September 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 21579/30000] net/smc/smc_core.c:770:6: sparse: sparse: symbol '__smcr_link_clear' was not declared. Should it be static?
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: bef6f06e039b8929481350d15d6d8c3ba81c6fd2 commit: 7dad816cb1f8841fda526c0978c10a94793f1178 [21579/30000] anolis: net/smc: Resolve the race between SMC-R link access and clear config: arm64-randconfig-r131-20240925 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290926.Ll8zQyOY-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290926.Ll8zQyOY-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290926.Ll8zQyOY-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> net/smc/smc_core.c:770:6: sparse: sparse: symbol '__smcr_link_clear' was not declared. Should it be static? vim +/__smcr_link_clear +770 net/smc/smc_core.c 769 > 770 void __smcr_link_clear(struct smc_link *lnk) 771 { 772 smc_wr_free_link_mem(lnk); 773 smc_lgr_put(lnk->lgr); /* lgr_hold in smcr_link_init() */ 774 memset(lnk, 0, sizeof(struct smc_link)); 775 lnk->state = SMC_LNK_UNUSED; 776 } 777 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 4008/23799] drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c:138:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'erofs_try_to_release_workgroup' was not declared. Should it be static?
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 3841d75a6dcd12d108aaf56560b99431d18169e4 commit: fb4c3a2751ebf142fecc61eea8c738573ec3bf10 [4008/23799] staging: erofs: fix race when the managed cache is enabled config: arm64-randconfig-r133-20240926 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290639.uZftDFPU-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290639.uZftDFPU-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290639.uZftDFPU-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c:138:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'erofs_try_to_release_workgroup' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c:138:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'erofs_try_to_release_workgroup' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 138 | bool erofs_try_to_release_workgroup(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/erofs_try_to_release_workgroup +138 drivers/staging/erofs/utils.c 137 > 138 bool erofs_try_to_release_workgroup(struct erofs_sb_info *sbi, 139 struct erofs_workgroup *grp, 140 bool cleanup) 141 { 142 void *entry; 143 144 /* 145 * for managed cache enabled, the refcount of workgroups 146 * themselves could be < 0 (freezed). So there is no guarantee 147 * that all refcount > 0 if managed cache is enabled. 148 */ 149 if (!erofs_workgroup_try_to_freeze(grp, 1)) 150 return false; 151 152 /* 153 * note that all cached pages should be unlinked 154 * before delete it from the radix tree. 155 * Otherwise some cached pages of an orphan old workgroup 156 * could be still linked after the new one is available. 157 */ 158 if (erofs_try_to_free_all_cached_pages(sbi, grp)) { 159 erofs_workgroup_unfreeze(grp, 1); 160 return false; 161 } 162 163 /* 164 * it is impossible to fail after the workgroup is freezed, 165 * however in order to avoid some race conditions, add a 166 * DBG_BUGON to observe this in advance. 167 */ 168 entry = radix_tree_delete(&sbi->workstn_tree, grp->index); 169 DBG_BUGON((void *)((unsigned long)entry & 170 ~RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_ENTRY) != grp); 171 172 /* 173 * if managed cache is enable, the last refcount 174 * should indicate the related workstation. 175 */ 176 erofs_workgroup_unfreeze_final(grp); 177 return true; 178 } 179 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 21084/30000] drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:79:53: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: bef6f06e039b8929481350d15d6d8c3ba81c6fd2 commit: 0b68f4778af4fded021ba67f5eb3fb74ff8d7fc1 [21084/30000] net: hns3: support arp proxy config: arm64-randconfig-r131-20240925 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290547.aSbDInhQ-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290547.aSbDInhQ-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290547.aSbDInhQ-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:79:53: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __be16 [usertype] vlan_tci @@ got unsigned short [usertype] vlan_tci @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:79:53: sparse: expected restricted __be16 [usertype] vlan_tci drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:79:53: sparse: got unsigned short [usertype] vlan_tci >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:128:58: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [usertype] vlan_tci @@ got restricted __be16 [usertype] vlan_tci @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:128:58: sparse: expected unsigned short [usertype] vlan_tci drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c:128:58: sparse: got restricted __be16 [usertype] vlan_tci vim +79 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_roh.c 56 57 int hns3_handle_roh_arp_req(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hns3_nic_priv *priv) 58 { 59 struct hnae3_handle *h = priv->ae_handle; 60 struct hns3_enet_ring *ring; 61 struct arphdr *arphdr; 62 struct ethhdr *ethhdr; 63 int reply_idx, len; 64 __be32 *sip, *tip; 65 66 /* use same queue num in rx */ 67 ring = &priv->ring[skb->queue_mapping + h->kinfo.num_tqps]; 68 reply_idx = ring->arp_reply_tail; 69 hns3_roh_arp_reply_idx_move_fd(reply_idx); 70 /* This smp_load_acquire() pairs with smp_store_release() in 71 * hns3_handle_roh_arp_reply(). 72 */ 73 if (reply_idx == smp_load_acquire(&ring->arp_reply_head)) 74 return NETDEV_TX_BUSY; 75 len = skb->len; 76 77 if (skb_vlan_tagged(skb)) { 78 ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].has_vlan = true; > 79 ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].vlan_tci = skb_vlan_tag_get(skb); 80 skb_vlan_pop(skb); 81 len += VLAN_HLEN; 82 } else { 83 ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].has_vlan = false; 84 } 85 86 ethhdr = eth_hdr(skb); 87 arphdr = arp_hdr(skb); 88 89 hns3_extract_arp_ip_field(arphdr, &sip, &tip, skb->dev->addr_len); 90 ether_addr_copy(ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].dest_hw, ethhdr->h_source); 91 ether_addr_copy(ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].src_hw, ethhdr->h_dest); 92 ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].dest_ip = *sip; 93 ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].src_ip = *tip; 94 hns3_roh_update_mac_by_ip(be32_to_cpu(*tip), 95 ring->arp_reply[reply_idx].src_hw); 96 /* This smp_store_release() pairs with smp_load_acquire() in 97 * hns3_handle_roh_arp_reply(). Ensure that the arp_reply_tail is 98 * update validly. 99 */ 100 smp_store_release(&ring->arp_reply_tail, reply_idx); 101 102 ring = &priv->ring[skb->queue_mapping]; 103 u64_stats_update_begin(&ring->syncp); 104 ring->stats.tx_pkts++; 105 ring->stats.tx_bytes += len; 106 u64_stats_update_end(&ring->syncp); 107 108 dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); 109 napi_schedule(&ring->tqp_vector->napi); 110 return NETDEV_TX_OK; 111 } 112 113 static struct sk_buff *setup_arp_reply_skb(struct hns3_arp_reply *arp_reply, 114 struct hns3_nic_priv *priv) 115 { 116 struct sk_buff *skb = arp_create(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP, 117 arp_reply->dest_ip, priv->netdev, 118 arp_reply->src_ip, arp_reply->dest_hw, 119 arp_reply->src_hw, arp_reply->dest_hw); 120 if (!skb) 121 return NULL; 122 123 skb_reset_mac_header(skb); 124 skb_reset_mac_len(skb); 125 126 if (arp_reply->has_vlan) { 127 skb = vlan_insert_tag_set_proto(skb, htons(ETH_P_8021Q), > 128 arp_reply->vlan_tci); 129 if (!skb) 130 return NULL; 131 skb_reset_network_header(skb); 132 } 133 134 skb_reserve(skb, skb->mac_len); 135 return skb; 136 } 137 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 21485/30000] drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_device.c:344:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_destroy_upi_list'
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: bef6f06e039b8929481350d15d6d8c3ba81c6fd2 commit: 84e122368ec3a37e074c9657bc09422b62f6ccd0 [21485/30000] ub: add new feature for urma config: arm64-randconfig-004-20240928 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290428.ZYNCVbJr-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290428.ZYNCVbJr-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290428.ZYNCVbJr-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_device.c:344:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_destroy_upi_list' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 344 | void ubcore_destroy_upi_list(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_uvs_cmd.c: In function 'ubcore_uvs_cmd_channel_init': >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_uvs_cmd.c:47:15: warning: 'strncpy' output truncated before terminating nul copying 10 bytes from a string of the same length [-Wstringop-truncation] 47 | (void)strncpy(arg.out.kernel_out, "Hello uvs!", strlen("Hello uvs!")); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:49:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_check_port_state' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 49 | int ubcore_check_port_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, uint8_t port_idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:73:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_find_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 73 | int ubcore_find_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:90:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_find_port_with_dev_name' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 90 | int ubcore_find_port_with_dev_name(struct ubcore_device *dev, char *dev_name) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:113:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_set_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 113 | int ubcore_set_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:149:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_put_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 149 | void ubcore_put_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:169:10: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_idx_alloc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 169 | uint32_t ubcore_sip_idx_alloc(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:197:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_idx_free' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 197 | int ubcore_sip_idx_free(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:210:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_table_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 210 | void ubcore_sip_table_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:216:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_table_uninit' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 216 | void ubcore_sip_table_uninit(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:230:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_add_sip_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 230 | int ubcore_add_sip_entry(const struct ubcore_sip_info *sip, uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:250:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_del_sip_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 250 | int ubcore_del_sip_entry(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:264:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_lookup_sip_idx' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 264 | int ubcore_lookup_sip_idx(struct ubcore_sip_info *sip, uint32_t *idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:285:10: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_get_sip_max_cnt' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 285 | uint32_t ubcore_get_sip_max_cnt(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:290:25: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_lookup_sip_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 290 | struct ubcore_sip_info *ubcore_lookup_sip_info(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:301:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_notify_uvs_del_sip' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 301 | int ubcore_notify_uvs_del_sip(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:343:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_notify_uvs_add_sip' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 343 | int ubcore_notify_uvs_add_sip(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ubcore_destroy_upi_list +344 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_device.c 343 > 344 void ubcore_destroy_upi_list(void) 345 { 346 struct ubcore_upi_entry *entry = NULL, *next; 347 348 mutex_lock(&g_upi_lock); 349 list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, next, &g_upi_list, node) { 350 if (entry != NULL) { 351 list_del(&entry->node); 352 kfree(entry); 353 } 354 } 355 mutex_unlock(&g_upi_lock); 356 } 357 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1487/23799] drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:72:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'install_memreserve_table' was not declared. Should it be static?
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 3841d75a6dcd12d108aaf56560b99431d18169e4 commit: 805a16040f9b52834cff060839fe25ad655f042e [1487/23799] efi/arm: libstub: add a root memreserve config table config: arm64-randconfig-r133-20240926 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290414.yOuyHbaP-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290414.yOuyHbaP-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290414.yOuyHbaP-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:72:6: sparse: sparse: symbol 'install_memreserve_table' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:72:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'install_memreserve_table' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 72 | void install_memreserve_table(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:116:15: warning: no previous prototype for 'efi_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 116 | unsigned long efi_entry(void *handle, efi_system_table_t *sys_table, | ^~~~~~~~~ drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c: In function 'efi_entry': drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:135:29: warning: variable 'si' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 135 | struct screen_info *si; | ^~ vim +/install_memreserve_table +72 drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c 71 > 72 void install_memreserve_table(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg) 73 { 74 struct linux_efi_memreserve *rsv; 75 efi_guid_t memreserve_table_guid = LINUX_EFI_MEMRESERVE_TABLE_GUID; 76 efi_status_t status; 77 78 status = efi_call_early(allocate_pool, EFI_LOADER_DATA, sizeof(*rsv), 79 (void **)&rsv); 80 if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) { 81 pr_efi_err(sys_table_arg, "Failed to allocate memreserve entry!\n"); 82 return; 83 } 84 85 rsv->next = 0; 86 rsv->base = 0; 87 rsv->size = 0; 88 89 status = efi_call_early(install_configuration_table, 90 &memreserve_table_guid, 91 rsv); 92 if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) 93 pr_efi_err(sys_table_arg, "Failed to install memreserve config table!\n"); 94 } 95 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 21044/30000] drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:478:68: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: bef6f06e039b8929481350d15d6d8c3ba81c6fd2 commit: 7906c655c7b6e8bd68a7e7ee2455d9a8d8622fa9 [21044/30000] net: hns3: add command queue trace for hns3 config: arm64-randconfig-r131-20240925 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290215.32P52XtH-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290215.32P52XtH-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290215.32P52XtH-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:478:68: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [usertype] opcode @@ got restricted __le16 [usertype] opcode @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:478:68: sparse: expected unsigned short [usertype] opcode drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:478:68: sparse: got restricted __le16 [usertype] opcode drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:514:67: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected unsigned short [usertype] opcode @@ got restricted __le16 [usertype] opcode @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:514:67: sparse: expected unsigned short [usertype] opcode drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c:514:67: sparse: got restricted __le16 [usertype] opcode -- drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_mbx.c: note: in included file (through include/trace/trace_events.h, include/trace/define_trace.h, ...): >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/./hclge_trace.h:132:1: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_mbx.c: note: in included file (through include/trace/perf.h, include/trace/define_trace.h, drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_trace.h): >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/./hclge_trace.h:132:1: sparse: sparse: cast to restricted __le32 vim +478 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_common/hclge_comm_cmd.c 461 462 /** 463 * hclge_comm_cmd_send - send command to command queue 464 * @hw: pointer to the hw struct 465 * @desc: prefilled descriptor for describing the command 466 * @num : the number of descriptors to be sent 467 * 468 * This is the main send command for command queue, it 469 * sends the queue, cleans the queue, etc 470 **/ 471 int hclge_comm_cmd_send(struct hclge_comm_hw *hw, struct hclge_desc *desc, 472 int num) 473 { 474 struct hclge_comm_cmq_ring *csq = &hw->cmq.csq; 475 int ret; 476 int ntc; 477 trace_hclge_comm_cmd_send(hw, desc, num, > 478 hclge_comm_is_special_opcode(desc->opcode)); 479 480 spin_lock_bh(&hw->cmq.csq.lock); 481 482 if (test_bit(HCLGE_COMM_STATE_CMD_DISABLE, &hw->comm_state)) { 483 spin_unlock_bh(&hw->cmq.csq.lock); 484 return -EBUSY; 485 } 486 487 if (num > hclge_comm_ring_space(&hw->cmq.csq)) { 488 /* If CMDQ ring is full, SW HEAD and HW HEAD may be different, 489 * need update the SW HEAD pointer csq->next_to_clean 490 */ 491 csq->next_to_clean = 492 hclge_comm_read_dev(hw, HCLGE_COMM_NIC_CSQ_HEAD_REG); 493 spin_unlock_bh(&hw->cmq.csq.lock); 494 return -EBUSY; 495 } 496 497 /** 498 * Record the location of desc in the ring for this time 499 * which will be use for hardware to write back 500 */ 501 ntc = hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use; 502 503 hclge_comm_cmd_copy_desc(hw, desc, num); 504 505 /* Write to hardware */ 506 hclge_comm_write_dev(hw, HCLGE_COMM_NIC_CSQ_TAIL_REG, 507 hw->cmq.csq.next_to_use); 508 509 ret = hclge_comm_cmd_check_result(hw, desc, num, ntc); 510 511 spin_unlock_bh(&hw->cmq.csq.lock); 512 513 trace_hclge_comm_cmd_get(hw, desc, num, 514 hclge_comm_is_special_opcode(desc->opcode)); 515 return ret; 516 } 517 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 21349/23799] drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-plat.c:169:23: error: lvalue required as unary '&' operand
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

Hi Malloy, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 3841d75a6dcd12d108aaf56560b99431d18169e4 commit: d65622e6edee11f7fcbd295bdb5aef86e12dfef3 [21349/23799] mmc: add support for Phytium MMC config: arm64-randconfig-003-20240928 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290132.fGKHm3da-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290132.fGKHm3da-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290132.fGKHm3da-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-plat.c:169:23: error: lvalue required as unary '&' operand 169 | .pm = &phytium_mci_dev_pm_ops, | ^ vim +169 drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-plat.c 161 162 static struct platform_driver phytium_mci_driver = { 163 .probe = phytium_mci_probe, 164 .remove = phytium_mci_remove, 165 .driver = { 166 .name = "phytium-mci-platform", 167 .of_match_table = phytium_mci_of_ids, 168 .acpi_match_table = phytium_mci_acpi_ids, > 169 .pm = &phytium_mci_dev_pm_ops, 170 }, 171 }; 172 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 19223/30000] drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:26:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_post_jetty_send_wr'
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: bef6f06e039b8929481350d15d6d8c3ba81c6fd2 commit: 33800c2820ab85fe02800e33f6b3287130278bdf [19223/30000] ub: ubcore add data plane ops api. config: arm64-randconfig-004-20240928 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290129.erX7l03j-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290129.erX7l03j-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290129.erX7l03j-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:26:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_post_jetty_send_wr' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 26 | int ubcore_post_jetty_send_wr(struct ubcore_jetty *jetty, const struct ubcore_jfs_wr *wr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:42:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_post_jetty_recv_wr' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 42 | int ubcore_post_jetty_recv_wr(struct ubcore_jetty *jetty, const struct ubcore_jfr_wr *wr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:58:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_post_jfs_wr' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 58 | int ubcore_post_jfs_wr(struct ubcore_jfs *jfs, const struct ubcore_jfs_wr *wr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:74:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_post_jfr_wr' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 74 | int ubcore_post_jfr_wr(struct ubcore_jfr *jfr, const struct ubcore_jfr_wr *wr, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:90:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_poll_jfc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 90 | int ubcore_poll_jfc(struct ubcore_jfc *jfc, int cr_cnt, struct ubcore_cr *cr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c:105:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_rearm_jfc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 105 | int ubcore_rearm_jfc(struct ubcore_jfc *jfc, bool solicited_only) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ubcore_post_jetty_send_wr +26 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_dp.c 25 > 26 int ubcore_post_jetty_send_wr(struct ubcore_jetty *jetty, const struct ubcore_jfs_wr *wr, 27 struct ubcore_jfs_wr **bad_wr) 28 { 29 struct ubcore_ops *dev_ops; 30 31 if (jetty == NULL || jetty->ub_dev == NULL || jetty->ub_dev->ops == NULL || 32 jetty->ub_dev->ops->post_jetty_send_wr == NULL || wr == NULL || bad_wr == NULL) { 33 ubcore_log_err("Invalid parameter"); 34 return -EINVAL; 35 } 36 37 dev_ops = jetty->ub_dev->ops; 38 return dev_ops->post_jetty_send_wr(jetty, wr, bad_wr); 39 } 40 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_post_jetty_send_wr); 41 > 42 int ubcore_post_jetty_recv_wr(struct ubcore_jetty *jetty, const struct ubcore_jfr_wr *wr, 43 struct ubcore_jfr_wr **bad_wr) 44 { 45 struct ubcore_ops *dev_ops; 46 47 if (jetty == NULL || jetty->ub_dev == NULL || jetty->ub_dev->ops == NULL || 48 jetty->ub_dev->ops->post_jetty_recv_wr == NULL || wr == NULL || bad_wr == NULL) { 49 ubcore_log_err("Invalid parameter"); 50 return -EINVAL; 51 } 52 53 dev_ops = jetty->ub_dev->ops; 54 return dev_ops->post_jetty_recv_wr(jetty, wr, bad_wr); 55 } 56 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_post_jetty_recv_wr); 57 > 58 int ubcore_post_jfs_wr(struct ubcore_jfs *jfs, const struct ubcore_jfs_wr *wr, 59 struct ubcore_jfs_wr **bad_wr) 60 { 61 struct ubcore_ops *dev_ops; 62 63 if (jfs == NULL || jfs->ub_dev == NULL || jfs->ub_dev->ops == NULL || 64 jfs->ub_dev->ops->post_jfs_wr == NULL || wr == NULL || bad_wr == NULL) { 65 ubcore_log_err("Invalid parameter"); 66 return -EINVAL; 67 } 68 69 dev_ops = jfs->ub_dev->ops; 70 return dev_ops->post_jfs_wr(jfs, wr, bad_wr); 71 } 72 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_post_jfs_wr); 73 > 74 int ubcore_post_jfr_wr(struct ubcore_jfr *jfr, const struct ubcore_jfr_wr *wr, 75 struct ubcore_jfr_wr **bad_wr) 76 { 77 struct ubcore_ops *dev_ops; 78 79 if (jfr == NULL || jfr->ub_dev == NULL || jfr->ub_dev->ops == NULL || 80 jfr->ub_dev->ops->post_jfr_wr == NULL || wr == NULL || bad_wr == NULL) { 81 ubcore_log_err("Invalid parameter"); 82 return -EINVAL; 83 } 84 85 dev_ops = jfr->ub_dev->ops; 86 return dev_ops->post_jfr_wr(jfr, wr, bad_wr); 87 } 88 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_post_jfr_wr); 89 > 90 int ubcore_poll_jfc(struct ubcore_jfc *jfc, int cr_cnt, struct ubcore_cr *cr) 91 { 92 struct ubcore_ops *dev_ops; 93 94 if (jfc == NULL || jfc->ub_dev == NULL || jfc->ub_dev->ops == NULL || 95 jfc->ub_dev->ops->poll_jfc == NULL || cr == NULL) { 96 ubcore_log_err("Invalid parameter"); 97 return -EINVAL; 98 } 99 100 dev_ops = jfc->ub_dev->ops; 101 return dev_ops->poll_jfc(jfc, cr_cnt, cr); 102 } 103 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_poll_jfc); 104 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 27588/30000] include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:221:41: warning: attribute 'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: bef6f06e039b8929481350d15d6d8c3ba81c6fd2 commit: 0695e18bbaebbfbe22b049104bbb9a4300a9f30c [27588/30000] mm: Add PMU based memory sampling abstract layer config: arm64-randconfig-002-20240928 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290030.UdfZl3fZ-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290030.UdfZl3fZ-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290030.UdfZl3fZ-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:65, from <command-line>: drivers/arm/spe/spe.c: In function '__arm_spe_dev_probe': >> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:221:41: warning: attribute 'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label 221 | # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/arm/spe/spe.c:492:17: note: in expansion of macro 'fallthrough' 492 | fallthrough; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:221:41: warning: attribute 'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label 221 | # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/arm/spe/spe.c:514:17: note: in expansion of macro 'fallthrough' 514 | fallthrough; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ARM_SPE_MEM_SAMPLING Depends on [n]: ARM64 [=y] && !ARM_SPE_PMU [=y] Selected by [y]: - MEM_SAMPLING [=y] && ARM64 [=y] WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for BPF_NET_GLOBAL_PROG Depends on [n]: NET [=n] && BPF_SYSCALL [=n] Selected by [y]: - SCHED_TASK_RELATIONSHIP [=y] && CGROUPS [=y] && NUMA_BALANCING [=y] vim +/fallthrough +221 include/linux/compiler_attributes.h 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 209 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 210 /* 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 211 * Add the pseudo keyword 'fallthrough' so case statement blocks 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 212 * must end with any of these keywords: 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 213 * break; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 214 * fallthrough; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 215 * goto <label>; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 216 * return [expression]; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 217 * 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 218 * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html#Statement-Attr… 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 219 */ 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 220 #if __has_attribute(__fallthrough__) 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 @221 # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 222 #else 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 223 # define fallthrough do {} while (0) /* fallthrough */ a3f8a30f3f0079 Miguel Ojeda 2018-08-30 224 #endif a3f8a30f3f0079 Miguel Ojeda 2018-08-30 225 :::::: The code at line 221 was first introduced by commit :::::: 294f69e662d1570703e9b56e95be37a9fd3afba5 compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use :::::: TO: Joe Perches <joe(a)perches.com> :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 21291/23799] drivers/spi/spi-phytium-plat.c:192:36: warning: 'phytium_spi_acpi_match' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 29 Sep '24

29 Sep '24

Hi Malloy, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 3841d75a6dcd12d108aaf56560b99431d18169e4 commit: e8483fcd43fc1dbb8d21bb7eacce804cbab6a7c6 [21291/23799] spi: add phytium spi support config: arm64-randconfig-003-20240928 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290023.FihgEvFc-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240929/202409290023.FihgEvFc-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202409290023.FihgEvFc-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/spi/spi-phytium-plat.c:192:36: warning: 'phytium_spi_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 192 | static const struct acpi_device_id phytium_spi_acpi_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/phytium_spi_acpi_match +192 drivers/spi/spi-phytium-plat.c 191 > 192 static const struct acpi_device_id phytium_spi_acpi_match[] = { 193 {"PHYT000E", 0}, 194 {} 195 }; 196 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, phytium_spi_acpi_match); 197 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0