- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer
by Tirui Yin 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.324 commit e7ea60184e1e88a3c9e437b3265cbb6439aa7e26 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB5AVT CVE: CVE-2024-50302 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 177f25d1292c7e16e1199b39c85480f7f8815552 ] Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report. Fixes: 27ce405039bf ("HID: fix data access in implement()") Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens(a)google.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tirui Yin <yintirui(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index a8f155bda610..7dd30deceda4 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ u8 *hid_alloc_report_buf(struct hid_report *report, gfp_t flags) u32 len = hid_report_len(report) + 7; - return kmalloc(len, flags); + return kzalloc(len, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hid_alloc_report_buf); -- 2.17.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer
by Tirui Yin 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.230 commit d7dc68d82ab3fcfc3f65322465da3d7031d4ab46 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB5AVT CVE: CVE-2024-50302 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 177f25d1292c7e16e1199b39c85480f7f8815552 ] Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report. Fixes: 27ce405039bf ("HID: fix data access in implement()") Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens(a)google.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tirui Yin <yintirui(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index 6474aa50931c..75d272e5376b 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ u8 *hid_alloc_report_buf(struct hid_report *report, gfp_t flags) u32 len = hid_report_len(report) + 7; - return kmalloc(len, flags); + return kzalloc(len, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hid_alloc_report_buf); -- 2.17.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer
by Tirui Yin 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.230 commit d7dc68d82ab3fcfc3f65322465da3d7031d4ab46 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB5AVT CVE: CVE-2024-50302 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 177f25d1292c7e16e1199b39c85480f7f8815552 ] Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report. Fixes: 27ce405039bf ("HID: fix data access in implement()") Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens(a)google.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tirui Yin <yintirui(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index 5281d693b32d..0fef4bdb90f1 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ u8 *hid_alloc_report_buf(struct hid_report *report, gfp_t flags) u32 len = hid_report_len(report) + 7; - return kmalloc(len, flags); + return kzalloc(len, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hid_alloc_report_buf); -- 2.17.1

2 1

[OLK-5.10] HID: core: zero-initialize the report buffer
by Tirui Yin 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.230 commit d7dc68d82ab3fcfc3f65322465da3d7031d4ab46 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB5AVT CVE: CVE-2024-50302 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 177f25d1292c7e16e1199b39c85480f7f8815552 ] Since the report buffer is used by all kinds of drivers in various ways, let's zero-initialize it during allocation to make sure that it can't be ever used to leak kernel memory via specially-crafted report. Fixes: 27ce405039bf ("HID: fix data access in implement()") Reported-by: Benoît Sevens <bsevens(a)google.com> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Tirui Yin <yintirui(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c index 5281d693b32d..0fef4bdb90f1 100644 --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c @@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ u8 *hid_alloc_report_buf(struct hid_report *report, gfp_t flags) u32 len = hid_report_len(report) + 7; - return kmalloc(len, flags); + return kzalloc(len, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hid_alloc_report_buf); -- 2.17.1

1 0

[openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] vp_vdpa: fix id_table array not null terminated error
by liukai 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

From: Xiaoguang Wang <lege.wang(a)jaguarmicro.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.1.119 commit 870d68fe17b5d9032049dcad98b5781a344a8657 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IB8IUJ CVE: CVE-2024-53110 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- commit 4e39ecadf1d2a08187139619f1f314b64ba7d947 upstream. Allocate one extra virtio_device_id as null terminator, otherwise vdpa_mgmtdev_get_classes() may iterate multiple times and visit undefined memory. Fixes: ffbda8e9df10 ("vdpa/vp_vdpa : add vdpa tool support in vp_vdpa") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Parav Pandit <parav(a)nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen(a)jaguarmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Wang <lege.wang(a)jaguarmicro.com> Message-Id: <20241105133518.1494-1-lege.wang(a)jaguarmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst(a)redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav(a)nvidia.com> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Kai <liukai284(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c index bc0bdcc7bcea..4e513a38df60 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c @@ -574,7 +574,11 @@ static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) goto mdev_err; } - mdev_id = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_device_id), GFP_KERNEL); + /* + * id_table should be a null terminated array, so allocate one additional + * entry here, see vdpa_mgmtdev_get_classes(). + */ + mdev_id = kcalloc(2, sizeof(struct virtio_device_id), GFP_KERNEL); if (!mdev_id) { err = -ENOMEM; goto mdev_id_err; @@ -594,8 +598,8 @@ static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id) goto probe_err; } - mdev_id->device = mdev->id.device; - mdev_id->vendor = mdev->id.vendor; + mdev_id[0].device = mdev->id.device; + mdev_id[0].vendor = mdev->id.vendor; mgtdev->id_table = mdev_id; mgtdev->max_supported_vqs = vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev); mgtdev->supported_features = vp_modern_get_features(mdev); -- 2.34.1

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1584/1584] drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:31:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'ahci_wait_em_reset'
by kernel test robot 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: 8a512be8da229a21f36ac0a0253414f2fb9ac174 commit: fb43492008c11fe89e510dd63383a2d37ea3cf8e [1584/1584] ata: ahci: Add support for AHCI SGPIO Enclosure Management config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041754.ZiNZbWX3-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041754.ZiNZbWX3-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041754.ZiNZbWX3-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:10: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:9: In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:8: In file included from include/linux/cacheflush.h:5: In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/cacheflush.h:5: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2235: include/linux/vmstat.h:508:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 508 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 509 | item]; | ~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:515:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 515 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 516 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:527:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 527 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 528 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:536:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 536 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 537 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:31:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'ahci_wait_em_reset' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 31 | int ahci_wait_em_reset(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin, u32 retry) | ^ drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:31:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 31 | int ahci_wait_em_reset(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin, u32 retry) | ^ | static >> drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:55:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 55 | void ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) | ^ drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:55:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 55 | void ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) | ^ | static >> drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:99:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio_gpmode' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 99 | void ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio_gpmode(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) | ^ drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:99:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 99 | void ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio_gpmode(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) | ^ | static >> drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:601:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'set_em_messages' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 601 | void set_em_messages(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) | ^ drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:601:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 601 | void set_em_messages(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) | ^ | static >> drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:621:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'add_sgpio_zhaoxin' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 621 | int add_sgpio_zhaoxin(void) | ^ drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:621:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 621 | int add_sgpio_zhaoxin(void) | ^ | static >> drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:673:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'remove_sgpio_zhaoxin' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 673 | void remove_sgpio_zhaoxin(void) | ^ drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c:673:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 673 | void remove_sgpio_zhaoxin(void) | ^ | static 11 warnings generated. vim +/ahci_wait_em_reset +31 drivers/ata/ahci_zhaoxin_sgpio.c 25 26 static unsigned int zhaoxin_em_type __read_mostly = AHCI_EM_MSG_LED_MODE; /*LED protocol*/ 27 module_param(zhaoxin_em_type, int, 0644); 28 MODULE_PARM_DESC(zhaoxin_em_type, 29 "AHCI Enclosure Management Message type control (1 = led on, 2 = sgpio on,3 = sgpio gp on)"); 30 > 31 int ahci_wait_em_reset(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin, u32 retry) 32 { 33 void __iomem *mmio = sgpio_zhaoxin->mmio; 34 u32 em_ctl; 35 36 if (!sgpio_zhaoxin || retry == 0) { 37 pr_err("In ahci wait em reset, invalid param\n"); 38 return -EINVAL; 39 } 40 41 while (retry--) { /*EM_CTL needs reset at least 64ms*/ 42 em_ctl = readl(mmio + HOST_EM_CTL); 43 if (em_ctl & EM_CTL_RST) 44 usleep_range(10000, 20000); /*EM_CTL still in reset, usleep 10ms*/ 45 else 46 break; 47 48 if (!retry) 49 pr_err("Wait for EM_CTL reset, time out\n"); 50 } 51 52 return 0; 53 } 54 > 55 void ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) 56 { 57 void __iomem *mmio = sgpio_zhaoxin->mmio; 58 void __iomem *em_mmio = mmio + SGPIO_OFFSET; 59 60 u32 read; 61 62 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_0.enable = 1; 63 64 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.blink_gen_a = 0x7; 65 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.blink_gen_b = 0x3; 66 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.blink_gen_c = 0x0; 67 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.stretch_act_on = 0; 68 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.stretch_act_off = 0; 69 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.max_act_on = 2; 70 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.force_act_off = 1; 71 72 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_cfg.sload = 0xf; 73 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_cfg.count = 0x0; 74 75 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.transmit_0.sgpio_tx_0 = 0; 76 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.transmit_1.sgpio_tx_1 = 0; 77 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_reg.sgpio_tx_gp = 0; 78 79 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.receive_reg.sgpio_rx = 0x07070707; 80 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_receive_reg.sgpio_rx_gp = 0; 81 82 /*Setup SGPIO type*/ 83 read = readl(mmio + sgpio_zhaoxin->em_loc); 84 read = read | SGPIO_MESSAGE_HEAD; /*LED register MSG_HEAD, select SGPIO*/ 85 writel(read, mmio + sgpio_zhaoxin->em_loc); 86 87 /*Setup gp mode*/ 88 writel(sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_cfg.sgpio_tx_gp_cfg, em_mmio + 0x38); 89 90 /*Initial SGPIO CFG1*/ 91 writel(sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_1.sgpio_cfg_1, em_mmio + 0x4); 92 93 /*Initial SGPIO CFG0*/ 94 read = readl(em_mmio); 95 read |= sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_0.sgpio_cfg_0; 96 writel(read, em_mmio); 97 } 98 > 99 void ahci_zhaoxin_set_em_sgpio_gpmode(struct sgpio_zhaoxin *sgpio_zhaoxin) 100 { 101 void __iomem *mmio = sgpio_zhaoxin->mmio; 102 void __iomem *em_mmio = mmio + SGPIO_OFFSET; 103 u32 read; 104 105 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_0.enable = 1; 106 107 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_cfg.sload = 0xf; 108 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_cfg.count = 0xff; 109 110 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.transmit_0.sgpio_tx_0 = 0; 111 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.transmit_1.sgpio_tx_1 = 0; 112 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_reg.sgpio_tx_gp = 0; 113 114 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.receive_reg.sgpio_rx = 0; 115 sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_receive_reg.sgpio_rx_gp = 0xff0f0000; 116 117 /*Setup SGPIO type*/ 118 read = readl(mmio + sgpio_zhaoxin->em_loc); 119 read |= SGPIO_MESSAGE_HEAD; 120 writel(read, mmio + sgpio_zhaoxin->em_loc); 121 122 /*Setup gp mode*/ 123 writel(sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.gp_transmit_cfg.sgpio_tx_gp_cfg, em_mmio + 0x38); 124 125 /*Enable SGPIO*/ 126 writel(sgpio_zhaoxin->sgpio_reg.cfg_0.sgpio_cfg_0, em_mmio); 127 } 128 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2439/2439] include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:221:41: warning: attribute 'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label
by kernel test robot 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi Ze, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: b61a367ade32ff42d5f3066b9750e855dc98dd29 commit: 0695e18bbaebbfbe22b049104bbb9a4300a9f30c [2439/2439] mm: Add PMU based memory sampling abstract layer config: arm64-randconfig-004-20241117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041721.uYCyd8sz-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041721.uYCyd8sz-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041721.uYCyd8sz-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:65, from <command-line>: drivers/arm/spe/spe.c: In function '__arm_spe_dev_probe': >> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:221:41: warning: attribute 'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label 221 | # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/arm/spe/spe.c:492:17: note: in expansion of macro 'fallthrough' 492 | fallthrough; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ >> include/linux/compiler_attributes.h:221:41: warning: attribute 'fallthrough' not preceding a case label or default label 221 | # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/arm/spe/spe.c:514:17: note: in expansion of macro 'fallthrough' 514 | fallthrough; | ^~~~~~~~~~~ Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for ARM_SPE_MEM_SAMPLING Depends on [n]: ARM64 [=y] && !ARM_SPE_PMU [=y] Selected by [y]: - MEM_SAMPLING [=y] && ARM64 [=y] vim +/fallthrough +221 include/linux/compiler_attributes.h 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 209 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 210 /* 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 211 * Add the pseudo keyword 'fallthrough' so case statement blocks 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 212 * must end with any of these keywords: 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 213 * break; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 214 * fallthrough; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 215 * goto <label>; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 216 * return [expression]; 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 217 * 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 218 * gcc: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Attributes.html#Statement-Attr… 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 219 */ 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 220 #if __has_attribute(__fallthrough__) 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 @221 # define fallthrough __attribute__((__fallthrough__)) 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 222 #else 294f69e662d157 Joe Perches 2019-10-05 223 # define fallthrough do {} while (0) /* fallthrough */ a3f8a30f3f0079 Miguel Ojeda 2018-08-30 224 #endif a3f8a30f3f0079 Miguel Ojeda 2018-08-30 225 :::::: The code at line 221 was first introduced by commit :::::: 294f69e662d1570703e9b56e95be37a9fd3afba5 compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo keyword for switch/case use :::::: TO: Joe Perches <joe(a)perches.com> :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)linux-foundation.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2516/2516] drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:213:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_unset_port_netdev'
by kernel test robot 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi Yizhen, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: b71af6f00ede58be00cb7306c9acb2660ec90947 commit: 37c6170f742ef3a18a3131a2a157dd7b7aa08103 [2516/2516] ub: Fix bugs in urma kernel and user lib config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041601.Eu6aB1G8-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041601.Eu6aB1G8-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041601.Eu6aB1G8-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:51:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_check_port_state' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 51 | int ubcore_check_port_state(struct ubcore_device *dev, uint8_t port_idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:75:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_find_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 75 | void ubcore_find_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:133:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_set_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 133 | int ubcore_set_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:213:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_unset_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 213 | int ubcore_unset_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:242:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_put_port_netdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 242 | void ubcore_put_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:262:10: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_idx_alloc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 262 | uint32_t ubcore_sip_idx_alloc(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:290:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_idx_free' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 290 | int ubcore_sip_idx_free(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:303:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_table_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 303 | void ubcore_sip_table_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:309:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_sip_table_uninit' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 309 | void ubcore_sip_table_uninit(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:324:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_add_sip_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 324 | int ubcore_add_sip_entry(const struct ubcore_sip_info *sip, uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:344:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_del_sip_entry' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 344 | int ubcore_del_sip_entry(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:358:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_lookup_sip_idx' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 358 | int ubcore_lookup_sip_idx(struct ubcore_sip_info *sip, uint32_t *idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:379:10: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_get_sip_max_cnt' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 379 | uint32_t ubcore_get_sip_max_cnt(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:384:25: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_lookup_sip_info' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 384 | struct ubcore_sip_info *ubcore_lookup_sip_info(uint32_t idx) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:395:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_notify_uvs_del_sip' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 395 | int ubcore_notify_uvs_del_sip(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c:437:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ubcore_notify_uvs_add_sip' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 437 | int ubcore_notify_uvs_add_sip(struct ubcore_device *dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/ubcore_unset_port_netdev +213 drivers/ub/urma/ubcore/ubcore_netdev.c 212 > 213 int ubcore_unset_port_netdev(struct ubcore_device *dev, struct net_device *ndev, 214 unsigned int port_id) 215 { 216 struct ubcore_ndev_port *port_info; 217 218 if (dev == NULL || ndev == NULL) { 219 ubcore_log_err("invalid input parameter.\n"); 220 return -1; 221 } 222 down_write(&g_port_list_lock); 223 list_for_each_entry(port_info, &dev->port_list, node) { 224 if (port_info->ndev == ndev) { 225 if (ubcore_del_port(port_info, (uint8_t)port_id, dev, ndev) != 0) { 226 up_write(&g_port_list_lock); 227 ubcore_log_err("Failed to do ubcore_del_port"); 228 return -1; 229 } 230 up_write(&g_port_list_lock); 231 return 0; 232 } 233 } 234 up_write(&g_port_list_lock); 235 236 ubcore_log_err("Failed to find and remove ndev:%s dev_name: %s bound port: %u\n", 237 netdev_name(ndev), dev->dev_name, port_id); 238 return -1; 239 } 240 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ubcore_unset_port_netdev); 241 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1320/1320] arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[2]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct sk_buff_head[1]'
by kernel test robot 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 98beb6bc5000f977169e4f633e450f4e3e9d84d1 commit: 71e217e85c3dff8a9151707ed3afc7b4b054a2d4 [1320/1320] selinux: use kernel linux/socket.h for genheaders and mdp config: arm64-randconfig-002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041542.hMfB2LmU-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041542.hMfB2LmU-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041542.hMfB2LmU-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:34, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:5, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:37, from include/linux/bitops.h:19, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/linux/moduleparam.h:7, from net/core/netpoll.c:14: In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock_flags' at include/linux/spinlock.h:191:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119:2, inlined from 'refill_skbs' at net/core/netpoll.c:230:2: >> arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[2]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct sk_buff_head[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'refill_skbs': net/core/netpoll.c:47:28: note: at offset 20 into object 'skb_pool' of size 24 47 | static struct sk_buff_head skb_pool; | ^~~~~~~~ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock_flags' at include/linux/spinlock.h:191:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:119:2, inlined from 'refill_skbs' at net/core/netpoll.c:230:2: >> arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[2]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct sk_buff_head[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'refill_skbs': net/core/netpoll.c:47:28: note: at offset 20 into object 'skb_pool' of size 24 47 | static struct sk_buff_head skb_pool; | ^~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/if_ether.h:23, from include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h:19, from include/linux/ethtool.h:19, from include/linux/netdevice.h:42, from net/core/netpoll.c:16: In function '__skb_queue_before', inlined from '__skb_queue_tail' at include/linux/skbuff.h:1866:2, inlined from 'refill_skbs' at net/core/netpoll.c:236:3: include/linux/skbuff.h:1832:9: warning: array subscript 'struct sk_buff[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct sk_buff_head[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1832 | __skb_insert(newsk, next->prev, next, list); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'refill_skbs': net/core/netpoll.c:47:28: note: object 'skb_pool' of size 24 47 | static struct sk_buff_head skb_pool; | ^~~~~~~~ In function '__skb_insert', inlined from '__skb_queue_before' at include/linux/skbuff.h:1832:2, inlined from '__skb_queue_tail' at include/linux/skbuff.h:1866:2, inlined from 'refill_skbs' at net/core/netpoll.c:236:3: include/linux/skbuff.h:1726:21: warning: array subscript 'struct sk_buff[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'struct sk_buff_head[1]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1726 | next->prev = prev->next = newsk; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/core/netpoll.c: In function 'refill_skbs': net/core/netpoll.c:47:28: note: object 'skb_pool' of size 24 47 | static struct sk_buff_head skb_pool; | ^~~~~~~~ -- net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'ip_rt_send_redirect': net/ipv4/route.c:866:13: warning: variable 'log_martians' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 866 | int log_martians; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:34, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:5, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:37, from include/linux/bitops.h:19, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/linux/list.h:9, from include/linux/module.h:10, from net/ipv4/route.c:67: In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock.h:334:2, inlined from 'update_or_create_fnhe' at net/ipv4/route.c:648:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:82, from include/linux/seqlock.h:36, from include/linux/time.h:6, from include/linux/stat.h:19, from include/linux/module.h:11: net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'update_or_create_fnhe': net/ipv4/route.c:578:24: note: object 'fnhe_lock' of size 4 578 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fnhe_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock.h:334:2, inlined from 'update_or_create_fnhe' at net/ipv4/route.c:648:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'update_or_create_fnhe': net/ipv4/route.c:578:24: note: object 'fnhe_lock' of size 4 578 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fnhe_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ net/ipv4/route.c: In function '__ip_rt_update_pmtu': >> net/ipv4/route.c:1027:37: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fib_nh[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1027 | struct fib_nh *nh = &FIB_RES_NH(res); In file included from include/net/route.h:31, from include/net/lwtunnel.h:10, from include/net/ip_tunnels.h:18, from include/net/dst_metadata.h:6, from net/ipv4/route.c:94: include/net/ip_fib.h:127:33: note: while referencing 'fib_nh' 127 | struct fib_nh fib_nh[0]; | ^~~~~~ net/ipv4/route.c: In function '__ip_do_redirect': net/ipv4/route.c:779:53: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fib_nh[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 779 | struct fib_nh *nh = &FIB_RES_NH(res); include/net/ip_fib.h:127:33: note: while referencing 'fib_nh' 127 | struct fib_nh fib_nh[0]; | ^~~~~~ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock.h:334:2, inlined from 'ip_del_fnhe' at net/ipv4/route.c:1326:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'ip_del_fnhe': net/ipv4/route.c:578:24: note: object 'fnhe_lock' of size 4 578 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fnhe_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock.h:334:2, inlined from 'ip_del_fnhe' at net/ipv4/route.c:1326:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'ip_del_fnhe': net/ipv4/route.c:578:24: note: object 'fnhe_lock' of size 4 578 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fnhe_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock.h:334:2, inlined from 'rt_bind_exception' at net/ipv4/route.c:1415:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'rt_bind_exception': net/ipv4/route.c:578:24: note: object 'fnhe_lock' of size 4 578 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fnhe_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:136:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_bh' at include/linux/spinlock.h:334:2, inlined from 'rt_bind_exception' at net/ipv4/route.c:1415:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:458:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 458 | asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h:479:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 479 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, a, "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'rt_bind_exception': net/ipv4/route.c:578:24: note: object 'fnhe_lock' of size 4 578 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fnhe_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ net/ipv4/route.c: In function 'ip_rt_get_source': include/net/ip_fib.h:167:50: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct fib_nh[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 167 | #define FIB_RES_NH(res) ((res).fi->fib_nh[0]) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~ include/net/ip_fib.h:179:11: note: in expansion of macro 'FIB_RES_NH' -- fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1713:25: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1713 | memmove(&el->l_recs[0], &el->l_recs[1], size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1713:41: warning: array subscript 1 is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1713 | memmove(&el->l_recs[0], &el->l_recs[1], size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1714:24: warning: array subscript num_recs is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1714 | memset(&el->l_recs[num_recs], 0, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_replay_truncate_records': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:5972:34: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_truncate_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 5972 | rec = tl->tl_recs[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:538:35: note: while referencing 'tl_recs' 538 | /*08*/ struct ocfs2_truncate_rec tl_recs[0]; /* Truncate records */ | ^~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:5972:34: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_truncate_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 5972 | rec = tl->tl_recs[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:538:35: note: while referencing 'tl_recs' 538 | /*08*/ struct ocfs2_truncate_rec tl_recs[0]; /* Truncate records */ | ^~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_records': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:3989:34: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 3989 | rec = &el->l_recs[next_free - 1]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:3989:34: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 3989 | rec = &el->l_recs[next_free - 1]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:3989:34: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 3989 | rec = &el->l_recs[next_free - 1]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_figure_appending_type.isra': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:4561:26: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 4561 | rec = &el->l_recs[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:4561:26: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 4561 | rec = &el->l_recs[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ In function 'ocfs2_adjust_root_records', inlined from 'ocfs2_complete_edge_insert' at fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2114:2: fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2025:48: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2025 | if (le64_to_cpu(root_el->l_recs[i].e_blkno) == left_el_blkno) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:32:51: note: in definition of macro '__le64_to_cpu' 32 | #define __le64_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u64)(__le64)(x)) | ^ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2025:21: note: in expansion of macro 'le64_to_cpu' 2025 | if (le64_to_cpu(root_el->l_recs[i].e_blkno) == left_el_blkno) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h: In function 'ocfs2_complete_edge_insert': fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ In function 'ocfs2_adjust_root_records', inlined from 'ocfs2_complete_edge_insert' at fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2114:2: fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2035:9: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2035 | ocfs2_adjust_adjacent_records(&root_el->l_recs[i], | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2036 | &root_el->l_recs[i + 1], right_el); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h: In function 'ocfs2_complete_edge_insert': fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ In function 'ocfs2_adjust_root_records', inlined from 'ocfs2_complete_edge_insert' at fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2114:2: fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2035:9: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2035 | ocfs2_adjust_adjacent_records(&root_el->l_recs[i], | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2036 | &root_el->l_recs[i + 1], right_el); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h: In function 'ocfs2_complete_edge_insert': fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ >> fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2087:28: warning: array subscript idx is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2087 | left_rec = &el->l_recs[idx]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2090:29: warning: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2090 | right_rec = &el->l_recs[0]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_figure_contig_type': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:4504:31: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 4504 | contig_type = ocfs2_et_extent_contig(et, &el->l_recs[i], | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 4505 | insert_rec); | ~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:4515:44: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 4515 | &el->l_recs[insert->ins_contig_index]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function '__ocfs2_find_path.constprop': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1827:42: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1827 | rec = &el->l_recs[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1827:42: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1827 | rec = &el->l_recs[i]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1840:47: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1840 | blkno = le64_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_blkno); | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:32:51: note: in definition of macro '__le64_to_cpu' 32 | #define __le64_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u64)(__le64)(x)) | ^ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1840:25: note: in expansion of macro 'le64_to_cpu' 1840 | blkno = le64_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_blkno); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_find_branch_target.constprop': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1488:47: warning: array subscript i is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1488 | blkno = le64_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_blkno); | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:32:51: note: in definition of macro '__le64_to_cpu' 32 | #define __le64_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u64)(__le64)(x)) | ^ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1488:25: note: in expansion of macro 'le64_to_cpu' 1488 | blkno = le64_to_cpu(el->l_recs[i].e_blkno); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_update_edge_lengths.isra': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2561:26: warning: array subscript idx is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2561 | rec = &el->l_recs[idx]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2561:26: warning: array subscript idx is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2561 | rec = &el->l_recs[idx]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2561:26: warning: array subscript idx is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2561 | rec = &el->l_recs[idx]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2567:34: warning: array subscript idx is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2567 | rec = &el->l_recs[idx]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:2567:34: warning: array subscript idx is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 2567 | rec = &el->l_recs[idx]; | ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' 512 | /*10*/ struct ocfs2_extent_rec l_recs[0]; /* Extent records */ | ^~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/alloc.c: In function 'ocfs2_adjust_rightmost_branch': fs/ocfs2/alloc.c:1141:15: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'struct ocfs2_extent_rec[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 1141 | rec = &el->l_recs[le16_to_cpu(el->l_next_free_rec) - 1]; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h:512:33: note: while referencing 'l_recs' .. vim +458 arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_lse.h c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 448 c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 449 #define __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, sz, name, mb, cl...) \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 450 static inline unsigned long __cmpxchg_case_##name(volatile void *ptr, \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 451 unsigned long old, \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 452 unsigned long new) \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 453 { \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 454 register unsigned long x0 asm ("x0") = (unsigned long)ptr; \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 455 register unsigned long x1 asm ("x1") = old; \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 456 register unsigned long x2 asm ("x2") = new; \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 457 \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 @458 asm volatile(ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN( \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 459 /* LL/SC */ \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 460 __LL_SC_CMPXCHG(name) \ 05492f2fd87d0a Will Deacon 2016-09-06 461 __nops(2), \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 462 /* LSE atomics */ \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 463 " mov " #w "30, %" #w "[old]\n" \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 464 " cas" #mb #sz "\t" #w "30, %" #w "[new], %[v]\n" \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 465 " mov %" #w "[ret], " #w "30") \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 466 : [ret] "+r" (x0), [v] "+Q" (*(unsigned long *)ptr) \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 467 : [old] "r" (x1), [new] "r" (x2) \ 5be8b70af1ca78 Ard Biesheuvel 2016-02-25 468 : __LL_SC_CLOBBERS, ##cl); \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 469 \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 470 return x0; \ c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 471 } c342f78217e822 Will Deacon 2015-04-23 472 :::::: The code at line 458 was first introduced by commit :::::: c342f78217e822d2178265b0b1de232eeb717149 arm64: cmpxchg: patch in lse instructions when supported by the CPU :::::: TO: Will Deacon <will.deacon(a)arm.com> :::::: CC: Will Deacon <will.deacon(a)arm.com> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1320/1320] drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c:295:34: warning: 'of_st_nci_i2c_match' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 04 Dec '24

04 Dec '24

Hi Paulo, First bad commit (maybe != root cause): tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 98beb6bc5000f977169e4f633e450f4e3e9d84d1 commit: 71e217e85c3dff8a9151707ed3afc7b4b054a2d4 [1320/1320] selinux: use kernel linux/socket.h for genheaders and mdp config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-005 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041541.cTSYXphC-lkp@…) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241204/202412041541.cTSYXphC-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412041541.cTSYXphC-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c:295:34: warning: 'of_st_nci_i2c_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 295 | static const struct of_device_id of_st_nci_i2c_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c:288:36: warning: 'st_nci_i2c_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 288 | static const struct acpi_device_id st_nci_i2c_acpi_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/of_st_nci_i2c_match +295 drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c ed6a2f3fb770ac drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2015-12-23 294 ed06aeefdac348 drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2015-06-09 @295 static const struct of_device_id of_st_nci_i2c_match[] = { 1a94cb6025d49b drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2014-12-08 296 { .compatible = "st,st21nfcb-i2c", }, 35630df68d6030 drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2014-05-25 297 { .compatible = "st,st21nfcb_i2c", }, ed06aeefdac348 drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2015-06-09 298 { .compatible = "st,st21nfcc-i2c", }, 35630df68d6030 drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2014-05-25 299 {} 35630df68d6030 drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2014-05-25 300 }; ed06aeefdac348 drivers/nfc/st-nci/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2015-06-09 301 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_st_nci_i2c_match); 35630df68d6030 drivers/nfc/st21nfcb/i2c.c Christophe Ricard 2014-05-25 302 :::::: The code at line 295 was first introduced by commit :::::: ed06aeefdac348cfb91a3db5fe1067e3202afd70 nfc: st-nci: Rename st21nfcb to st-nci :::::: TO: Christophe Ricard <christophe.ricard(a)gmail.com> :::::: CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo(a)linux.intel.com> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0