- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] CVE-2024-26923
by Liu Jian 06 May '24

06 May '24

CVE-2024-26923 Kuniyuki Iwashima (1): af_unix: Suppress false-positive lockdep splat for spin_lock() in __unix_gc(). Michal Luczaj (1): af_unix: Fix garbage collector racing against connect() include/net/af_unix.h | 3 +++ net/unix/garbage.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[rdma-core-2403 v2 28/29] libhns: Fix missing flexible WQE buffer page flag
by Chengchang Tang 06 May '24

06 May '24

driver inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I98HIN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Due to the lack of this flag, this feature cannot actually take effect. Fixes: bf57963e729c ("libhns: Support flexible WQE buffer page size") Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengchang(a)huawei.com> --- providers/hns/hns_roce_u.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/providers/hns/hns_roce_u.c b/providers/hns/hns_roce_u.c index 7a3d1a2..c4a3ba5 100644 --- a/providers/hns/hns_roce_u.c +++ b/providers/hns/hns_roce_u.c @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void ucontext_set_cmd(struct hns_roce_alloc_ucontext *cmd, struct hnsdv_context_attr *attr) { cmd->config |= HNS_ROCE_EXSGE_FLAGS | HNS_ROCE_RQ_INLINE_FLAGS | - HNS_ROCE_CQE_INLINE_FLAGS; + HNS_ROCE_CQE_INLINE_FLAGS | HNS_ROCE_UCTX_DYN_QP_PGSZ; if (!attr || !(attr->flags & HNSDV_CONTEXT_FLAGS_DCA)) return; -- 2.33.0

1 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/2] Introduce CONFIG_ARCH_CUSTOM_NUMA_DISTANCE
by Hui Tang 06 May '24

06 May '24

This patchset allow arch adjust node_relaim_distance, as follow: Hui Tang (2): arm64/numa: Support node_reclaim_distance adjust for arch config: enable COBFIG_ARCH_CUSTOM_NUMA_DISTANCE for arm64 arch/arm64/Kconfig | 13 +++++ arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 1 + drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/2] block: fix discard ioctl
by Li Nan 06 May '24

06 May '24

Li Nan (2): block: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard() block: check io size before submit discard block/blk-lib.c | 8 ++++++++ block/ioctl.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.39.2

2 3

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] scsi: target: core: Add TMF to tmr_list handling
by Cui GaoSheng 06 May '24

06 May '24

From: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov(a)yadro.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.308 commit 425a571a7e6fc389954cf2564e1edbba3740e171 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9HJQC CVE: CVE-2024-26845 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 83ab68168a3d990d5ff39ab030ad5754cbbccb25 ] An abort that is responded to by iSCSI itself is added to tmr_list but does not go to target core. A LUN_RESET that goes through tmr_list takes a refcounter on the abort and waits for completion. However, the abort will be never complete because it was not started in target core. Unable to locate ITT: 0x05000000 on CID: 0 Unable to locate RefTaskTag: 0x05000000 on CID: 0. wait_for_tasks: Stopping tmf LUN_RESET with tag 0x0 ref_task_tag 0x0 i_state 34 t_state ISTATE_PROCESSING refcnt 2 transport_state active,stop,fabric_stop wait for tasks: tmf LUN_RESET with tag 0x0 ref_task_tag 0x0 i_state 34 t_state ISTATE_PROCESSING refcnt 2 transport_state active,stop,fabric_stop ... INFO: task kworker/0:2:49 blocked for more than 491 seconds. task:kworker/0:2 state:D stack: 0 pid: 49 ppid: 2 flags:0x00000800 Workqueue: events target_tmr_work [target_core_mod] Call Trace: __switch_to+0x2c4/0x470 _schedule+0x314/0x1730 schedule+0x64/0x130 schedule_timeout+0x168/0x430 wait_for_completion+0x140/0x270 target_put_cmd_and_wait+0x64/0xb0 [target_core_mod] core_tmr_lun_reset+0x30/0xa0 [target_core_mod] target_tmr_work+0xc8/0x1b0 [target_core_mod] process_one_work+0x2d4/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x78/0x6c0 To fix this, only add abort to tmr_list if it will be handled by target core. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov(a)yadro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240111125941.8688-1-d.bogdanov@yadro.com Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Cui GaoSheng <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 5 ----- drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c index e9ff2a7c0c0e..f990aae1d621 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c @@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ int transport_lookup_tmr_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u64 unpacked_lun) struct se_session *se_sess = se_cmd->se_sess; struct se_node_acl *nacl = se_sess->se_node_acl; struct se_tmr_req *se_tmr = se_cmd->se_tmr_req; - unsigned long flags; rcu_read_lock(); deve = target_nacl_find_deve(nacl, unpacked_lun); @@ -195,10 +194,6 @@ int transport_lookup_tmr_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u64 unpacked_lun) se_cmd->se_dev = rcu_dereference_raw(se_lun->lun_se_dev); se_tmr->tmr_dev = rcu_dereference_raw(se_lun->lun_se_dev); - spin_lock_irqsave(&se_tmr->tmr_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); - list_add_tail(&se_tmr->tmr_list, &se_tmr->tmr_dev->dev_tmr_list); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_tmr->tmr_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); - return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(transport_lookup_tmr_lun); diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c index 9c60a090cfd1..7bd863e2c05b 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c @@ -3431,6 +3431,10 @@ int transport_generic_handle_tmr( unsigned long flags; bool aborted = false; + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmd->se_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); + list_add_tail(&cmd->se_tmr_req->tmr_list, &cmd->se_dev->dev_tmr_list); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmd->se_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmd->t_state_lock, flags); if (cmd->transport_state & CMD_T_ABORTED) { aborted = true; -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] x86,static_call: Fix __static_call_return0 for i386
by Yang Yingliang 06 May '24

06 May '24

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz(a)infradead.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.18-rc2 commit 1cd5f059d956e6f614ba6666ecdbcf95db05d5f5 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9JNPZ Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- Paolo reported that the instruction sequence that is used to replace: call __static_call_return0 namely: 66 66 48 31 c0 data16 data16 xor %rax,%rax decodes to something else on i386, namely: 66 66 48 data16 dec %ax 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax Which is a nonsensical sequence that happens to have the same outcome. *However* an important distinction is that it consists of 2 instructions which is a problem when the thing needs to be overwriten with a regular call instruction again. As such, replace the instruction with something that decodes the same on both i386 and x86_64. Fixes: 3f2a8fc4b15d ("static_call/x86: Add __static_call_return0()") Reported-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz(a)infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220318204419.GT8939@worktop.programming.kicks-a… Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c index 094fa18ec9a7..a5a4a4e61b42 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c @@ -12,10 +12,9 @@ enum insn_type { }; /* - * data16 data16 xorq %rax, %rax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %rax - * The REX.W cancels the effect of any data16. + * cs cs cs xorl %eax, %eax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %[er]ax */ -static const u8 xor5rax[] = { 0x66, 0x66, 0x48, 0x31, 0xc0 }; +static const u8 xor5rax[] = { 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x2e, 0x31, 0xc0 }; /* * ud1 %esp, %ecx - a 3 byte #UD that is unique to trampolines, chosen such -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS,v2] scsi: target: core: Add TMF to tmr_list handling
by Cui GaoSheng 06 May '24

06 May '24

From: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov(a)yadro.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.308 commit 425a571a7e6fc389954cf2564e1edbba3740e171 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9HJQC CVE: CVE-2024-26845 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 83ab68168a3d990d5ff39ab030ad5754cbbccb25 ] An abort that is responded to by iSCSI itself is added to tmr_list but does not go to target core. A LUN_RESET that goes through tmr_list takes a refcounter on the abort and waits for completion. However, the abort will be never complete because it was not started in target core. Unable to locate ITT: 0x05000000 on CID: 0 Unable to locate RefTaskTag: 0x05000000 on CID: 0. wait_for_tasks: Stopping tmf LUN_RESET with tag 0x0 ref_task_tag 0x0 i_state 34 t_state ISTATE_PROCESSING refcnt 2 transport_state active,stop,fabric_stop wait for tasks: tmf LUN_RESET with tag 0x0 ref_task_tag 0x0 i_state 34 t_state ISTATE_PROCESSING refcnt 2 transport_state active,stop,fabric_stop ... INFO: task kworker/0:2:49 blocked for more than 491 seconds. task:kworker/0:2 state:D stack: 0 pid: 49 ppid: 2 flags:0x00000800 Workqueue: events target_tmr_work [target_core_mod] Call Trace: __switch_to+0x2c4/0x470 _schedule+0x314/0x1730 schedule+0x64/0x130 schedule_timeout+0x168/0x430 wait_for_completion+0x140/0x270 target_put_cmd_and_wait+0x64/0xb0 [target_core_mod] core_tmr_lun_reset+0x30/0xa0 [target_core_mod] target_tmr_work+0xc8/0x1b0 [target_core_mod] process_one_work+0x2d4/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x78/0x6c0 To fix this, only add abort to tmr_list if it will be handled by target core. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Bogdanov <d.bogdanov(a)yadro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240111125941.8688-1-d.bogdanov@yadro.com Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Cui GaoSheng <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 5 ----- drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c index e9ff2a7c0c0e..f990aae1d621 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c @@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ int transport_lookup_tmr_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u64 unpacked_lun) struct se_session *se_sess = se_cmd->se_sess; struct se_node_acl *nacl = se_sess->se_node_acl; struct se_tmr_req *se_tmr = se_cmd->se_tmr_req; - unsigned long flags; rcu_read_lock(); deve = target_nacl_find_deve(nacl, unpacked_lun); @@ -195,10 +194,6 @@ int transport_lookup_tmr_lun(struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u64 unpacked_lun) se_cmd->se_dev = rcu_dereference_raw(se_lun->lun_se_dev); se_tmr->tmr_dev = rcu_dereference_raw(se_lun->lun_se_dev); - spin_lock_irqsave(&se_tmr->tmr_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); - list_add_tail(&se_tmr->tmr_list, &se_tmr->tmr_dev->dev_tmr_list); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&se_tmr->tmr_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); - return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(transport_lookup_tmr_lun); diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c index 9c60a090cfd1..7bd863e2c05b 100644 --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c @@ -3431,6 +3431,10 @@ int transport_generic_handle_tmr( unsigned long flags; bool aborted = false; + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmd->se_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); + list_add_tail(&cmd->se_tmr_req->tmr_list, &cmd->se_dev->dev_tmr_list); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cmd->se_dev->se_tmr_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&cmd->t_state_lock, flags); if (cmd->transport_state & CMD_T_ABORTED) { aborted = true; -- 2.34.1

1 0

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/2] block: fix discard
by Li Nan 06 May '24

06 May '24

Li Nan (2): block: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard() block: check io size before submit discard block/blk-lib.c | 8 ++++++++ block/ioctl.c | 5 +++-- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.39.2

2 3

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] block: fix overflow in blk_ioctl_discard()
by Li Nan 06 May '24

06 May '24

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc3 commit 22d24a544b0d49bbcbd61c8c0eaf77d3c9297155 category: bugfix bugzilla: 189755, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9K0H3 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- There is no check for overflow of 'start + len' in blk_ioctl_discard(). Hung task occurs if submit an discard ioctl with the following param: start = 0x80000000000ff000, len = 0x8000000000fff000; Add the overflow validation now. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch(a)lst.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240329012319.2034550-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> Conflict: block/ioctl.c Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> --- block/ioctl.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/ioctl.c b/block/ioctl.c index 1d2b7f701288..1fdf496d7717 100644 --- a/block/ioctl.c +++ b/block/ioctl.c @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, unsigned long arg, unsigned long flags) { uint64_t range[2]; - uint64_t start, len; + uint64_t start, len, end; struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev); int err; @@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ static int blk_ioctl_discard(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, if (len & 511) return -EINVAL; - if (start + len > i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode)) + if (check_add_overflow(start, len, &end) || + end > i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode)) return -EINVAL; err = truncate_bdev_range(bdev, mode, start, start + len - 1); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] rtmutex: Add acquire semantics for rtmutex lock acquisition slow path
by Yang Yingliang 06 May '24

06 May '24

From: Mel Gorman <mgorman(a)techsingularity.net> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.2-rc2 commit 1c0908d8e441631f5b8ba433523cf39339ee2ba0 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9JNPZ Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- Jan Kara reported the following bug triggering on 6.0.5-rt14 running dbench on XFS on arm64. kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:625! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP CPU: 11 PID: 6611 Comm: dbench Tainted: G E 6.0.0-rt14-rt+ #1 pc : clear_inode+0xa0/0xc0 lr : clear_inode+0x38/0xc0 Call trace: clear_inode+0xa0/0xc0 evict+0x160/0x180 iput+0x154/0x240 do_unlinkat+0x184/0x300 __arm64_sys_unlinkat+0x48/0xc0 el0_svc_common.constprop.4+0xe4/0x2c0 do_el0_svc+0xac/0x100 el0_svc+0x78/0x200 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x9c/0xc0 el0t_64_sync+0x19c/0x1a0 It also affects 6.1-rc7-rt5 and affects a preempt-rt fork of 5.14 so this is likely a bug that existed forever and only became visible when ARM support was added to preempt-rt. The same problem does not occur on x86-64 and he also reported that converting sb->s_inode_wblist_lock to raw_spinlock_t makes the problem disappear indicating that the RT spinlock variant is the problem. Which in turn means that RT mutexes on ARM64 and any other weakly ordered architecture are affected by this independent of RT. Will Deacon observed: "I'd be more inclined to be suspicious of the slowpath tbh, as we need to make sure that we have acquire semantics on all paths where the lock can be taken. Looking at the rtmutex code, this really isn't obvious to me -- for example, try_to_take_rt_mutex() appears to be able to return via the 'takeit' label without acquire semantics and it looks like we might be relying on the caller's subsequent _unlock_ of the wait_lock for ordering, but that will give us release semantics which aren't correct." Sebastian Andrzej Siewior prototyped a fix that does work based on that comment but it was a little bit overkill and added some fences that should not be necessary. The lock owner is updated with an IRQ-safe raw spinlock held, but the spin_unlock does not provide acquire semantics which are needed when acquiring a mutex. Adds the necessary acquire semantics for lock owner updates in the slow path acquisition and the waiter bit logic. It successfully completed 10 iterations of the dbench workload while the vanilla kernel fails on the first iteration. [ bigeasy(a)linutronix.de: Initial prototype fix ] Fixes: 700318d1d7b38 ("locking/rtmutex: Use acquire/release semantics") Fixes: 23f78d4a03c5 ("[PATCH] pi-futex: rt mutex core") Reported-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman(a)techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx(a)linutronix.de> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202100223.6mevpbl7i6x5udfd@techsingularity.n… Conflicts: kernel/locking/rtmutex.c kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c [yyl: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c index a82d1176e7c6..9d24d2263a86 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c @@ -49,15 +49,31 @@ * set this bit before looking at the lock. */ -static void -rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner) +static struct task_struct * +rt_mutex_owner_encode(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner) { unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner; if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS; - WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, (struct task_struct *)val); + return (struct task_struct *)val; +} + +static void +rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner) +{ + /* + * lock->wait_lock is held but explicit acquire semantics are needed + * for a new lock owner so WRITE_ONCE is insufficient. + */ + xchg_acquire(&lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, owner)); +} + +static void rt_mutex_clear_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock) +{ + /* lock->wait_lock is held so the unlock provides release semantics. */ + WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, NULL)); } static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) @@ -66,7 +82,7 @@ static inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) ((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); } -static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) +static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock, bool acquire_lock) { unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner; @@ -132,8 +148,21 @@ static void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) * still set. */ owner = READ_ONCE(*p); - if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) - WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); + if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) { + /* + * See rt_mutex_set_owner() and rt_mutex_clear_owner() on + * why xchg_acquire() is used for updating owner for + * locking and WRITE_ONCE() for unlocking. + * + * WRITE_ONCE() would work for the acquire case too, but + * in case that the lock acquisition failed it might + * force other lockers into the slow path unnecessarily. + */ + if (acquire_lock) + xchg_acquire(p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); + else + WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS); + } } /* @@ -157,6 +186,13 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock) owner = *p; } while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner); + + /* + * The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE + * operations in the event of contention. Ensure the successful + * cmpxchg is visible. + */ + smp_mb__after_atomic(); } /* @@ -1255,7 +1291,7 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state, * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up. */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lock->wait_lock, flags); @@ -1276,7 +1312,7 @@ static inline int __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock) * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit * unconditionally. Clean this up. */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); return ret; } @@ -1701,7 +1737,7 @@ void rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex *lock, void rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex *lock) { debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock); - rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL); + rt_mutex_clear_owner(lock); } /** @@ -1838,7 +1874,7 @@ int rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might * have to fix that up. */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); return ret; @@ -1894,7 +1930,7 @@ bool rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock, * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might * have to fix that up. */ - fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock); + fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, false); raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock); -- 2.25.1

2 1