From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v7.1-rc1 commit d8e27d2d22b6e2df3a0125b8c08e9aace38c954c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/15786 CVE: CVE-2026-53085 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- The open-coded task_vma iterator reads task->mm locklessly and acquires mmap_read_trylock() but never calls mmget(). If the task exits concurrently, the mm_struct can be freed as it is not SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, resulting in a use-after-free. Safely read task->mm with a trylock on alloc_lock and acquire an mm reference. Drop the reference via bpf_iter_mmput_async() in _destroy() and error paths. bpf_iter_mmput_async() is a local wrapper around mmput_async() with a fallback to mmput() on !CONFIG_MMU. Reject irqs-disabled contexts (including NMI) up front. Operations used by _next() and _destroy() (mmap_read_unlock, bpf_iter_mmput_async) take spinlocks with IRQs disabled (pool->lock, pi_lock). Running from NMI or from a tracepoint that fires with those locks held could deadlock. A trylock on alloc_lock is used instead of the blocking task_lock() (get_task_mm) to avoid a deadlock when a softirq BPF program iterates a task that already holds its alloc_lock on the same CPU. Fixes: 4ac454682158 ("bpf: Introduce task_vma open-coded iterator kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260408154539.3832150-2-puranjay@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c index 145c506899e4..26284c8a8c72 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/bpf_mem_alloc.h> #include <linux/btf_ids.h> #include <linux/mm_types.h> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h> #include "mmap_unlock_work.h" static const char * const iter_task_type_names[] = { @@ -825,6 +826,15 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_find_vma_proto = { .arg5_type = ARG_ANYTHING, }; +static inline void bpf_iter_mmput_async(struct mm_struct *mm) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_MMU + mmput_async(mm); +#else + mmput(mm); +#endif +} + struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data { struct task_struct *task; struct mm_struct *mm; @@ -856,6 +866,24 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_vma_new(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it, BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern) != sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_vma)); BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_vma_kern) != __alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_vma)); + /* bpf_iter_mmput_async() needs mmput_async() which requires CONFIG_MMU */ + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMU)) { + kit->data = NULL; + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + + /* + * Reject irqs-disabled contexts including NMI. Operations used + * by _next() and _destroy() (mmap_read_unlock, bpf_iter_mmput_async) + * can take spinlocks with IRQs disabled (pi_lock, pool->lock). + * Running from NMI or from a tracepoint that fires with those + * locks held could deadlock. + */ + if (irqs_disabled()) { + kit->data = NULL; + return -EBUSY; + } + /* is_iter_reg_valid_uninit guarantees that kit hasn't been initialized * before, so non-NULL kit->data doesn't point to previously * bpf_mem_alloc'd bpf_iter_task_vma_kern_data @@ -865,7 +893,25 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_vma_new(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it, return -ENOMEM; kit->data->task = get_task_struct(task); + /* + * Safely read task->mm and acquire an mm reference. + * + * Cannot use get_task_mm() because its task_lock() is a + * blocking spin_lock that would deadlock if the target task + * already holds alloc_lock on this CPU (e.g. a softirq BPF + * program iterating a task interrupted while holding its + * alloc_lock). + */ + if (!spin_trylock(&task->alloc_lock)) { + err = -EBUSY; + goto err_cleanup_iter; + } kit->data->mm = task->mm; + if (kit->data->mm && !(task->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) + mmget(kit->data->mm); + else + kit->data->mm = NULL; + spin_unlock(&task->alloc_lock); if (!kit->data->mm) { err = -ENOENT; goto err_cleanup_iter; @@ -875,15 +921,16 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_vma_new(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it, irq_work_busy = bpf_mmap_unlock_get_irq_work(&kit->data->work); if (irq_work_busy || !mmap_read_trylock(kit->data->mm)) { err = -EBUSY; - goto err_cleanup_iter; + goto err_cleanup_mmget; } vma_iter_init(&kit->data->vmi, kit->data->mm, addr); return 0; +err_cleanup_mmget: + bpf_iter_mmput_async(kit->data->mm); err_cleanup_iter: - if (kit->data->task) - put_task_struct(kit->data->task); + put_task_struct(kit->data->task); bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->data); /* NULL kit->data signals failed bpf_iter_task_vma initialization */ kit->data = NULL; @@ -906,6 +953,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it) if (kit->data) { bpf_mmap_unlock_mm(kit->data->work, kit->data->mm); put_task_struct(kit->data->task); + bpf_iter_mmput_async(kit->data->mm); bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, kit->data); } } -- 2.34.1