September 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1 0/2] CVE-2024-36915
by Yongqiang Liu 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

Eric Dumazet (2): net: add copy_safe_from_sockptr() helper nfc: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_setsockopt() unsafe copies include/linux/sockptr.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[OLK-5.10 0/2] CVE-2024-36915
by Yongqiang Liu 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

Eric Dumazet (2): net: add copy_safe_from_sockptr() helper nfc: llcp: fix nfc_llcp_setsockopt() unsafe copies include/linux/sockptr.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/nfc/llcp_sock.c | 12 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

1 2

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] drm/amd/display: Skip finding free audio for unknown engine_id
by Zhao Wenhui 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: Alex Hung <alex.hung(a)amd.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.222 commit ffa7bd3ca9cfa902b857d1dc9a5f46fededf86c8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAGT0E CVE: CVE-2024-42119 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 1357b2165d9ad94faa4c4a20d5e2ce29c2ff29c3 ] [WHY] ENGINE_ID_UNKNOWN = -1 and can not be used as an array index. Plus, it also means it is uninitialized and does not need free audio. [HOW] Skip and return NULL. This fixes 2 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira(a)amd.com> Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhao Wenhui <zhaowenhui8(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c index f1eda1a6496d..0a13c06eea44 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c @@ -1802,6 +1802,9 @@ static struct audio *find_first_free_audio( { int i, available_audio_count; + if (id == ENGINE_ID_UNKNOWN) + return NULL; + available_audio_count = pool->audio_count; for (i = 0; i < available_audio_count; i++) { -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] drm/amd/display: Skip finding free audio for unknown engine_id
by Zhao Wenhui 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: Alex Hung <alex.hung(a)amd.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.222 commit ffa7bd3ca9cfa902b857d1dc9a5f46fededf86c8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAGT0E CVE: CVE-2024-42119 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 1357b2165d9ad94faa4c4a20d5e2ce29c2ff29c3 ] [WHY] ENGINE_ID_UNKNOWN = -1 and can not be used as an array index. Plus, it also means it is uninitialized and does not need free audio. [HOW] Skip and return NULL. This fixes 2 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira(a)amd.com> Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhao Wenhui <zhaowenhui8(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c index f1eda1a6496d..0a13c06eea44 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c @@ -1802,6 +1802,9 @@ static struct audio *find_first_free_audio( { int i, available_audio_count; + if (id == ENGINE_ID_UNKNOWN) + return NULL; + available_audio_count = pool->audio_count; for (i = 0; i < available_audio_count; i++) { -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] jfs: don't walk off the end of ealist
by Zhao Wenhui 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: lei lu <llfamsec(a)gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.223 commit 6386f1b6a10e5d1ddd03db4ff6dfc55d488852ce category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAG918 CVE: CVE-2024-41017 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=… -------------------------------- commit d0fa70aca54c8643248e89061da23752506ec0d4 upstream. Add a check before visiting the members of ea to make sure each ea stays within the ealist. Signed-off-by: lei lu <llfamsec(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Zhao Wenhui <zhaowenhui8(a)huawei.com> --- fs/jfs/xattr.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jfs/xattr.c b/fs/jfs/xattr.c index 7ae54f78a5b0..aea5531559c0 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/jfs/xattr.c @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ ssize_t __jfs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *data, size_t buf_size) { struct jfs_ea_list *ealist; - struct jfs_ea *ea; + struct jfs_ea *ea, *ealist_end; struct ea_buffer ea_buf; int xattr_size; ssize_t size; @@ -817,9 +817,16 @@ ssize_t __jfs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *data, goto not_found; ealist = (struct jfs_ea_list *) ea_buf.xattr; + ealist_end = END_EALIST(ealist); /* Find the named attribute */ - for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < END_EALIST(ealist); ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) + for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < ealist_end; ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) { + if (unlikely(ea + 1 > ealist_end) || + unlikely(NEXT_EA(ea) > ealist_end)) { + size = -EUCLEAN; + goto release; + } + if ((namelen == ea->namelen) && memcmp(name, ea->name, namelen) == 0) { /* Found it */ @@ -834,6 +841,7 @@ ssize_t __jfs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *data, memcpy(data, value, size); goto release; } + } not_found: size = -ENODATA; release: @@ -861,7 +869,7 @@ ssize_t jfs_listxattr(struct dentry * dentry, char *data, size_t buf_size) ssize_t size = 0; int xattr_size; struct jfs_ea_list *ealist; - struct jfs_ea *ea; + struct jfs_ea *ea, *ealist_end; struct ea_buffer ea_buf; down_read(&JFS_IP(inode)->xattr_sem); @@ -876,9 +884,16 @@ ssize_t jfs_listxattr(struct dentry * dentry, char *data, size_t buf_size) goto release; ealist = (struct jfs_ea_list *) ea_buf.xattr; + ealist_end = END_EALIST(ealist); /* compute required size of list */ - for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < END_EALIST(ealist); ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) { + for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < ealist_end; ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) { + if (unlikely(ea + 1 > ealist_end) || + unlikely(NEXT_EA(ea) > ealist_end)) { + size = -EUCLEAN; + goto release; + } + if (can_list(ea)) size += name_size(ea) + 1; } -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] jfs: don't walk off the end of ealist
by Zhao Wenhui 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: lei lu <llfamsec(a)gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.223 commit 6386f1b6a10e5d1ddd03db4ff6dfc55d488852ce category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAG918 CVE: CVE-2024-41017 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=… -------------------------------- commit d0fa70aca54c8643248e89061da23752506ec0d4 upstream. Add a check before visiting the members of ea to make sure each ea stays within the ealist. Signed-off-by: lei lu <llfamsec(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Zhao Wenhui <zhaowenhui8(a)huawei.com> --- fs/jfs/xattr.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jfs/xattr.c b/fs/jfs/xattr.c index 7ae54f78a5b0..aea5531559c0 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/xattr.c +++ b/fs/jfs/xattr.c @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ ssize_t __jfs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *data, size_t buf_size) { struct jfs_ea_list *ealist; - struct jfs_ea *ea; + struct jfs_ea *ea, *ealist_end; struct ea_buffer ea_buf; int xattr_size; ssize_t size; @@ -817,9 +817,16 @@ ssize_t __jfs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *data, goto not_found; ealist = (struct jfs_ea_list *) ea_buf.xattr; + ealist_end = END_EALIST(ealist); /* Find the named attribute */ - for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < END_EALIST(ealist); ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) + for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < ealist_end; ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) { + if (unlikely(ea + 1 > ealist_end) || + unlikely(NEXT_EA(ea) > ealist_end)) { + size = -EUCLEAN; + goto release; + } + if ((namelen == ea->namelen) && memcmp(name, ea->name, namelen) == 0) { /* Found it */ @@ -834,6 +841,7 @@ ssize_t __jfs_getxattr(struct inode *inode, const char *name, void *data, memcpy(data, value, size); goto release; } + } not_found: size = -ENODATA; release: @@ -861,7 +869,7 @@ ssize_t jfs_listxattr(struct dentry * dentry, char *data, size_t buf_size) ssize_t size = 0; int xattr_size; struct jfs_ea_list *ealist; - struct jfs_ea *ea; + struct jfs_ea *ea, *ealist_end; struct ea_buffer ea_buf; down_read(&JFS_IP(inode)->xattr_sem); @@ -876,9 +884,16 @@ ssize_t jfs_listxattr(struct dentry * dentry, char *data, size_t buf_size) goto release; ealist = (struct jfs_ea_list *) ea_buf.xattr; + ealist_end = END_EALIST(ealist); /* compute required size of list */ - for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < END_EALIST(ealist); ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) { + for (ea = FIRST_EA(ealist); ea < ealist_end; ea = NEXT_EA(ea)) { + if (unlikely(ea + 1 > ealist_end) || + unlikely(NEXT_EA(ea) > ealist_end)) { + size = -EUCLEAN; + goto release; + } + if (can_list(ea)) size += name_size(ea) + 1; } -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] vfs: Don't evict inode under the inode lru traversing context
by Zheng Qixing 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.48 commit b9bda5f6012dd00372f3a06a82ed8971a4c57c32 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAOXZK CVE: CVE-2024-45003 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit 2a0629834cd82f05d424bbc193374f9a43d1f87d upstream. The inode reclaiming process(See function prune_icache_sb) collects all reclaimable inodes and mark them with I_FREEING flag at first, at that time, other processes will be stuck if they try getting these inodes (See function find_inode_fast), then the reclaiming process destroy the inodes by function dispose_list(). Some filesystems(eg. ext4 with ea_inode feature, ubifs with xattr) may do inode lookup in the inode evicting callback function, if the inode lookup is operated under the inode lru traversing context, deadlock problems may happen. Case 1: In function ext4_evict_inode(), the ea inode lookup could happen if ea_inode feature is enabled, the lookup process will be stuck under the evicting context like this: 1. File A has inode i_reg and an ea inode i_ea 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // i_ea is added into lru // lru->i_ea 3. Then, following three processes running like this: PA PB echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // i_reg is added into lru, lru->i_ea->i_reg prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate i_ea->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(i_reg) spin_unlock(&i_reg->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file A i_reg->nlink = 0 iput(i_reg) // i_reg->nlink is 0, do evict ext4_evict_inode ext4_xattr_delete_inode ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all ext4_xattr_inode_iget ext4_iget(i_ea->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast __wait_on_freeing_inode(i_ea) ----→ AA deadlock dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&i_ea->i_state) Case 2: In deleted inode writing function ubifs_jnl_write_inode(), file deleting process holds BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex while getting the xattr inode, which could race with inode reclaiming process(The reclaiming process could try locking BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex in inode evicting function), then an ABBA deadlock problem would happen as following: 1. File A has inode ia and a xattr(with inode ixa), regular file B has inode ib and a xattr. 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // ixa is added into lru // lru->ixa 3. Then, following three processes running like this: PA PB PC echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // ib and ia are added into lru, lru->ixa->ib->ia prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate ixa->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(ib) spin_unlock(&ib->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file B ib->nlink = 0 rm file A iput(ia) ubifs_evict_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_write_inode(ia) make_reservation(BASEHD) // Lock wbuf->io_mutex ubifs_iget(ixa->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast __wait_on_freeing_inode(ixa) | iput(ib) // ib->nlink is 0, do evict | ubifs_evict_inode | ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ib) ↓ ubifs_jnl_write_inode ABBA deadlock ←-----make_reservation(BASEHD) dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&ixa->i_state) Fix the possible deadlock by using new inode state flag I_LRU_ISOLATING to pin the inode in memory while inode_lru_isolate() reclaims its pages instead of using ordinary inode reference. This way inode deletion cannot be triggered from inode_lru_isolate() thus avoiding the deadlock. evict() is made to wait for I_LRU_ISOLATING to be cleared before proceeding with inode cleanup. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/37c29c42-7685-d1f0-067d-63582ffac405@huaweiclou… Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219022 Fixes: e50e5129f384 ("ext4: xattr-in-inode support") Fixes: 7959cf3a7506 ("ubifs: journal: Handle xattrs like files") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809031628.1069873-1-chengzhihao@huaweicloud.… Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Suggested-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing(a)huawei.com> --- fs/inode.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 2d8b8d353750..d31fd643c7ef 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -486,6 +486,39 @@ static void inode_lru_list_del(struct inode *inode) this_cpu_dec(nr_unused); } +static void inode_pin_lru_isolating(struct inode *inode) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON(inode->i_state & (I_LRU_ISOLATING | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)); + inode->i_state |= I_LRU_ISOLATING; +} + +static void inode_unpin_lru_isolating(struct inode *inode) +{ + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_LRU_ISOLATING)); + inode->i_state &= ~I_LRU_ISOLATING; + smp_mb(); + wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_LRU_ISOLATING); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); +} + +static void inode_wait_for_lru_isolating(struct inode *inode) +{ + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + if (inode->i_state & I_LRU_ISOLATING) { + DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wq, &inode->i_state, __I_LRU_ISOLATING); + wait_queue_head_t *wqh; + + wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_LRU_ISOLATING); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); + __wait_on_bit(wqh, &wq, bit_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_LRU_ISOLATING); + } + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); +} + /** * inode_sb_list_add - add inode to the superblock list of inodes * @inode: inode to add @@ -655,6 +688,8 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode) inode_sb_list_del(inode); + inode_wait_for_lru_isolating(inode); + /* * Wait for flusher thread to be done with the inode so that filesystem * does not start destroying it while writeback is still running. Since @@ -843,7 +878,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item, * be under pressure before the cache inside the highmem zone. */ if (inode_has_buffers(inode) || !mapping_empty(&inode->i_data)) { - __iget(inode); + inode_pin_lru_isolating(inode); spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); spin_unlock(lru_lock); if (remove_inode_buffers(inode)) { @@ -855,7 +890,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item, __count_vm_events(PGINODESTEAL, reap); mm_account_reclaimed_pages(reap); } - iput(inode); + inode_unpin_lru_isolating(inode); spin_lock(lru_lock); return LRU_RETRY; } diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index e4ea5c34b90c..e7c55ebb9d71 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -2334,6 +2334,9 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src, * * I_PINNING_FSCACHE_WB Inode is pinning an fscache object for writeback. * + * I_LRU_ISOLATING Inode is pinned being isolated from LRU without holding + * i_count. + * * Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING? */ #define I_DIRTY_SYNC (1 << 0) @@ -2357,6 +2360,8 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src, #define I_DONTCACHE (1 << 16) #define I_SYNC_QUEUED (1 << 17) #define I_PINNING_FSCACHE_WB (1 << 18) +#define __I_LRU_ISOLATING 19 +#define I_LRU_ISOLATING (1 << __I_LRU_ISOLATING) #define I_DIRTY_INODE (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) #define I_DIRTY (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES) -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] vfs: Don't evict inode under the inode lru traversing context
by Zheng Qixing 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.48 commit b9bda5f6012dd00372f3a06a82ed8971a4c57c32 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAOXZK CVE: CVE-2024-45003 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------------------- commit 2a0629834cd82f05d424bbc193374f9a43d1f87d upstream. The inode reclaiming process(See function prune_icache_sb) collects all reclaimable inodes and mark them with I_FREEING flag at first, at that time, other processes will be stuck if they try getting these inodes (See function find_inode_fast), then the reclaiming process destroy the inodes by function dispose_list(). Some filesystems(eg. ext4 with ea_inode feature, ubifs with xattr) may do inode lookup in the inode evicting callback function, if the inode lookup is operated under the inode lru traversing context, deadlock problems may happen. Case 1: In function ext4_evict_inode(), the ea inode lookup could happen if ea_inode feature is enabled, the lookup process will be stuck under the evicting context like this: 1. File A has inode i_reg and an ea inode i_ea 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // i_ea is added into lru // lru->i_ea 3. Then, following three processes running like this: PA PB echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // i_reg is added into lru, lru->i_ea->i_reg prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate i_ea->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(i_reg) spin_unlock(&i_reg->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file A i_reg->nlink = 0 iput(i_reg) // i_reg->nlink is 0, do evict ext4_evict_inode ext4_xattr_delete_inode ext4_xattr_inode_dec_ref_all ext4_xattr_inode_iget ext4_iget(i_ea->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast __wait_on_freeing_inode(i_ea) ----→ AA deadlock dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&i_ea->i_state) Case 2: In deleted inode writing function ubifs_jnl_write_inode(), file deleting process holds BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex while getting the xattr inode, which could race with inode reclaiming process(The reclaiming process could try locking BASEHD's wbuf->io_mutex in inode evicting function), then an ABBA deadlock problem would happen as following: 1. File A has inode ia and a xattr(with inode ixa), regular file B has inode ib and a xattr. 2. getfattr(A, xattr_buf) // ixa is added into lru // lru->ixa 3. Then, following three processes running like this: PA PB PC echo 2 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches shrink_slab prune_dcache_sb // ib and ia are added into lru, lru->ixa->ib->ia prune_icache_sb list_lru_walk_one inode_lru_isolate ixa->i_state |= I_FREEING // set inode state inode_lru_isolate __iget(ib) spin_unlock(&ib->i_lock) spin_unlock(lru_lock) rm file B ib->nlink = 0 rm file A iput(ia) ubifs_evict_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ia) ubifs_jnl_write_inode(ia) make_reservation(BASEHD) // Lock wbuf->io_mutex ubifs_iget(ixa->i_ino) iget_locked find_inode_fast __wait_on_freeing_inode(ixa) | iput(ib) // ib->nlink is 0, do evict | ubifs_evict_inode | ubifs_jnl_delete_inode(ib) ↓ ubifs_jnl_write_inode ABBA deadlock ←-----make_reservation(BASEHD) dispose_list // cannot be executed by prune_icache_sb wake_up_bit(&ixa->i_state) Fix the possible deadlock by using new inode state flag I_LRU_ISOLATING to pin the inode in memory while inode_lru_isolate() reclaims its pages instead of using ordinary inode reference. This way inode deletion cannot be triggered from inode_lru_isolate() thus avoiding the deadlock. evict() is made to wait for I_LRU_ISOLATING to be cleared before proceeding with inode cleanup. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/37c29c42-7685-d1f0-067d-63582ffac405@huaweiclou… Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219022 Fixes: e50e5129f384 ("ext4: xattr-in-inode support") Fixes: 7959cf3a7506 ("ubifs: journal: Handle xattrs like files") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240809031628.1069873-1-chengzhihao@huaweicloud.… Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Suggested-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Zheng Qixing <zhengqixing(a)huawei.com> --- fs/inode.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- include/linux/fs.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index bec790bde7ca..c4eaa1db9d1a 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -453,6 +453,39 @@ static void inode_lru_list_del(struct inode *inode) this_cpu_dec(nr_unused); } +static void inode_pin_lru_isolating(struct inode *inode) +{ + lockdep_assert_held(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON(inode->i_state & (I_LRU_ISOLATING | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)); + inode->i_state |= I_LRU_ISOLATING; +} + +static void inode_unpin_lru_isolating(struct inode *inode) +{ + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_LRU_ISOLATING)); + inode->i_state &= ~I_LRU_ISOLATING; + smp_mb(); + wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_LRU_ISOLATING); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); +} + +static void inode_wait_for_lru_isolating(struct inode *inode) +{ + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + if (inode->i_state & I_LRU_ISOLATING) { + DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wq, &inode->i_state, __I_LRU_ISOLATING); + wait_queue_head_t *wqh; + + wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_LRU_ISOLATING); + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); + __wait_on_bit(wqh, &wq, bit_wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock); + WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_LRU_ISOLATING); + } + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); +} + /** * inode_sb_list_add - add inode to the superblock list of inodes * @inode: inode to add @@ -572,6 +605,8 @@ static void evict(struct inode *inode) inode_sb_list_del(inode); + inode_wait_for_lru_isolating(inode); + /* * Wait for flusher thread to be done with the inode so that filesystem * does not start destroying it while writeback is still running. Since @@ -771,7 +806,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item, } if (inode_has_buffers(inode) || inode->i_data.nrpages) { - __iget(inode); + inode_pin_lru_isolating(inode); spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); spin_unlock(lru_lock); if (remove_inode_buffers(inode)) { @@ -784,7 +819,7 @@ static enum lru_status inode_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item, if (current->reclaim_state) current->reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab += reap; } - iput(inode); + inode_unpin_lru_isolating(inode); spin_lock(lru_lock); return LRU_RETRY; } diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 9d7e901b71fd..7e8684e3f05d 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -2280,6 +2280,9 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src, * Used to detect that mark_inode_dirty() should not move * inode between dirty lists. * + * I_LRU_ISOLATING Inode is pinned being isolated from LRU without holding + * i_count. + * * Q: What is the difference between I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING? */ #define I_DIRTY_SYNC (1 << 0) @@ -2302,6 +2305,8 @@ static inline void kiocb_clone(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct kiocb *kiocb_src, #define I_CREATING (1 << 15) #define I_DONTCACHE (1 << 16) #define I_SYNC_QUEUED (1 << 17) +#define __I_LRU_ISOLATING 19 +#define I_LRU_ISOLATING (1 << __I_LRU_ISOLATING) #define I_DIRTY_INODE (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC) #define I_DIRTY (I_DIRTY_INODE | I_DIRTY_PAGES) -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] nfs: always check dreq->error after a commit
by Li Lingfeng 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)kernel.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.0-rc1 commit 55051c0ced7d322a169f8603d306ee6ec079f8ae category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IARK13 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- When the client gets back a short DIO write, it will then attempt to issue another write to finish the DIO request. If that write then fails (as is often the case in an -ENOSPC situation), then we still may need to issue a COMMIT if the earlier short write was unstable. If that COMMIT then succeeds, then we don't want the client to reschedule the write requests, and to instead just return a short write. Otherwise, we can end up looping over the same DIO write forever. Always consult dreq->error after a successful RPC, even when the flag state is not NFS_ODIRECT_DONE. Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028370 Reported-by: Boyang Xue <bxue(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust(a)hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3(a)huawei.com> --- fs/nfs/direct.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c index 499519f0f6ec..5b8ab542ee84 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c @@ -629,8 +629,9 @@ static void nfs_direct_commit_complete(struct nfs_commit_data *data) dreq->max_count = 0; dreq->count = 0; dreq->flags = NFS_ODIRECT_DONE; - } else if (dreq->flags == NFS_ODIRECT_DONE) + } else { status = dreq->error; + } nfs_init_cinfo_from_dreq(&cinfo, dreq); -- 2.31.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] drm/amd/display: Skip finding free audio for unknown engine_id
by Zhao Wenhui 18 Sep '24

18 Sep '24

From: Alex Hung <alex.hung(a)amd.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.222 commit ffa7bd3ca9cfa902b857d1dc9a5f46fededf86c8 category: bugfix https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAGT0E CVE: CVE-2024-42119 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?h=… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 1357b2165d9ad94faa4c4a20d5e2ce29c2ff29c3 ] [WHY] ENGINE_ID_UNKNOWN = -1 and can not be used as an array index. Plus, it also means it is uninitialized and does not need free audio. [HOW] Skip and return NULL. This fixes 2 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <rodrigo.siqueira(a)amd.com> Acked-by: Wayne Lin <wayne.lin(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Hung <alex.hung(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhao Wenhui <zhaowenhui8(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c index f1eda1a6496d..0a13c06eea44 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c @@ -1802,6 +1802,9 @@ static struct audio *find_first_free_audio( { int i, available_audio_count; + if (id == ENGINE_ID_UNKNOWN) + return NULL; + available_audio_count = pool->audio_count; for (i = 0; i < available_audio_count; i++) { -- 2.34.1

2 1