May 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] ALSA: emu10k1: Fix out of bounds access in snd_emu10k1_pcm_channel_alloc()
by Zhang Xiaoxu 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: Tasos Sahanidis <tasos(a)tasossah.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.0-rc5 commit d29f59051d3a07b81281b2df2b8c9dfe4716067f category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: CVE-2022-48702 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… --------------------------- The voice allocator sometimes begins allocating from near the end of the array and then wraps around, however snd_emu10k1_pcm_channel_alloc() accesses the newly allocated voices as if it never wrapped around. This results in out of bounds access if the first voice has a high enough index so that first_voice + requested_voice_count > NUM_G (64). The more voices are requested, the more likely it is for this to occur. This was initially discovered using PipeWire, however it can be reproduced by calling aplay multiple times with 16 channels: aplay -r 48000 -D plughw:CARD=Live,DEV=3 -c 16 /dev/zero UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c:127:40 index 65 is out of range for type 'snd_emu10k1_voice [64]' CPU: 1 PID: 31977 Comm: aplay Tainted: G W IOE 6.0.0-rc2-emu10k1+ #7 Hardware name: ASUSTEK COMPUTER INC P5W DH Deluxe/P5W DH Deluxe, BIOS 3002 07/22/2010 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x3f __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x44/0x49 snd_emu10k1_playback_hw_params+0x3bc/0x420 [snd_emu10k1] snd_pcm_hw_params+0x29f/0x600 [snd_pcm] snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0x188/0x1410 [snd_pcm] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x26/0x50 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x35/0x170 snd_pcm_ioctl+0x27/0x40 [snd_pcm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x95/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Signed-off-by: Tasos Sahanidis <tasos(a)tasossah.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3707dcab-320a-62ff-63c0-73fc201ef756@tasossah.com Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.de> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5(a)huawei.com> --- sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c index 9f2b6097f486..623776b13f8d 100644 --- a/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c +++ b/sound/pci/emu10k1/emupcm.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int snd_emu10k1_pcm_channel_alloc(struct snd_emu10k1_pcm * epcm, int voic epcm->voices[0]->epcm = epcm; if (voices > 1) { for (i = 1; i < voices; i++) { - epcm->voices[i] = &epcm->emu->voices[epcm->voices[0]->number + i]; + epcm->voices[i] = &epcm->emu->voices[(epcm->voices[0]->number + i) % NUM_G]; epcm->voices[i]->epcm = epcm; } } -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression
by Li Lingfeng 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli(a)igalia.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit 5c2386ba80e779a92ec3bb64ccadbedd88f779b1 category: bugfix bugzilla: 189877 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit f23a4d6e07570826fe95023ca1aa96a011fa9f84 upstream. Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But it happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to scsi_add_host() didn't happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some error paths, for example. Syzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error'ing on usb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see that the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host allocation, but there's no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads to messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc structure): usb-storage 4-1:87.51: USB Mass Storage device detected proc_dir_entry 'scsi/usb-storage' already registered WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3519 at fs/proc/generic.c:377 proc_register+0x347/0x4e0 fs/proc/generic.c:376 The proper fix seems to still call scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on dev_release(), but guard that with the state check for SHOST_CREATED; there is even a comment in scsi_host_dev_release() detailing that: such conditional is meant for cases where the SCSI host was allocated but there was no calls to {add,remove}_host(), like the usb-storage case. This is what we propose here and with that, the error path of usb-storage does not trigger the warning anymore. Reported-by: syzbot+c645abf505ed21f931b5(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry(a)oracle.com> Cc: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki(a)wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli(a)igalia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240313113006.2834799-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen(a)oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c index 5bac4936c647..3feaa61f948f 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c @@ -334,12 +334,13 @@ static void scsi_host_dev_release(struct device *dev) if (shost->shost_state == SHOST_CREATED) { /* - * Free the shost_dev device name here if scsi_host_alloc() - * and scsi_host_put() have been called but neither + * Free the shost_dev device name and remove the proc host dir + * here if scsi_host_{alloc,put}() have been called but neither * scsi_host_add() nor scsi_host_remove() has been called. * This avoids that the memory allocated for the shost_dev - * name is leaked. + * name as well as the proc dir structure are leaked. */ + scsi_proc_hostdir_rm(shost->hostt); kfree(dev_name(&shost->shost_dev)); } -- 2.31.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/1] CVE-2023-52650
by Yuntao Liu 07 May '24

07 May '24

CVE-2023-52650 Chen Ni (1): [Backport] drm/tegra: dsi: Add missing check for of_find_device_by_node drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dsi.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.34.1

2 2

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/1] CVE-2023-52650
by Yuntao Liu 07 May '24

07 May '24

CVE-2023-52650 Chen Ni (1): [Backport] drm/tegra: dsi: Add missing check for of_find_device_by_node drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dsi.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.34.1

2 2

[PATCH OLK-5.10] fs: sysfs: Fix reference leak in sysfs_break_active_protection()
by Yifan Qiao 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: Alan Stern <stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu> stable inclusion from stable-v6.8.8 commit a4c99b57d43bab45225ba92d574a8683f9edc8e4 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L5IQ CVE: CVE-2024-26993 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit a90bca2228c0646fc29a72689d308e5fe03e6d78 upstream. The sysfs_break_active_protection() routine has an obvious reference leak in its error path. If the call to kernfs_find_and_get() fails then kn will be NULL, so the companion sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() routine won't get called (and would only cause an access violation by trying to dereference kn->parent if it was called). As a result, the reference to kobj acquired at the start of the function will never be released. Fix the leak by adding an explicit kobject_put() call when kn is NULL. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu> Fixes: 2afc9166f79b ("scsi: sysfs: Introduce sysfs_{un,}break_active_protection()") Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8a4d3f0f-c5e3-4b70-a188-0ca433f9e6f9@rowland.harv… Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yifan Qiao <qiaoyifan4(a)huawei.com> --- fs/sysfs/file.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c index a12ac0356c69..f21e73d10724 100644 --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ struct kernfs_node *sysfs_break_active_protection(struct kobject *kobj, kn = kernfs_find_and_get(kobj->sd, attr->name); if (kn) kernfs_break_active_protection(kn); + else + kobject_put(kobj); return kn; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_break_active_protection); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] fs: sysfs: Fix reference leak in sysfs_break_active_protection()
by Yifan Qiao 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: Alan Stern <stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu> stable inclusion from stable-v6.8.8 commit a4c99b57d43bab45225ba92d574a8683f9edc8e4 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L5IQ CVE: CVE-2024-26993 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit a90bca2228c0646fc29a72689d308e5fe03e6d78 upstream. The sysfs_break_active_protection() routine has an obvious reference leak in its error path. If the call to kernfs_find_and_get() fails then kn will be NULL, so the companion sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() routine won't get called (and would only cause an access violation by trying to dereference kn->parent if it was called). As a result, the reference to kobj acquired at the start of the function will never be released. Fix the leak by adding an explicit kobject_put() call when kn is NULL. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu> Fixes: 2afc9166f79b ("scsi: sysfs: Introduce sysfs_{un,}break_active_protection()") Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8a4d3f0f-c5e3-4b70-a188-0ca433f9e6f9@rowland.harv… Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yifan Qiao <qiaoyifan4(a)huawei.com> --- fs/sysfs/file.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c index a12ac0356c69..f21e73d10724 100644 --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ struct kernfs_node *sysfs_break_active_protection(struct kobject *kobj, kn = kernfs_find_and_get(kobj->sd, attr->name); if (kn) kernfs_break_active_protection(kn); + else + kobject_put(kobj); return kn; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_break_active_protection); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] fs: sysfs: Fix reference leak in sysfs_break_active_protection()
by Yifan Qiao 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: Alan Stern <stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu> stable inclusion from stable-v6.8.8 commit a4c99b57d43bab45225ba92d574a8683f9edc8e4 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L5IQ CVE: CVE-2024-26993 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit a90bca2228c0646fc29a72689d308e5fe03e6d78 upstream. The sysfs_break_active_protection() routine has an obvious reference leak in its error path. If the call to kernfs_find_and_get() fails then kn will be NULL, so the companion sysfs_unbreak_active_protection() routine won't get called (and would only cause an access violation by trying to dereference kn->parent if it was called). As a result, the reference to kobj acquired at the start of the function will never be released. Fix the leak by adding an explicit kobject_put() call when kn is NULL. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern(a)rowland.harvard.edu> Fixes: 2afc9166f79b ("scsi: sysfs: Introduce sysfs_{un,}break_active_protection()") Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche(a)acm.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8a4d3f0f-c5e3-4b70-a188-0ca433f9e6f9@rowland.harv… Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yifan Qiao <qiaoyifan4(a)huawei.com> --- fs/sysfs/file.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c index a12ac0356c69..f21e73d10724 100644 --- a/fs/sysfs/file.c +++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c @@ -450,6 +450,8 @@ struct kernfs_node *sysfs_break_active_protection(struct kobject *kobj, kn = kernfs_find_and_get(kobj->sd, attr->name); if (kn) kernfs_break_active_protection(kn); + else + kobject_put(kobj); return kn; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_break_active_protection); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[openeuler:OLK-5.10] BUILD SUCCESS 93f42c5daddd692f4cc1f56387774d46e083147c
by kernel test robot 07 May '24

07 May '24

tree/branch: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 branch HEAD: 93f42c5daddd692f4cc1f56387774d46e083147c !6798 media: ir_toy: fix a memleak in irtoy_tx Warning ids grouped by kconfigs: clang_recent_errors |-- arm64-allyesconfig | |-- Documentation-devicetree-bindings-arm-cpu.yaml:properties:capacity-dmips-mhz:ref-should-not-be-valid-under-const:ref | |-- Documentation-devicetree-bindings-arm-cpu.yaml:title:ARM-CPUs-bindings-should-not-be-valid-under-pattern:(-Bb-inding-Ss-chema) | |-- Documentation-devicetree-bindings-arm-cpus.yaml:examples:cpus-arm-pbha-performance-only-bits-arm-pbha-no-aliases-bits-ncpu-device_type-cpu-compatible-arm-cortex-a57-...-n-is-not-of-type-array | |-- Documentation-devicetree-bindings-arm-cpus.yaml:maintainers-is-a-required-property | |-- description:Display-controller-reference-clock-source-is-not-of-type-object-boolean | |-- description:Display-controller-reference-clock-source-is-too-short | |-- description:Offset-and-length-of-the-memory-mapped-registers-is-too-short | |-- items-is-not-one-of-type-description-dependencies-dependentRequired-dependentSchemas-properties-patternProperties-additionalProperties-unevaluatedProperties-deprecated-required-not-allOf-anyOf-oneOf-r | `-- minItems-is-not-one-of-type-description-dependencies-dependentRequired-dependentSchemas-properties-patternProperties-additionalProperties-unevaluatedProperties-deprecated-required-not-allOf-anyOf-oneO `-- x86_64-allnoconfig |-- Warning:openEuler-MAINTAINERS-references-a-file-that-doesn-t-exist:Documentation-networking-hinic3.rst `-- drivers-net-ethernet-mucse-rnpm-rnpm_common.h:linux-version.h-not-needed. elapsed time: 729m configs tested: 35 configs skipped: 149 The following configs have been built successfully. More configs may be tested in the coming days. tested configs: arm64 allmodconfig clang arm64 allnoconfig gcc arm64 defconfig gcc arm64 randconfig-001-20240507 clang arm64 randconfig-002-20240507 clang arm64 randconfig-003-20240507 clang arm64 randconfig-004-20240507 clang x86_64 allnoconfig clang x86_64 allyesconfig clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-001-20240507 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-002-20240507 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-003-20240507 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-004-20240507 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-005-20240507 clang x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-006-20240507 gcc x86_64 defconfig gcc x86_64 randconfig-001-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-002-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-003-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-004-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-005-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-006-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-011-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-012-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-013-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-014-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-015-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-016-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-071-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-072-20240507 gcc x86_64 randconfig-073-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-074-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-075-20240507 clang x86_64 randconfig-076-20240507 clang x86_64 rhel-8.3-rust clang -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openEuler-1.0-LTS] nouveau: fix instmem race condition around ptr stores
by Yipeng Zou 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: Dave Airlie <airlied(a)redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10 commit 13d76b2f443dc371842916dd8768009ff1594716 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9LK8M CVE: CVE-2024-26984 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit fff1386cc889d8fb4089d285f883f8cba62d82ce upstream. Running a lot of VK CTS in parallel against nouveau, once every few hours you might see something like this crash. BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008 PGD 8000000114e6e067 P4D 8000000114e6e067 PUD 109046067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI CPU: 7 PID: 53891 Comm: deqp-vk Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6+ #27 Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI/Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF, BIOS F8 11/05/2021 RIP: 0010:gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0xe3/0x180 [nouveau] Code: c7 48 01 c8 49 89 45 58 85 d2 0f 84 95 00 00 00 41 0f b7 46 12 49 8b 7e 08 89 da 42 8d 2c f8 48 8b 47 08 41 83 c7 01 48 89 ee <48> 8b 40 08 ff d0 0f 1f 00 49 8b 7e 08 48 89 d9 48 8d 75 04 48 c1 RSP: 0000:ffffac20c5857838 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000004d8001 RCX: 0000000000000001 RDX: 00000000004d8001 RSI: 00000000000006d8 RDI: ffffa07afe332180 RBP: 00000000000006d8 R08: ffffac20c5857ad0 R09: 0000000000ffff10 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffa07af27e2de0 R12: 000000000000001c R13: ffffac20c5857ad0 R14: ffffa07a96fe9040 R15: 000000000000001c FS: 00007fe395eed7c0(0000) GS:ffffa07e2c980000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000011febe001 CR4: 00000000003706f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ... ? gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0xe3/0x180 [nouveau] ? gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0x37/0x180 [nouveau] nvkm_vmm_iter+0x351/0xa20 [nouveau] ? __pfx_nvkm_vmm_ref_ptes+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] ? __pfx_gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] ? __pfx_gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] ? __lock_acquire+0x3ed/0x2170 ? __pfx_gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] nvkm_vmm_ptes_get_map+0xc2/0x100 [nouveau] ? __pfx_nvkm_vmm_ref_ptes+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] ? __pfx_gp100_vmm_pgt_mem+0x10/0x10 [nouveau] nvkm_vmm_map_locked+0x224/0x3a0 [nouveau] Adding any sort of useful debug usually makes it go away, so I hand wrote the function in a line, and debugged the asm. Every so often pt->memory->ptrs is NULL. This ptrs ptr is set in the nv50_instobj_acquire called from nvkm_kmap. If Thread A and Thread B both get to nv50_instobj_acquire around the same time, and Thread A hits the refcount_set line, and in lockstep thread B succeeds at refcount_inc_not_zero, there is a chance the ptrs value won't have been stored since refcount_set is unordered. Force a memory barrier here, I picked smp_mb, since we want it on all CPUs and it's write followed by a read. v2: use paired smp_rmb/smp_wmb. Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Fixes: be55287aa5ba ("drm/nouveau/imem/nv50: embed nvkm_instobj directly into nv04_instobj") Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr(a)redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240411011510.2546857-1-airl… Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yipeng Zou <zouyipeng(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c index db48a1daca0c..f8ca79eaa7f7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/instmem/nv50.c @@ -221,8 +221,11 @@ nv50_instobj_acquire(struct nvkm_memory *memory) void __iomem *map = NULL; /* Already mapped? */ - if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&iobj->maps)) + if (refcount_inc_not_zero(&iobj->maps)) { + /* read barrier match the wmb on refcount set */ + smp_rmb(); return iobj->map; + } /* Take the lock, and re-check that another thread hasn't * already mapped the object in the meantime. @@ -249,6 +252,8 @@ nv50_instobj_acquire(struct nvkm_memory *memory) iobj->base.memory.ptrs = &nv50_instobj_fast; else iobj->base.memory.ptrs = &nv50_instobj_slow; + /* barrier to ensure the ptrs are written before refcount is set */ + smp_wmb(); refcount_set(&iobj->maps, 1); } -- 2.34.1

1 0

[PATCH OLK-5.10] kprobes: Fix check for probe enabled in kill_kprobe()
by Pu Lehui 07 May '24

07 May '24

From: Li Huafei <lihuafei1(a)huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.2-rc1 commit 0c76ef3f26d5ef2ac2c21b47e7620cff35809fbb category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9MXH3 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- In kill_kprobe(), the check whether disarm_kprobe_ftrace() needs to be called always fails. This is because before that we set the KPROBE_FLAG_GONE flag for kprobe so that "!kprobe_disabled(p)" is always false. The disarm_kprobe_ftrace() call introduced by commit: 0cb2f1372baa ("kprobes: Fix NULL pointer dereference at kprobe_ftrace_handler") to fix the NULL pointer reference problem. When the probe is enabled, if we do not disarm it, this problem still exists. Fix it by putting the probe enabled check before setting the KPROBE_FLAG_GONE flag. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221126114316.201857-1-lihuafei1@huawei.com/ Fixes: 3031313eb3d54 ("kprobes: Fix to check probe enabled before disarm_kprobe_ftrace()") Signed-off-by: Li Huafei <lihuafei1(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat(a)kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt(a)goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- kernel/kprobes.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c index 6fd66a47b476..325a81f9c38f 100644 --- a/kernel/kprobes.c +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c @@ -2281,6 +2281,14 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) if (WARN_ON_ONCE(kprobe_gone(p))) return; + /* + * The module is going away. We should disarm the kprobe which + * is using ftrace, because ftrace framework is still available at + * MODULE_STATE_GOING notification. + */ + if (kprobe_ftrace(p) && !kprobe_disabled(p) && !kprobes_all_disarmed) + disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p); + p->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_GONE; if (kprobe_aggrprobe(p)) { /* @@ -2297,14 +2305,6 @@ static void kill_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) * the original probed function (which will be freed soon) any more. */ arch_remove_kprobe(p); - - /* - * The module is going away. We should disarm the kprobe which - * is using ftrace, because ftrace framework is still available at - * MODULE_STATE_GOING notification. - */ - if (kprobe_ftrace(p) && !kprobe_disabled(p) && !kprobes_all_disarmed) - disarm_kprobe_ftrace(p); } /* Disable one kprobe */ -- 2.34.1

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel May 2024