Hi WenChen,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10
head: 170b758d064664f953e8f6de41dd4a3ef122443a
commit: 329bf7f331286ee5d571d374e31ed50d2877b110 [2284/2284] ubcore: fix the bug of tp negotiation concurrency
config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241029 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031836.4wU640gU-lkp@…)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241103/202411031836.4wU640gU-lkp@…)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411031836.4wU640gU-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:66:17: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_get_mtu' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
66 | enum ubcore_mtu ubcore_get_mtu(int mtu)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:392:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_modify_tp_state' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
392 | int ubcore_modify_tp_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct ubcore_tp *tp,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:894:19: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_create_vtp' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
894 | struct ubcore_tp *ubcore_create_vtp(struct ubcore_device *dev, union ubcore_eid *remote_eid,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c:920:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_destroy_vtp' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
920 | int ubcore_destroy_vtp(struct ubcore_tp *vtp)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/ubcore_modify_tp_state +392 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_tp.c
391
> 392 int ubcore_modify_tp_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct ubcore_tp *tp,
393 enum ubcore_tp_state new_state, struct ubcore_tp_attr *attr, union ubcore_tp_attr_mask mask)
394 {
395 if (ubcore_modify_tp_state_check(tp, new_state) != 0)
396 return -1;
397
398 if (tp->state == UBCORE_TP_STATE_ERR && new_state == UBCORE_TP_STATE_ERR) {
399 ubcore_log_info("tp is already in ERR state and tpn = %u",
400 tp->tpn);
401 return 0;
402 }
403
404 if (dev->ops->modify_tp(tp, attr, mask) != 0) {
405 /* tp->peer_ext.addr will be freed when called ubcore_destroy_tp */
406 ubcore_log_err("Failed to modify tp to %u from state %u and tpn = %u",
407 (uint32_t)new_state, (uint32_t)tp->state, tp->tpn);
408 return -1;
409 }
410 tp->state = new_state;
411 ubcore_log_info("tp state:(%u to %u) with tpn %u, peer_tpn %u",
412 (uint32_t)tp->state, (uint32_t)new_state, tp->tpn, tp->peer_tpn);
413 return 0;
414 }
415
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.1
commit ec851b23084b3a0af8bf0f5e51d33a8d678bdc49
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRIL
CVE: CVE-2022-48975
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?…
--------------------------------
Here is a backtrace report about memory leak detected in
gpiochip_setup_dev():
unreferenced object 0xffff88810b406400 (size 512):
comm "python3", pid 1682, jiffies 4295346908 (age 24.090s)
backtrace:
kmalloc_trace
device_add device_private_init at drivers/base/core.c:3361
(inlined by) device_add at drivers/base/core.c:3411
cdev_device_add
gpiolib_cdev_register
gpiochip_setup_dev
gpiochip_add_data_with_key
gcdev_register() & gcdev_unregister() would call device_add() &
device_del() (no matter CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV is enabled or not) to
register/unregister device.
However, if device_add() succeeds, some resource (like
struct device_private allocated by device_private_init())
is not released by device_del().
Therefore, after device_add() succeeds by gcdev_register(), it
needs to call put_device() to release resource in the error handle
path.
Here we move forward the register of release function, and let it
release every piece of resource by put_device() instead of kfree().
While at it, fix another subtle issue, i.e. when gc->ngpio is equal
to 0, we still call kcalloc() and, in case of further error, kfree()
on the ZERO_PTR pointer, which is not NULL. It's not a bug per se,
but rather waste of the resources and potentially wrong expectation
about contents of the gdev->descs variable.
Fixes: 159f3cd92f17 ("gpiolib: Defer gpio device setup until after gpiolib initialization")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski(a)linaro.org>
Conflicts:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
[ 3cc1fb73993905b598da3802f87ac59411c52516(gpiolib: do not print err message for EPROBE_DEFER).
990f6756bb64756d2d1033118cded6333b43397d(gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio_chip).
9dbd1ab20509e85cd3fac9479a00c59e83c08196(gpiolib: check the 'ngpios' property in core gpiolib code).
context conflicts because the preceding three commit commands are not merge]
Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index 59d8affad343..3fc011d4b4aa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -500,12 +500,13 @@ static int gpiochip_setup_dev(struct gpio_device *gdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */
+ gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release;
+
ret = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev);
if (ret)
goto err_remove_device;
- /* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */
- gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release;
dev_dbg(&gdev->dev, "registered GPIOs %d to %d on %s\n", gdev->base,
gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1, gdev->chip->label ? : "generic");
@@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
unsigned i;
- int base = gc->base;
+ int base = 0;
struct gpio_device *gdev;
/*
@@ -624,22 +625,22 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
else
gdev->owner = THIS_MODULE;
- gdev->descs = kcalloc(gc->ngpio, sizeof(gdev->descs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!gdev->descs) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_free_dev_name;
- }
-
if (gc->ngpio == 0) {
chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err_free_descs;
+ goto err_free_dev_name;
}
if (gc->ngpio > FASTPATH_NGPIO)
chip_warn(gc, "line cnt %u is greater than fast path cnt %u\n",
gc->ngpio, FASTPATH_NGPIO);
+ gdev->descs = kcalloc(gc->ngpio, sizeof(*gdev->descs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!gdev->descs) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_free_dev_name;
+ }
+
gdev->label = kstrdup_const(gc->label ?: "unknown", GFP_KERNEL);
if (!gdev->label) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -658,11 +659,13 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
* it may be a pipe dream. It will not happen before we get rid
* of the sysfs interface anyways.
*/
+ base = gc->base;
if (base < 0) {
base = gpiochip_find_base(gc->ngpio);
if (base < 0) {
- ret = base;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
+ ret = base;
+ base = 0;
goto err_free_label;
}
/*
@@ -770,6 +773,11 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
err_free_gpiochip_mask:
gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges(gc);
gpiochip_free_valid_mask(gc);
+ if (gdev->dev.release) {
+ /* release() has been registered by gpiochip_setup_dev() */
+ put_device(&gdev->dev);
+ goto err_print_message;
+ }
err_remove_from_list:
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
list_del(&gdev->list);
@@ -783,11 +791,12 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
err_free_ida:
ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
err_free_gdev:
+ kfree(gdev);
+err_print_message:
/* failures here can mean systems won't boot... */
pr_err("%s: GPIOs %d..%d (%s) failed to register, %d\n", __func__,
- gdev->base, gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1,
+ base, base + gdev->ngpio - 1,
gc->label ? : "generic", ret);
- kfree(gdev);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add_data_with_key);
--
2.34.1
From: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com>
mainline inclusion
from mainline-v6.1
commit ec851b23084b3a0af8bf0f5e51d33a8d678bdc49
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRIL
CVE: CVE-2022-48975
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?…
--------------------------------
Here is a backtrace report about memory leak detected in
gpiochip_setup_dev():
unreferenced object 0xffff88810b406400 (size 512):
comm "python3", pid 1682, jiffies 4295346908 (age 24.090s)
backtrace:
kmalloc_trace
device_add device_private_init at drivers/base/core.c:3361
(inlined by) device_add at drivers/base/core.c:3411
cdev_device_add
gpiolib_cdev_register
gpiochip_setup_dev
gpiochip_add_data_with_key
gcdev_register() & gcdev_unregister() would call device_add() &
device_del() (no matter CONFIG_GPIO_CDEV is enabled or not) to
register/unregister device.
However, if device_add() succeeds, some resource (like
struct device_private allocated by device_private_init())
is not released by device_del().
Therefore, after device_add() succeeds by gcdev_register(), it
needs to call put_device() to release resource in the error handle
path.
Here we move forward the register of release function, and let it
release every piece of resource by put_device() instead of kfree().
While at it, fix another subtle issue, i.e. when gc->ngpio is equal
to 0, we still call kcalloc() and, in case of further error, kfree()
on the ZERO_PTR pointer, which is not NULL. It's not a bug per se,
but rather waste of the resources and potentially wrong expectation
about contents of the gdev->descs variable.
Fixes: 159f3cd92f17 ("gpiolib: Defer gpio device setup until after gpiolib initialization")
Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com>
Co-developed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko(a)linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski(a)linaro.org>
Conflicts:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
[ 3cc1fb73993905b598da3802f87ac59411c52516(gpiolib: do not print err message for EPROBE_DEFER).
990f6756bb64756d2d1033118cded6333b43397d(gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio_chip).
9dbd1ab20509e85cd3fac9479a00c59e83c08196(gpiolib: check the 'ngpios' property in core gpiolib code).
context conflicts because the preceding three commit commands are not merge]
Signed-off-by: He Yujie <coka.heyujie(a)huawei.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index a8e63d8f0e36..ae000b513bc1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -500,12 +500,13 @@ static int gpiochip_setup_dev(struct gpio_device *gdev)
if (ret)
return ret;
+ /* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */
+ gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release;
+
ret = gpiochip_sysfs_register(gdev);
if (ret)
goto err_remove_device;
- /* From this point, the .release() function cleans up gpio_device */
- gdev->dev.release = gpiodevice_release;
dev_dbg(&gdev->dev, "registered GPIOs %d to %d on %s\n", gdev->base,
gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1, gdev->chip->label ? : "generic");
@@ -572,7 +573,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
unsigned long flags;
int ret = 0;
unsigned i;
- int base = gc->base;
+ int base = 0;
struct gpio_device *gdev;
/*
@@ -624,22 +625,22 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
else
gdev->owner = THIS_MODULE;
- gdev->descs = kcalloc(gc->ngpio, sizeof(gdev->descs[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!gdev->descs) {
- ret = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_free_dev_name;
- }
-
if (gc->ngpio == 0) {
chip_err(gc, "tried to insert a GPIO chip with zero lines\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto err_free_descs;
+ goto err_free_dev_name;
}
if (gc->ngpio > FASTPATH_NGPIO)
chip_warn(gc, "line cnt %u is greater than fast path cnt %u\n",
gc->ngpio, FASTPATH_NGPIO);
+ gdev->descs = kcalloc(gc->ngpio, sizeof(*gdev->descs), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!gdev->descs) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_free_dev_name;
+ }
+
gdev->label = kstrdup_const(gc->label ?: "unknown", GFP_KERNEL);
if (!gdev->label) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -658,11 +659,13 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
* it may be a pipe dream. It will not happen before we get rid
* of the sysfs interface anyways.
*/
+ base = gc->base;
if (base < 0) {
base = gpiochip_find_base(gc->ngpio);
if (base < 0) {
- ret = base;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_lock, flags);
+ ret = base;
+ base = 0;
goto err_free_label;
}
/*
@@ -770,6 +773,11 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
of_gpiochip_remove(gc);
err_free_gpiochip_mask:
gpiochip_free_valid_mask(gc);
+ if (gdev->dev.release) {
+ /* release() has been registered by gpiochip_setup_dev() */
+ put_device(&gdev->dev);
+ goto err_print_message;
+ }
err_remove_from_list:
spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_lock, flags);
list_del(&gdev->list);
@@ -783,11 +791,12 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
err_free_ida:
ida_free(&gpio_ida, gdev->id);
err_free_gdev:
+ kfree(gdev);
+err_print_message:
/* failures here can mean systems won't boot... */
pr_err("%s: GPIOs %d..%d (%s) failed to register, %d\n", __func__,
- gdev->base, gdev->base + gdev->ngpio - 1,
+ base, base + gdev->ngpio - 1,
gc->label ? : "generic", ret);
- kfree(gdev);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add_data_with_key);
--
2.34.1
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb(a)google.com>
stable inclusion
from stable-v6.6.55
commit af3122f5fdc0d00581d6e598a668df6bf54c9daa
category: bugfix
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAYRAJ
CVE: CVE-2024-49978
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id…
-------------------------------------------------
commit a1e40ac5b5e9077fe1f7ae0eb88034db0f9ae1ab upstream.
Detect gso fraglist skbs with corrupted geometry (see below) and
pass these to skb_segment instead of skb_segment_list, as the first
can segment them correctly.
Valid SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST skbs
- consist of two or more segments
- the head_skb holds the protocol headers plus first gso_size
- one or more frag_list skbs hold exactly one segment
- all but the last must be gso_size
Optional datapath hooks such as NAT and BPF (bpf_skb_pull_data) can
modify these skbs, breaking these invariants.
In extreme cases they pull all data into skb linear. For UDP, this
causes a NULL ptr deref in __udpv4_gso_segment_list_csum at
udp_hdr(seg->next)->dest.
Detect invalid geometry due to pull, by checking head_skb size.
Don't just drop, as this may blackhole a destination. Convert to be
able to pass to regular skb_segment.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240428142913.18666-1-shiming.cheng@mediate…
Fixes: 9fd1ff5d2ac7 ("udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO.")
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb(a)google.com>
Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241001171752.107580-1-willemdebruijn.kernel@gmai…
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56(a)huawei.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
index f544016e6eb3..a727eeafd0a9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_offload.c
@@ -290,8 +290,26 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,
return NULL;
}
- if (skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST)
- return __udp_gso_segment_list(gso_skb, features, is_ipv6);
+ if (skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST) {
+ /* Detect modified geometry and pass those to skb_segment. */
+ if (skb_pagelen(gso_skb) - sizeof(*uh) == skb_shinfo(gso_skb)->gso_size)
+ return __udp_gso_segment_list(gso_skb, features, is_ipv6);
+
+ /* Setup csum, as fraglist skips this in udp4_gro_receive. */
+ gso_skb->csum_start = skb_transport_header(gso_skb) - gso_skb->head;
+ gso_skb->csum_offset = offsetof(struct udphdr, check);
+ gso_skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_PARTIAL;
+
+ uh = udp_hdr(gso_skb);
+ if (is_ipv6)
+ uh->check = ~udp_v6_check(gso_skb->len,
+ &ipv6_hdr(gso_skb)->saddr,
+ &ipv6_hdr(gso_skb)->daddr, 0);
+ else
+ uh->check = ~udp_v4_check(gso_skb->len,
+ ip_hdr(gso_skb)->saddr,
+ ip_hdr(gso_skb)->daddr, 0);
+ }
skb_pull(gso_skb, sizeof(*uh));
--
2.34.1