November 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2284/2284] fs/proc/base.c:1454:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pbha_bit0_hide_file'
by kernel test robot 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

Hi Ma, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 170b758d064664f953e8f6de41dd4a3ef122443a commit: bea38841945a52bd03004240eb0da6a5115bae21 [2284/2284] arm64: mm: Hide pbha_bit0 in procfs if pbha is not enabled config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411032055.ZoDSmsZX-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411032055.ZoDSmsZX-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411032055.ZoDSmsZX-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> fs/proc/base.c:1454:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'pbha_bit0_hide_file' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1454 | bool pbha_bit0_hide_file(const char *name) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/pbha_bit0_hide_file +1454 fs/proc/base.c 1453 > 1454 bool pbha_bit0_hide_file(const char *name) 1455 { 1456 if (!system_support_pbha_bit0() && !strncmp("pbha_bit0", name, 9)) 1457 return true; 1458 1459 return false; 1460 } 1461 #else 1462 static bool pbha_bit0_hide_file(const char *name) { return false; } 1463 #endif 1464 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1245/1245] kernel/time/.tmp_hrtimer.o: warning: objtool: hrtimer_start_range_ns()+0x2b3: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e833cceaa63f729c44be494d90d6ee3bfaf22faf commit: 40ecfb28732cefd0c5658f7c10543bbc4cd41cb8 [1245/1245] hrtimer: Prevent queuing of hrtimer without a function callback config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20241031 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031810.7yoZknlT-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.2 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7ba7d8e2f7b6445b60679da826210cdde29eaf8b) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031810.7yoZknlT-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411031810.7yoZknlT-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/time/hrtimer.c:130:21: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 130 | [CLOCK_REALTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_REALTIME, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:128:27: note: previous initialization is here 128 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:131:22: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 131 | [CLOCK_MONOTONIC] = HRTIMER_BASE_MONOTONIC, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:128:27: note: previous initialization is here 128 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:132:21: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 132 | [CLOCK_BOOTTIME] = HRTIMER_BASE_BOOTTIME, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:128:27: note: previous initialization is here 128 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:133:17: warning: initializer overrides prior initialization of this subobject [-Winitializer-overrides] 133 | [CLOCK_TAI] = HRTIMER_BASE_TAI, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/time/hrtimer.c:128:27: note: previous initialization is here 128 | [0 ... MAX_CLOCKS - 1] = HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4 warnings generated. >> kernel/time/.tmp_hrtimer.o: warning: objtool: hrtimer_start_range_ns()+0x2b3: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2284/2284] drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:392:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_modify_tp_state'
by kernel test robot 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

Hi WenChen, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 170b758d064664f953e8f6de41dd4a3ef122443a commit: 329bf7f331286ee5d571d374e31ed50d2877b110 [2284/2284] ubcore: fix the bug of tp negotiation concurrency config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031836.4wU640gU-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031836.4wU640gU-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411031836.4wU640gU-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:66:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_get_mtu' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 66 | enum ubcore_mtu ubcore_get_mtu(int mtu) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:392:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_modify_tp_state' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 392 | int ubcore_modify_tp_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct ubcore_tp *tp, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:894:19: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_create_vtp' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 894 | struct ubcore_tp *ubcore_create_vtp(struct ubcore_device *dev, union ubcore_eid *remote_eid, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:920:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_destroy_vtp' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 920 | int ubcore_destroy_vtp(struct ubcore_tp *vtp) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ubcore_modify_tp_state +392 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c 391 > 392 int ubcore_modify_tp_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct ubcore_tp *tp, 393 enum ubcore_tp_state new_state, struct ubcore_tp_attr *attr, union ubcore_tp_attr_mask mask) 394 { 395 if (ubcore_modify_tp_state_check(tp, new_state) != 0) 396 return -1; 397 398 if (tp->state == UBCORE_TP_STATE_ERR && new_state == UBCORE_TP_STATE_ERR) { 399 ubcore_log_info("tp is already in ERR state and tpn = %u", 400 tp->tpn); 401 return 0; 402 } 403 404 if (dev->ops->modify_tp(tp, attr, mask) != 0) { 405 /* tp->peer_ext.addr will be freed when called ubcore_destroy_tp */ 406 ubcore_log_err("Failed to modify tp to %u from state %u and tpn = %u", 407 (uint32_t)new_state, (uint32_t)tp->state, tp->tpn); 408 return -1; 409 } 410 tp->state = new_state; 411 ubcore_log_info("tp state:(%u to %u) with tpn %u, peer_tpn %u", 412 (uint32_t)tp->state, (uint32_t)new_state, tp->tpn, tp->peer_tpn); 413 return 0; 414 } 415 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH OLK-6.6] rseq/mm_cid: change the mm_cid macro default status and keep KABI consistent
by He Yujie 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

Offering: HULK hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB1OJX -------------------------------- Changing the mm_cid macro to disable status by modifying Kconfig: def_bool n, and reserving the field for task_struct and mm_struct by using KABI_REPLACE to keep KABI consistent. Fixes: af7f588d8f73 ("sched: Introduce per-memory-map concurrency ID") Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com> --- arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 2 +- arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 2 +- include/linux/mm_types.h | 6 ++++-- include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++++ init/Kconfig | 2 +- 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig index 96ca8b990e22..67d02760f856 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig @@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH=y CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_QOS_SCHED_DYNAMIC_AFFINITY=y -CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID=y +# CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID is not set CONFIG_QOS_SCHED_SMART_GRID=y CONFIG_CGROUP_PIDS=y CONFIG_CGROUP_RDMA=y diff --git a/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig b/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig index d95d966f7fb2..ea83b730a3be 100644 --- a/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig +++ b/arch/x86/configs/openeuler_defconfig @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH=y CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y CONFIG_QOS_SCHED_DYNAMIC_AFFINITY=y -CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID=y +# CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID is not set # CONFIG_QOS_SCHED_SMART_GRID is not set CONFIG_CGROUP_PIDS=y CONFIG_CGROUP_RDMA=y diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h index 793c16b99237..fdc047bdbc49 100644 --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h @@ -711,12 +711,10 @@ struct vm_area_struct { KABI_RESERVE(4) } __randomize_layout; -#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID struct mm_cid { u64 time; int cid; }; -#endif struct kioctx_table; struct iommu_mm_data; @@ -789,6 +787,10 @@ struct mm_struct { * When the next mm_cid scan is due (in jiffies). */ unsigned long mm_cid_next_scan; +#else + KABI_REPLACE(struct mm_cid __percpu *pcpu_cid, + struct mm_cid __percpu *pcpu_cid) + KABI_REPLACE(unsigned long mm_cid_next_scan, unsigned long mm_cid_next_scan) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_MMU atomic_long_t pgtables_bytes; /* size of all page tables */ diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h index f40411aa7b70..7b1c53f71ee4 100644 --- a/include/linux/sched.h +++ b/include/linux/sched.h @@ -1355,6 +1355,13 @@ struct task_struct { int migrate_from_cpu; int mm_cid_active; /* Whether cid bitmap is active */ struct callback_head cid_work; +#else + KABI_REPLACE(int mm_cid, int mm_cid) + KABI_REPLACE(int last_mm_cid, int last_mm_cid) + KABI_REPLACE(int migrate_from_cpu, int migrate_from_cpu) + KABI_REPLACE(int mm_cid_active, int mm_cid_active) + KABI_REPLACE(struct callback_head cid_work, + struct callback_head cid_work) #endif struct tlbflush_unmap_batch tlb_ubc; diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 6ea4eafecab1..2d6ae58a5bf7 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -1137,7 +1137,7 @@ config QOS_SCHED_DYNAMIC_AFFINITY cpus allowed. config SCHED_MM_CID - def_bool y + def_bool n depends on SMP && RSEQ config UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP -- 2.34.1

2 1

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1257/1257] drivers/edac/skx_base.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .init.text
by kernel test robot 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e833cceaa63f729c44be494d90d6ee3bfaf22faf commit: e34047f6dc606c123911c6db8fa424bb4a035262 [1257/1257] EDAC, skx_edac: Delete duplicated code config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20241102 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031540.xYeDxC2Y-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031540.xYeDxC2Y-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411031540.xYeDxC2Y-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/edac/skx_base.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .init.text -- drivers/edac/skx_common.c:470:8: warning: variable 'type' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 470 | char *type, *optype; | ^ 1 warning generated. >> drivers/edac/skx_common.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .init.text -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2284/2284] drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:213:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_unset_port_netdev'
by kernel test robot 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

Hi Yizhen, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 170b758d064664f953e8f6de41dd4a3ef122443a commit: 37c6170f742ef3a18a3131a2a157dd7b7aa08103 [2284/2284] ub: Fix bugs in urma kernel and user lib config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031516.C5nPknta-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031516.C5nPknta-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411031516.C5nPknta-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:51:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_check_port_state' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 51 | int ubcore_check_port_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, uint8_t port_idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:75:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_find_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 75 | void ubcore_find_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:133:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_set_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 133 | int ubcore_set_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:213:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_unset_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 213 | int ubcore_unset_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:242:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_put_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 242 | void ubcore_put_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:262:10: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_idx_alloc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 262 | uint32_t ubcore_sip_idx_alloc(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:290:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_idx_free' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 290 | int ubcore_sip_idx_free(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:303:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_table_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 303 | void ubcore_sip_table_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:309:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_table_uninit' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 309 | void ubcore_sip_table_uninit(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:324:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_add_sip_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 324 | int ubcore_add_sip_entry(const struct ubcore_sip_info *sip, uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:344:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_del_sip_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 344 | int ubcore_del_sip_entry(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:358:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_lookup_sip_idx' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 358 | int ubcore_lookup_sip_idx(struct ubcore_sip_info *sip, uint32_t *idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:379:10: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_get_sip_max_cnt' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 379 | uint32_t ubcore_get_sip_max_cnt(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:384:25: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_lookup_sip_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 384 | struct ubcore_sip_info *ubcore_lookup_sip_info(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:395:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_notify_uvs_del_sip' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 395 | int ubcore_notify_uvs_del_sip(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:437:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_notify_uvs_add_sip' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 437 | int ubcore_notify_uvs_add_sip(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ubcore_unset_port_netdev +213 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c 212 > 213 int ubcore_unset_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, 214 unsigned int port_id) 215 { 216 struct ubcore_ndev_port *port_info; 217 218 if (dev == NULL || ndev == NULL) { 219 ubcore_log_err("invalid input parameter.\n"); 220 return -1; 221 } 222 down_write(&g_port_list_lock); 223 list_for_each_entry(port_info, &dev->port_list, node) { 224 if (port_info->ndev == ndev) { 225 if (ubcore_del_port(port_info, (uint8_t)port_id, dev, ndev) != 0) { 226 up_write(&g_port_list_lock); 227 ubcore_log_err("Failed to do ubcore_del_port"); 228 return -1; 229 } 230 up_write(&g_port_list_lock); 231 return 0; 232 } 233 } 234 up_write(&g_port_list_lock); 235 236 ubcore_log_err("Failed to find and remove ndev:%s dev_name: %s bound port: %u\n", 237 netdev_name(ndev), dev->dev_name, port_id); 238 return -1; 239 } 240 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_unset_port_netdev); 241 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] ASoC: soc-pcm: Add NULL check in BE reparenting
by He Yujie 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam(a)quicinc.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.269 commit e7166d6821c15f3516bcac8ae3f155924da1908c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRF7 CVE: CVE-2022-48992 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit db8f91d424fe0ea6db337aca8bc05908bbce1498 ] Add NULL check in dpcm_be_reparent API, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error. The issue occurred in fuzzing test. Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam(a)quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1669098673-29703-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@q… Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 551bfc581fc1..99426075d148 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -1263,6 +1263,8 @@ static void dpcm_be_reparent(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, return; be_substream = snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(be, stream); + if (!be_substream) + return; list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &be->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe) { if (dpcm->fe == fe) -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] ASoC: soc-pcm: Add NULL check in BE reparenting
by He Yujie 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam(a)quicinc.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19 commit e7166d6821c15f3516bcac8ae3f155924da1908c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRF7 CVE: CVE-2022-48992 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit db8f91d424fe0ea6db337aca8bc05908bbce1498 ] Add NULL check in dpcm_be_reparent API, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error. The issue occurred in fuzzing test. Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam(a)quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1669098673-29703-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@q… Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 551bfc581fc1..99426075d148 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -1263,6 +1263,8 @@ static void dpcm_be_reparent(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, return; be_substream = snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(be, stream); + if (!be_substream) + return; list_for_each_entry(dpcm, &be->dpcm[stream].fe_clients, list_fe) { if (dpcm->fe == fe) -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] ASoC: soc-pcm: Add NULL check in BE reparenting
by He Yujie 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam(a)quicinc.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.159 commit f6f45e538328df9ce66aa61bafee1a5717c4b700 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7NTXH Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit db8f91d424fe0ea6db337aca8bc05908bbce1498 ] Add NULL check in dpcm_be_reparent API, to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference error. The issue occurred in fuzzing test. Signed-off-by: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam(a)quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1669098673-29703-1-git-send-email-quic_srivasam@q… Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com> --- sound/soc/soc-pcm.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c index 8b8a9aca2912..9a60d62f12fe 100644 --- a/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c +++ b/sound/soc/soc-pcm.c @@ -1159,6 +1159,8 @@ static void dpcm_be_reparent(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *fe, return; be_substream = snd_soc_dpcm_get_substream(be, stream); + if (!be_substream) + return; for_each_dpcm_fe(be, stream, dpcm) { if (dpcm->fe == fe) -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev()
by He Yujie 03 Nov '24

03 Nov '24

From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.1 commit ec851b23084b3a0af8bf0f5e51d33a8d678bdc49 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRIL CVE: CVE-2022-48975 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- Here is a backtrace report about memory leak detected in gpiochip_setup_dev(): unreferenced object 0xffff88810b406400 (size 512): comm "python3", pid 1682, jiffies 4295346908 (age 24.090s) backtrace: kmalloc_trace device_add device_private_init at drivers/base/core.c:3361 (inlined by) device_add at drivers/base/core.c:3411 cdev_device_add gpiolib_cdev_register gpiochip_setup_dev gpiochip_add_data_with_key gcdev_register() & gcdev_unregister() would call device_add() & device_del() (no matter CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV is enabled or not) to register/unregister device. However, if device_add() succeeds, some resource (like struct device_private allocated by device_private_init()) is not released by device_del(). Therefore, after device_add() succeeds by gcdev_register(), it needs to call put_device() to release resource in the error handle path. Here we move forward the register of release function, and let it release every piece of resource by put_device() instead of kfree(). While at it, fix another subtle issue, i.e. when gc->ngpio is equal to 0, we still call kcalloc() and, in case of further error, kfree() on the ZERO_PTR pointer, which is not NULL. It's not a bug per se, but rather waste of the resources and potentially wrong expectation about contents of the gdev->descs variable. Fixes: 159f3cd92f17 ("gpiolib: Defer gpio device setup until after gpiolib initialization") Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com> Co-developed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski(a)linaro.org> Conflicts: drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c [ 3cc1fb73993905b598da3802f87ac59411c52516(gpiolib: do not print err message for EPROBE_DEFER). 990f6756bb64756d2d1033118cded6333b43397d(gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio_chip). 9dbd1ab20509e85cd3fac9479a00c59e83c08196(gpiolib: check the 'ngpios' property in core gpiolib code). context conflicts because the preceding three commit commands are not merge] Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c index 59d8affad343..3fc011d4b4aa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c @@ -500,12 +500,13 @@ static int gpiochip_setup_dev(struct gpio_device *gdev) if (ret) return ret; + /* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */ + gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release; + ret = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev); if (ret) goto err_remove_device; - /* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */ - gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release; dev_dbg(&gdev->dev, "registered GPIOs %d to %d on %s\n", gdev->base, gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1, gdev->chip->label ? : "generic"); @@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, unsigned long flags; int ret = 0; unsigned i; - int base = gc->base; + int base = 0; struct gpio_device *gdev; /* @@ -624,22 +625,22 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, else gdev->owner = THIS_MODULE; - gdev->descs = kcalloc(gc->ngpio, sizeof(gdev->descs[0]), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gdev->descs) { - ret = -ENOMEM; - goto err_free_dev_name; - } - if (gc->ngpio == 0) { chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n"); ret = -EINVAL; - goto err_free_descs; + goto err_free_dev_name; } if (gc->ngpio > FASTPATH_NGPIO) chip_warn(gc, "line cnt %u is greater than fast path cnt %u\n", gc->ngpio, FASTPATH_NGPIO); + gdev->descs = kcalloc(gc->ngpio, sizeof(*gdev->descs), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!gdev->descs) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto err_free_dev_name; + } + gdev->label = kstrdup_const(gc->label ?: "unknown", GFP_KERNEL); if (!gdev->label) { ret = -ENOMEM; @@ -658,11 +659,13 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, * it may be a pipe dream. It will not happen before we get rid * of the sysfs interface anyways. */ + base = gc->base; if (base < 0) { base = gpiochip_find_base(gc->ngpio); if (base < 0) { - ret = base; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags); + ret = base; + base = 0; goto err_free_label; } /* @@ -770,6 +773,11 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, err_free_gpiochip_mask: gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(gc); gpiochip_free_valid_mask(gc); + if (gdev->dev.release) { + /* release() has been registered by gpiochip_setup_dev() */ + put_device(&gdev->dev); + goto err_print_message; + } err_remove_from_list: spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags); list_del(&gdev->list); @@ -783,11 +791,12 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data, err_free_ida: ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id); err_free_gdev: + kfree(gdev); +err_print_message: /* failures here can mean systems won't boot... */ pr_err("%s: GPIOs %d..%d (%s) failed to register, %d\n", __func__, - gdev->base, gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1, + base, base + gdev->ngpio - 1, gc->label ? : "generic", ret); - kfree(gdev); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add_data_with_key); -- 2.34.1

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel November 2024