June 2024 - Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/1] Fix allmodconfig build frame size error
by Shuai Wu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

Fix allmodconfig build frame size is large than 2048 bytes error in hiroce3 driver. Fixes: 5bc8dbb5fdf5 ("infiniband/hw/hiroce3: Add Huawei Intelligent Network Card RDMA Driver") Shuai Wu (1): net/ethernet/huawei/hiroce3: Fix allmodconfig build frame size error drivers/infiniband/hw/hiroce3/dfx/roce_dfx_query.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.33.0

2 2

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS v2 0/2] CVE-2024-36971
by Liu Jian 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

CVE-2024-36971 Eric Dumazet (1): net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race Liu Jian (1): net: fix kabi breakage in struct dst_ops include/net/dst_ops.h | 4 ++++ include/net/sock.h | 13 +++---------- net/ipv4/route.c | 22 ++++++++-------------- net/ipv6/route.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 11 +++-------- 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 11555/22961] drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:39:30: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
by kernel test robot 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 74cd1e5b892070aee2e2ce11eae993856552e98c commit: 8ad07513042c8fef5a03b404f0bbf066f603c101 [11555/22961] net: hns3: place dcqcn implementations in an ind file config: arm64-randconfig-r111-20240615 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240618/202406181426.ygyn6idN-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240618/202406181426.ygyn6idN-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406181426.ygyn6idN-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:39:30: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __le32 @@ got unsigned int [usertype] @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:39:30: sparse: expected restricted __le32 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:39:30: sparse: got unsigned int [usertype] >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:42:22: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __le32 @@ got unsigned int @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:42:22: sparse: expected restricted __le32 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:42:22: sparse: got unsigned int >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:43:22: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __le32 @@ got int @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:43:22: sparse: expected restricted __le32 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:43:22: sparse: got int drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:44:22: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected restricted __le32 @@ got int @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:44:22: sparse: expected restricted __le32 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:44:22: sparse: got int >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:53:23: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] @@ got restricted __le32 @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:53:23: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:53:23: sparse: got restricted __le32 >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:255:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] dcqcn_rx_cnt @@ got restricted __le32 @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:255:42: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] dcqcn_rx_cnt drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:255:42: sparse: got restricted __le32 >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:256:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] dcqcn_tx_cnt @@ got restricted __le32 @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:256:42: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] dcqcn_tx_cnt drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:256:42: sparse: got restricted __le32 >> drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:257:42: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [usertype] dcqcn_db_cnt @@ got restricted __le32 @@ drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:257:42: sparse: expected unsigned int [usertype] dcqcn_db_cnt drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c:257:42: sparse: got restricted __le32 vim +39 drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3_cae/hns3_cae_dcqcn.c 15 16 static int hns3_dcqcn_rw(struct hns3_nic_priv *net_priv, 17 u32 offset, u32 *data, u32 rw_type) 18 { 19 struct hnae3_handle *h = net_priv->ae_handle; 20 struct hclge_vport *vport; 21 struct hclge_dev *hdev; 22 struct hclge_desc desc; 23 int ret; 24 25 if (!data) 26 return -EFAULT; 27 28 vport = container_of(h, struct hclge_vport, nic); 29 hdev = vport->back; 30 31 if (rw_type == DEVMEM_CFG_READ) { 32 hns3_cae_cmd_setup_basic_desc(&desc, 33 HCLGE_OPC_DCQCN_TEMPLATE_CFG, 34 true); 35 } else { 36 hns3_cae_cmd_setup_basic_desc(&desc, 37 HCLGE_OPC_DCQCN_TEMPLATE_CFG, 38 false); > 39 desc.data[2] = *data; 40 } 41 > 42 desc.data[0] = SCC_TEMP_LOW_ADDR + offset; > 43 desc.data[1] = SCC_TEMP_HIGH_ADDR; 44 desc.data[4] = 32; 45 46 ret = hns3_cae_cmd_send(hdev, &desc, 1); 47 if (ret) { 48 dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev, "disable net lane failed %d\n", ret); 49 return ret; 50 } 51 52 if (rw_type == DEVMEM_CFG_READ) > 53 *data = desc.data[2]; 54 55 return 0; 56 } 57 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1 v2 0/3] CVE-2024-36971
by Liu Jian 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

CVE-2024-36971 Eric Dumazet (2): net: annotate data-races around sk->sk_dst_pending_confirm net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race Liu Jian (1): net: fix kabi breakage in struct dst_ops include/net/dst_ops.h | 3 ++- include/net/sock.h | 17 +++++------------ net/core/sock.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/route.c | 22 ++++++++-------------- net/ipv4/tcp_output.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/route.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 11 +++-------- 7 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 4

[PATCH OLK-5.10 v2 0/2] CVE-2024-36971
by Liu Jian 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

CVE-2024-36971 Eric Dumazet (1): net: fix __dst_negative_advice() race Liu Jian (1): net: fix kabi breakage in struct dst_ops include/net/dst_ops.h | 3 ++- include/net/sock.h | 13 +++---------- net/ipv4/route.c | 22 ++++++++-------------- net/ipv6/route.c | 29 +++++++++++++++-------------- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 11 +++-------- 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 3

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] i2c: core: Run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible
by Kaixiong Yu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

fix CVE-2023-52791 Benjamin Bara (2): i2c: core: Run atomic i2c xfer when !preemptible i2c: core: Fix atomic xfer check for non-preempt config drivers/i2c/i2c-core.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.25.1

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] net: ethernet: fix potential use-after-free in ec_bhf_remove
by Kaixiong Yu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin(a)gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.196 commit 0260916843cc74f3906acf8b6f256693e01530a2 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9R4HZ CVE: CVE-2021-47235 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 9cca0c2d70149160407bda9a9446ce0c29b6e6c6 ] static void ec_bhf_remove(struct pci_dev *dev) { ... struct ec_bhf_priv *priv = netdev_priv(net_dev); unregister_netdev(net_dev); free_netdev(net_dev); pci_iounmap(dev, priv->dma_io); pci_iounmap(dev, priv->io); ... } priv is netdev private data, but it is used after free_netdev(). It can cause use-after-free when accessing priv pointer. So, fix it by moving free_netdev() after pci_iounmap() calls. Fixes: 6af55ff52b02 ("Driver for Beckhoff CX5020 EtherCAT master module.") Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kaixiong Yu <yukaixiong(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/ec_bhf.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ec_bhf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ec_bhf.c index d71cba0842c5..59dc20020c73 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ec_bhf.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ec_bhf.c @@ -585,10 +585,12 @@ static void ec_bhf_remove(struct pci_dev *dev) struct ec_bhf_priv *priv = netdev_priv(net_dev); unregister_netdev(net_dev); - free_netdev(net_dev); pci_iounmap(dev, priv->dma_io); pci_iounmap(dev, priv->io); + + free_netdev(net_dev); + pci_release_regions(dev); pci_clear_master(dev); pci_disable_device(dev); -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] mm: swap: fix race between free_swap_and_cache() and swapoff()
by Jinjiang Tu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit d85c11c97ecf92d47a4b29e3faca714dc1f18d0d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L4RJ CVE: CVE-2024-26960 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 82b1c07a0af603e3c47b906c8e991dc96f01688e ] There was previously a theoretical window where swapoff() could run and teardown a swap_info_struct while a call to free_swap_and_cache() was running in another thread. This could cause, amongst other bad possibilities, swap_page_trans_huge_swapped() (called by free_swap_and_cache()) to access the freed memory for swap_map. This is a theoretical problem and I haven't been able to provoke it from a test case. But there has been agreement based on code review that this is possible (see link below). Fix it by using get_swap_device()/put_swap_device(), which will stall swapoff(). There was an extra check in _swap_info_get() to confirm that the swap entry was not free. This isn't present in get_swap_device() because it doesn't make sense in general due to the race between getting the reference and swapoff. So I've added an equivalent check directly in free_swap_and_cache(). Details of how to provoke one possible issue (thanks to David Hildenbrand for deriving this): --8<----- __swap_entry_free() might be the last user and result in "count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE". swapoff->try_to_unuse() will stop as soon as soon as si->inuse_pages==0. So the question is: could someone reclaim the folio and turn si->inuse_pages==0, before we completed swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(). Imagine the following: 2 MiB folio in the swapcache. Only 2 subpages are still references by swap entries. Process 1 still references subpage 0 via swap entry. Process 2 still references subpage 1 via swap entry. Process 1 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE [then, preempted in the hypervisor etc.] Process 2 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE Process 2 goes ahead, passes swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), and calls __try_to_reclaim_swap(). __try_to_reclaim_swap()->folio_free_swap()->delete_from_swap_cache()-> put_swap_folio()->free_swap_slot()->swapcache_free_entries()-> swap_entry_free()->swap_range_free()-> ... WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries); What stops swapoff to succeed after process 2 reclaimed the swap cache but before process1 finished its call to swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()? --8<----- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306140356.3974886-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com Fixes: 7c00bafee87c ("mm/swap: free swap slots in batch") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/65a66eb9-41f8-4790-8db2-0c70ea15979f@redha… Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang(a)huawei.com> --- mm/swapfile.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c index a10c67728e46..2f8a099f014b 100644 --- a/mm/swapfile.c +++ b/mm/swapfile.c @@ -1373,6 +1373,11 @@ static unsigned char __swap_entry_free_locked(struct swap_info_struct *p, } /* + * Note that when only holding the PTL, swapoff might succeed immediately + * after freeing a swap entry. Therefore, immediately after + * __swap_entry_free(), the swap info might become stale and should not + * be touched without a prior get_swap_device(). + * * Check whether swap entry is valid in the swap device. If so, * return pointer to swap_info_struct, and keep the swap entry valid * via preventing the swap device from being swapoff, until @@ -1899,13 +1904,19 @@ int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry) if (non_swap_entry(entry)) return 1; - p = _swap_info_get(entry); + p = get_swap_device(entry); if (p) { + if (WARN_ON(data_race(!p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)]))) { + put_swap_device(p); + return 0; + } + count = __swap_entry_free(p, entry); if (count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE && !swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(p, entry)) __try_to_reclaim_swap(p, swp_offset(entry), TTRS_UNMAPPED | TTRS_FULL); + put_swap_device(p); } return p != NULL; } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] mm: swap: fix race between free_swap_and_cache() and swapoff()
by Jinjiang Tu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit d85c11c97ecf92d47a4b29e3faca714dc1f18d0d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L4RJ CVE: CVE-2024-26960 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 82b1c07a0af603e3c47b906c8e991dc96f01688e ] There was previously a theoretical window where swapoff() could run and teardown a swap_info_struct while a call to free_swap_and_cache() was running in another thread. This could cause, amongst other bad possibilities, swap_page_trans_huge_swapped() (called by free_swap_and_cache()) to access the freed memory for swap_map. This is a theoretical problem and I haven't been able to provoke it from a test case. But there has been agreement based on code review that this is possible (see link below). Fix it by using get_swap_device()/put_swap_device(), which will stall swapoff(). There was an extra check in _swap_info_get() to confirm that the swap entry was not free. This isn't present in get_swap_device() because it doesn't make sense in general due to the race between getting the reference and swapoff. So I've added an equivalent check directly in free_swap_and_cache(). Details of how to provoke one possible issue (thanks to David Hildenbrand for deriving this): --8<----- __swap_entry_free() might be the last user and result in "count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE". swapoff->try_to_unuse() will stop as soon as soon as si->inuse_pages==0. So the question is: could someone reclaim the folio and turn si->inuse_pages==0, before we completed swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(). Imagine the following: 2 MiB folio in the swapcache. Only 2 subpages are still references by swap entries. Process 1 still references subpage 0 via swap entry. Process 2 still references subpage 1 via swap entry. Process 1 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE [then, preempted in the hypervisor etc.] Process 2 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache(). -> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE Process 2 goes ahead, passes swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), and calls __try_to_reclaim_swap(). __try_to_reclaim_swap()->folio_free_swap()->delete_from_swap_cache()-> put_swap_folio()->free_swap_slot()->swapcache_free_entries()-> swap_entry_free()->swap_range_free()-> ... WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries); What stops swapoff to succeed after process 2 reclaimed the swap cache but before process1 finished its call to swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()? --8<----- Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306140356.3974886-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com Fixes: 7c00bafee87c ("mm/swap: free swap slots in batch") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/65a66eb9-41f8-4790-8db2-0c70ea15979f@redha… Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts(a)arm.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david(a)redhat.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang(a)intel.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang(a)huawei.com> --- mm/swapfile.c | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/swapfile.c b/mm/swapfile.c index a10c67728e46..2f8a099f014b 100644 --- a/mm/swapfile.c +++ b/mm/swapfile.c @@ -1373,6 +1373,11 @@ static unsigned char __swap_entry_free_locked(struct swap_info_struct *p, } /* + * Note that when only holding the PTL, swapoff might succeed immediately + * after freeing a swap entry. Therefore, immediately after + * __swap_entry_free(), the swap info might become stale and should not + * be touched without a prior get_swap_device(). + * * Check whether swap entry is valid in the swap device. If so, * return pointer to swap_info_struct, and keep the swap entry valid * via preventing the swap device from being swapoff, until @@ -1899,13 +1904,19 @@ int free_swap_and_cache(swp_entry_t entry) if (non_swap_entry(entry)) return 1; - p = _swap_info_get(entry); + p = get_swap_device(entry); if (p) { + if (WARN_ON(data_race(!p->swap_map[swp_offset(entry)]))) { + put_swap_device(p); + return 0; + } + count = __swap_entry_free(p, entry); if (count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE && !swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(p, entry)) __try_to_reclaim_swap(p, swp_offset(entry), TTRS_UNMAPPED | TTRS_FULL); + put_swap_device(p); } return p != NULL; } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] ARM: 9359/1: flush: check if the folio is reserved for no-mapping addresses
by Jinjiang Tu 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

From: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc1 commit 0c66c6f4e21cb22220cbd8821c5c73fc157d20dc category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9L5E2 CVE: CVE-2024-26947 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- Since commit a4d5613c4dc6 ("arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment") changes the semantics of pfn_valid() to check presence of the memory map for a PFN. A valid page for an address which is reserved but not mapped by the kernel[1], the system crashed during some uio test with the following memory layout: node 0: [mem 0x00000000c0a00000-0x00000000cc8fffff] node 0: [mem 0x00000000d0000000-0x00000000da1fffff] the uio layout is：0xc0900000, 0x100000 the crash backtrace like: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address bff00000 [...] CPU: 1 PID: 465 Comm: startapp.bin Tainted: G O 5.10.0 #1 Hardware name: Generic DT based system PC is at b15_flush_kern_dcache_area+0x24/0x3c LR is at __sync_icache_dcache+0x6c/0x98 [...] (b15_flush_kern_dcache_area) from (__sync_icache_dcache+0x6c/0x98) (__sync_icache_dcache) from (set_pte_at+0x28/0x54) (set_pte_at) from (remap_pfn_range+0x1a0/0x274) (remap_pfn_range) from (uio_mmap+0x184/0x1b8 [uio]) (uio_mmap [uio]) from (__mmap_region+0x264/0x5f4) (__mmap_region) from (__do_mmap_mm+0x3ec/0x440) (__do_mmap_mm) from (do_mmap+0x50/0x58) (do_mmap) from (vm_mmap_pgoff+0xfc/0x188) (vm_mmap_pgoff) from (ksys_mmap_pgoff+0xac/0xc4) (ksys_mmap_pgoff) from (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x5c) Code: e0801001 e2423001 e1c00003 f57ff04f (ee070f3e) ---[ end trace 09cf0734c3805d52 ]--- Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception So check if PG_reserved was set to solve this issue. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zbtdue57RO0QScJM@linux.ibm.com/ Fixes: a4d5613c4dc6 ("arm: extend pfn_valid to take into account freed memory map alignment") Suggested-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel(a)armlinux.org.uk> Conflicts: arch/arm/mm/flush.c [Conflicts due to folio api.] Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang(a)huawei.com> --- arch/arm/mm/flush.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/flush.c b/arch/arm/mm/flush.c index 6d89db7895d1..ef848bf0df28 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/flush.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/flush.c @@ -280,6 +280,9 @@ void __sync_icache_dcache(pte_t pteval) return; page = pfn_to_page(pfn); + if (PageReserved(page)) + return; + if (cache_is_vipt_aliasing()) mapping = page_mapping_file(page); else -- 2.25.1

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel June 2024