- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 1/4] btrfs: fix race between quota disable and quota assign ioctls
by Yongqiang Liu 06 Apr '23

06 Apr '23

From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.2-rc8 commit 2f1a6be12ab6c8470d5776e68644726c94257c54 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I6PQCT CVE: CVE-2023-1611 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- The quota assign ioctl can currently run in parallel with a quota disable ioctl call. The assign ioctl uses the quota root, while the disable ioctl frees that root, and therefore we can have a use-after-free triggered in the assign ioctl, leading to a trace like the following when KASAN is enabled: [672.723][T736] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0 [672.723][T736] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888022ec0208 by task btrfs_search_sl/27736 [672.724][T736] [672.725][T736] CPU: 1 PID: 27736 Comm: btrfs_search_sl Not tainted 6.3.0-rc3 #37 [672.723][T736] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 [672.727][T736] Call Trace: [672.728][T736] <TASK> [672.728][T736] dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150 [672.725][T736] print_report+0xc1/0x5e0 [672.720][T736] ? __virt_addr_valid+0x61/0x2e0 [672.727][T736] ? __phys_addr+0xc9/0x150 [672.725][T736] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0 [672.722][T736] kasan_report+0xc0/0xf0 [672.729][T736] ? btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0 [672.724][T736] btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0 [672.723][T736] ? fs_reclaim_acquire+0xba/0x160 [672.722][T736] ? split_leaf+0x13d0/0x13d0 [672.726][T736] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0 [672.723][T736] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x338/0x3c0 [672.722][T736] update_qgroup_status_item+0xf7/0x320 [672.724][T736] ? add_qgroup_rb+0x3d0/0x3d0 [672.739][T736] ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x2b0 [672.730][T736] ? spin_bug+0x1d0/0x1d0 [672.737][T736] btrfs_run_qgroups+0x5de/0x840 [672.730][T736] ? btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0xa70/0xa70 [672.738][T736] ? __del_qgroup_relation+0x4ba/0xe00 [672.738][T736] btrfs_ioctl+0x3d58/0x5d80 [672.735][T736] ? tomoyo_path_number_perm+0x16a/0x550 [672.737][T736] ? tomoyo_execute_permission+0x4a0/0x4a0 [672.731][T736] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x50/0x50 [672.737][T736] ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x54/0x90 [672.734][T736] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x132/0x1660 [672.730][T736] ? vfs_fileattr_set+0xc40/0xc40 [672.730][T736] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2e/0x50 [672.732][T736] ? sigprocmask+0xf2/0x340 [672.737][T736] ? __fget_files+0x26a/0x480 [672.732][T736] ? bpf_lsm_file_ioctl+0x9/0x10 [672.738][T736] ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x50/0x50 [672.736][T736] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x198/0x210 [672.736][T736] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [672.731][T736] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [672.739][T736] RIP: 0033:0x4556ad [672.742][T736] </TASK> [672.743][T736] [672.748][T736] Allocated by task 27677: [672.743][T736] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40 [672.741][T736] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [672.741][T736] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa4/0xb0 [672.749][T736] btrfs_alloc_root+0x48/0x90 [672.746][T736] btrfs_create_tree+0x146/0xa20 [672.744][T736] btrfs_quota_enable+0x461/0x1d20 [672.743][T736] btrfs_ioctl+0x4a1c/0x5d80 [672.747][T736] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x198/0x210 [672.749][T736] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [672.744][T736] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [672.756][T736] [672.757][T736] Freed by task 27677: [672.759][T736] kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40 [672.759][T736] kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30 [672.756][T736] kasan_save_free_info+0x2e/0x50 [672.751][T736] ____kasan_slab_free+0x162/0x1c0 [672.758][T736] slab_free_freelist_hook+0x89/0x1c0 [672.752][T736] __kmem_cache_free+0xaf/0x2e0 [672.752][T736] btrfs_put_root+0x1ff/0x2b0 [672.759][T736] btrfs_quota_disable+0x80a/0xbc0 [672.752][T736] btrfs_ioctl+0x3e5f/0x5d80 [672.756][T736] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x198/0x210 [672.753][T736] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [672.765][T736] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [672.769][T736] [672.768][T736] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888022ec0000 [672.768][T736] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096 [672.769][T736] The buggy address is located 520 bytes inside of [672.769][T736] freed 4096-byte region [ffff888022ec0000, ffff888022ec1000) [672.760][T736] [672.764][T736] The buggy address belongs to the physical page: [672.761][T736] page:ffffea00008bb000 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x22ec0 [672.766][T736] head:ffffea00008bb000 order:3 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0 [672.779][T736] flags: 0xfff00000010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff) [672.770][T736] raw: 00fff00000010200 ffff888012842140 ffffea000054ba00 dead000000000002 [672.770][T736] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000040004 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 [672.771][T736] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected [672.778][T736] page_owner tracks the page as allocated [672.777][T736] page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0xd2040(__GFP_IO|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC), pid 88 [672.779][T736] get_page_from_freelist+0x119c/0x2d50 [672.779][T736] __alloc_pages+0x1cb/0x4a0 [672.776][T736] alloc_pages+0x1aa/0x270 [672.773][T736] allocate_slab+0x260/0x390 [672.771][T736] ___slab_alloc+0xa9a/0x13e0 [672.778][T736] __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0xb0 [672.771][T736] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x136/0x320 [672.789][T736] __kmalloc+0x4e/0x1a0 [672.783][T736] tomoyo_realpath_from_path+0xc3/0x600 [672.781][T736] tomoyo_path_perm+0x22f/0x420 [672.782][T736] tomoyo_path_unlink+0x92/0xd0 [672.780][T736] security_path_unlink+0xdb/0x150 [672.788][T736] do_unlinkat+0x377/0x680 [672.788][T736] __x64_sys_unlink+0xca/0x110 [672.789][T736] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [672.783][T736] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [672.784][T736] page last free stack trace: [672.787][T736] free_pcp_prepare+0x4e5/0x920 [672.787][T736] free_unref_page+0x1d/0x4e0 [672.784][T736] __unfreeze_partials+0x17c/0x1a0 [672.797][T736] qlist_free_all+0x6a/0x180 [672.796][T736] kasan_quarantine_reduce+0x189/0x1d0 [672.797][T736] __kasan_slab_alloc+0x64/0x90 [672.793][T736] kmem_cache_alloc+0x17c/0x3c0 [672.799][T736] getname_flags.part.0+0x50/0x4e0 [672.799][T736] getname_flags+0x9e/0xe0 [672.792][T736] vfs_fstatat+0x77/0xb0 [672.791][T736] __do_sys_newlstat+0x84/0x100 [672.798][T736] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [672.796][T736] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd [672.790][T736] [672.791][T736] Memory state around the buggy address: [672.799][T736] ffff888022ec0100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [672.805][T736] ffff888022ec0180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [672.802][T736] >ffff888022ec0200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [672.809][T736] ^ [672.809][T736] ffff888022ec0280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb [672.809][T736] ffff888022ec0300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb Fix this by having the qgroup assign ioctl take the qgroup ioctl mutex before calling btrfs_run_qgroups(), which is what all qgroup ioctls should call. Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAFcO6XN3VD8ogmHwqRk4kbiwtpUSNySu2VAxN8… CC: stable(a)vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana(a)suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.com> Conflicts: fs/btrfs/qgroup.c Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Wang Weiyang <wangweiyang2(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 ++ fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 11 ++++++++++- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c index a5ae02bf3652..00424d3f3464 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c @@ -5240,7 +5240,9 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_assign(struct file *file, void __user *arg) } /* update qgroup status and info */ + mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); err = btrfs_run_qgroups(trans); + mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); if (err < 0) btrfs_handle_fs_error(fs_info, err, "failed to update qgroup status and info"); diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 7916f711daf5..8e58c58f73a3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -2196,7 +2196,8 @@ int btrfs_qgroup_account_extents(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) } /* - * called from commit_transaction. Writes all changed qgroups to disk. + * Writes all changed qgroups to disk. + * Called by the transaction commit path and the qgroup assign ioctl. */ int btrfs_run_qgroups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) { @@ -2204,6 +2205,14 @@ int btrfs_run_qgroups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans) struct btrfs_root *quota_root = fs_info->quota_root; int ret = 0; + /* + * In case we are called from the qgroup assign ioctl, assert that we + * are holding the qgroup_ioctl_lock, otherwise we can race with a quota + * disable operation (ioctl) and access a freed quota root. + */ + if (trans->transaction->state != TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING) + lockdep_assert_held(&fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock); + if (!quota_root) return ret; -- 2.25.1

1 3

Kernel sig 4.7 14:00-15:30 例会议题情况//答复: openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会
by liaotao (C) 06 Apr '23

06 Apr '23

当前例会议题：议题一：进展update --- 张伽琳 & 郑增凯议题二：openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2需求评审 ---张伽琳欢迎大家继续申报~ -----原始约会----- 发件人: openEuler conference <public(a)openeuler.org> 发送时间: 2023年4月7日 9:30 收件人: dev@openeuler.org,kernel-discuss@openeuler.org,kernel@openeuler.org 主题: openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会时间: 2023年4月7日星期五 14:00-15:30(UTC+08:00) 北京，重庆，香港特别行政区，乌鲁木齐。地点: 您好！ Kernel SIG 邀请您参加 2023-04-07 14:00 召开的Zoom会议(自动录制) 会议主题：openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会会议内容： 1.进展update 2.议题征集中欢迎大家积极申报议题（新增议题可以直接回复邮件，或录入会议看板）会议链接：https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88353599877?pwd=aFZtMjJwUHl1UmNTZFV4eUJQM2xVdz09 会议纪要：https://etherpad.openeuler.org/p/Kernel-meetings 温馨提醒：建议接入会议后修改参会人的姓名，也可以使用您在gitee.com的ID 更多资讯尽在：https://openeuler.org/zh/ Hello! openEuler Kernel SIG invites you to attend the Zoom conference(auto recording) will be held at 2023-04-07 14:00, The subject of the conference is openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会, Summary: 1.进展update 2.议题征集中欢迎大家积极申报议题（新增议题可以直接回复邮件，或录入会议看板） You can join the meeting at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88353599877?pwd=aFZtMjJwUHl1UmNTZFV4eUJQM2xVdz09. Add topics at https://etherpad.openeuler.org/p/Kernel-meetings. Note: You are advised to change the participant name after joining the conference or use your ID at gitee.com. More information: https://openeuler.org/en/

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 1/4] ext4: fix race between writepages and remount
by Yongqiang Liu 04 Apr '23

04 Apr '23

From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: 188500, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6RJ0V CVE: NA -------------------------------- We got a WARNING in ext4_add_complete_io: ================================================================== WARNING: at fs/ext4/page-io.c:231 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: ksoftirqd/10 Tainted: 6.3.0-rc2 #85 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 [ext4] [...] Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_end_bio+0xa8/0x240 [ext4] bio_endio+0x195/0x310 blk_update_request+0x184/0x770 scsi_end_request+0x2f/0x240 scsi_io_completion+0x75/0x450 scsi_finish_command+0xef/0x160 scsi_complete+0xa3/0x180 blk_complete_reqs+0x60/0x80 blk_done_softirq+0x25/0x40 __do_softirq+0x119/0x4c8 run_ksoftirqd+0x42/0x70 smpboot_thread_fn+0x136/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 ----------------------------|---------------------------- mount -o dioread_lock ext4_writepages ext4_do_writepages *if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))* // rsv_blocks is not assigned here mount -o remount,dioread_nolock ext4_journal_start_with_reserve __ext4_journal_start __ext4_journal_start_sb jbd2__journal_start *if (rsv_blocks)* // h_rsv_handle is not initialized here mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode) if (dioread_nolock && (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN)) mpd->io_submit.io_end->handle = handle->h_rsv_handle ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN // now io_end->handle is NULL but has EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag scsi_finish_command scsi_io_completion scsi_io_completion_action scsi_end_request blk_update_request req_bio_endio bio_endio bio->bi_end_io > ext4_end_bio ext4_put_io_end_defer ext4_add_complete_io // trigger WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal); The immediate cause of this problem is that ext4_should_dioread_nolock() function returns inconsistent values in the ext4_do_writepages() and mpage_map_one_extent(). There are four conditions in this function that can be changed at mount time to cause this problem. These four conditions can be divided into two categories: (1) journal_data and EXT4_EXTENTS_FL, which can be changed by ioctl (2) DELALLOC and DIOREAD_NOLOCK, which can be changed by remount The two in the first category have been fixed by commit c8585c6fcaf2 ("ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages") and commit cb85f4d23f79 ("ext4: fix race between writepages and enabling EXT4_EXTENTS_FL") respectively. Two cases in the other category have not yet been fixed, and the above issue is caused by this situation. We refer to the fix for the first category, when applying options during remount, we grab s_writepages_rwsem to avoid racing with writepages ops to trigger this problem. Fixes: 6b523df4fb5a ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 ++- fs/ext4/super.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h index 4c88e75180a2..6df919b154b4 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h @@ -1530,7 +1530,8 @@ struct ext4_sb_info { /* * Barrier between writepages ops and changing any inode's JOURNAL_DATA - * or EXTENTS flag. + * or EXTENTS flag or between writepages ops and changing DIOREAD_NOLOCK + * mount option on remount. */ struct percpu_rw_semaphore s_writepages_rwsem; struct dax_device *s_daxdev; diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index 8029a6f6471c..df07222f1cc5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -5605,10 +5605,20 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) vfs_flags = SB_LAZYTIME | SB_I_VERSION; sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~vfs_flags) | (*flags & vfs_flags); + /* + * Changing the DIOREAD_NOLOCK mount option may cause two calls to + * ext4_should_dioread_nolock() to return inconsistent values, + * triggering WARN_ON in ext4_add_complete_io(). we grab here + * s_writepages_rwsem to avoid race between writepages ops and + * remount. + */ + percpu_down_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); if (!parse_options(data, sb, NULL, &journal_ioprio, 1)) { err = -EINVAL; + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); goto restore_opts; } + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); if ((old_opts.s_mount_opt & EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM) ^ test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)) { @@ -5833,6 +5843,7 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) return 0; restore_opts: + percpu_down_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); sb->s_flags = old_sb_flags; sbi->s_mount_opt = old_opts.s_mount_opt; sbi->s_mount_opt2 = old_opts.s_mount_opt2; @@ -5841,6 +5852,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) sbi->s_commit_interval = old_opts.s_commit_interval; sbi->s_min_batch_time = old_opts.s_min_batch_time; sbi->s_max_batch_time = old_opts.s_max_batch_time; + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); + if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY) && sbi->system_blks) ext4_release_system_zone(sb); #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA -- 2.25.1

1 6

[PATCH openEuler-5.10-LTS 01/15] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: fix memleak for 'qdata' in alua_activate()
by Jialin Zhang 04 Apr '23

04 Apr '23

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6NBAZ CVE: NA -------------------------------- If alua_rtpg_queue() failed from alua_activate(), then 'qdata' is not freed, which will cause following memleak: unreferenced object 0xffff88810b2c6980 (size 32): comm "kworker/u16:2", pid 635322, jiffies 4355801099 (age 1216426.076s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 40 39 24 c1 ff ff ff ff 00 f8 ea 0a 81 88 ff ff @9$............. backtrace: [<0000000098f3a26d>] alua_activate+0xb0/0x320 [<000000003b529641>] scsi_dh_activate+0xb2/0x140 [<000000007b296db3>] activate_path_work+0xc6/0xe0 [dm_multipath] [<000000007adc9ace>] process_one_work+0x3c5/0x730 [<00000000c457a985>] worker_thread+0x93/0x650 [<00000000cb80e628>] kthread+0x1ba/0x210 [<00000000a1e61077>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix the problem by freeing 'qdata' in error path. Fixes: 625fe857e4fa ("scsi: scsi_dh_alua: Check scsi_device_get() return value") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c index fe8a5e5c0df8..bf0b3178f84d 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c @@ -1036,10 +1036,12 @@ static int alua_activate(struct scsi_device *sdev, rcu_read_unlock(); mutex_unlock(&h->init_mutex); - if (alua_rtpg_queue(pg, sdev, qdata, true)) + if (alua_rtpg_queue(pg, sdev, qdata, true)) { fn = NULL; - else + } else { + kfree(qdata); err = SCSI_DH_DEV_OFFLINED; + } kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group); out: if (fn) -- 2.25.1

1 14

[PATCH openEuler-5.10-LTS-SP1 01/16] scsi: scsi_dh_alua: fix memleak for 'qdata' in alua_activate()
by Jialin Zhang 04 Apr '23

04 Apr '23

From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6NBAZ CVE: NA -------------------------------- If alua_rtpg_queue() failed from alua_activate(), then 'qdata' is not freed, which will cause following memleak: unreferenced object 0xffff88810b2c6980 (size 32): comm "kworker/u16:2", pid 635322, jiffies 4355801099 (age 1216426.076s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 40 39 24 c1 ff ff ff ff 00 f8 ea 0a 81 88 ff ff @9$............. backtrace: [<0000000098f3a26d>] alua_activate+0xb0/0x320 [<000000003b529641>] scsi_dh_activate+0xb2/0x140 [<000000007b296db3>] activate_path_work+0xc6/0xe0 [dm_multipath] [<000000007adc9ace>] process_one_work+0x3c5/0x730 [<00000000c457a985>] worker_thread+0x93/0x650 [<00000000cb80e628>] kthread+0x1ba/0x210 [<00000000a1e61077>] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Fix the problem by freeing 'qdata' in error path. Fixes: 625fe857e4fa ("scsi: scsi_dh_alua: Check scsi_device_get() return value") Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Hou Tao <houtao1(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c index fe8a5e5c0df8..bf0b3178f84d 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c @@ -1036,10 +1036,12 @@ static int alua_activate(struct scsi_device *sdev, rcu_read_unlock(); mutex_unlock(&h->init_mutex); - if (alua_rtpg_queue(pg, sdev, qdata, true)) + if (alua_rtpg_queue(pg, sdev, qdata, true)) { fn = NULL; - else + } else { + kfree(qdata); err = SCSI_DH_DEV_OFFLINED; + } kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group); out: if (fn) -- 2.25.1

1 15

openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会
by openEuler conference 04 Apr '23

04 Apr '23

您好！ Kernel SIG 邀请您参加 2023-04-07 14:00 召开的Zoom会议(自动录制) 会议主题：openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会会议内容： 1.进展update 2.议题征集中欢迎大家积极申报议题（新增议题可以直接回复邮件，或录入会议看板）会议链接：https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88353599877?pwd=aFZtMjJwUHl1UmNTZFV4eUJQM2xVdz09 会议纪要：https://etherpad.openeuler.org/p/Kernel-meetings 温馨提醒：建议接入会议后修改参会人的姓名，也可以使用您在gitee.com的ID 更多资讯尽在：https://openeuler.org/zh/ Hello! openEuler Kernel SIG invites you to attend the Zoom conference(auto recording) will be held at 2023-04-07 14:00, The subject of the conference is openEuler Kernel SIG双周例会, Summary: 1.进展update 2.议题征集中欢迎大家积极申报议题（新增议题可以直接回复邮件，或录入会议看板） You can join the meeting at https://us06web.zoom.us/j/88353599877?pwd=aFZtMjJwUHl1UmNTZFV4eUJQM2xVdz09. Add topics at https://etherpad.openeuler.org/p/Kernel-meetings. Note: You are advised to change the participant name after joining the conference or use your ID at gitee.com. More information: https://openeuler.org/en/

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 1/4] ext4: fix race between writepages and remount
by Yongqiang Liu 03 Apr '23

03 Apr '23

From: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: 188500, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I6RJ0V CVE: NA -------------------------------- We got a WARNING in ext4_add_complete_io: ================================================================== WARNING: at fs/ext4/page-io.c:231 ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: ksoftirqd/10 Tainted: 6.3.0-rc2 #85 RIP: 0010:ext4_put_io_end_defer+0x182/0x250 [ext4] [...] Call Trace: <TASK> ext4_end_bio+0xa8/0x240 [ext4] bio_endio+0x195/0x310 blk_update_request+0x184/0x770 scsi_end_request+0x2f/0x240 scsi_io_completion+0x75/0x450 scsi_finish_command+0xef/0x160 scsi_complete+0xa3/0x180 blk_complete_reqs+0x60/0x80 blk_done_softirq+0x25/0x40 __do_softirq+0x119/0x4c8 run_ksoftirqd+0x42/0x70 smpboot_thread_fn+0x136/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x1a0 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 ================================================================== Above issue may happen as follows: cpu1 cpu2 ----------------------------|---------------------------- mount -o dioread_lock ext4_writepages ext4_do_writepages *if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode))* // rsv_blocks is not assigned here mount -o remount,dioread_nolock ext4_journal_start_with_reserve __ext4_journal_start __ext4_journal_start_sb jbd2__journal_start *if (rsv_blocks)* // h_rsv_handle is not initialized here mpage_map_and_submit_extent mpage_map_one_extent dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode) if (dioread_nolock && (map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN)) mpd->io_submit.io_end->handle = handle->h_rsv_handle ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN // now io_end->handle is NULL but has EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN flag scsi_finish_command scsi_io_completion scsi_io_completion_action scsi_end_request blk_update_request req_bio_endio bio_endio bio->bi_end_io > ext4_end_bio ext4_put_io_end_defer ext4_add_complete_io // trigger WARN_ON(!io_end->handle && sbi->s_journal); The immediate cause of this problem is that ext4_should_dioread_nolock() function returns inconsistent values in the ext4_do_writepages() and mpage_map_one_extent(). There are four conditions in this function that can be changed at mount time to cause this problem. These four conditions can be divided into two categories: (1) journal_data and EXT4_EXTENTS_FL, which can be changed by ioctl (2) DELALLOC and DIOREAD_NOLOCK, which can be changed by remount The two in the first category have been fixed by commit c8585c6fcaf2 ("ext4: fix races between changing inode journal mode and ext4_writepages") and commit cb85f4d23f79 ("ext4: fix race between writepages and enabling EXT4_EXTENTS_FL") respectively. Two cases in the other category have not yet been fixed, and the above issue is caused by this situation. We refer to the fix for the first category, when applying options during remount, we grab s_writepages_rwsem to avoid racing with writepages ops to trigger this problem. Fixes: 6b523df4fb5a ("ext4: use transaction reservation for extent conversion in ext4_end_io") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13(a)huawei.com> --- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 ++- fs/ext4/super.c | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h index 4c88e75180a2..6df919b154b4 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h @@ -1530,7 +1530,8 @@ struct ext4_sb_info { /* * Barrier between writepages ops and changing any inode's JOURNAL_DATA - * or EXTENTS flag. + * or EXTENTS flag or between writepages ops and changing DIOREAD_NOLOCK + * mount option on remount. */ struct percpu_rw_semaphore s_writepages_rwsem; struct dax_device *s_daxdev; diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c index 8029a6f6471c..df07222f1cc5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/super.c +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c @@ -5605,10 +5605,20 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) vfs_flags = SB_LAZYTIME | SB_I_VERSION; sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~vfs_flags) | (*flags & vfs_flags); + /* + * Changing the DIOREAD_NOLOCK mount option may cause two calls to + * ext4_should_dioread_nolock() to return inconsistent values, + * triggering WARN_ON in ext4_add_complete_io(). we grab here + * s_writepages_rwsem to avoid race between writepages ops and + * remount. + */ + percpu_down_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); if (!parse_options(data, sb, NULL, &journal_ioprio, 1)) { err = -EINVAL; + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); goto restore_opts; } + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); if ((old_opts.s_mount_opt & EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM) ^ test_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM)) { @@ -5833,6 +5843,7 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) return 0; restore_opts: + percpu_down_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); sb->s_flags = old_sb_flags; sbi->s_mount_opt = old_opts.s_mount_opt; sbi->s_mount_opt2 = old_opts.s_mount_opt2; @@ -5841,6 +5852,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) sbi->s_commit_interval = old_opts.s_commit_interval; sbi->s_min_batch_time = old_opts.s_min_batch_time; sbi->s_max_batch_time = old_opts.s_max_batch_time; + percpu_up_write(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem); + if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY) && sbi->system_blks) ext4_release_system_zone(sb); #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA -- 2.25.1

1 3

[PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Move rwsem lock inside snd_ctl_elem_read to prevent UAF
by Hui Tang 31 Mar '23

31 Mar '23

From: Clement Lecigne <clecigne(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.162 commit df02234e6b87d2a9a82acd3198e44bdeff8488c6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I6AOWP CVE: CVE-2023-0266 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Note: this is a fix that works around the bug equivalently as the two upstream commits: 1fa4445f9adf ("ALSA: control - introduce snd_ctl_notify_one() helper") 56b88b50565c ("ALSA: pcm: Move rwsem lock inside snd_ctl_elem_read to prevent UAF") but in a simpler way to fit with older stable trees -- tiwai ] Add missing locking in ctl_elem_read_user/ctl_elem_write_user which can be easily triggered and turned into an use-after-free. Example code paths with SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_ELEM_READ: 64-bits: snd_ctl_ioctl snd_ctl_elem_read_user [takes controls_rwsem] snd_ctl_elem_read [lock properly held, all good] [drops controls_rwsem] 32-bits (compat): snd_ctl_ioctl_compat snd_ctl_elem_write_read_compat ctl_elem_write_read snd_ctl_elem_read [missing lock, not good] CVE-2023-0266 was assigned for this issue. Signed-off-by: Clement Lecigne <clecigne(a)google.com> Cc: stable(a)kernel.org # 5.12 and older Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.de> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex(a)perex.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Hui Tang <tanghui20(a)huawei.com> --- sound/core/control_compat.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/core/control_compat.c b/sound/core/control_compat.c index 507fd5210c1c..f5e51f5e3437 100644 --- a/sound/core/control_compat.c +++ b/sound/core/control_compat.c @@ -316,7 +316,9 @@ static int ctl_elem_read_user(struct snd_card *card, err = snd_power_wait(card, SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0); if (err < 0) goto error; + down_read(&card->controls_rwsem); err = snd_ctl_elem_read(card, data); + up_read(&card->controls_rwsem); if (err < 0) goto error; err = copy_ctl_value_to_user(userdata, valuep, data, type, count); @@ -344,7 +346,9 @@ static int ctl_elem_write_user(struct snd_ctl_file *file, err = snd_power_wait(card, SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0); if (err < 0) goto error; + down_write(&card->controls_rwsem); err = snd_ctl_elem_write(card, file, data); + up_write(&card->controls_rwsem); if (err < 0) goto error; err = copy_ctl_value_to_user(userdata, valuep, data, type, count); -- 2.17.1

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] ALSA: pcm: Move rwsem lock inside snd_ctl_elem_read to prevent UAF
by Zhang Changzhong 31 Mar '23

31 Mar '23

From: Clement Lecigne <clecigne(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.162 commit df02234e6b87d2a9a82acd3198e44bdeff8488c6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I6AOWP CVE: CVE-2023-0266 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Note: this is a fix that works around the bug equivalently as the two upstream commits: 1fa4445f9adf ("ALSA: control - introduce snd_ctl_notify_one() helper") 56b88b50565c ("ALSA: pcm: Move rwsem lock inside snd_ctl_elem_read to prevent UAF") but in a simpler way to fit with older stable trees -- tiwai ] Add missing locking in ctl_elem_read_user/ctl_elem_write_user which can be easily triggered and turned into an use-after-free. Example code paths with SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_ELEM_READ: 64-bits: snd_ctl_ioctl snd_ctl_elem_read_user [takes controls_rwsem] snd_ctl_elem_read [lock properly held, all good] [drops controls_rwsem] 32-bits (compat): snd_ctl_ioctl_compat snd_ctl_elem_write_read_compat ctl_elem_write_read snd_ctl_elem_read [missing lock, not good] CVE-2023-0266 was assigned for this issue. Signed-off-by: Clement Lecigne <clecigne(a)google.com> Cc: stable(a)kernel.org # 5.12 and older Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai(a)suse.de> Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex(a)perex.cz> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Hui Tang <tanghui20(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: songping yu <yusongping(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong <zhangchangzhong(a)huawei.com> --- sound/core/control_compat.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/sound/core/control_compat.c b/sound/core/control_compat.c index 507fd52..f5e51f5 100644 --- a/sound/core/control_compat.c +++ b/sound/core/control_compat.c @@ -316,7 +316,9 @@ static int ctl_elem_read_user(struct snd_card *card, err = snd_power_wait(card, SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0); if (err < 0) goto error; + down_read(&card->controls_rwsem); err = snd_ctl_elem_read(card, data); + up_read(&card->controls_rwsem); if (err < 0) goto error; err = copy_ctl_value_to_user(userdata, valuep, data, type, count); @@ -344,7 +346,9 @@ static int ctl_elem_write_user(struct snd_ctl_file *file, err = snd_power_wait(card, SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0); if (err < 0) goto error; + down_write(&card->controls_rwsem); err = snd_ctl_elem_write(card, file, data); + up_write(&card->controls_rwsem); if (err < 0) goto error; err = copy_ctl_value_to_user(userdata, valuep, data, type, count); -- 2.9.5

1 0

【重要】openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2需求收集
by zhangjialin (F) 30 Mar '23

30 Mar '23

openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2需求收集截止日期：2023年4月7日星期五 openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2需求合入截止日期：2023年5月19日星期五目前是需求收集阶段，如果您有合入openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP2的需求，请您尽快向openEuler社区提交需求issue 需求issue提交链接：https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues，issue类型选择需求，issue标题以[… 我们将在2023年4月7日kernel sig双周例会上集中讨论，采纳的需求将纳入里程碑规划

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel