- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/2] Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix CVE-2024-56605
by Lin Ruifeng 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

fix CVE-2024-56605 Fedor Pchelkin (1): Bluetooth: L2CAP: handle NULL sock pointer in l2cap_sock_alloc Ignat Korchagin (1): [Backport] Bluetooth: L2CAP: do not leave dangling sk pointer on error in l2cap_sock_create() net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) -- 2.22.0

2 3

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1343/1343] fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 05 Feb '25

05 Feb '25

Hi Theodore, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: 41298197ead9e85ee2ec1d52122f03fd1863cff2 [1343/1343] ext4: convert BUG_ON's to WARN_ON's in mballoc.c config: x86_64-randconfig-101-20241223 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250205/202502050119.jyApN4Fx-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250205/202502050119.jyApN4Fx-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502050119.jyApN4Fx-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12: In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16: In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:26: In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:14: include/linux/pagemap.h:425:21: warning: cast from 'int (*)(struct file *, struct page *)' to 'filler_t *' (aka 'int (*)(void *, struct page *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 425 | filler_t *filler = (filler_t *)mapping->a_ops->readpage; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4734: warning: Function parameter or member 'bh' not described in 'ext4_free_blocks' >> fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1365/1365] drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.
by kernel test robot 04 Feb '25

04 Feb '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b8815fbbe89b0d15fa3296c3e57d2197a92f5bc0 [1365/1365] ACPI: CPPC: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init failed in CPU Hotplug situation config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20250103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250204/202502042318.pGS3sedi-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502042318.pGS3sedi-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed. vim +614 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c 576 577 int acpi_get_psd_map(struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data) 578 { 579 struct cpc_desc **cpc_pptr, *cpc_ptr; 580 int parsed_core_num = 0; 581 int i, ret; 582 583 cpc_pptr = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); 584 if (!cpc_pptr) 585 return -ENOMEM; 586 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 587 cpc_pptr[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpc_desc), GFP_KERNEL); 588 if (!cpc_pptr[i]) { 589 ret = -ENOMEM; 590 goto out; 591 } 592 } 593 594 /* 595 * We can not use acpi_get_devices() to walk the processor devices 596 * because some processor device is not present. 597 */ 598 ret = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, 599 ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_parse_cpc, NULL, 600 cpc_pptr, (void **)&parsed_core_num); 601 if (ret) 602 goto out; 603 if (parsed_core_num != num_possible_cpus()) { 604 ret = -EINVAL; 605 goto out; 606 } 607 608 ret = __acpi_get_psd_map(all_cpu_data, cpc_pptr); 609 610 out: 611 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 612 cpc_ptr = cpc_pptr[i]; 613 if (cpc_ptr) > 614 kfree(cpc_ptr); 615 } 616 kfree(cpc_pptr); 617 618 return ret; 619 } 620 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_psd_map); 621 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1407/1407] include/linux/thread_info.h:59:17: warning: 'b' may be used uninitialized
by kernel test robot 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi Yu, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b9f356e64a7eda411ba8b63df9d4c5e204f16025 [1407/1407] block-io-hierarchy: core hierarchy iodump implementation config: arm64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290356.I10Fs5vR-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290356.I10Fs5vR-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501290356.I10Fs5vR-lkp@intel.com/ Note: it may well be a FALSE warning. FWIW you are at least aware of it now. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5, from ./arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1, from include/linux/preempt.h:81, from include/linux/spinlock.h:51, from include/linux/wait.h:9, from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8, from include/linux/fs.h:7, from include/linux/seq_file.h:11, from block/blk-io-hierarchy/iodump.c:14: In function 'check_object_size', inlined from 'check_copy_size' at include/linux/thread_info.h:90:2, inlined from 'copy_from_user' at include/linux/uaccess.h:143:6, inlined from 'threshold_store' at block/blk-io-hierarchy/iodump.c:240:6: >> include/linux/thread_info.h:59:17: warning: 'b' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 59 | __check_object_size(ptr, n, to_user); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/thread_info.h: In function 'threshold_store': include/linux/thread_info.h:52:13: note: by argument 1 of type 'const void *' to '__check_object_size' declared here 52 | extern void __check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ block/blk-io-hierarchy/iodump.c:234:14: note: 'b' declared here 234 | char b[MAX_BUF_LEN + 1]; | ^ vim +/b +59 include/linux/thread_info.h 0f60a8efe4005a Kees Cook 2016-07-12 50 f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 51 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 52 extern void __check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 53 bool to_user); f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 54 a85d6b8242dc78 Kees Cook 2016-09-07 55 static __always_inline void check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 56 bool to_user) f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 57 { 81409e9e280588 Kees Cook 2016-08-31 58 if (!__builtin_constant_p(n)) f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 @59 __check_object_size(ptr, n, to_user); f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 60 } f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 61 #else f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 62 static inline void check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 63 bool to_user) f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 64 { } f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 65 #endif /* CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY */ f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 66 :::::: The code at line 59 was first introduced by commit :::::: f5509cc18daa7f82bcc553be70df2117c8eedc16 mm: Hardened usercopy :::::: TO: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> :::::: CC: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2720/2720] drivers/block/null_blk/main.o: warning: objtool: local_lock_release()+0x16c: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi Damien, First bad commit (maybe != root cause): tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 683824f7f33a10565e9afcc9358ed8004d851077 commit: 35959f33a5dde63a001111516adda66dbe7a7027 [2720/2720] null_blk: Move driver into its own directory config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20250124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290314.CKmch30j-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290314.CKmch30j-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501290314.CKmch30j-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/block/null_blk/main.o: warning: objtool: local_lock_release()+0x16c: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1407/1407] include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h:106:27: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u32[1]' {aka 'unsigned int[1]'}
by kernel test robot 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi Steven, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: a6a7981cbf66d4951425d33cdce6ef39206eba83 [1407/1407] Net: ethernet: Support 3snic 3s9xx network card config: arm64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290212.Q2TSAA3o-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290212.Q2TSAA3o-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501290212.Q2TSAA3o-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:492:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'sss_nic_get_io_stats_size' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 492 | u32 sss_nic_get_io_stats_size(const struct sss_nic_dev *nic_dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:39, from include/linux/bitops.h:20, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:6: In function 'test_bit', inlined from 'sss_nic_add_ethtool_link_mode' at drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:764:7: >> include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h:106:27: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u32[1]' {aka 'unsigned int[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 106 | return 1UL & (addr[BIT_WORD(nr)] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1))); | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c: In function 'sss_nic_add_ethtool_link_mode': drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:759:40: note: object 'hw_mode' of size 4 759 | u32 hw_mode, u32 op) | ~~~~^~~~~~~ vim +106 include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 98 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 99 /** 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 100 * test_bit - Determine whether a bit is set 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 101 * @nr: bit number to test 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 102 * @addr: Address to start counting from 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 103 */ 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 104 static inline int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr) 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 105 { d05be13bcc6ec61 Jiri Slaby 2007-10-18 @106 return 1UL & (addr[BIT_WORD(nr)] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1))); 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 107 } 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 108 :::::: The code at line 106 was first introduced by commit :::::: d05be13bcc6ec615fb2e9556a9b85d52800669b6 define first set of BIT* macros :::::: TO: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby(a)gmail.com> :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)woody.linux-foundation.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2720/2720] kernel/sched/core.o: warning: objtool: preempt_count_add()+0xdc: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 683824f7f33a10565e9afcc9358ed8004d851077 commit: 2fe77d25dac03b271f454e3f0c006616fdce4e55 [2720/2720] sched: Core-wide rq->lock config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20250124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501282335.hXkI4N24-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501282335.hXkI4N24-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501282335.hXkI4N24-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/sched/core.o: warning: objtool: preempt_count_add()+0xdc: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1343/1343] fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

Hi Theodore, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: 41298197ead9e85ee2ec1d52122f03fd1863cff2 [1343/1343] ext4: convert BUG_ON's to WARN_ON's in mballoc.c config: x86_64-randconfig-101-20241223 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501280034.3ctUnk1s-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501280034.3ctUnk1s-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501280034.3ctUnk1s-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12: In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16: In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:26: In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:14: include/linux/pagemap.h:425:21: warning: cast from 'int (*)(struct file *, struct page *)' to 'filler_t *' (aka 'int (*)(void *, struct page *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 425 | filler_t *filler = (filler_t *)mapping->a_ops->readpage; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4734: warning: Function parameter or member 'bh' not described in 'ext4_free_blocks' >> fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1334/1334] kernel/hung_task.c:148:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace'
by kernel test robot 27 Jan '25

27 Jan '25

Hi Guilherme, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: 190aae97bcddbed131a203f829257b168f5058ce [1334/1334] kernel/hung_task.c: introduce sysctl to print all traces when a hung task is detected config: x86_64-randconfig-103-20241218 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250127/202501272153.j77d8naO-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250127/202501272153.j77d8naO-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501272153.j77d8naO-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/hung_task.c:148:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace' 148 | if (sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace) | ^ kernel/hung_task.c:235:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 235 | int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^ kernel/hung_task.c:235:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 235 | int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^ | static 1 warning and 1 error generated. vim +/sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace +148 kernel/hung_task.c 94 95 static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout) 96 { 97 unsigned long switch_count = t->nvcsw + t->nivcsw; 98 99 /* 100 * Ensure the task is not frozen. 101 * Also, skip vfork and any other user process that freezer should skip. 102 */ 103 if (unlikely(t->flags & (PF_FROZEN | PF_FREEZER_SKIP))) 104 return; 105 106 /* 107 * When a freshly created task is scheduled once, changes its state to 108 * TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE without having ever been switched out once, it 109 * musn't be checked. 110 */ 111 if (unlikely(!switch_count)) 112 return; 113 114 if (switch_count != t->last_switch_count) { 115 t->last_switch_count = switch_count; 116 t->last_switch_time = jiffies; 117 return; 118 } 119 if (time_is_after_jiffies(t->last_switch_time + timeout * HZ)) 120 return; 121 122 trace_sched_process_hang(t); 123 124 if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) { 125 console_verbose(); 126 hung_task_show_lock = true; 127 hung_task_call_panic = true; 128 } 129 130 /* 131 * Ok, the task did not get scheduled for more than 2 minutes, 132 * complain: 133 */ 134 if (sysctl_hung_task_warnings) { 135 if (sysctl_hung_task_warnings > 0) 136 sysctl_hung_task_warnings--; 137 pr_err("INFO: task %s:%d blocked for more than %ld seconds.\n", 138 t->comm, t->pid, timeout); 139 pr_err(" %s %s %.*s\n", 140 print_tainted(), init_utsname()->release, 141 (int)strcspn(init_utsname()->version, " "), 142 init_utsname()->version); 143 pr_err("\"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\"" 144 " disables this message.\n"); 145 sched_show_task(t); 146 hung_task_show_lock = true; 147 > 148 if (sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace) 149 hung_task_show_all_bt = true; 150 } 151 152 touch_nmi_watchdog(); 153 } 154 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1365/1365] drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.
by kernel test robot 27 Jan '25

27 Jan '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b8815fbbe89b0d15fa3296c3e57d2197a92f5bc0 [1365/1365] ACPI: CPPC: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init failed in CPU Hotplug situation config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20250103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250127/202501272114.s699yjVJ-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501272114.s699yjVJ-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed. vim +614 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c 576 577 int acpi_get_psd_map(struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data) 578 { 579 struct cpc_desc **cpc_pptr, *cpc_ptr; 580 int parsed_core_num = 0; 581 int i, ret; 582 583 cpc_pptr = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); 584 if (!cpc_pptr) 585 return -ENOMEM; 586 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 587 cpc_pptr[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpc_desc), GFP_KERNEL); 588 if (!cpc_pptr[i]) { 589 ret = -ENOMEM; 590 goto out; 591 } 592 } 593 594 /* 595 * We can not use acpi_get_devices() to walk the processor devices 596 * because some processor device is not present. 597 */ 598 ret = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, 599 ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_parse_cpc, NULL, 600 cpc_pptr, (void **)&parsed_core_num); 601 if (ret) 602 goto out; 603 if (parsed_core_num != num_possible_cpus()) { 604 ret = -EINVAL; 605 goto out; 606 } 607 608 ret = __acpi_get_psd_map(all_cpu_data, cpc_pptr); 609 610 out: 611 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 612 cpc_ptr = cpc_pptr[i]; 613 if (cpc_ptr) > 614 kfree(cpc_ptr); 615 } 616 kfree(cpc_pptr); 617 618 return ret; 619 } 620 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_psd_map); 621 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0