[PATCH OLK-6.6 v2 0/2] kabi reserve for memcg and cgroup_bpf
v2->v1: 1)change the kabi reserve number for struct cgroup_bpf. 2)delete the reserve for memcg_vmstats{percpu} Lu Jialin (2): memcg/kabi: reserve space for memcg related structures cgroup_bpf/kabi: reserve space for cgroup_bpf releated structure include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/bpf.h | 11 +++++++++++ include/linux/memcontrol.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+) -- 2.34.1
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8TP4Z -------------------------------- We reserve some fields beforehand for memcg related structures prone to change, therefore, we can hot add/change features of memcg with this enhancement. After reserving, normally cache does not matter as the reserved fields are not accessed at all. Signed-off-by: Lu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com> --- include/linux/memcontrol.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 31aff8b9286a..bcdc74961a2f 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <linux/vmstat.h> #include <linux/writeback.h> #include <linux/page-flags.h> +#include <linux/kabi.h> struct mem_cgroup; struct obj_cgroup; @@ -51,6 +52,12 @@ enum memcg_memory_event { MEMCG_SWAP_HIGH, MEMCG_SWAP_MAX, MEMCG_SWAP_FAIL, +#ifdef CONFIG_KABI_RESERVE + MEMCG_MEMORY_EVENTS_RESERVE_1, + MEMCG_MEMORY_EVENTS_RESERVE_2, + MEMCG_MEMORY_EVENTS_RESERVE_3, + MEMCG_MEMORY_EVENTS_RESERVE_4, +#endif MEMCG_NR_MEMORY_EVENTS, }; @@ -66,6 +73,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_cookie { struct mem_cgroup_id { int id; refcount_t ref; + KABI_RESERVE(1) }; /* @@ -117,6 +125,9 @@ struct lruvec_stats { /* Pending child counts during tree propagation */ long state_pending[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS]; + + KABI_RESERVE(1) + KABI_RESERVE(2) }; /* @@ -140,6 +151,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node { bool on_tree; struct mem_cgroup *memcg; /* Back pointer, we cannot */ /* use container_of */ + + KABI_RESERVE(1) + KABI_RESERVE(2) }; struct mem_cgroup_threshold { @@ -166,6 +180,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup_thresholds { * It must be able to store at least primary->size - 1 entries. */ struct mem_cgroup_threshold_ary *spare; + + KABI_RESERVE(1) + KABI_RESERVE(2) }; /* @@ -350,6 +367,14 @@ struct mem_cgroup { bool high_async_reclaim; #endif + KABI_RESERVE(1) + KABI_RESERVE(2) + KABI_RESERVE(3) + KABI_RESERVE(4) + KABI_RESERVE(5) + KABI_RESERVE(6) + KABI_RESERVE(7) + KABI_RESERVE(8) struct mem_cgroup_per_node *nodeinfo[]; }; -- 2.34.1
hulk inclusion category: feature bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I8TP4Z -------------------------------- We reserve some fields beforehand for cgroup_bpf_attach_type bpf_cgroup_storage_type prone and struct cgroup_bpf to change, therefore, we can hot add/change features of bpf cgroup with this enhancement. After reserving, normally cache does not matter as the reserved fields are not accessed at all. Signed-off-by: Lu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com> --- include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/bpf.h | 11 +++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h index 7b121bd780eb..ed04fe751dd0 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf-cgroup-defs.h @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <linux/list.h> #include <linux/percpu-refcount.h> #include <linux/workqueue.h> +#include <linux/kabi.h> struct bpf_prog_array; @@ -44,6 +45,16 @@ enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type { CGROUP_INET_SOCK_RELEASE, CGROUP_LSM_START, CGROUP_LSM_END = CGROUP_LSM_START + CGROUP_LSM_NUM - 1, +#ifdef CONFIG_KABI_RESERVE + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_1, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_2, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_3, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_4, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_5, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_6, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_7, + CGROUP_ATTACH_TYPE_KABI_RESERVE_8, +#endif MAX_CGROUP_BPF_ATTACH_TYPE }; @@ -70,6 +81,15 @@ struct cgroup_bpf { /* cgroup_bpf is released using a work queue */ struct work_struct release_work; + + KABI_RESERVE(1) + KABI_RESERVE(2) + KABI_RESERVE(3) + KABI_RESERVE(4) + KABI_RESERVE(5) + KABI_RESERVE(6) + KABI_RESERVE(7) + KABI_RESERVE(8) }; #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF */ diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h index 392f581af2ce..5ac22a961534 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h> #include <linux/static_call.h> #include <linux/memcontrol.h> +#include <linux/kabi.h> struct bpf_verifier_env; struct bpf_verifier_log; @@ -974,6 +975,16 @@ struct bpf_prog_offload { enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type { BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED, BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_PERCPU, +#ifdef CONFIG_KABI_RESERVE + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_1, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_2, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_3, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_4, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_5, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_6, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_7, + BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_KABI_RESERVE_8, +#endif __BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_MAX }; -- 2.34.1
反馈： 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集，已成功转换为PR！ PR链接地址： https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3856 邮件列表地址：https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/I... FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/3856 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/I...
participants (2)
-
Lu Jialin -
patchwork bot