February 2025 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-6.6] workqueue: Do not warn when cancelling WQ_MEM_RECLAIM work from !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM worker
by Zeng Heng 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin(a)igalia.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.72 commit 1fd2a57dcb4de3cb40844a29c71b5d7b46a84334 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBID2Z CVE: CVE-2024-57888 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit de35994ecd2dd6148ab5a6c5050a1670a04dec77 ] After commit 746ae46c1113 ("drm/sched: Mark scheduler work queues with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM") amdgpu started seeing the following warning: [ ] workqueue: WQ_MEM_RECLAIM sdma0:drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM events:amdgpu_device_delay_enable_gfx_off [amdgpu] ... [ ] Workqueue: sdma0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] ... [ ] Call Trace: [ ] <TASK> ... [ ] ? check_flush_dependency+0xf5/0x110 ... [ ] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x6e/0x80 [ ] amdgpu_gfx_off_ctrl+0xab/0x140 [amdgpu] [ ] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x40/0x50 [amdgpu] [ ] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0xf4/0x810 [amdgpu] [ ] ? drm_sched_run_job_work+0x22c/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ ] amdgpu_job_run+0xaa/0x1f0 [amdgpu] [ ] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x257/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ ] process_one_work+0x217/0x720 ... [ ] </TASK> The intent of the verifcation done in check_flush_depedency is to ensure forward progress during memory reclaim, by flagging cases when either a memory reclaim process, or a memory reclaim work item is flushed from a context not marked as memory reclaim safe. This is correct when flushing, but when called from the cancel(_delayed)_work_sync() paths it is a false positive because work is either already running, or will not be running at all. Therefore cancelling it is safe and we can relax the warning criteria by letting the helper know of the calling context. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin(a)igalia.com> Fixes: fca839c00a12 ("workqueue: warn if memory reclaim tries to flush !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue") References: 746ae46c1113 ("drm/sched: Mark scheduler work queues with WQ_MEM_RECLAIM") Cc: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai(a)gmail.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher(a)amd.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig(a)amd.com Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v4.5+ Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Conflicts: kernel/workqueue.c [Fix context conflict.] Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com> --- kernel/workqueue.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 5bb2fba9cb8a..db78a74f5455 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -2940,23 +2940,27 @@ static int rescuer_thread(void *__rescuer) * check_flush_dependency - check for flush dependency sanity * @target_wq: workqueue being flushed * @target_work: work item being flushed (NULL for workqueue flushes) + * @from_cancel: are we called from the work cancel path * * %current is trying to flush the whole @target_wq or @target_work on it. - * If @target_wq doesn't have %WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, verify that %current is not - * reclaiming memory or running on a workqueue which doesn't have - * %WQ_MEM_RECLAIM as that can break forward-progress guarantee leading to - * a deadlock. + * If this is not the cancel path (which implies work being flushed is either + * already running, or will not be at all), check if @target_wq doesn't have + * %WQ_MEM_RECLAIM and verify that %current is not reclaiming memory or running + * on a workqueue which doesn't have %WQ_MEM_RECLAIM as that can break forward- + * progress guarantee leading to a deadlock. */ static void check_flush_dependency(struct workqueue_struct *target_wq, - struct work_struct *target_work) + struct work_struct *target_work, + bool from_cancel) { - work_func_t target_func = target_work ? target_work->func : NULL; + work_func_t target_func; struct worker *worker; - if (target_wq->flags & WQ_MEM_RECLAIM) + if (from_cancel || target_wq->flags & WQ_MEM_RECLAIM) return; worker = current_wq_worker(); + target_func = target_work ? target_work->func : NULL; WARN_ONCE(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC, "workqueue: PF_MEMALLOC task %d(%s) is flushing !WQ_MEM_RECLAIM %s:%ps", @@ -3189,7 +3193,7 @@ void __flush_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq) list_add_tail(&this_flusher.list, &wq->flusher_overflow); } - check_flush_dependency(wq, NULL); + check_flush_dependency(wq, NULL, false); mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex); @@ -3364,7 +3368,7 @@ static bool start_flush_work(struct work_struct *work, struct wq_barrier *barr, pwq = worker->current_pwq; } - check_flush_dependency(pwq->wq, work); + check_flush_dependency(pwq->wq, work, from_cancel); insert_wq_barrier(pwq, barr, work, worker); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock); -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] net/smc: check v2_ext_offset/eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt when receiving proposal msg
by Zeng Heng 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

From: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.68 commit 295a92e3df32e72aff0f4bc25c310e349d07ffbf category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IBH1XN Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 7863c9f3d24ba49dbead7e03dfbe40deb5888fdf ] When receiving proposal msg in server, the fields v2_ext_offset/ eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt in proposal msg are from the remote client and can not be fully trusted. Especially the field v2_ext_offset, once exceed the max value, there has the chance to access wrong address, and crash may happen. This patch checks the fields v2_ext_offset/eid_cnt/ism_gid_cnt before using them. Fixes: 8c3dca341aea ("net/smc: build and send V2 CLC proposal") Signed-off-by: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang(a)linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen(a)linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: D. Wythe <alibuda(a)linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Conflicts: net/smc/smc_clc.c [Fix context conflict.] Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com> --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 3 ++- net/smc/smc_clc.c | 8 +++++++- net/smc/smc_clc.h | 8 +++++++- 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 6881fd03ef25..1ad7b05893af 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -2280,7 +2280,8 @@ static void smc_find_rdma_v2_device_serv(struct smc_sock *new_smc, goto not_found; smc_v2_ext = smc_get_clc_v2_ext(pclc); - if (!smc_clc_match_eid(ini->negotiated_eid, smc_v2_ext, NULL, NULL)) + if (!smc_v2_ext || + !smc_clc_match_eid(ini->negotiated_eid, smc_v2_ext, NULL, NULL)) goto not_found; /* prepare RDMA check */ diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.c b/net/smc/smc_clc.c index d96ad04e7dcf..3d0139250cc8 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.c @@ -352,7 +352,6 @@ static bool smc_clc_msg_prop_valid(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc) struct smc_clc_msg_hdr *hdr = &pclc->hdr; struct smc_clc_v2_extension *v2_ext; - v2_ext = smc_get_clc_v2_ext(pclc); pclc_prfx = smc_clc_proposal_get_prefix(pclc); if (hdr->version == SMC_V1) { if (hdr->typev1 == SMC_TYPE_N) @@ -365,6 +364,13 @@ static bool smc_clc_msg_prop_valid(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *pclc) sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_trail)) return false; } else { + v2_ext = smc_get_clc_v2_ext(pclc); + if ((hdr->typev2 != SMC_TYPE_N && + (!v2_ext || v2_ext->hdr.eid_cnt > SMC_CLC_MAX_UEID)) || + (smcd_indicated(hdr->typev2) && + v2_ext->hdr.ism_gid_cnt > SMCD_CLC_MAX_V2_GID_ENTRIES)) + return false; + if (ntohs(hdr->length) != sizeof(*pclc) + sizeof(struct smc_clc_msg_smcd) + diff --git a/net/smc/smc_clc.h b/net/smc/smc_clc.h index 58777b6a0dfe..0ddf0f5307a7 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_clc.h +++ b/net/smc/smc_clc.h @@ -366,8 +366,14 @@ static inline struct smc_clc_v2_extension * smc_get_clc_v2_ext(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal *prop) { struct smc_clc_msg_smcd *prop_smcd = smc_get_clc_msg_smcd(prop); + u16 max_offset; - if (!prop_smcd || !ntohs(prop_smcd->v2_ext_offset)) + max_offset = offsetof(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal_area, pclc_v2_ext) - + offsetof(struct smc_clc_msg_proposal_area, pclc_smcd) - + offsetofend(struct smc_clc_msg_smcd, v2_ext_offset); + + if (!prop_smcd || !ntohs(prop_smcd->v2_ext_offset) || + ntohs(prop_smcd->v2_ext_offset) > max_offset) return NULL; return (struct smc_clc_v2_extension *) -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] i3c: Use i3cdev->desc->info instead of calling i3c_device_get_info() to avoid deadlock
by Zeng Heng 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

From: Defa Li <defa.li(a)mediatek.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.66 commit ffe19e363c6f8b992ba835a361542568dea17409 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBJC4W CVE: CVE-2024-43098 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 6cf7b65f7029914dc0cd7db86fac9ee5159008c6 ] A deadlock may happen since the i3c_master_register() acquires &i3cbus->lock twice. See the log below. Use i3cdev->desc->info instead of calling i3c_device_info() to avoid acquiring the lock twice. v2: - Modified the title and commit message ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.11.0-mainline -------------------------------------------- init/1 is trying to acquire lock: f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&i3cbus->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_bus_normaluse_lock but task is already holding lock: f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&i3cbus->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_master_register other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&i3cbus->lock); lock(&i3cbus->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 2 locks held by init/1: #0: fcffff809b6798f8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach #1: f1ffff80a6a40dc0 (&i3cbus->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: i3c_master_register stack backtrace: CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xfc/0x17c show_stack+0x18/0x28 dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0xc0 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_deadlock_bug+0x388/0x390 __lock_acquire+0x18bc/0x32ec lock_acquire+0x134/0x2b0 down_read+0x50/0x19c i3c_bus_normaluse_lock+0x14/0x24 i3c_device_get_info+0x24/0x58 i3c_device_uevent+0x34/0xa4 dev_uevent+0x310/0x384 kobject_uevent_env+0x244/0x414 kobject_uevent+0x14/0x20 device_add+0x278/0x460 device_register+0x20/0x34 i3c_master_register_new_i3c_devs+0x78/0x154 i3c_master_register+0x6a0/0x6d4 mtk_i3c_master_probe+0x3b8/0x4d8 platform_probe+0xa0/0xe0 really_probe+0x114/0x454 __driver_probe_device+0xa0/0x15c driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x1ac __driver_attach+0xc4/0x1f0 bus_for_each_dev+0x104/0x160 driver_attach+0x24/0x34 bus_add_driver+0x14c/0x294 driver_register+0x68/0x104 __platform_driver_register+0x20/0x30 init_module+0x20/0xfe4 do_one_initcall+0x184/0x464 do_init_module+0x58/0x1ec load_module+0xefc/0x10c8 __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x238/0x33c invoke_syscall+0x58/0x10c el0_svc_common+0xa8/0xdc do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 el0_svc+0x50/0xac el0t_64_sync_handler+0x70/0xbc el0t_64_sync+0x1a8/0x1ac Signed-off-by: Defa Li <defa.li(a)mediatek.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107132549.25439-1-defa.li@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni(a)bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/i3c/master.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i3c/master.c b/drivers/i3c/master.c index 70d120dfb090..d40bc8fd7c15 100644 --- a/drivers/i3c/master.c +++ b/drivers/i3c/master.c @@ -280,7 +280,8 @@ static int i3c_device_uevent(const struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *e struct i3c_device_info devinfo; u16 manuf, part, ext; - i3c_device_get_info(i3cdev, &devinfo); + if (i3cdev->desc) + devinfo = i3cdev->desc->info; manuf = I3C_PID_MANUF_ID(devinfo.pid); part = I3C_PID_PART_ID(devinfo.pid); ext = I3C_PID_EXTRA_INFO(devinfo.pid); -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] vsock/bpf: return early if transport is not assigned
by Pu Lehui 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare(a)redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.74 commit 58e586c30d0b6f5dc0174a41026f2b0a48c9aab6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBJXEX CVE: CVE-2025-21670 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit f6abafcd32f9cfc4b1a2f820ecea70773e26d423 upstream. Some of the core functions can only be called if the transport has been assigned. As Michal reported, a socket might have the transport at NULL, for example after a failed connect(), causing the following trace: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 12faf8067 P4D 12faf8067 PUD 113670067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+ RIP: 0010:vsock_connectible_has_data+0x1f/0x40 Call Trace: vsock_bpf_recvmsg+0xca/0x5e0 sock_recvmsg+0xb9/0xc0 __sys_recvfrom+0xb3/0x130 __x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e So we need to check the `vsk->transport` in vsock_bpf_recvmsg(), especially for connected sockets (stream/seqpacket) as we already do in __vsock_connectible_recvmsg(). Fixes: 634f1a7110b4 ("vsock: support sockmap") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal(a)rbox.co> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/5ca20d4c-1017-49c2-9516-f6f75fd331e9@rbox.co/ Tested-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal(a)rbox.co> Reported-by: syzbot+3affdbfc986ecd9200fd(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/677f84a8.050a0220.25a300.01b3.GAE@google.com/ Tested-by: syzbot+3affdbfc986ecd9200fd(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel(a)theori.io> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c index 4aa6e74ec295..f201d9eca1df 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_bpf.c @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static int vsock_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, int flags, int *addr_len) { struct sk_psock *psock; + struct vsock_sock *vsk; int copied; psock = sk_psock_get(sk); @@ -84,6 +85,13 @@ static int vsock_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, return __vsock_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags); lock_sock(sk); + vsk = vsock_sk(sk); + + if (!vsk->transport) { + copied = -ENODEV; + goto out; + } + if (vsock_has_data(sk, psock) && sk_psock_queue_empty(psock)) { release_sock(sk); sk_psock_put(sk, psock); @@ -108,6 +116,7 @@ static int vsock_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, copied = sk_msg_recvmsg(sk, psock, msg, len, flags); } +out: release_sock(sk); sk_psock_put(sk, psock); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] fix CVE-2024-56605
by Lin Ruifeng 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

fix CVE-2024-56605 Fedor Pchelkin (1): Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Ignat Korchagin (1): Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create() net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.22.0

2 3

[PATCH OLK-5.10] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A55 to the repeat tlbi list
by Bowen You 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

From: James Morse <james.morse(a)arm.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.1-rc1 commit 171df58028bf4649460fb146a56a58dcb0c8f75a category: bugfix bugzilla: 190345 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- Cortex-A55 is affected by an erratum where in rare circumstances the CPUs may not handle a race between a break-before-make sequence on one CPU, and another CPU accessing the same page. This could allow a store to a page that has been unmapped. Work around this by adding the affected CPUs to the list that needs TLB sequences to be done twice. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse(a)arm.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220930131959.3082594-1-james.morse@arm.com Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas(a)arm.com> Conflicts: arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c [Some erratum are not added into repeat tlbi list] Signed-off-by: Bowen You <youbowen2(a)huawei.com> --- Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++ arch/arm64/Kconfig | 17 +++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst index af12c363a699..7a087383d8c2 100644 --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ stable kernels. +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+ | ARM | Cortex-A55 | #1530923 | ARM64_ERRATUM_1530923 | +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+ +| ARM | Cortex-A55 | #2441007 | ARM64_ERRATUM_2441007 | ++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+ | ARM | Cortex-A57 | #832075 | ARM64_ERRATUM_832075 | +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+ | ARM | Cortex-A57 | #852523 | N/A | diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig index 8b8f48b2a51e..751f6c1a2bcc 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig @@ -624,6 +624,23 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1530923 config ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI bool +config ARM64_ERRATUM_2441007 + bool "Cortex-A55: Completion of affected memory accesses might not be guaranteed by completion of a TLBI" + default y + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI + help + This option adds a workaround for ARM Cortex-A55 erratum #2441007. + + Under very rare circumstances, affected Cortex-A55 CPUs + may not handle a race between a break-before-make sequence on one + CPU, and another CPU accessing the same page. This could allow a + store to a page that has been unmapped. + + Work around this by adding the affected CPUs to the list that needs + TLB sequences to be done twice. + + If unsure, say Y. + config ARM64_ERRATUM_1286807 bool "Cortex-A76: Modification of the translation table for a virtual address might lead to read-after-read ordering violation" default y diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c index 7f175b3aac15..c7bac554ca8c 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -297,6 +297,11 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_repeat_tlbi_list[] = { /* Kryo4xx Gold (rcpe to rfpe) => (r0p0 to r3p0) */ ERRATA_MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_QCOM_KRYO_4XX_GOLD, 0xc, 0xe, 0xf, 0xe), }, +#endif +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2441007 + { + ERRATA_MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_CORTEX_A55), + }, #endif {}, }; -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix CVE-2024-56605
by Lin Ruifeng 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

fix CVE-2024-56605 Fedor Pchelkin (1): Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Ignat Korchagin (1): [Backport] Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create() net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.22.0

2 3

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1343/1343] fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

Hi Theodore, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: 41298197ead9e85ee2ec1d52122f03fd1863cff2 [1343/1343] ext4: convert BUG_ON's to WARN_ON's in mballoc.c config: x86_64-randconfig-101-20241223 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250205/202502050119.jyApN4Fx-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250205/202502050119.jyApN4Fx-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502050119.jyApN4Fx-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12: In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16: In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:26: In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:14: include/linux/pagemap.h:425:21: warning: cast from 'int (*)(struct file *, struct page *)' to 'filler_t *' (aka 'int (*)(void *, struct page *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 425 | filler_t *filler = (filler_t *)mapping->a_ops->readpage; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4734: warning: Function parameter or member 'bh' not described in 'ext4_free_blocks' >> fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1365/1365] drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.
by kernel test robot 04 Feb '25

04 Feb '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b8815fbbe89b0d15fa3296c3e57d2197a92f5bc0 [1365/1365] ACPI: CPPC: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init failed in CPU Hotplug situation config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20250103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250204/202502042318.pGS3sedi-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502042318.pGS3sedi-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed. vim +614 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c 576 577 int acpi_get_psd_map(struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data) 578 { 579 struct cpc_desc **cpc_pptr, *cpc_ptr; 580 int parsed_core_num = 0; 581 int i, ret; 582 583 cpc_pptr = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); 584 if (!cpc_pptr) 585 return -ENOMEM; 586 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 587 cpc_pptr[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpc_desc), GFP_KERNEL); 588 if (!cpc_pptr[i]) { 589 ret = -ENOMEM; 590 goto out; 591 } 592 } 593 594 /* 595 * We can not use acpi_get_devices() to walk the processor devices 596 * because some processor device is not present. 597 */ 598 ret = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, 599 ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_parse_cpc, NULL, 600 cpc_pptr, (void **)&parsed_core_num); 601 if (ret) 602 goto out; 603 if (parsed_core_num != num_possible_cpus()) { 604 ret = -EINVAL; 605 goto out; 606 } 607 608 ret = __acpi_get_psd_map(all_cpu_data, cpc_pptr); 609 610 out: 611 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 612 cpc_ptr = cpc_pptr[i]; 613 if (cpc_ptr) > 614 kfree(cpc_ptr); 615 } 616 kfree(cpc_pptr); 617 618 return ret; 619 } 620 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_psd_map); 621 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0