- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-6.6 2/8] [Backport] exfat: fix memory leak in exfat_load_bitmap()
by Yongjian Sun 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

From: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo(a)sony.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.12-rc1 commit d2b537b3e533f28e0d97293fe9293161fe8cd137 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRBG CVE: CVE-2024-50013 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- If the first directory entry in the root directory is not a bitmap directory entry, 'bh' will not be released and reassigned, which will cause a memory leak. Fixes: 1e49a94cf707 ("exfat: add bitmap operations") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo(a)sony.com> Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama(a)sony.com> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yongjian Sun <sunyongjian1(a)huawei.com> --- fs/exfat/balloc.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exfat/balloc.c b/fs/exfat/balloc.c index e918decb3735..5b547a596380 100644 --- a/fs/exfat/balloc.c +++ b/fs/exfat/balloc.c @@ -110,11 +110,8 @@ int exfat_load_bitmap(struct super_block *sb) return -EIO; type = exfat_get_entry_type(ep); - if (type == TYPE_UNUSED) - break; - if (type != TYPE_BITMAP) - continue; - if (ep->dentry.bitmap.flags == 0x0) { + if (type == TYPE_BITMAP && + ep->dentry.bitmap.flags == 0x0) { int err; err = exfat_allocate_bitmap(sb, ep); @@ -122,6 +119,9 @@ int exfat_load_bitmap(struct super_block *sb) return err; } brelse(bh); + + if (type == TYPE_UNUSED) + return -EINVAL; } if (exfat_get_next_cluster(sb, &clu.dir)) -- 2.39.2

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] rtc: cmos: Fix event handler registration ordering issue
by Heyuan Wang 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.163 commit 0bcfccb48696aba475f046c2021f0733659ce0ef category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRDI CVE: CVE-2022-48953 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… ---------------------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 4919d3eb2ec0ee364f7e3cf2d99646c1b224fae8 ] Because acpi_install_fixed_event_handler() enables the event automatically on success, it is incorrect to call it before the handler routine passed to it is ready to handle events. Unfortunately, the rtc-cmos driver does exactly the incorrect thing by calling cmos_wake_setup(), which passes rtc_handler() to acpi_install_fixed_event_handler(), before cmos_do_probe(), because rtc_handler() uses dev_get_drvdata() to get to the cmos object pointer and the driver data pointer is only populated in cmos_do_probe(). This leads to a NULL pointer dereference in rtc_handler() on boot if the RTC fixed event happens to be active at the init time. To address this issue, change the initialization ordering of the driver so that cmos_wake_setup() is always called after a successful cmos_do_probe() call. While at it, change cmos_pnp_probe() to call cmos_do_probe() after the initial if () statement used for computing the IRQ argument to be passed to cmos_do_probe() which is cleaner than calling it in each branch of that if () (local variable "irq" can be of type int, because it is passed to that function as an argument of type int). Note that commit 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") caused this issue to affect a larger number of systems, because previously it only affected systems with ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0 set, but it is present regardless of that commit. Fixes: 6492fed7d8c9 ("rtc: rtc-cmos: Do not check ACPI_FADT_LOW_POWER_S0") Fixes: a474aaedac99 ("rtc-cmos: move wake setup from ACPI glue into RTC driver") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20221010141630.zfzi7mk7zvnmclzy@techsing… Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman(a)techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Tested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman(a)techsingularity.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5629262.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni(a)bootlin.com> Stable-dep-of: 83ebb7b3036d ("rtc: cmos: Disable ACPI RTC event on removal") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Heyuan Wang <wangheyuan2(a)h-partners.com> --- drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c index 58c6382a2807..2660e52b487c 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c @@ -1301,10 +1301,10 @@ static void cmos_check_acpi_rtc_status(struct device *dev, static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *pnp, const struct pnp_device_id *id) { - cmos_wake_setup(&pnp->dev); + int irq, ret; if (pnp_port_start(pnp, 0) == 0x70 && !pnp_irq_valid(pnp, 0)) { - unsigned int irq = 0; + irq = 0; #ifdef CONFIG_X86 /* Some machines contain a PNP entry for the RTC, but * don't define the IRQ. It should always be safe to @@ -1313,13 +1313,17 @@ static int cmos_pnp_probe(struct pnp_dev *pnp, const struct pnp_device_id *id) if (nr_legacy_irqs()) irq = RTC_IRQ; #endif - return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, - pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq); } else { - return cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, - pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), - pnp_irq(pnp, 0)); + irq = pnp_irq(pnp, 0); } + + ret = cmos_do_probe(&pnp->dev, pnp_get_resource(pnp, IORESOURCE_IO, 0), irq); + if (ret) + return ret; + + cmos_wake_setup(&pnp->dev); + + return 0; } static void cmos_pnp_remove(struct pnp_dev *pnp) @@ -1403,10 +1407,9 @@ static inline void cmos_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev) {} static int __init cmos_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct resource *resource; - int irq; + int irq, ret; cmos_of_init(pdev); - cmos_wake_setup(&pdev->dev); if (RTC_IOMAPPED) resource = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IO, 0); @@ -1416,7 +1419,13 @@ static int __init cmos_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (irq < 0) irq = -1; - return cmos_do_probe(&pdev->dev, resource, irq); + ret = cmos_do_probe(&pdev->dev, resource, irq); + if (ret) + return ret; + + cmos_wake_setup(&pdev->dev); + + return 0; } static int cmos_platform_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] ASoC: ops: Fix bounds check for _sx controls
by Heyuan Wang 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

From: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.158 commit b50c9641897274c3faef5f95ac852f54b94be2e8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRF8 CVE: CVE-2022-49005 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 698813ba8c580efb356ace8dbf55f61dac6063a8 ] For _sx controls the semantics of the max field is not the usual one, max is the number of steps rather than the maximum value. This means that our check in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx() needs to just check against the maximum value. Fixes: 4f1e50d6a9cf9c1b ("ASoC: ops: Reject out of bounds values in snd_soc_put_volsw_sx()") Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511134137.169575-1-broonie@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Heyuan Wang <wangheyuan2(a)h-partners.com> --- sound/soc/soc-ops.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-ops.c b/sound/soc/soc-ops.c index 0f26d6c31ce5..5fdd96e77ef3 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-ops.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-ops.c @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ int snd_soc_put_volsw_sx(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, val = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0]; if (mc->platform_max && val > mc->platform_max) return -EINVAL; - if (val > max - min) + if (val > max) return -EINVAL; if (val < 0) return -EINVAL; -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH 6.6 v4 0/3] CVE-2024-50063
by Pu Lehui 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

Pu Lehui (1): bpf: Fix kabi breakage in struct bpf_map Xu Kuohai (2): bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks selftests/bpf: Add test for lsm tail call include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +- kernel/bpf/core.c | 21 +++++++-- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_tailcall.c | 34 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_tailcall.c -- 2.34.1

1 3

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 15256/23932] arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:1250: warning: Function parameter or member 'comp' not described in 'do_device_sync'
by kernel test robot 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: c129df6fe938fddc83fddea6a1976cd18573b095 commit: b55756d8f2c3e005e73aa59652dae1e528956862 [15256/23932] arm64/mpam: Implement helpers for handling configuration and monitoring config: arm64-randconfig-001-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241101/202411011311.9dahsLh5-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241101/202411011311.9dahsLh5-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411011311.9dahsLh5-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:520:24: warning: no previous prototype for 'mpam_component_get' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 520 | struct mpam_component *mpam_component_get(struct mpam_class *class, int id, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:612:1: warning: no previous prototype for '__mpam_device_create' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 612 | __mpam_device_create(u8 level_idx, enum mpam_class_types type, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:692:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'mpam_discovery_start' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 692 | int __init mpam_discovery_start(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:918:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'mpam_discovery_complete' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 918 | int __init mpam_discovery_complete(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:935:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'mpam_discovery_failed' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 935 | void __init mpam_discovery_failed(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:34, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:5, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:37, from include/linux/bitops.h:19, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h:37, from include/linux/bug.h:5, from include/linux/io.h:23, from arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:29: In function '__cmpxchg_case_mb_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_mb' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:143:1, inlined from 'mpam_cpu_online' at arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:891:8: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:492:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'int[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 492 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:523:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 523 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , mb_4, al, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c: In function 'mpam_cpu_online': arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:73:12: note: object 'mpam_broken' of size 4 73 | static int mpam_broken; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ In function '__cmpxchg_case_mb_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_mb' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:143:1, inlined from 'mpam_cpu_online' at arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:891:8: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:492:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'int[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 492 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:523:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 523 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , mb_4, al, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c: In function 'mpam_cpu_online': arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:73:12: note: object 'mpam_broken' of size 4 73 | static int mpam_broken; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:1250: warning: Function parameter or member 'comp' not described in 'do_device_sync' >> arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c:1250: warning: Function parameter or member 'sync_ctx' not described in 'do_device_sync' vim +1250 arch/arm64/kernel/mpam/mpam_device.c 1242 1243 /** 1244 * in some cases/platforms the MSC register access is only possible with 1245 * the associated CPUs. And need to check if those CPUS are online before 1246 * accessing it. So we use those CPUs dev->online_affinity to apply config. 1247 */ 1248 static int do_device_sync(struct mpam_component *comp, 1249 struct mpam_device_sync *sync_ctx) > 1250 { 1251 int cpu; 1252 struct mpam_device *dev; 1253 1254 lockdep_assert_cpus_held(); 1255 1256 cpu = get_cpu(); 1257 if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &comp->fw_affinity)) 1258 mpam_component_device_sync(sync_ctx); 1259 put_cpu(); 1260 1261 /* 1262 * Find the set of other CPUs we need to run on to update 1263 * this component 1264 */ 1265 list_for_each_entry(dev, &comp->devices, comp_list) { 1266 if (sync_ctx->error) 1267 break; 1268 1269 if (cpumask_intersects(&dev->online_affinity, 1270 &sync_ctx->updated_on)) 1271 continue; 1272 1273 /* 1274 * This device needs the config applying, and hasn't been 1275 * reachable by any cpu so far. 1276 */ 1277 cpu = cpumask_any(&dev->online_affinity); 1278 smp_call_function_single(cpu, mpam_component_device_sync, 1279 sync_ctx, 1); 1280 } 1281 1282 return sync_ctx->error; 1283 } 1284 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 19549/30000] arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:1729:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'early_pbha_init'
by kernel test robot 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

Hi Ma, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 8c742fc5ad4aebf865be0fa53ebdbf26f0991e2c commit: f43933b3f947a7f9314ec8d704c6ae01041dbbba [19549/30000] arm64: cpufeature: Enable PBHA for stage1 early via FDT config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241101/202411011254.Q328bGAB-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241101/202411011254.Q328bGAB-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411011254.Q328bGAB-lkp@intel.com/ Note: functions only called from assembly code should be annotated with the asmlinkage attribute All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:1627:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'update_pbha_perf_only_bit' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1627 | void update_pbha_perf_only_bit(const u8 *bits, int cnt) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:1729:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'early_pbha_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1729 | void __init early_pbha_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/early_pbha_init +1729 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c 1728 > 1729 void __init early_pbha_init(void) 1730 { 1731 void *fdt; 1732 int node; 1733 const u8 *prop; 1734 int size; 1735 1736 spin_lock(&pbha_dt_lock); 1737 1738 fdt = get_early_fdt_ptr(); 1739 if (!fdt) 1740 goto unlock; 1741 1742 node = fdt_path_offset(fdt, "/cpus"); 1743 if (node < 0) 1744 goto unlock; 1745 1746 prop = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "arm,pbha-performance-only", &size); 1747 if (!prop) 1748 goto unlock; 1749 1750 if (!cpu_has_pbha()) 1751 goto unlock; 1752 1753 update_pbha_perf_only_bit(prop, size); 1754 enable_pbha_inner(); 1755 1756 pbha_enabled = true; 1757 1758 unlock: 1759 spin_unlock(&pbha_dt_lock); 1760 } 1761 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Fix rare race in __genradix_ptr_alloc()
by Zhang Zekun 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.226 commit 99418ec776a39609f50934720419e0b464ca2283 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAVU82 CVE: CVE-2024-47668 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… ----------------------------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit b2f11c6f3e1fc60742673b8675c95b78447f3dae ] If we need to increase the tree depth, allocate a new node, and then race with another thread that increased the tree depth before us, we'll still have a preallocated node that might be used later. If we then use that node for a new non-root node, it'll still have a pointer to the old root instead of being zeroed - fix this by zeroing it in the cmpxchg failure path. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11(a)huawei.com> --- lib/generic-radix-tree.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c index 7dfa88282b00..78f081d695d0 100644 --- a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c +++ b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ void *__genradix_ptr_alloc(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset, if ((v = cmpxchg_release(&radix->root, r, new_root)) == r) { v = new_root; new_node = NULL; + } else { + new_node->children[0] = NULL; } } -- 2.17.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Fix rare race in __genradix_ptr_alloc()
by Zhang Zekun 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.226 commit 99418ec776a39609f50934720419e0b464ca2283 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAVU82 CVE: CVE-2024-47668 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… ----------------------------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit b2f11c6f3e1fc60742673b8675c95b78447f3dae ] If we need to increase the tree depth, allocate a new node, and then race with another thread that increased the tree depth before us, we'll still have a preallocated node that might be used later. If we then use that node for a new non-root node, it'll still have a pointer to the old root instead of being zeroed - fix this by zeroing it in the cmpxchg failure path. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11(a)huawei.com> --- lib/generic-radix-tree.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c index 7dfa88282b00..78f081d695d0 100644 --- a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c +++ b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ void *__genradix_ptr_alloc(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset, if ((v = cmpxchg_release(&radix->root, r, new_root)) == r) { v = new_root; new_node = NULL; + } else { + new_node->children[0] = NULL; } } -- 2.17.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Fix rare race in __genradix_ptr_alloc()
by Zhang Zekun 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.226 commit 99418ec776a39609f50934720419e0b464ca2283 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAVU82 CVE: CVE-2024-47668 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… ----------------------------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit b2f11c6f3e1fc60742673b8675c95b78447f3dae ] If we need to increase the tree depth, allocate a new node, and then race with another thread that increased the tree depth before us, we'll still have a preallocated node that might be used later. If we then use that node for a new non-root node, it'll still have a pointer to the old root instead of being zeroed - fix this by zeroing it in the cmpxchg failure path. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet(a)linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhang Zekun <zhangzekun11(a)huawei.com> --- lib/generic-radix-tree.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c index 7dfa88282b00..78f081d695d0 100644 --- a/lib/generic-radix-tree.c +++ b/lib/generic-radix-tree.c @@ -131,6 +131,8 @@ void *__genradix_ptr_alloc(struct __genradix *radix, size_t offset, if ((v = cmpxchg_release(&radix->root, r, new_root)) == r) { v = new_root; new_node = NULL; + } else { + new_node->children[0] = NULL; } } -- 2.17.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6 v3 0/3] CVE-2024-50063
by Pu Lehui 01 Nov '24

01 Nov '24

Pu Lehui (1): bpf: Fix kabi breakage in struct bpf_map Xu Kuohai (2): bpf: Prevent tail call between progs attached to different hooks selftests/bpf: Add test for lsm tail call include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +- kernel/bpf/core.c | 21 +++++++-- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_lsm.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++- .../selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_tailcall.c | 34 ++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/lsm_tailcall.c -- 2.34.1

2 4