October 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1359/15331] mm/share_pool.c:1226:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'huge_ptep_get'
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi Wang, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 9d0af12b79bee784902822ddeec2e1a8cfc18524 commit: 549b1f40b56511536196f7522ffa4d7b3da42337 [1359/15331] mm/sharepool: Implement mg_sp_make_share_u2k() config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241027 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270650.btnHpujZ-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270650.btnHpujZ-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270650.btnHpujZ-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/share_pool.c: In function 'sp_hugetlb_entry': >> mm/share_pool.c:1226:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'huge_ptep_get' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1226 | pte_t pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> mm/share_pool.c:1226:21: error: invalid initializer mm/share_pool.c: At top level: mm/share_pool.c:1005:13: warning: 'sp_area_put_locked' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 1005 | static void sp_area_put_locked(struct sp_area *spa) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:944:24: warning: 'sp_area_get' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 944 | static struct sp_area *sp_area_get(struct sp_group *spg, | ^~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:791:24: warning: 'sp_area_alloc' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 791 | static struct sp_area *sp_area_alloc(unsigned long size, unsigned long flags, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:587:21: warning: 'spa_file' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 587 | static struct file *spa_file(struct sp_area *spa) | ^~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:582:22: warning: 'spa_size' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 582 | static unsigned long spa_size(struct sp_area *spa) | ^~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:497:13: warning: 'update_mem_usage_k2u' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 497 | static void update_mem_usage_k2u(unsigned long size, bool inc, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:485:13: warning: 'update_mem_usage_alloc' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 485 | static void update_mem_usage_alloc(unsigned long size, bool inc, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:438:12: warning: 'sp_group_setup_mapping_normal' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 438 | static int sp_group_setup_mapping_normal(struct mm_struct *mm, struct sp_group *spg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:380:13: warning: 'sp_mapping_detach' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 380 | static void sp_mapping_detach(struct sp_group *spg, struct sp_mapping *spm) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/share_pool.c:237:13: warning: 'meminfo_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 237 | static void meminfo_init(struct sp_meminfo *meminfo) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from mm/share_pool.c:26: mm/share_pool.c:76:19: warning: 'sp_group_idr' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 76 | static DEFINE_IDR(sp_group_idr); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/idr.h:56:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_IDR' 56 | #define DEFINE_IDR(name) struct idr name = IDR_INIT(name) | ^~~~ mm/share_pool.c:73:12: warning: 'system_group_count' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 73 | static int system_group_count; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/huge_ptep_get +1226 mm/share_pool.c 1221 1222 static int sp_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask, 1223 unsigned long addr, unsigned long next, 1224 struct mm_walk *walk) 1225 { > 1226 pte_t pte = huge_ptep_get(ptep); 1227 struct page *page = pte_page(pte); 1228 struct sp_walk_data *sp_walk_data; 1229 1230 if (unlikely(!pte_present(pte))) { 1231 pr_debug("the page of addr %lx unexpectedly not in RAM\n", (unsigned long)addr); 1232 return -EFAULT; 1233 } 1234 1235 sp_walk_data = walk->private; 1236 get_page(page); 1237 sp_walk_data->pages[sp_walk_data->page_count++] = page; 1238 return 0; 1239 } 1240 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 6355/30000] arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c:38:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_enter'; did you mean 'printk_nmi_enter'?
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi Li, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 412556141b3c12f2f160acc3a09a40c937837ee3 commit: f86d165bfe5f6248743774bb07af0bd7cff12443 [6355/30000] arm64: Add non nmi ipi backtrace support config: arm64-randconfig-001-20241026 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270515.tTl9lU9j-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270515.tTl9lU9j-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270515.tTl9lU9j-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c: In function 'ipi_cpu_backtrace': >> arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c:38:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_enter'; did you mean 'printk_nmi_enter'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 38 | printk_safe_enter(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | printk_nmi_enter >> arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c:40:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_exit'; did you mean 'printk_nmi_exit'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 40 | printk_safe_exit(); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | printk_nmi_exit cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +38 arch/arm64/kernel/ipi_nmi.c 35 36 static void ipi_cpu_backtrace(void *info) 37 { > 38 printk_safe_enter(); 39 nmi_cpu_backtrace(get_irq_regs()); > 40 printk_safe_exit(); 41 } 42 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 21583/23866] drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c:3322: warning: Excess function parameter 'ce' description in 'qm_hw_error_init'
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 22c50245e8025b0c6beee13d0df238987b98e6f8 commit: 267bce716c1008522c3b8ddbeac8d3c65514e98f [21583/23866] crypto: hisilicon/qm - drop unnecessary IS_ENABLE(CONFIG_NUMA) check config: arm64-randconfig-002-20241026 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270513.RTL2eHIu-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270513.RTL2eHIu-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270513.RTL2eHIu-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c:3322: warning: Excess function parameter 'ce' description in 'qm_hw_error_init' >> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c:3322: warning: Excess function parameter 'nfe' description in 'qm_hw_error_init' >> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c:3322: warning: Excess function parameter 'fe' description in 'qm_hw_error_init' >> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c:3322: warning: Excess function parameter 'msi' description in 'qm_hw_error_init' vim +3322 drivers/crypto/hisilicon/qm.c ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3302 ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3303 /** 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3304 * qm_hw_error_init() - Configure qm hardware error report method. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3305 * @qm: The qm which we want to configure. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3306 * @ce: Correctable error configure. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3307 * @nfe: Non-fatal error configure. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3308 * @fe: Fatal error configure. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3309 * @msi: Error reported by message signal interrupt. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3310 * ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3311 * Hardware errors of qm can be reported either by RAS interrupts which will ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3312 * be handled by UEFI and then PCIe AER or by device MSI. User can configure ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3313 * each error to use either of above two methods. For RAS interrupts, we can ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3314 * configure an error as one of correctable error, non-fatal error or ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3315 * fatal error. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3316 * ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3317 * Bits indicating errors can be configured to ce, nfe, fe and msi to enable ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3318 * related report methods. Error report will be masked if related error bit ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3319 * does not configure. ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3320 */ 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3321 static void qm_hw_error_init(struct hisi_qm *qm) ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 @3322 { 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3323 u32 nfe = qm->err_ini.err_info.nfe; 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3324 u32 msi = qm->err_ini.err_info.msi; 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3325 u32 ce = qm->err_ini.err_info.ce; 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3326 u32 fe = qm->err_ini.err_info.fe; 73d33f5c59dc38 Yu'an Wang 2020-04-16 3327 ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3328 if (!qm->ops->hw_error_init) { ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3329 dev_err(&qm->pdev->dev, ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3330 "QM version %d doesn't support hw error handling!\n", ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3331 qm->ver); ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3332 return; ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3333 } ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3334 efe221f95003ac Zhou Wang 2019-07-11 3335 qm->ops->hw_error_init(qm, ce, nfe, fe, msi); ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3336 } ae67d23af736c7 xuzaibo 2019-04-21 3337 :::::: The code at line 3322 was first introduced by commit :::::: ae67d23af736c75f90795297fddb86dc97e7b3c7 arm64: Add hisilicon Crypto drivers qm/hpre/zip and code format :::::: TO: xuzaibo <xuzaibo(a)huawei.com> :::::: CC: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi(a)huawei.com> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10] BUILD REGRESSION 412556141b3c12f2f160acc3a09a40c937837ee3
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

tree/branch: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 branch HEAD: 412556141b3c12f2f160acc3a09a40c937837ee3 !12511 jfs: Fix array-index-out-of-bounds in diFree Error/Warning (recently discovered and may have been fixed): https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410262337.lOJflwzz-lkp@intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270055.nuIJoCrv-lkp@intel.com arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h:20:2: error: unknown register name 'r2' in asm arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h:20:2: error: unknown register name 'r3' in asm kernel/workqueue.c:4823:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'printk_safe_exit' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs: recent_errors |-- arm64-randconfig-001-20241026 | |-- drivers-tty-tty_buffer.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-printk_safe_exit | `-- kernel-sched-topology.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-register_sysctl_init |-- arm64-randconfig-003-20241026 | |-- arch-arm64-include-asm-archrandom.h:error:unknown-register-name-r2-in-asm | |-- arch-arm64-include-asm-archrandom.h:error:unknown-register-name-r3-in-asm | `-- arch-arm64-include-asm-stack_pointer.h:error:register-sp-unsuitable-for-global-register-variables-on-this-target |-- x86_64-allnoconfig | `-- kernel-workqueue.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-printk_safe_exit-Werror-Wimplicit-function-declaration `-- x86_64-allyesconfig |-- drivers-net-ipvlan-ipvlan_main.c:warning:variable-old_prog-set-but-not-used |-- kernel-sched-core.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-sched_setsteal `-- kernel-sched-core.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-tg_change_steal elapsed time: 818m configs tested: 11 configs skipped: 101 tested configs: arm64 allmodconfig clang-20 arm64 allnoconfig gcc-14.1.0 arm64 randconfig-001-20241026 gcc-14.1.0 arm64 randconfig-002-20241026 clang-20 arm64 randconfig-003-20241026 clang-20 arm64 randconfig-004-20241026 gcc-14.1.0 x86_64 allnoconfig clang-19 x86_64 allyesconfig clang-19 x86_64 defconfig gcc-11 x86_64 kexec clang-19 x86_64 rhel-8.3 gcc-12 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 701/15331] error: unknown target ABI 'ilp32'
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi Andrew, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 9d0af12b79bee784902822ddeec2e1a8cfc18524 commit: f9b54a6714445cde83aeff0318cf767b3b81229d [701/15331] arm64:ilp32: add ARM64_ILP32 to Kconfig config: arm64-randconfig-004-20241027 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270424.nEC5EwVg-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 16.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7cbf1a2591520c2491aa35339f227775f4d3adf6) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270424.nEC5EwVg-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270424.nEC5EwVg-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/Makefile:90: FORCE prerequisite is missing arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/Makefile:87: FORCE prerequisite is missing arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/Makefile:84: FORCE prerequisite is missing >> error: unknown target ABI 'ilp32' make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:373: arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/vdso-ilp32.lds] Error 1 shuffle=3671098848 >> clang-16: warning: -Wl,-soname=linux-ilp32-vdso.so.1: 'linker' input unused [-Wunused-command-line-argument] >> error: unknown target ABI 'ilp32' make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/Makefile:84: arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/vgettimeofday-ilp32.o] Error 1 shuffle=3671098848 >> error: unknown target ABI 'ilp32' >> error: unknown target ABI 'ilp32' make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/Makefile:90: arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/sigreturn-ilp32.o] Error 1 shuffle=3671098848 make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/Makefile:87: arch/arm64/kernel/vdso-ilp32/note-ilp32.o] Error 1 shuffle=3671098848 make[3]: Target 'include/generated/vdso-ilp32-offsets.h' not remade because of errors. make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/Makefile:201: vdso_prepare] Error 2 shuffle=3671098848 make[2]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. make[1]: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=3671098848 make[1]: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2 shuffle=3671098848 make: Target 'prepare' not remade because of errors. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1624/15331] drivers/cpufreq/loongson3-acpi-cpufreq.c:89:12: warning: 'lasx_count_threshold' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi liuyun, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 9d0af12b79bee784902822ddeec2e1a8cfc18524 commit: 47a0b6f372d7f05822d021f86b21a34fd2142225 [1624/15331] cpufreq: Add cpufreq driver for LoongArch config: loongarch-randconfig-002-20241027 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270415.BPgdabxg-lkp@…) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270415.BPgdabxg-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270415.BPgdabxg-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/cpufreq/loongson3-acpi-cpufreq.c:645:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'loongson3_set_mode' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 645 | int loongson3_set_mode(int mode, int freq_level) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/cpufreq/loongson3-acpi-cpufreq.c:835:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'load_update' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 835 | unsigned int load_update(struct core_data *core) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/cpufreq/loongson3-acpi-cpufreq.c:1520:36: warning: 'processor_device_ids' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 1520 | static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/cpufreq/loongson3-acpi-cpufreq.c:89:12: warning: 'lasx_count_threshold' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 89 | static int lasx_count_threshold = 200; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/lasx_count_threshold +89 drivers/cpufreq/loongson3-acpi-cpufreq.c 85 86 /* threshold of core's get into msa */ 87 static int msa_count_threshold = 200; 88 /* threshold of core's get into lasx */ > 89 static int lasx_count_threshold = 200; 90 /* other cores' upper load threshold when 1 core get into boost mode and enable msa/lasx */ 91 static int load_threshold = 60; 92 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 9757/15331] drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c:378:58: error: 'NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE' undeclared
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi Hongchen, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 9d0af12b79bee784902822ddeec2e1a8cfc18524 commit: 30affb08c584efdc07b3c68015b5902ea02ec86a [9757/15331] irqchip/loongson-eiointc: fix gsi register error config: loongarch-randconfig-001-20241027 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270410.DRsfwEJr-lkp@…) compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270410.DRsfwEJr-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270410.DRsfwEJr-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c:357:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'pch_pic_parse_madt' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 357 | int __init pch_pic_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c:370:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'pch_msi_parse_madt' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 370 | int __init pch_msi_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c: In function 'pch_msi_parse_madt': >> drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c:378:58: error: 'NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE' undeclared (first use in this function) 378 | node = eiointc_priv[nr_pics - 1]->node / NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c:378:58: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c: In function 'eiointc_acpi_init': drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c:481:45: error: 'NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE' undeclared (first use in this function) 481 | node = acpi_eiointc->node / NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE +378 drivers/irqchip/irq-loongson-eiointc.c 369 370 int __init pch_msi_parse_madt(union acpi_subtable_headers *header, 371 const unsigned long end) 372 { 373 struct irq_domain *parent; 374 struct acpi_madt_msi_pic *pchmsi_entry = (struct acpi_madt_msi_pic *)header; 375 int node; 376 377 if (cpu_has_flatmode) > 378 node = eiointc_priv[nr_pics - 1]->node / NODES_PER_FLATMODE_NODE; 379 else 380 node = eiointc_priv[nr_pics - 1]->node; 381 382 parent = acpi_get_vec_parent(node, msi_group); 383 384 if (parent) 385 return pch_msi_acpi_init(parent, pchmsi_entry); 386 387 return 0; 388 } 389 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 16561/23866] mm/pin_mem.c:228:31: error: 'HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR' undeclared; did you mean 'HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER'?
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi Jingxian, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 22c50245e8025b0c6beee13d0df238987b98e6f8 commit: 1a378b87531ea80e7847bf0105adedff28a73080 [16561/23866] mm: add pin memory method for checkpoint add restore config: arm64-randconfig-002-20241027 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270402.9XpA0lvS-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270402.9XpA0lvS-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270402.9XpA0lvS-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/pin_mem.c:171:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'reserve_page_from_buddy' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 171 | void reserve_page_from_buddy(unsigned long nr_pages, struct page *page) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c: In function 'init_huge_pmd_pages': >> mm/pin_mem.c:228:31: error: 'HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER'? 228 | page->compound_dtor = HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR + 1; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | HUGETLB_PAGE_ORDER mm/pin_mem.c:228:31: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in mm/pin_mem.c: At top level: mm/pin_mem.c:254:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_user_map_pages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 254 | void free_user_map_pages(unsigned int pid_index, unsigned int entry_index, unsigned int page_index) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c:311:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'check_redirect_end_valid' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 311 | bool check_redirect_end_valid(struct redirect_info *redirect_start, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c:392:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'calculate_pin_mem_digest' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 392 | int calculate_pin_mem_digest(struct pin_mem_dump_info *pmdi, char *digest) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c:481:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'collect_pmd_huge_pages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 481 | int collect_pmd_huge_pages(struct task_struct *task, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c:544:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'collect_normal_pages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 544 | int collect_normal_pages(struct task_struct *task, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c: In function 'collect_normal_pages': mm/pin_mem.c:549:26: warning: variable 'nr_pages' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 549 | unsigned long i, nr_pages; | ^~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c: At top level: mm/pin_mem.c:610:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'free_pin_pages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 610 | void free_pin_pages(struct page_map_entry *pme) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c:770:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'remap_normal_pages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 770 | vm_fault_t remap_normal_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/pin_mem.c:857:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'remap_huge_pmd_pages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 857 | vm_fault_t remap_huge_pmd_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +228 mm/pin_mem.c 211 212 static void init_huge_pmd_pages(struct page *head_page) 213 { 214 int i = 0; 215 struct page *page = head_page; 216 unsigned long *temp; 217 unsigned long compound_pad = COMPOUND_PAD_START; 218 219 __set_bit(PG_head, &page->flags); 220 __set_bit(PG_active, &page->flags); 221 atomic_set(&page->_refcount, 1); 222 page++; 223 i++; 224 page->compound_head = (unsigned long)head_page + 1; 225 page->_compound_pad_2 = (unsigned long)head_page & COMPOUND_PAD_MASK; 226 temp = (unsigned long *)(&(page->_compound_pad_2)); 227 temp[1] = LIST_POISON4; > 228 page->compound_dtor = HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR + 1; 229 page->compound_order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER; 230 page++; 231 i++; 232 page->compound_head = (unsigned long)head_page + 1; 233 page->_compound_pad_2 = (unsigned long)head_page + compound_pad; 234 i++; 235 236 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(page->deferred_list)); 237 for (; i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++) { 238 page = head_page + i; 239 page->compound_head = (unsigned long)head_page + 1; 240 compound_pad += COMPOUND_PAD_DELTA; 241 page->_compound_pad_2 = (unsigned long)head_page + compound_pad; 242 temp = (unsigned long *)(&(page->_compound_pad_2)); 243 temp[1] = LIST_POISON4; 244 } 245 } 246 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 2413/15331] mm/mem_reliable.c:320:13: warning: 'mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

Hi Ma, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 9d0af12b79bee784902822ddeec2e1a8cfc18524 commit: 425771499c0742a996ab28df143d7a5123102686 [2413/15331] mm: mem_reliable: Introduce proc interface to disable memory reliable features config: arm64-randconfig-001-20241027 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270450.rOHyUqxL-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270450.rOHyUqxL-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270450.rOHyUqxL-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): mm/mem_reliable.c: In function 'mem_reliable_feature_disable': mm/mem_reliable.c:345:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disable'; did you mean 'mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 345 | mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disable(idx); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled mm/mem_reliable.c: At top level: >> mm/mem_reliable.c:320:13: warning: 'mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 320 | static void mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled(int idx) {} | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled +320 mm/mem_reliable.c 302 303 static int __init reliable_sysctl_init(void) 304 { 305 if (!mem_reliable_is_enabled()) 306 return 0; 307 308 if (!register_sysctl("vm", reliable_ctl_table)) { 309 pr_err("register sysctl failed."); 310 return -ENOMEM; 311 } 312 313 percpu_counter_init(&pagecache_reliable_pages, 0, GFP_KERNEL); 314 percpu_counter_init(&anon_reliable_pages, 0, GFP_KERNEL); 315 316 return 0; 317 } 318 arch_initcall(reliable_sysctl_init); 319 #else > 320 static void mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disabled(int idx) {} 321 #endif 322 323 static void mem_reliable_feature_disable(int idx) 324 { 325 char *str = NULL; 326 327 switch (idx) { 328 case MEM_RELIABLE_FALLBACK: 329 reliable_allow_fallback = false; 330 str = "fallback"; 331 break; 332 case MEM_RELIABLE_SHMEM: 333 shmem_reliable = false; 334 str = "shmem"; 335 break; 336 case MEM_RELIABLE_PAGECACHE: 337 pagecache_reliable = false; 338 str = "pagecache"; 339 break; 340 default: 341 pr_err("unknown index: %d", idx); 342 return; 343 } 344 > 345 mem_reliable_ctrl_bit_disable(idx); 346 pr_info("%s is disabled\n", str); 347 } 348 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 8428/23866] arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c:266:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'acpi_map_cpu'
by kernel test robot 27 Oct '24

27 Oct '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 22c50245e8025b0c6beee13d0df238987b98e6f8 commit: 2875d85b7ff5a4f1350595c92305314f0ac07657 [8428/23866] arm64: Add CPU hotplug support config: arm64-randconfig-002-20241026 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270248.Ne5SK2Qt-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241027/202410270248.Ne5SK2Qt-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410270248.Ne5SK2Qt-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c:266:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'acpi_map_cpu' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 266 | int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c: In function 'acpi_map_cpu': arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c:275:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_add_cpu'; did you mean 'be64_add_cpu'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 275 | numa_add_cpu(cpu); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ | be64_add_cpu arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c: At top level: >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c:285:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'acpi_unmap_cpu' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 285 | int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c: In function 'acpi_unmap_cpu': arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c:288:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'numa_clear_node' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 288 | numa_clear_node(cpu); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/acpi_map_cpu +266 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c 265 > 266 int acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle, phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id, 267 int *pcpu) 268 { 269 int cpu, nid; 270 271 cpu = acpi_map_cpuid(physid, acpi_id); 272 nid = acpi_get_node(handle); 273 if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) { 274 set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, nid); 275 numa_add_cpu(cpu); 276 } 277 278 *pcpu = cpu; 279 set_cpu_present(cpu, true); 280 281 return 0; 282 } 283 EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_map_cpu); 284 > 285 int acpi_unmap_cpu(int cpu) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0