October 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 18629/30000] drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_main.c:61:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_open'
by kernel test robot 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

Hi Yizhen, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 5dabb43a473af8dee4493436b2946432f83d2620 commit: 95c713224477ac3433652331dd715e9bbcbc793a [18629/30000] ub: init ubcore module config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241029/202410291112.nLGMJoif-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241029/202410291112.nLGMJoif-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410291112.nLGMJoif-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_main.c:61:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_open' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 61 | int ubcore_open(struct inode *i_node, struct file *filp) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ubcore_open +61 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_main.c 60 > 61 int ubcore_open(struct inode *i_node, struct file *filp) 62 { 63 return 0; 64 } 65 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays
by Bowen You 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.269 commit cff35329070b96b4484d23f9f48a5ca2c947e750 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRFA CVE: CVE-2022-48967 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e329e71013c9b5a4535b099208493c7826ee4a64 ] While running under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, syzkaller reported: memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 129) of single field "target->sensf_res" at net/nfc/nci/ntf.c:260 (size 18) This appears to be a legitimate lack of bounds checking in nci_add_new_protocol(). Add the missing checks. Reported-by: syzbot+210e196cef4711b65139(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000001c590f05ee7b3ff4@google.com Fixes: 019c4fbaa790 ("NFC: Add NCI multiple targets support") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202214410.never.693-kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bowen You <youbowen2(a)huawei.com> --- net/nfc/nci/ntf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c index 1e8c1a12aaec..4f75453c07aa 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c @@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, target->sens_res = nfca_poll->sens_res; target->sel_res = nfca_poll->sel_res; target->nfcid1_len = nfca_poll->nfcid1_len; + if (target->nfcid1_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->nfcid1)) + return -EPROTO; if (target->nfcid1_len > 0) { memcpy(target->nfcid1, nfca_poll->nfcid1, target->nfcid1_len); @@ -238,6 +240,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, nfcb_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcb_poll *)params; target->sensb_res_len = nfcb_poll->sensb_res_len; + if (target->sensb_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensb_res)) + return -EPROTO; if (target->sensb_res_len > 0) { memcpy(target->sensb_res, nfcb_poll->sensb_res, target->sensb_res_len); @@ -246,6 +250,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, nfcf_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcf_poll *)params; target->sensf_res_len = nfcf_poll->sensf_res_len; + if (target->sensf_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensf_res)) + return -EPROTO; if (target->sensf_res_len > 0) { memcpy(target->sensf_res, nfcf_poll->sensf_res, target->sensf_res_len); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] libbpf: Handle size overflow for ringbuf mmap
by Pu Lehui 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Hou Tao <houtao1(a)huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.158 commit 8a549ab6724520aa3c07f47e0eba820293551490 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRFE CVE: CVE-2022-49030 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 927cbb478adf917e0a142b94baa37f06279cc466 ] The maximum size of ringbuf is 2GB on x86-64 host, so 2 * max_entries will overflow u32 when mapping producer page and data pages. Only casting max_entries to size_t is not enough, because for 32-bits application on 64-bits kernel the size of read-only mmap region also could overflow size_t. So fixing it by casting the size of read-only mmap region into a __u64 and checking whether or not there will be overflow during mmap. Fixes: bf99c936f947 ("libbpf: Add BPF ring buffer support") Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221116072351.1168938-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c index 86c31c787fb9..5e242be45206 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ int ring_buffer__add(struct ring_buffer *rb, int map_fd, __u32 len = sizeof(info); struct epoll_event *e; struct ring *r; + __u64 mmap_sz; void *tmp; int err; @@ -97,8 +98,7 @@ int ring_buffer__add(struct ring_buffer *rb, int map_fd, r->mask = info.max_entries - 1; /* Map writable consumer page */ - tmp = mmap(NULL, rb->page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, - map_fd, 0); + tmp = mmap(NULL, rb->page_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, map_fd, 0); if (tmp == MAP_FAILED) { err = -errno; pr_warn("ringbuf: failed to mmap consumer page for map fd=%d: %d\n", @@ -111,8 +111,12 @@ int ring_buffer__add(struct ring_buffer *rb, int map_fd, * data size to allow simple reading of samples that wrap around the * end of a ring buffer. See kernel implementation for details. * */ - tmp = mmap(NULL, rb->page_size + 2 * info.max_entries, PROT_READ, - MAP_SHARED, map_fd, rb->page_size); + mmap_sz = rb->page_size + 2 * (__u64)info.max_entries; + if (mmap_sz != (__u64)(size_t)mmap_sz) { + pr_warn("ringbuf: ring buffer size (%u) is too big\n", info.max_entries); + return -E2BIG; + } + tmp = mmap(NULL, (size_t)mmap_sz, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, map_fd, rb->page_size); if (tmp == MAP_FAILED) { err = -errno; ringbuf_unmap_ring(rb, r); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] net: ethernet: nixge: fix NULL dereference
by Pu Lehui 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Yuri Karpov <YKarpov(a)ispras.ru> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.158 commit 45752af0247589e6d3dede577415bfe117b4392c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRDM CVE: CVE-2022-49019 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 9256db4e45e8b497b0e993cc3ed4ad08eb2389b6 ] In function nixge_hw_dma_bd_release() dereference of NULL pointer priv->rx_bd_v is possible for the case of its allocation failure in nixge_hw_dma_bd_init(). Move for() loop with priv->rx_bd_v dereference under the check for its validity. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. Fixes: 492caffa8a1a ("net: ethernet: nixge: Add support for National Instruments XGE netdev") Signed-off-by: Yuri Karpov <YKarpov(a)ispras.ru> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ni/nixge.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ni/nixge.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ni/nixge.c index 17205264c2c1..e5a4a2753e17 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ni/nixge.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ni/nixge.c @@ -249,25 +249,26 @@ static void nixge_hw_dma_bd_release(struct net_device *ndev) struct sk_buff *skb; int i; - for (i = 0; i < RX_BD_NUM; i++) { - phys_addr = nixge_hw_dma_bd_get_addr(&priv->rx_bd_v[i], - phys); - - dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent, phys_addr, - NIXGE_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE, - DMA_FROM_DEVICE); - - skb = (struct sk_buff *)(uintptr_t) - nixge_hw_dma_bd_get_addr(&priv->rx_bd_v[i], - sw_id_offset); - dev_kfree_skb(skb); - } + if (priv->rx_bd_v) { + for (i = 0; i < RX_BD_NUM; i++) { + phys_addr = nixge_hw_dma_bd_get_addr(&priv->rx_bd_v[i], + phys); + + dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent, phys_addr, + NIXGE_MAX_JUMBO_FRAME_SIZE, + DMA_FROM_DEVICE); + + skb = (struct sk_buff *)(uintptr_t) + nixge_hw_dma_bd_get_addr(&priv->rx_bd_v[i], + sw_id_offset); + dev_kfree_skb(skb); + } - if (priv->rx_bd_v) dma_free_coherent(ndev->dev.parent, sizeof(*priv->rx_bd_v) * RX_BD_NUM, priv->rx_bd_v, priv->rx_bd_p); + } if (priv->tx_skb) devm_kfree(ndev->dev.parent, priv->tx_skb); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] hwmon: (ibmpex) Fix possible UAF when ibmpex_register_bmc() fails
by Cui GaoSheng 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.158 commit 90907cd4d11351ff76c9a447bcb5db0e264c47cd category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRE1 CVE: CVE-2022-49029 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e2a87785aab0dac190ac89be6a9ba955e2c634f2 ] Smatch report warning as follows: drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c:509 ibmpex_register_bmc() warn: '&data->list' not removed from list If ibmpex_find_sensors() fails in ibmpex_register_bmc(), data will be freed, but data->list will not be removed from driver_data.bmc_data, then list traversal may cause UAF. Fix by removeing it from driver_data.bmc_data before free(). Fixes: 57c7c3a0fdea ("hwmon: IBM power meter driver") Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117034423.2935739-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Cui GaoSheng <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c index b2ab83c9fd9a..fe90f0536d76 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c @@ -502,6 +502,7 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev) return; out_register: + list_del(&data->list); hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev); out_user: ipmi_destroy_user(data->user); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] hwmon: (ibmpex) Fix possible UAF when ibmpex_register_bmc() fails
by Cui GaoSheng 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.268 commit 24b9633f7db7f4809be7053df1d2e117e7c2de10 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRE1 CVE: CVE-2022-49029 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e2a87785aab0dac190ac89be6a9ba955e2c634f2 ] Smatch report warning as follows: drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c:509 ibmpex_register_bmc() warn: '&data->list' not removed from list If ibmpex_find_sensors() fails in ibmpex_register_bmc(), data will be freed, but data->list will not be removed from driver_data.bmc_data, then list traversal may cause UAF. Fix by removeing it from driver_data.bmc_data before free(). Fixes: 57c7c3a0fdea ("hwmon: IBM power meter driver") Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117034423.2935739-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Cui GaoSheng <cuigaosheng1(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c index ab72cabf5a95..e289c845f970 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/ibmpex.c @@ -517,6 +517,7 @@ static void ibmpex_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev) return; out_register: + list_del(&data->list); hwmon_device_unregister(data->hwmon_dev); out_user: ipmi_destroy_user(data->user); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 7038/15358] bma_cdev.c:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `debug'; drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/bma/edma_drv/bma_pci.o:bma_pci.c:(.bss+0x0): first defined here
by kernel test robot 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 27e5d43e49e85d816bd05ffe8672ceea631a07e4 commit: 0b6609ecfba8575f870350666ab13e25accc8d14 [7038/15358] Huawei BMA: Adding Huawei BMA driver: host_cdev_drv config: loongarch-randconfig-001-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241029/202410291139.y46hXQik-lkp@…) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241029/202410291139.y46hXQik-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410291139.y46hXQik-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): loongarch64-linux-ld: drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/bma/cdev_drv/bma_cdev.o: in function `.LANCHOR1': >> bma_cdev.c:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `debug'; drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/bma/edma_drv/bma_pci.o:bma_pci.c:(.bss+0x0): first defined here -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] NFC: nci: Bounds check struct nfc_target arrays
by Bowen You 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.159 commit 27eb2d7a1b9987b6d0429b7716b1ff3b82c4ffc9 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRFA CVE: CVE-2022-48967 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e329e71013c9b5a4535b099208493c7826ee4a64 ] While running under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, syzkaller reported: memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 129) of single field "target->sensf_res" at net/nfc/nci/ntf.c:260 (size 18) This appears to be a legitimate lack of bounds checking in nci_add_new_protocol(). Add the missing checks. Reported-by: syzbot+210e196cef4711b65139(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000001c590f05ee7b3ff4@google.com Fixes: 019c4fbaa790 ("NFC: Add NCI multiple targets support") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski(a)linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202214410.never.693-kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bowen You <youbowen2(a)huawei.com> --- net/nfc/nci/ntf.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c index 33e1170817f0..f8b20cddd5c9 100644 --- a/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c +++ b/net/nfc/nci/ntf.c @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, target->sens_res = nfca_poll->sens_res; target->sel_res = nfca_poll->sel_res; target->nfcid1_len = nfca_poll->nfcid1_len; + if (target->nfcid1_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->nfcid1)) + return -EPROTO; if (target->nfcid1_len > 0) { memcpy(target->nfcid1, nfca_poll->nfcid1, target->nfcid1_len); @@ -226,6 +228,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, nfcb_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcb_poll *)params; target->sensb_res_len = nfcb_poll->sensb_res_len; + if (target->sensb_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensb_res)) + return -EPROTO; if (target->sensb_res_len > 0) { memcpy(target->sensb_res, nfcb_poll->sensb_res, target->sensb_res_len); @@ -234,6 +238,8 @@ static int nci_add_new_protocol(struct nci_dev *ndev, nfcf_poll = (struct rf_tech_specific_params_nfcf_poll *)params; target->sensf_res_len = nfcf_poll->sensf_res_len; + if (target->sensf_res_len > ARRAY_SIZE(target->sensf_res)) + return -EPROTO; if (target->sensf_res_len > 0) { memcpy(target->sensf_res, nfcf_poll->sensf_res, target->sensf_res_len); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] apparmor: fix policy_unpack_test on big endian systems
by Gu Bowen 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.225 commit 7e8bad2cf3930e2ff7cab10644ca111bacaba398 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/IB0D93 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 98c0cc48e27e9d269a3e4db2acd72b486c88ec77 ] policy_unpack_test fails on big endian systems because data byte order is expected to be little endian but is generated in host byte order. This results in test failures such as: # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:150 Expected array_size == (u16)16, but array_size == 4096 (0x1000) (u16)16 == 16 (0x10) # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1 not ok 3 policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_null_name # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c:164 Expected array_size == (u16)16, but array_size == 4096 (0x1000) (u16)16 == 16 (0x10) # policy_unpack_test_unpack_array_with_name: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1 Add the missing endianness conversions when generating test data. Fixes: 4d944bcd4e73 ("apparmor: add AppArmor KUnit tests for policy unpack") Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Gu Bowen <gubowen5(a)huawei.com> --- security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c index 533137f45361..4951d9bef579 100644 --- a/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c +++ b/security/apparmor/policy_unpack_test.c @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf, *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1; strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_U32_NAME); *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 1) = AA_U32; - *((u32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U32_DATA; + *((__le32 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U32_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le32(TEST_U32_DATA); buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_U64_BUF_OFFSET; *buf = AA_NAME; *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1; strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_U64_NAME); *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 1) = AA_U64; - *((u64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_U64_DATA; + *((__le64 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_U64_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le64(TEST_U64_DATA); buf = e->start + TEST_NAMED_BLOB_BUF_OFFSET; *buf = AA_NAME; @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ struct aa_ext *build_aa_ext_struct(struct policy_unpack_fixture *puf, *(buf + 1) = strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1; strcpy(buf + 3, TEST_ARRAY_NAME); *(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 1) = AA_ARRAY; - *((u16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = TEST_ARRAY_SIZE; + *((__le16 *)(buf + 3 + strlen(TEST_ARRAY_NAME) + 2)) = cpu_to_le16(TEST_ARRAY_SIZE); return e; } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] PCI: mt7621: Add sentinel to quirks table
by liwei 29 Oct '24

29 Oct '24

From: John Thomson <git(a)johnthomson.fastmail.com.au> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.2-rc1 commit 19098934f910b4d47cb30251dd39ffa57bef9523 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRFS Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… ------------------------------------------------- Current driver is missing a sentinel in the struct soc_device_attribute array, which causes an oops when assessed by the soc_device_match(mt7621_pcie_quirks_match) call. This was only exposed once the CONFIG_SOC_MT7621 mt7621 soc_dev_attr was fixed to register the SOC as a device, in: commit 7c18b64bba3b ("mips: ralink: mt7621: do not use kzalloc too early") Fix it by adding the required sentinel. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/26ebbed1-0fe9-4af9-8466-65f841d0b382@app.fastm… Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221205204645.301301-1-git@johnthomson.fastmail.… Fixes: b483b4e4d3f6 ("staging: mt7621-pci: add quirks for 'E2' revision using 'soc_device_attribute'") Signed-off-by: John Thomson <git(a)johnthomson.fastmail.com.au> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi(a)kernel.org> Acked-by: Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos(a)gmail.com> Conflicts: drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c [commit 4793895f597d42eb54a0f54711b61263b6a8dd03("PCI: mt7621: Rename mt7621_pci_ to mt7621_pcie_") was not merged] Signed-off-by: liwei <liwei728(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c index 8831db383fad..8f2c43eda4ca 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c +++ b/drivers/staging/mt7621-pci/pci-mt7621.c @@ -677,7 +677,8 @@ static int mt7621_pcie_register_host(struct pci_host_bridge *host, } static const struct soc_device_attribute mt7621_pci_quirks_match[] = { - { .soc_id = "mt7621", .revision = "E2" } + { .soc_id = "mt7621", .revision = "E2" }, + { /* sentinel */ } }; static int mt7621_pci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) -- 2.25.1

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel October 2024