From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v7.1-rc2 commit 101f3498b4bdfef97152a444847948de1543f692 category: other bugzilla: NA Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i... -------------------------------- Zicheng Qu reported that, because avg_vruntime() always includes cfs_rq->curr, when ->on_rq, place_entity() doesn't work right. Specifically, the lag scaling in place_entity() relies on avg_vruntime() being the state *before* placement of the new entity. However in this case avg_vruntime() will actually already include the entity, which breaks things. Also, Zicheng Qu argues that avg_vruntime should be invariant under reweight. IOW commit 6d71a9c61604 ("sched/fair: Fix EEVDF entity placement bug causing scheduling lag") was wrong! The issue reported in 6d71a9c61604 could possibly be explained by rounding artifacts -- notably the extreme weight '2' is outside of the range of avg_vruntime/sum_w_vruntime, since that uses scale_load_down(). By scaling vruntime by the real weight, but accounting it in vruntime with a factor 1024 more, the average moves significantly. However, that is now cured. Tested by reverting 66951e4860d3 ("sched/fair: Fix update_cfs_group() vs DELAY_DEQUEUE") and tracing vruntime and vlag figures again. Reported-by: Zicheng Qu <quzicheng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Tested-by: Shubhang Kaushik <shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260219080625.066102672%40infradead.org Conflicts: kernel/sched/fair.c [context conflicts] Signed-off-by: Chen Jinghuang <chenjinghuang2@huawei.com> --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 147 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index c70715c24bc8..5ba5a6ae0243 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -974,17 +974,22 @@ static inline u64 cfs_rq_max_slice(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq); * * -r_max < lag < max(r_max, q) */ -static void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +static s64 entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, u64 avruntime) { u64 max_slice = cfs_rq_max_slice(cfs_rq) + TICK_NSEC; s64 vlag, limit; - SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq); - - vlag = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq) - se->vruntime; + vlag = avruntime - se->vruntime; limit = calc_delta_fair(max_slice, se); - se->vlag = clamp(vlag, -limit, limit); + return clamp(vlag, -limit, limit); +} + +static void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) +{ + WARN_ON_ONCE(!se->on_rq); + + se->vlag = entity_lag(cfs_rq, se, avg_vruntime(cfs_rq)); } /* @@ -4064,23 +4069,125 @@ static inline void dequeue_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se) { } #endif -static void place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags); +static void +rescale_entity(struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long weight, bool rel_vprot) +{ + unsigned long old_weight = se->load.weight; + + /* + * VRUNTIME + * -------- + * + * COROLLARY #1: The virtual runtime of the entity needs to be + * adjusted if re-weight at !0-lag point. + * + * Proof: For contradiction assume this is not true, so we can + * re-weight without changing vruntime at !0-lag point. + * + * Weight VRuntime Avg-VRuntime + * before w v V + * after w' v' V' + * + * Since lag needs to be preserved through re-weight: + * + * lag = (V - v)*w = (V'- v')*w', where v = v' + * ==> V' = (V - v)*w/w' + v (1) + * + * Let W be the total weight of the entities before reweight, + * since V' is the new weighted average of entities: + * + * V' = (WV + w'v - wv) / (W + w' - w) (2) + * + * by using (1) & (2) we obtain: + * + * (WV + w'v - wv) / (W + w' - w) = (V - v)*w/w' + v + * ==> (WV-Wv+Wv+w'v-wv)/(W+w'-w) = (V - v)*w/w' + v + * ==> (WV - Wv)/(W + w' - w) + v = (V - v)*w/w' + v + * ==> (V - v)*W/(W + w' - w) = (V - v)*w/w' (3) + * + * Since we are doing at !0-lag point which means V != v, we + * can simplify (3): + * + * ==> W / (W + w' - w) = w / w' + * ==> Ww' = Ww + ww' - ww + * ==> W * (w' - w) = w * (w' - w) + * ==> W = w (re-weight indicates w' != w) + * + * So the cfs_rq contains only one entity, hence vruntime of + * the entity @v should always equal to the cfs_rq's weighted + * average vruntime @V, which means we will always re-weight + * at 0-lag point, thus breach assumption. Proof completed. + * + * + * COROLLARY #2: Re-weight does NOT affect weighted average + * vruntime of all the entities. + * + * Proof: According to corollary #1, Eq. (1) should be: + * + * (V - v)*w = (V' - v')*w' + * ==> v' = V' - (V - v)*w/w' (4) + * + * According to the weighted average formula, we have: + * + * V' = (WV - wv + w'v') / (W - w + w') + * = (WV - wv + w'(V' - (V - v)w/w')) / (W - w + w') + * = (WV - wv + w'V' - Vw + wv) / (W - w + w') + * = (WV + w'V' - Vw) / (W - w + w') + * + * ==> V'*(W - w + w') = WV + w'V' - Vw + * ==> V' * (W - w) = (W - w) * V (5) + * + * If the entity is the only one in the cfs_rq, then reweight + * always occurs at 0-lag point, so V won't change. Or else + * there are other entities, hence W != w, then Eq. (5) turns + * into V' = V. So V won't change in either case, proof done. + * + * + * So according to corollary #1 & #2, the effect of re-weight + * on vruntime should be: + * + * v' = V' - (V - v) * w / w' (4) + * = V - (V - v) * w / w' + * = V - vl * w / w' + * = V - vl' + */ + se->vlag = div64_long(se->vlag * old_weight, weight); + + /* + * DEADLINE + * -------- + * + * When the weight changes, the virtual time slope changes and + * we should adjust the relative virtual deadline accordingly. + * + * d' = v' + (d - v)*w/w' + * = V' - (V - v)*w/w' + (d - v)*w/w' + * = V - (V - v)*w/w' + (d - v)*w/w' + * = V + (d - V)*w/w' + */ + if (se->rel_deadline) + se->deadline = div64_long(se->deadline * old_weight, weight); + + if (rel_vprot) + se->vprot = div64_long(se->vprot * old_weight, weight); +} static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, unsigned long weight) { bool curr = cfs_rq->curr == se; bool rel_vprot = false; - u64 vprot; + u64 avruntime = 0; if (se->on_rq) { /* commit outstanding execution time */ update_curr(cfs_rq); - update_entity_lag(cfs_rq, se); - se->deadline -= se->vruntime; + avruntime = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq); + se->vlag = entity_lag(cfs_rq, se, avruntime); + se->deadline -= avruntime; se->rel_deadline = 1; if (curr && protect_slice(se)) { - vprot = se->vprot - se->vruntime; + se->vprot -= avruntime; rel_vprot = true; } @@ -4091,16 +4198,7 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, } dequeue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se); - /* - * Because we keep se->vlag = V - v_i, while: lag_i = w_i*(V - v_i), - * we need to scale se->vlag when w_i changes. - */ - se->vlag = div_s64(se->vlag * se->load.weight, weight); - if (se->rel_deadline) - se->deadline = div_s64(se->deadline * se->load.weight, weight); - - if (rel_vprot) - vprot = div_s64(vprot * se->load.weight, weight); + rescale_entity(se, weight, rel_vprot); update_load_set(&se->load, weight); @@ -4114,9 +4212,12 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se); if (se->on_rq) { - place_entity(cfs_rq, se, curr ? ENQUEUE_REWEIGHT_CURR : 0); if (rel_vprot) - se->vprot = se->vruntime + vprot; + se->vprot += avruntime; + se->deadline += avruntime; + se->rel_deadline = 0; + se->vruntime = avruntime - se->vlag; + update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight); if (!curr) __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se); @@ -5591,7 +5692,7 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags) skip_lag_scale: se->vruntime = vruntime - lag; - if (se->rel_deadline) { + if (sched_feat(PLACE_REL_DEADLINE) && se->rel_deadline) { se->deadline += se->vruntime; se->rel_deadline = 0; return; -- 2.34.1