Driver: hinic drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/Makefile | 14 +- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_api_cmd.c | 1164 ++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_api_cmd.h | 298 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cfg.c | 2478 ++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cfg.h | 526 ++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cmdq.c | 1575 ++++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cmdq.h | 217 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_common.c | 71 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_common.h | 29 - drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_csr.h | 207 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ctx_def.h | 242 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dbg.h | 93 + .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dbgtool_knl.c | 899 +++ .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dbgtool_knl.h | 120 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dcb.c | 1795 ++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dcb.h | 67 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_debugfs.c | 324 -- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_debugfs.h | 113 - drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dev.h | 132 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c | 584 -- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h | 119 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dfx_def.h | 150 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_eqs.c | 1462 +++++ drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_eqs.h | 177 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ethtool.c | 3078 ++++++---- drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw.h | 770 +++ .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_api_cmd.c | 987 ---- .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_api_cmd.h | 203 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_cmdq.c | 963 ---- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_cmdq.h | 185 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_csr.h | 139 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c | 1197 ---- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h | 660 --- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_eqs.c | 996 ---- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_eqs.h | 262 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_if.c | 419 -- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_if.h | 295 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_io.c | 634 --- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_io.h | 123 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_mbox.h | 172 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_mgmt.c | 681 --- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_mgmt.h | 636 ++- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_qp.c | 971 ---- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_qp.h | 232 - .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_qp_ctxt.h | 210 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_wq.c | 904 --- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_wq.h | 111 - .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_wqe.h | 430 -- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwdev.c | 5001 +++++++++++++++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwdev.h | 370 ++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwif.c | 1005 ++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwif.h | 123 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_lld.c | 2923 ++++++++++ drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_lld.h | 128 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c | 3848 +++++++++---- .../hinic/{hinic_hw_mbox.c => hinic_mbox.c} | 1267 +++-- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mbox.h | 241 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mgmt.c | 1446 +++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mgmt.h | 245 + .../huawei/hinic/hinic_mgmt_interface.h | 987 ++++ .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_msix_attr.c | 130 + .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_msix_attr.h | 69 + .../huawei/hinic/hinic_multi_host_mgmt.c | 972 ++++ .../huawei/hinic/hinic_multi_host_mgmt.h | 107 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic.h | 115 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_cfg.c | 3996 +++++++++++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_cfg.h | 638 +++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_dbg.c | 294 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_dev.h | 289 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_io.c | 1047 ++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_io.h | 99 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nictool.c | 2503 +++++++++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nictool.h | 277 + .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_pci_id_tbl.h | 40 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_port.c | 1412 ----- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_port.h | 900 --- .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_port_cmd.h | 541 ++ .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_qe_def.h | 459 ++ drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_qp.c | 222 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_qp.h | 143 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.c | 1342 +++-- drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_rx.h | 126 +- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sm_lt.h | 228 + .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sml_counter.c | 310 + .../ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sml_counter.h | 119 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sml_lt.c | 286 + .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sriov.c | 1535 ++--- .../net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sriov.h | 98 +- drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.c | 1426 +++-- drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_tx.h | 127 +- drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_wq.c | 683 +++ drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_wq.h | 117 + drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/ossl_knl.h | 63 + 93 files changed, 46543 insertions(+), 19868 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_api_cmd.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_api_cmd.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cfg.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cfg.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cmdq.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_cmdq.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_common.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_common.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_csr.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_ctx_def.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dbg.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dbgtool_knl.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dbgtool_knl.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dcb.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dcb.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_debugfs.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_debugfs.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dev.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_dfx_def.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_eqs.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_eqs.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_api_cmd.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_api_cmd.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_cmdq.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_cmdq.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_csr.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_dev.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_eqs.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_eqs.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_if.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_if.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_io.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_io.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_mbox.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_mgmt.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_qp.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_qp.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_qp_ctxt.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_wq.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_wq.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_wqe.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwdev.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwdev.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwif.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hwif.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_lld.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_lld.h rename drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/{hinic_hw_mbox.c => hinic_mbox.c} (58%) create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mbox.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mgmt.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mgmt.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_mgmt_interface.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_msix_attr.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_msix_attr.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_multi_host_mgmt.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_multi_host_mgmt.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_cfg.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_cfg.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_dbg.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_dev.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_io.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nic_io.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nictool.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_nictool.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_pci_id_tbl.h delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_port.c delete mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_port.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_port_cmd.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_qe_def.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_qp.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_qp.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sm_lt.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sml_counter.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sml_counter.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_sml_lt.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_wq.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_wq.h create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/ossl_knl.h -- 2.24.0

2 2

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] CVE-2023-52502 for openEuler-1.0-LTS
by Liu Jian 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

CVE-2023-52502 Eric Dumazet (1): net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() Krzysztof Kozlowski (1): nfc: constify several pointers to u8, char and sk_buff include/net/nfc/nfc.h | 4 +-- net/nfc/core.c | 4 +-- net/nfc/hci/llc_shdlc.c | 10 +++--- net/nfc/llcp.h | 8 ++--- net/nfc/llcp_commands.c | 46 ++++++++++++++------------ net/nfc/llcp_core.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- net/nfc/nfc.h | 2 +- 7 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[PATCH OLK-5.10] net: nfc: fix races in nfc_llcp_sock_get() and nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn()
by Liu Jian 12 Mar '24

12 Mar '24

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.199 commit 6ac22ecdaad2ecc662048f8c6b0ceb1ca0699ef9 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I95AXP CVE: CVE-2023-52502 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… --------------------------- [ Upstream commit 31c07dffafce914c1d1543c135382a11ff058d93 ] Sili Luo reported a race in nfc_llcp_sock_get(), leading to UAF. Getting a reference on the socket found in a lookup while holding a lock should happen before releasing the lock. nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn() has a similar problem. Finally nfc_llcp_recv_snl() needs to make sure the socket found by nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn() does not disappear. Fixes: 8f50020ed9b8 ("NFC: LLCP late binding") Reported-by: Sili Luo <rootlab(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Cc: Willy Tarreau <w(a)1wt.eu> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009123110.3735515-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56(a)huawei.com> --- net/nfc/llcp_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c index ddfd159f64e1..f2a2454ed07d 100644 --- a/net/nfc/llcp_core.c +++ b/net/nfc/llcp_core.c @@ -205,17 +205,13 @@ static struct nfc_llcp_sock *nfc_llcp_sock_get(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, if (tmp_sock->ssap == ssap && tmp_sock->dsap == dsap) { llcp_sock = tmp_sock; + sock_hold(&llcp_sock->sk); break; } } read_unlock(&local->sockets.lock); - if (llcp_sock == NULL) - return NULL; - - sock_hold(&llcp_sock->sk); - return llcp_sock; } @@ -348,7 +344,8 @@ static int nfc_llcp_wks_sap(const char *service_name, size_t service_name_len) static struct nfc_llcp_sock *nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, - const u8 *sn, size_t sn_len) + const u8 *sn, size_t sn_len, + bool needref) { struct sock *sk; struct nfc_llcp_sock *llcp_sock, *tmp_sock; @@ -384,6 +381,8 @@ struct nfc_llcp_sock *nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, if (memcmp(sn, tmp_sock->service_name, sn_len) == 0) { llcp_sock = tmp_sock; + if (needref) + sock_hold(&llcp_sock->sk); break; } } @@ -425,7 +424,8 @@ u8 nfc_llcp_get_sdp_ssap(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, * to this service name. */ if (nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(local, sock->service_name, - sock->service_name_len) != NULL) { + sock->service_name_len, + false) != NULL) { mutex_unlock(&local->sdp_lock); return LLCP_SAP_MAX; @@ -833,16 +833,7 @@ static struct nfc_llcp_sock *nfc_llcp_connecting_sock_get(struct nfc_llcp_local static struct nfc_llcp_sock *nfc_llcp_sock_get_sn(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, const u8 *sn, size_t sn_len) { - struct nfc_llcp_sock *llcp_sock; - - llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(local, sn, sn_len); - - if (llcp_sock == NULL) - return NULL; - - sock_hold(&llcp_sock->sk); - - return llcp_sock; + return nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(local, sn, sn_len, true); } static const u8 *nfc_llcp_connect_sn(const struct sk_buff *skb, size_t *sn_len) @@ -1307,7 +1298,8 @@ static void nfc_llcp_recv_snl(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, } llcp_sock = nfc_llcp_sock_from_sn(local, service_name, - service_name_len); + service_name_len, + true); if (!llcp_sock) { sap = 0; goto add_snl; @@ -1327,6 +1319,7 @@ static void nfc_llcp_recv_snl(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, if (sap == LLCP_SAP_MAX) { sap = 0; + nfc_llcp_sock_put(llcp_sock); goto add_snl; } @@ -1344,6 +1337,7 @@ static void nfc_llcp_recv_snl(struct nfc_llcp_local *local, pr_debug("%p %d\n", llcp_sock, sap); + nfc_llcp_sock_put(llcp_sock); add_snl: sdp = nfc_llcp_build_sdres_tlv(tid, sap); if (sdp == NULL) -- 2.34.1

2 1