November 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1466/1466] drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_platform.c:253:12: warning: 'phytium_platform_pm_resume' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 14 Nov '24

14 Nov '24

Hi Li, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 19640fb08a2ccfb131121859517dfdbc6a04ccb6 commit: 792b82446538ed840a6e23b89673ce21564702bd [1466/1466] Fix gic support for Phytium S2500 config: arm64-randconfig-002-20241114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241114/202411140250.sY9gSIIA-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241114/202411140250.sY9gSIIA-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411140250.sY9gSIIA-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_platform.c:19:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_platform_carveout_mem_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 19 | int phytium_platform_carveout_mem_init(struct platform_device *pdev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_platform.c:60:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_platform_carveout_mem_fini' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 60 | void phytium_platform_carveout_mem_fini(struct platform_device *pdev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_platform.c:253:12: warning: 'phytium_platform_pm_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 253 | static int phytium_platform_pm_resume(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_platform.c:245:12: warning: 'phytium_platform_pm_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 245 | static int phytium_platform_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:23:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_pci_vram_hw_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 23 | void phytium_pci_vram_hw_init(struct phytium_display_private *priv) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:30:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_pci_vram_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 30 | int phytium_pci_vram_init(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct phytium_display_private *priv) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:68:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_pci_vram_fini' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 68 | void phytium_pci_vram_fini(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct phytium_display_private *priv) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:89:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_pci_dma_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 89 | int phytium_pci_dma_init(struct phytium_display_private *priv) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:137:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'phytium_pci_dma_fini' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 137 | void phytium_pci_dma_fini(struct phytium_display_private *priv) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c: In function 'phytium_pci_probe': drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:236:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_enable_msi'; did you mean 'pci_enable_sriov'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 236 | ret = pci_enable_msi(pdev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pci_enable_sriov drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:271:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_disable_msi'; did you mean 'pci_disable_sriov'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 271 | pci_disable_msi(pdev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pci_disable_sriov drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c: At top level: >> drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:328:12: warning: 'phytium_pci_pm_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 328 | static int phytium_pci_pm_resume(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_pci.c:305:12: warning: 'phytium_pci_pm_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 305 | static int phytium_pci_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/phytium_platform_pm_resume +253 drivers/gpu/drm/phytium/phytium_platform.c b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 244 b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 @245 static int phytium_platform_pm_suspend(struct device *dev) b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 246 { b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 247 struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 248 struct phytium_display_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private; b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 249 b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 250 return priv->display_pm_suspend(drm_dev); b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 251 } b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 252 b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 @253 static int phytium_platform_pm_resume(struct device *dev) b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 254 { b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 255 struct drm_device *drm_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 256 struct phytium_display_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private; b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 257 b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 258 return priv->display_pm_resume(drm_dev); b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 259 } b80df10f845813 lishuo 2024-01-31 260 :::::: The code at line 253 was first introduced by commit :::::: b80df10f845813bb4fc2002b5386ecdfa8be5f6c DRM: Phytium display DRM driver :::::: TO: lishuo <lishuo(a)phytium.com.cn> :::::: CC: lishuo <lishuo(a)phytium.com.cn> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1294/1294] drivers/gpio/gpio-phytium-platform.c:30:36: warning: 'phytium_gpio_acpi_match' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 14 Nov '24

14 Nov '24

Hi Tian, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: a81d020c58c2c6a55ebaf15846470a9ecb69bd1a commit: 00711bad7e372a30c4975ba43811ffa666aff0e1 [1294/1294] gpio: add phytium gpio driver config: arm64-randconfig-001-20241114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241114/202411140242.XxdoeZ1Z-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241114/202411140242.XxdoeZ1Z-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411140242.XxdoeZ1Z-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/gpio/gpio-phytium-platform.c:30:36: warning: 'phytium_gpio_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 30 | static const struct acpi_device_id phytium_gpio_acpi_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=n] && !S390 && (HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF [=n] || HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH [=y]) Selected by [y]: - SDEI_WATCHDOG [=y] && <choice> && ARM_SDE_INTERFACE [=y] && !HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP [=n] vim +/phytium_gpio_acpi_match +30 drivers/gpio/gpio-phytium-platform.c 29 > 30 static const struct acpi_device_id phytium_gpio_acpi_match[] = { 31 { "PHYT0001", 0 }, 32 { } 33 }; 34 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, phytium_gpio_acpi_match); 35 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1294/1294] drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c:739:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_refcount'
by kernel test robot 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: a81d020c58c2c6a55ebaf15846470a9ecb69bd1a commit: 451823febcb610969f048556cedc41b5e08fafb1 [1294/1294] UACCE backport from mainline config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-002-20241113 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411132335.bYokl2ag-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411132335.bYokl2ag-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411132335.bYokl2ag-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c:739:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'module_refcount' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 739 | if (module_refcount(uacce->pdev->driver->owner) > 0) | ^ drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c:1032:16: warning: unused variable 'uacce' [-Wunused-variable] 1032 | struct uacce *uacce = UACCE_FROM_CDEV_ATTR(dev); | ^~~~~ drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c:1046:16: warning: unused variable 'uacce' [-Wunused-variable] 1046 | struct uacce *uacce = UACCE_FROM_CDEV_ATTR(dev); | ^~~~~ 2 warnings and 1 error generated. vim +/module_refcount +739 drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c 1998d80a018804 drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-04-23 717 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 718 /* 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 719 * While user space releases a queue, all the relatives on the queue 76dbd49be7fc95 drivers/uacce/uacce.c xuzaibo 2019-07-11 720 * should be released imediately by this putting. 1998d80a018804 drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-04-23 721 */ f7acb5166348bf drivers/uacce/uacce.c Yu'an Wang 2020-02-20 722 static void uacce_put_queue(struct uacce_queue *q) 1998d80a018804 drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-04-23 723 { 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 724 struct uacce *uacce = q->uacce; e3234bd66f0c97 drivers/uacce/uacce.c xuzaibo 2019-05-13 725 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 726 /* 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 727 * To do: we should vm_munmap mmio and dus regions, currently we munmap 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 728 * mmio and dus region before put queue. 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 729 */ 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 730 if (uacce->ops->stop_queue) 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 731 uacce->ops->stop_queue(q); 299b4bc20a682a drivers/uacce/uacce.c lingmingqiang 2019-05-06 732 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 733 if (uacce->ops->put_queue) 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 734 uacce->ops->put_queue(q); 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 735 8bf65d5558d0bd drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-07-11 736 q->state = UACCE_Q_ZOMBIE; f7acb5166348bf drivers/uacce/uacce.c Yu'an Wang 2020-02-20 737 q->filep->private_data = NULL; f7acb5166348bf drivers/uacce/uacce.c Yu'an Wang 2020-02-20 738 uacce_queue_drain(q); f7acb5166348bf drivers/uacce/uacce.c Yu'an Wang 2020-02-20 @739 if (module_refcount(uacce->pdev->driver->owner) > 0) f7acb5166348bf drivers/uacce/uacce.c Yu'an Wang 2020-02-20 740 module_put(uacce->pdev->driver->owner); 1998d80a018804 drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-04-23 741 } 1998d80a018804 drivers/uacce/uacce.c Mingqiang Ling 2019-04-23 742 :::::: The code at line 739 was first introduced by commit :::::: f7acb5166348bf6c75ac40c5e6e14726bc3ca578 uacce: Remove uacce mode 1 relatives :::::: TO: Yu'an Wang <wangyuan46(a)huawei.com> :::::: CC: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1290/1290] kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:84:31: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'v'
by kernel test robot 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

Hi Wang, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: a81d020c58c2c6a55ebaf15846470a9ecb69bd1a commit: ce35ded5d5774f055f6850b15032066ff4936414 [1290/1290] sched: smart grid: init sched_grid_qos structure on QOS purpose config: arm64-randconfig-001-20241112 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411132206.ErjpyMwe-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411132206.ErjpyMwe-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411132206.ErjpyMwe-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:19: kernel/sched/grid/qos.c: In function 'sched_grid_preferred_interleave_nid': >> kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:84:31: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'v' 84 | if (nodes_equal(policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask)) | ^~ include/linux/nodemask.h:202:41: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_equal' 202 | __nodes_equal(&(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES) | ^~~~ kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:91:32: error: 'struct mempolicy' has no member named 'v' 91 | nodes_and(nmask, policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask); | ^~ include/linux/nodemask.h:162:47: note: in definition of macro 'nodes_and' 162 | __nodes_and(&(dst), &(src1), &(src2), MAX_NUMNODES) | ^~~~ >> kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:95:31: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'il_prev' 95 | next = next_node_in(me->il_prev, nmask); | ^~ include/linux/nodemask.h:278:46: note: in definition of macro 'next_node_in' 278 | #define next_node_in(n, src) __next_node_in((n), &(src)) | ^ kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:97:19: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'il_prev' 97 | me->il_prev = next; | ^~ In file included from kernel/sched/grid/qos.c:20: include/linux/mempolicy.h: At top level: include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 329 | static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, | ^~~~~~~~~~ vim +84 kernel/sched/grid/qos.c > 19 #include <linux/nodemask.h> 20 #include <linux/mempolicy.h> 21 #include <linux/slab.h> 22 #include <linux/sched.h> 23 #include <linux/sched/grid_qos.h> 24 #include "internal.h" 25 26 static int qos_affinity_set(struct task_struct *p) 27 { 28 int n; 29 struct sched_grid_qos_affinity *affinity = &p->grid_qos->affinity; 30 31 nodes_clear(affinity->mem_preferred_node_mask); 32 /* 33 * We want the memory allocation to be as close to the CPU 34 * as possible, and adjust after getting memory bandwidth usage. 35 */ 36 for (n = 0; n < nr_node_ids; n++) 37 if (cpumask_intersects(cpumask_of_node(n), p->prefer_cpus)) 38 node_set(n, affinity->mem_preferred_node_mask); 39 40 return 0; 41 } 42 43 int sched_grid_qos_fork(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *orig) 44 { 45 struct sched_grid_qos *qos; 46 47 qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos), GFP_KERNEL); 48 if (!qos) 49 return -ENOMEM; 50 51 qos_power_init(&qos->power); 52 qos_stat_init(&qos->stat); 53 54 nodes_clear(qos->affinity.mem_preferred_node_mask); 55 if (likely(orig->grid_qos)) 56 qos->affinity = orig->grid_qos->affinity; 57 qos->affinity_set = qos_affinity_set; 58 p->grid_qos = qos; 59 60 return 0; 61 } 62 63 void sched_grid_qos_free(struct task_struct *p) 64 { 65 kfree(p->grid_qos); 66 p->grid_qos = NULL; 67 } 68 69 /* dynamic select a more appropriate preferred interleave nid for process */ 70 int sched_grid_preferred_interleave_nid(struct mempolicy *policy) 71 { 72 nodemask_t nmask; 73 unsigned int next; 74 struct task_struct *me = current; 75 nodemask_t *preferred_nmask = NULL; 76 77 if (likely(me->grid_qos)) 78 preferred_nmask = 79 &me->grid_qos->affinity.mem_preferred_node_mask; 80 81 if (!preferred_nmask || !policy) 82 return NUMA_NO_NODE; 83 > 84 if (nodes_equal(policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask)) 85 return NUMA_NO_NODE; 86 /* 87 * We perceive the actual consumption of memory bandwidth 88 * in each node and post a preferred interleave nid in 89 * more appropriate range. 90 */ > 91 nodes_and(nmask, policy->v.nodes, *preferred_nmask); 92 if (nodes_empty(nmask)) 93 return NUMA_NO_NODE; 94 > 95 next = next_node_in(me->il_prev, nmask); 96 if (next < MAX_NUMNODES) 97 me->il_prev = next; 98 return next; 99 } 100 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1291/1291] drivers/char/svm.c:312:17-38: WARNING: atomic_dec_and_test variation before object free at line 335.
by kernel test robot 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: a81d020c58c2c6a55ebaf15846470a9ecb69bd1a commit: 4cdb60f56180d6ef7c10bd0e50ddda96ebc9f783 [1291/1291] svm: implement unpin pages to dec refcount config: arm64-randconfig-r063-20241113 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411132134.HfBsR3KA-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411132134.HfBsR3KA-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/char/svm.c:312:17-38: WARNING: atomic_dec_and_test variation before object free at line 335. vim +312 drivers/char/svm.c 304 305 static void svm_remove_sdma(struct svm_process *process, 306 struct svm_sdma *sdma, bool try_rm) 307 { 308 int null_count = 0; 309 310 mutex_lock(&process->mutex); 311 > 312 if (try_rm && (!atomic64_dec_and_test(&sdma->ref))) { 313 mutex_unlock(&process->mutex); 314 return; 315 } 316 317 rb_erase(&sdma->node, &process->sdma_list); 318 RB_CLEAR_NODE(&sdma->node); 319 mutex_unlock(&process->mutex); 320 321 while (sdma->nr_pages--) { 322 if (sdma->pages[sdma->nr_pages] == NULL) { 323 pr_err("null pointer, nr_pages:%d.\n", sdma->nr_pages); 324 null_count++; 325 continue; 326 } 327 328 put_page(sdma->pages[sdma->nr_pages]); 329 } 330 331 if (null_count) 332 dump_stack(); 333 334 kfree(sdma->pages); > 335 kfree(sdma); 336 } 337 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/3] fork: do not expose incomplete mm on fork
by Jinjiang Tu 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

Jinjiang Tu (1): mm/ksm: remove redundant code in ksm_fork Lorenzo Stoakes (2): fork: do not invoke uffd on fork if error occurs fork: only invoke khugepaged, ksm hooks if no error fs/userfaultfd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/ksm.h | 19 ++++--------------- include/linux/userfaultfd_k.h | 5 +++++ kernel/fork.c | 12 ++++++------ 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 4

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/2] mm, mmap: limit THP alignment of anonymous mappings to PMD-aligned sizes
by Jinjiang Tu 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

Jinjiang Tu (1): mm: enable PMD anouymous mapping by default Vlastimil Babka (1): mm, mmap: limit THP alignment of anonymous mappings to PMD-aligned sizes mm/huge_memory.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/3] CVE-2024-47745
by Liu Shixin 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

CVE-2024-47745. Kirill A. Shutemov (1): mm: split critical region in remap_file_pages() and invoke LSMs in between Liam Howlett (1): mm/mmap.c: don't unlock VMAs in remap_file_pages() Shu Han (1): mm: call the security_mmap_file() LSM hook in remap_file_pages() mm/mmap.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 4

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1291/1291] drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:48:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcim_enable_device'; did you mean 'pci_enable_device'?
by kernel test robot 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

Hi Malloy, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: d047cc727adb896a530936ced8c98485e6654a11 commit: d65622e6edee11f7fcbd295bdb5aef86e12dfef3 [1291/1291] mmc: add support for Phytium MMC config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241113 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411131629.7UL1eTyi-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411131629.7UL1eTyi-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411131629.7UL1eTyi-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c: In function 'phytium_mci_pci_probe': >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:48:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'pcim_enable_device'; did you mean 'pci_enable_device'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 48 | ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pci_enable_device >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:61:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'pci_enable_msi'; did you mean 'pci_enable_sriov'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 61 | pci_enable_msi(pdev); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | pci_enable_sriov drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c: At top level: >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:180:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class 180 | module_pci_driver(phytium_mci_pci_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:180:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'module_pci_driver' [-Werror=implicit-int] >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:180:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [-Wdeclaration-missing-parameter-type] >> drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c:171:26: warning: 'phytium_mci_pci_driver' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] 171 | static struct pci_driver phytium_mci_pci_driver = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +48 drivers/mmc/host/phytium-mci-pci.c 40 41 static int 42 phytium_mci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *pid) 43 { 44 struct phytium_mci_host *host; 45 struct mmc_host *mmc; 46 int ret; 47 > 48 ret = pcim_enable_device(pdev); 49 50 if (ret) 51 return ret; 52 pci_set_master(pdev); 53 54 mmc = mmc_alloc_host(sizeof(struct phytium_mci_host), &pdev->dev); 55 56 if (!mmc) 57 return -ENOMEM; 58 59 host = mmc_priv(mmc); 60 > 61 pci_enable_msi(pdev); 62 63 host->irq = pdev->irq; 64 host->irq_flags = IRQF_SHARED; 65 host->dev = &pdev->dev; 66 ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, 1 << PCI_BAR_NO, pci_name(pdev)); 67 68 if (ret) { 69 dev_err(&pdev->dev, "I/O memory remapping failed\n"); 70 goto host_free; 71 } 72 73 host->base = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[PCI_BAR_NO]; 74 host->is_use_dma = 1; 75 host->is_device_x100 = 1; 76 77 if (pdev->devfn == 2) { 78 host->caps = emmc_caps; 79 host->caps2 = emmc_caps2; 80 } else { 81 host->caps = sd_caps; 82 host->caps2 = sd_caps2; 83 mmc->f_max = 25000000; /* stable frequency */ 84 } 85 86 host->mmc = mmc; 87 host->clk_rate = MCI_CLK; 88 89 dev_info(&pdev->dev, 90 "%s %d:[bar %d] addr:0x%llx size:0x%llx km:0x%llx devfn:%d\n", 91 __func__, __LINE__, PCI_BAR_NO, pci_resource_start(pdev, 0), 92 pci_resource_len(pdev, 0), (uint64_t)host->base, pdev->devfn); 93 94 dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "%s %d:irq:0x%x\n", __func__, __LINE__, host->irq); 95 96 ret = phytium_mci_common_probe(host); 97 98 if (ret == MCI_REALEASE_MEM) { 99 ret = -ENOMEM; 100 goto release_mem; 101 } else if (ret) { 102 goto release; 103 } 104 pci_set_drvdata(pdev, mmc); 105 dev_info(&pdev->dev, 106 "%s %d: probe phytium mci successful.\n", __func__, __LINE__); 107 return 0; 108 109 release: 110 phytium_mci_deinit_hw(host); 111 release_mem: 112 113 if (host->dma.adma_table) { 114 dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, 115 MAX_BD_NUM * sizeof(struct phytium_adma2_64_desc), 116 host->dma.adma_table, host->dma.adma_addr); 117 } 118 host_free: 119 mmc_free_host(mmc); 120 pci_disable_device(pdev); 121 return ret; 122 } 123 124 static void phytium_mci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) 125 { 126 struct phytium_mci_host *host; 127 struct mmc_host *mmc; 128 129 mmc = pci_get_drvdata(pdev); 130 if (!mmc) { 131 dev_info(&pdev->dev, 132 "%s %d: mmc is null.\n", __func__, __LINE__); 133 return; 134 } 135 host = mmc_priv(mmc); 136 if (!host) { 137 dev_info(&pdev->dev, 138 "%s %d: host is null.\n", __func__, __LINE__); 139 mmc_remove_host(mmc); 140 mmc_free_host(mmc); 141 return; 142 } 143 144 del_timer(&host->hotplug_timer); 145 146 mmc_remove_host(host->mmc); 147 148 if (host->dma.adma_table) { 149 dma_free_coherent(&pdev->dev, 150 MAX_BD_NUM * sizeof(struct phytium_adma2_64_desc), 151 host->dma.adma_table, host->dma.adma_addr); 152 } 153 phytium_mci_deinit_hw(host); 154 mmc_free_host(mmc); 155 pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL); 156 } 157 158 static const struct pci_device_id phytium_mci_pci_tbl[] = { 159 { 160 .vendor = 0x1DB7, 161 .device = 0xDC28, 162 .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, 163 .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID, 164 .class = 0x5, 165 .class_mask = 0, 166 }, 167 {} 168 }; 169 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, phytium_mci_pci_tbl); 170 > 171 static struct pci_driver phytium_mci_pci_driver = { 172 .name = "phytium-mci-pci", 173 .id_table = phytium_mci_pci_tbl, 174 .probe = phytium_mci_pci_probe, 175 .remove = phytium_mci_pci_remove, 176 .driver = { 177 .pm = &phytium_mci_dev_pm_ops, 178 } 179 }; > 180 module_pci_driver(phytium_mci_pci_driver); 181 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1459/1459] mm/memcontrol.c:3147:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'hisi_oom_recover'
by kernel test robot 13 Nov '24

13 Nov '24

Hi Weilong, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 15bd887bf6e95b9bf10a564c75e14dee327ed0bc commit: b498d9f1bacd40d583c0970cab02ad522127a7e7 [1459/1459] arm64/ascend: Add new enable_oom_killer interface for oom contrl config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241113 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411131622.7s9aYTiW-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241113/202411131622.7s9aYTiW-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411131622.7s9aYTiW-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/memcontrol.c:3147:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'hisi_oom_recover' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 3147 | void hisi_oom_recover(struct obj_cgroup *objcg) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/hisi_oom_recover +3147 mm/memcontrol.c 3145 3146 #ifdef CONFIG_ASCEND_OOM > 3147 void hisi_oom_recover(struct obj_cgroup *objcg) 3148 { 3149 struct mem_cgroup *memcg; 3150 3151 memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(objcg); 3152 if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) 3153 memcg_oom_recover(memcg); 3154 css_put(&memcg->css); 3155 } 3156 #else 3157 static inline void hisi_oom_recover(struct obj_cgroup *objcg) { } 3158 #endif 3159 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0