- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1739/1739] mm/page_alloc.c:4648:27: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: &=
by kernel test robot 19 Oct '25

19 Oct '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 commit: 875ffd41499ee5a3512da409cbd4c2ffd32b3cfa [1739/1739] mm: Do limit checking after memory allocation for memory reliable config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251019/202510190803.oHSjvBlI-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 8.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251019/202510190803.oHSjvBlI-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510190803.oHSjvBlI-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) mm/page_alloc.c:140:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pcpu_drain_mutex' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/page_alloc.c:141:1: sparse: sparse: symbol '__pcpu_scope_pcpu_drain' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/page_alloc.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mm.h): include/linux/gfp.h:324:27: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:324:27: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer >> mm/page_alloc.c:4648:27: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: &= mm/page_alloc.c:4648:27: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/page_alloc.c:4648:27: sparse: right side has type int In file included from mm/page_alloc.c:70: mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'deferred_init_memmap': include/linux/ktask.h:123:21: warning: cast between incompatible function types from 'int (*)(long unsigned int, long unsigned int, struct deferred_args *)' to 'int (*)(void *, void *, void *)' [-Wcast-function-type] .kc_thread_func = (ktask_thread_func)(thread_func), 15- ^ include/linux/ktask.h:139:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KTASK_CTL_INITIALIZER' KTASK_CTL_INITIALIZER(thread_func, func_arg, min_chunk_size) 18- ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:1730:3: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_KTASK_CTL' DEFINE_KTASK_CTL(ctl, deferred_init_chunk, &args, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/ktask.h:123:21: warning: cast between incompatible function types from 'int (*)(long unsigned int, long unsigned int, struct deferred_args *)' to 'int (*)(void *, void *, void *)' [-Wcast-function-type] .kc_thread_func = (ktask_thread_func)(thread_func), 24- ^ include/linux/ktask.h:139:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KTASK_CTL_INITIALIZER' KTASK_CTL_INITIALIZER(thread_func, func_arg, min_chunk_size) 27- ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:1746:3: note: in expansion of macro 'DEFINE_KTASK_CTL' DEFINE_KTASK_CTL(ctl, deferred_free_chunk, &args, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:3083: warning: Function parameter or member 'mt' not described in '__putback_isolated_page' vim +4648 mm/page_alloc.c 4606 4607 /* 4608 * return true means memory allocation need retry and flag ___GFP_RELIABILITY 4609 * must be cleared. 4610 */ 4611 static inline bool check_after_alloc(gfp_t *gfp_mask, unsigned int order, 4612 int preferred_nid, nodemask_t *nodemask, 4613 struct page **_page) 4614 { 4615 if (!mem_reliable_is_enabled()) 4616 return false; 4617 4618 if (!(*gfp_mask & ___GFP_RELIABILITY)) 4619 return false; 4620 4621 if (!*_page) 4622 goto out_retry; 4623 4624 if (*gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) 4625 goto out; 4626 4627 /* check water mark, reserver mirrored mem for kernel */ 4628 if (!mem_reliable_watermark_ok(1 << order)) 4629 goto out_free_page; 4630 4631 /* percpu counter is not initialized, ignore limit check */ 4632 if (!mem_reliable_counter_initialized()) 4633 goto out; 4634 4635 /* spcial user task, systemd is limited by task_reliable_limit */ 4636 if (((current->flags & PF_RELIABLE) || is_global_init(current)) && 4637 !reliable_mem_limit_check(1 << order)) 4638 goto out_free_page; 4639 4640 goto out; 4641 4642 out_free_page: 4643 __free_pages(*_page, order); 4644 *_page = NULL; 4645 4646 out_retry: 4647 if (reliable_allow_fb_enabled() || is_global_init(current)) { > 4648 *gfp_mask &= ~___GFP_RELIABILITY; 4649 return true; 4650 } 4651 4652 if (*gfp_mask & (__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_THISNODE)) 4653 goto out; 4654 4655 /* Coredumps can quickly deplete all memory reserves */ 4656 if (current->flags & PF_DUMPCORE) 4657 goto out; 4658 /* The OOM killer will not help higher order allocs */ 4659 if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) 4660 goto out; 4661 4662 /* oom here */ 4663 mem_reliable_out_of_memory(*gfp_mask, order, preferred_nid, 4664 nodemask); 4665 out: 4666 return false; 4667 } 4668 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS] BUILD REGRESSION e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639
by kernel test robot 19 Oct '25

19 Oct '25

tree/branch: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS branch HEAD: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 !18333 scsi: qla2xxx: Wait for io return on terminate rport Error/Warning (recently discovered and may have been fixed): https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510182012.jZtZFjLW-lkp@intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510182359.uGdUMBQy-lkp@intel.com https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510190105.Ksp4uNzL-lkp@intel.com mm/mmu_gather.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .text Unverified Error/Warning (likely false positive, kindly check if interested): include/linux/uaccess.h:112:17: warning: 's32' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] Error/Warning ids grouped by kconfigs: recent_errors |-- arm64-allmodconfig | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- include-linux-list.h:warning:storing-the-address-of-local-variable-queue-in-(struct-list_head-)packet.prev | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. | `-- mm-rodata_test.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-rodata_test |-- arm64-allnoconfig | |-- include-linux-list.h:warning:storing-the-address-of-local-variable-wait-in-((struct-list_head-)x)-.prev | |-- include-linux-list.h:warning:storing-the-address-of-local-variable-waiter-in-(struct-list_head-)((char-)sem-).prev | |-- include-linux-mempolicy.h:warning:__do_mbind-defined-but-not-used | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-memory.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-hugetlb_insert_hugepage_pte_by_pa | |-- mm-mmap.c:warning:variable-new_start-set-but-not-used | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-clear_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-set_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-rmap.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-is_vma_temporary_stack | |-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used | `-- mm-vmscan.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-kernel_swap_enabled |-- arm64-defconfig | |-- include-linux-list.h:warning:storing-the-address-of-local-variable-waiter-in-(struct-list_head-)((char-)sem-).prev | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-clear_zone_contiguous | `-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-set_zone_contiguous |-- arm64-randconfig-001-20251018 | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. | |-- mm-rodata_test.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-rodata_test | `-- mm-vmscan.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-kernel_swap_enabled |-- arm64-randconfig-002-20251018 | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- include-linux-mempolicy.h:warning:__do_mbind-defined-but-not-used | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-string.h:warning:__builtin_memcpy-specified-bound-between-and-exceeds-maximum-object-size | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-clear_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-set_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-rmap.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-is_vma_temporary_stack | |-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used | `-- mm-vmscan.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-kernel_swap_enabled |-- arm64-randconfig-003-20250930 | `-- include-linux-uaccess.h:warning:s32-may-be-used-uninitialized |-- arm64-randconfig-003-20251018 | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- include-linux-list.h:warning:storing-the-address-of-local-variable-ticket-in-((struct-list_head-)((char-)space_info-))-.prev | |-- include-linux-mempolicy.h:warning:__do_mbind-defined-but-not-used | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-clear_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-set_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-rmap.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-is_vma_temporary_stack | `-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used |-- arm64-randconfig-004-20251018 | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- include-asm-generic-io.h:warning:reg-may-be-used-uninitialized-in-this-function | |-- include-linux-printk.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-linux-signal.h:warning:this-statement-may-fall-through | |-- include-scsi-scsi_cmnd.h:warning:scsi_cmnd-may-be-used-uninitialized-in-this-function | |-- init-calibrate.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-calibration_delay_done | |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. | |-- mm-memory.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-hugetlb_insert_hugepage_pte_by_pa | |-- mm-mmap.c:warning:variable-new_start-set-but-not-used | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-clear_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-page_alloc.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-set_zone_contiguous | |-- mm-rodata_test.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-rodata_test | `-- mm-vmscan.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-kernel_swap_enabled |-- arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 | |-- mm-mem_reliable.c:sparse:sparse:invalid-assignment: | |-- mm-mem_reliable.c:sparse:sparse:symbol-reliable_debug_handler-was-not-declared.-Should-it-be-static | |-- mm-mem_reliable.c:sparse:sparse:symbol-reliable_limit_handler-was-not-declared.-Should-it-be-static | |-- mm-mem_reliable.c:sparse:sparse:symbol-reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write-was-not-declared.-Should-it-be-static | `-- mm-page_alloc.c:sparse:sparse:incorrect-type-in-argument-(different-base-types)-expected-restricted-gfp_t-usertype-flags-got-unsigned-int |-- x86_64-allnoconfig | |-- mm-mmap.c:warning:variable-new_start-set-but-not-used | |-- mm-mmu_gather.o:warning:objtool:missing-symbol-for-section-.text | |-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used | `-- mm-vmscan.c:error:implicit-declaration-of-function-kernel_swap_enabled-Werror-Wimplicit-function-declaration |-- x86_64-allyesconfig | |-- block-blk-wbt.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-wbt_issue | |-- block-blk-wbt.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-wbt_requeue | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. | |-- mm-memory.c:warning:cast-from-int-(-)(unsigned-long-unsigned-long-struct-cgp_args-)-to-ktask_thread_func-(aka-int-(-)(void-void-void-)-)-converts-to-incompatible-function-type | `-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used |-- x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20251018 | |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union | |-- mm-hugetlb.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-free_huge_page_to_dhugetlb_pool | |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. | |-- mm-memory.c:warning:cast-from-int-(-)(unsigned-long-unsigned-long-struct-cgp_args-)-to-ktask_thread_func-(aka-int-(-)(void-void-void-)-)-converts-to-incompatible-function-type | `-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used `-- x86_64-rhel-9.4-rust |-- block-blk-wbt.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-wbt_issue |-- block-blk-wbt.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-wbt_requeue |-- drivers-pinctrl-core.c:error:Cannot-parse-struct-or-union |-- mm-hugetlb.c:warning:no-previous-prototype-for-function-free_huge_page_to_dhugetlb_pool |-- mm-memcontrol.c:warning:bad-line:otherwise. |-- mm-memory.c:warning:cast-from-int-(-)(unsigned-long-unsigned-long-struct-cgp_args-)-to-ktask_thread_func-(aka-int-(-)(void-void-void-)-)-converts-to-incompatible-function-type `-- mm-rmap.c:warning:variable-cstart-set-but-not-used elapsed time: 832m configs tested: 17 configs skipped: 122 tested configs: arm64 allmodconfig gcc-15.1.0 arm64 allnoconfig gcc-15.1.0 arm64 defconfig gcc-15.1.0 arm64 randconfig-001-20251018 gcc-8.5.0 arm64 randconfig-002-20251018 gcc-15.1.0 arm64 randconfig-003-20251018 gcc-13.4.0 arm64 randconfig-004-20251018 gcc-11.5.0 x86_64 allnoconfig clang-20 x86_64 allyesconfig clang-20 x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-001-20251018 gcc-14 x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-002-20251018 gcc-14 x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-003-20251018 gcc-14 x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-004-20251018 gcc-14 x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-005-20251018 gcc-14 x86_64 buildonly-randconfig-006-20251018 clang-20 x86_64 defconfig gcc-14 x86_64 rhel-9.4-rust clang-22 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] mm/page_alloc.c:3684:54: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types)
by kernel test robot 19 Oct '25

19 Oct '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 commit: 9b6c51cd780588813c5d327e2a6d677d010a2b6f [1740/1740] mm: fix zoneref mapping problem in memory reliable config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251019/202510190105.Ksp4uNzL-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251019/202510190105.Ksp4uNzL-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510190105.Ksp4uNzL-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) mm/page_alloc.c:140:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pcpu_drain_mutex' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/page_alloc.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mm.h): include/linux/mem_reliable.h:68:15: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:4656:13: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:4661:35: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: |= mm/page_alloc.c:4661:35: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/page_alloc.c:4661:35: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/page_alloc.c:4677:35: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: |= mm/page_alloc.c:4677:35: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/page_alloc.c:4677:35: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/page_alloc.c:4683:35: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: |= mm/page_alloc.c:4683:35: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/page_alloc.c:4683:35: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/page_alloc.c:4698:35: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: |= mm/page_alloc.c:4698:35: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/page_alloc.c:4698:35: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/page_alloc.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mm.h): include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:324:27: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:324:27: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:3683:14: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:3684:45: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer >> mm/page_alloc.c:3684:54: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different base types) @@ expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags @@ got unsigned int @@ mm/page_alloc.c:3684:54: sparse: expected restricted gfp_t [usertype] flags mm/page_alloc.c:3684:54: sparse: got unsigned int include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:3701:14: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'mem_init_print_info': mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 36- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7516:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7516 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: note: use '&__init_begin[0] <= &_sinittext[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 42- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7516:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7516 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 48- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7516:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7516 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: note: use '&_sinittext[0] < &__init_end[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 54- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7516:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7516 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 60- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7518:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7518 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: note: use '&_stext[0] <= &_sinittext[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 66- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7518:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7518 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 72- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7518:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7518 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: note: use '&_sinittext[0] < &_etext[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 78- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7518:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7518 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 84- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7519:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7519 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: note: use '&_sdata[0] <= &__init_begin[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 90- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7519:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7519 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 96- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7519:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7519 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: note: use '&__init_begin[0] < &_edata[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 102- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7519:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7519 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 108- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7520:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7520 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, __start_rodata, rosize); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:27: note: use '&_stext[0] <= &__start_rodata[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 114- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7520:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7520 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, __start_rodata, rosize); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 120- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7520:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7520 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, __start_rodata, rosize); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7512:41: note: use '&__start_rodata[0] < &_etext[0]' to compare the addresses 7512 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 126- | ^ vim +3684 mm/page_alloc.c 3673 3674 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_RELIABLE 3675 static inline void reliable_fb_find_zone(gfp_t gfp_mask, 3676 struct alloc_context *ac) 3677 { 3678 if (!reliable_allow_fb_enabled()) 3679 return; 3680 3681 /* dst node don't have zone we want, fallback here */ 3682 if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_THISNODE) && (ac->high_zoneidx == ZONE_NORMAL) && 3683 (gfp_mask & ___GFP_RELIABILITY)) { > 3684 ac->high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask & ~___GFP_RELIABILITY); 3685 ac->preferred_zoneref = first_zones_zonelist( 3686 ac->zonelist, ac->high_zoneidx, ac->nodemask); 3687 } 3688 3689 return; 3690 } 3691 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] mm/mem_reliable.c:401:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write' was not declared. Should it be static?
by kernel test robot 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 commit: 6943b93b464351cbc35aa002e86bac48e08b1c3f [1740/1740] mm: add support for limiting the usage of reliable memory in pagecache config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510182359.uGdUMBQy-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510182359.uGdUMBQy-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510182359.uGdUMBQy-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) mm/mem_reliable.c:39:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pagecache_reliable_pages' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:67:14: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/mem_reliable.c:250:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:323:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_debug_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:356:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_reserve_size_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? >> mm/mem_reliable.c:401:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write' was not declared. Should it be static? >> mm/mem_reliable.c:487:14: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: |= mm/mem_reliable.c:487:14: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/mem_reliable.c:487:14: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/mem_reliable.c:491:14: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: &= mm/mem_reliable.c:491:14: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/mem_reliable.c:491:14: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/mem_reliable.c:250:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_limit_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 250 | int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/mem_reliable.c:323:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_debug_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 323 | int reliable_debug_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/mem_reliable.c:356:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_reserve_size_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 356 | int reliable_reserve_size_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/mem_reliable.c:401:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 401 | int reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write +401 mm/mem_reliable.c 400 > 401 int reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write(struct ctl_table *table, int write, 402 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) 403 { 404 unsigned long old_value = reliable_pagecache_max_bytes; 405 int ret; 406 407 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); 408 if (!ret && write) { 409 if (reliable_pagecache_max_bytes > total_reliable_mem_sz()) { 410 reliable_pagecache_max_bytes = old_value; 411 return -EINVAL; 412 } 413 } 414 415 return ret; 416 } 417 418 static struct ctl_table reliable_ctl_table[] = { 419 { 420 .procname = "task_reliable_limit", 421 .data = &task_reliable_limit, 422 .maxlen = sizeof(task_reliable_limit), 423 .mode = 0644, 424 .proc_handler = reliable_limit_handler, 425 }, 426 { 427 .procname = "reliable_debug", 428 .data = &mem_reliable_ctrl_bits, 429 .maxlen = sizeof(mem_reliable_ctrl_bits), 430 .mode = 0600, 431 .proc_handler = reliable_debug_handler, 432 }, 433 { 434 .procname = "reliable_reserve_size", 435 .data = &sysctl_reliable_reserve_size, 436 .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_reliable_reserve_size), 437 .mode = 0644, 438 .proc_handler = reliable_reserve_size_handler, 439 }, 440 #ifdef CONFIG_SHMEM 441 { 442 .procname = "shmem_reliable_bytes_limit", 443 .data = &sysctl_shmem_reliable_bytes_limit, 444 .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_shmem_reliable_bytes_limit), 445 .mode = 0644, 446 .proc_handler = reliable_shmem_bytes_limit_handler, 447 }, 448 #endif 449 { 450 .procname = "reliable_pagecache_max_bytes", 451 .data = &reliable_pagecache_max_bytes, 452 .maxlen = sizeof(reliable_pagecache_max_bytes), 453 .mode = 0644, 454 .proc_handler = reliable_pagecache_max_bytes_write, 455 .extra1 = &zero, 456 }, 457 {} 458 }; 459 460 static struct ctl_table reliable_dir_table[] = { 461 { 462 .procname = "vm", 463 .maxlen = 0, 464 .mode = 0555, 465 .child = reliable_ctl_table, 466 }, 467 {} 468 }; 469 470 void page_cache_prepare_alloc(gfp_t *gfp) 471 { 472 long nr_reliable = 0; 473 int cpu; 474 475 if (!mem_reliable_is_enabled()) 476 return; 477 478 for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) 479 nr_reliable += this_cpu_read(pagecache_reliable_pages); 480 481 if (nr_reliable < 0) 482 goto no_reliable; 483 484 if (nr_reliable > reliable_pagecache_max_bytes >> PAGE_SHIFT) 485 goto no_reliable; 486 > 487 *gfp |= ___GFP_RELIABILITY; 488 return; 489 490 no_reliable: 491 *gfp &= ~___GFP_RELIABILITY; 492 } 493 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] mm/mem_reliable.c:272:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_debug_handler' was not declared. Should it be static?
by kernel test robot 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 commit: 851a3ff0b4de68403c9a344c3d5378aa590705b7 [1740/1740] mm: Introduce proc interface to control memory reliable features config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510182012.jZtZFjLW-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510182012.jZtZFjLW-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510182012.jZtZFjLW-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) mm/mem_reliable.c:52:14: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/mem_reliable.c:199:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? >> mm/mem_reliable.c:272:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_debug_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:199:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_limit_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 199 | int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/mem_reliable.c:272:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_debug_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 272 | int reliable_debug_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reliable_debug_handler +272 mm/mem_reliable.c 271 > 272 int reliable_debug_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, 273 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) 274 { 275 unsigned long old_ctrl_bits, new_ctrl_bits; 276 static DEFINE_MUTEX(reliable_debug_mutex); 277 int ret; 278 279 mutex_lock(&reliable_debug_mutex); 280 old_ctrl_bits = mem_reliable_ctrl_bits; 281 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); 282 if (ret == 0 && write) { 283 if (mem_reliable_ctrl_bits > (1 << CTRL_BITS_SHIFT) - 1) { 284 mem_reliable_ctrl_bits = old_ctrl_bits; 285 mutex_unlock(&reliable_debug_mutex); 286 287 return -EINVAL; 288 } 289 290 new_ctrl_bits = mem_reliable_ctrl_bits; 291 mem_reliable_ctrl_bits = old_ctrl_bits; 292 if (!!test_bit(MEM_RELIABLE_ALL, &new_ctrl_bits)) 293 mem_reliable_parse_ctrl_bits(new_ctrl_bits); 294 else 295 mem_reliable_disable_all(); 296 } 297 298 mutex_unlock(&reliable_debug_mutex); 299 300 return ret; 301 } 302 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static?
by kernel test robot 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 commit: 1845e7add95773a24019fb72bbea24a0a568663b [1740/1740] mm: Add reliable memory use limit for user tasks config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_limit_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 126 | int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reliable_limit_handler +126 mm/mem_reliable.c 124 125 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL > 126 int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, 127 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) 128 { 129 unsigned long old = task_reliable_limit; 130 int ret; 131 132 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); 133 if (ret == 0 && write) { 134 if (task_reliable_limit > total_reliable_mem_sz()) { 135 task_reliable_limit = old; 136 return -EINVAL; 137 } 138 } 139 140 return ret; 141 } 142 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH OLK-6.6] fs/resctrl: Re-allocate rmid for the monitor when migrating across control groups
by Zeng Heng 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/ID29XA -------------------------------- On x86 RDT, RMIDs are completely independent of CLOSIDs, so a monitor group can move between control groups freely without modifying rmid_entry. On ARM64 MPAM, however, a CLOSID owns a slice of RMID space. When migrate the monitor group to another control group, it should therefore re-allocate for a RMID tied to the new CLOSID. If the migrated monitor keeps the old CLOSID, tasks of the monitor will still adopt the previous CLOSID's settings and when the monitor group is later destroyed, the same rmid_entry will be added to the rmid_free_lru list twice, which corrupting the list. Fixes: 8da2b938eb7e ("x86/resctrl: Implement rename op for mon groups") Signed-off-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4(a)huawei.com> --- fs/resctrl/internal.h | 1 + fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 2 +- fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 10 ++++++++++ 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/resctrl/internal.h b/fs/resctrl/internal.h index 839fbcf51ed2..0e8865bf012a 100644 --- a/fs/resctrl/internal.h +++ b/fs/resctrl/internal.h @@ -294,5 +294,6 @@ bool has_busy_rmid(struct rdt_domain *d); void __check_limbo(struct rdt_domain *d, bool force_free); void rdt_staged_configs_clear(void); int resctrl_find_cleanest_closid(void); +struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid); #endif /* _FS_RESCTRL_INTERNAL_H */ diff --git a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c index d10497013638..b651b37e7e65 100644 --- a/fs/resctrl/monitor.c +++ b/fs/resctrl/monitor.c @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ bool has_busy_rmid(struct rdt_domain *d) return find_first_bit(d->rmid_busy_llc, idx_limit) != idx_limit; } -static struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid) +struct rmid_entry *resctrl_find_free_rmid(u32 closid) { struct rmid_entry *itr; u32 itr_idx, cmp_idx; diff --git a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c index 091dc20d0cc0..3d3b12db69b4 100644 --- a/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c +++ b/fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c @@ -3813,6 +3813,8 @@ static void mongrp_reparent(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, list_move_tail(&rdtgrp->mon.crdtgrp_list, &new_prdtgrp->mon.crdtgrp_list); + free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid); + rdtgrp->mon.rmid = alloc_rmid(new_prdtgrp->closid); rdtgrp->mon.parent = new_prdtgrp; rdtgrp->closid = new_prdtgrp->closid; @@ -3826,6 +3828,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_rename(struct kernfs_node *kn, struct kernfs_node *new_parent, const char *new_name) { struct rdtgroup *new_prdtgrp; + struct rmid_entry *entry; struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp; cpumask_var_t tmpmask; int ret; @@ -3884,6 +3887,13 @@ static int rdtgroup_rename(struct kernfs_node *kn, goto out; } + entry = resctrl_find_free_rmid(new_prdtgrp->closid); + if (IS_ERR(entry)) { + rdt_last_cmd_puts("Destination has been out of RMIDs\n"); + ret = PTR_ERR(entry); + goto out; + } + /* * Allocate the cpumask for use in mongrp_reparent() to avoid the * possibility of failing to allocate it after kernfs_rename() has -- 2.25.1

2 1

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] include/linux/mem_reliable.h:41:15: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer
by kernel test robot 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: fa8b6133306cb8ffc12abaab905aada1ef1a56fe commit: 33d1f46ad98ea3a13752a6360d97732ab4e119b9 [1740/1740] mm: Introduce memory reliable config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181428.zUMwm8BB-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181428.zUMwm8BB-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510181428.zUMwm8BB-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) mm/page_alloc.c:140:1: sparse: sparse: symbol 'pcpu_drain_mutex' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/page_alloc.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mm.h): >> include/linux/mem_reliable.h:41:15: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:4572:13: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c:4573:27: sparse: sparse: invalid assignment: |= mm/page_alloc.c:4573:27: sparse: left side has type restricted gfp_t mm/page_alloc.c:4573:27: sparse: right side has type unsigned int mm/page_alloc.c: note: in included file (through include/linux/mm.h): include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:324:27: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:324:27: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer include/linux/gfp.h:457:34: sparse: sparse: restricted gfp_t degrades to integer mm/page_alloc.c: In function 'mem_init_print_info': mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 20- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7377:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7377 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: note: use '&__init_begin[0] <= &_sinittext[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 26- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7377:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7377 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 32- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7377:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7377 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: note: use '&_sinittext[0] < &__init_end[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 38- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7377:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7377 | adj_init_size(__init_begin, __init_end, init_data_size, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 44- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7379:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7379 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: note: use '&_stext[0] <= &_sinittext[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 50- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7379:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7379 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 56- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7379:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7379 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: note: use '&_sinittext[0] < &_etext[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 62- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7379:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7379 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, _sinittext, init_code_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 68- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7380:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7380 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: note: use '&_sdata[0] <= &__init_begin[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 74- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7380:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7380 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 80- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7380:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7380 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: note: use '&__init_begin[0] < &_edata[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 86- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7380:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7380 | adj_init_size(_sdata, _edata, datasize, __init_begin, init_data_size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 92- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7381:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7381 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, __start_rodata, rosize); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:27: note: use '&_stext[0] <= &__start_rodata[0]' to compare the addresses 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 98- | ^~ mm/page_alloc.c:7381:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7381 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, __start_rodata, rosize); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/page_alloc.c:7373:41: warning: comparison between two arrays [-Warray-compare] 7373 | if (start <= pos && pos < end && size > adj) 104- | ^ mm/page_alloc.c:7381:9: note: in expansion of macro 'adj_init_size' 7381 | adj_init_size(_stext, _etext, codesize, __start_rodata, rosize); vim +41 include/linux/mem_reliable.h 31 32 static inline bool skip_none_movable_zone(gfp_t gfp, struct zoneref *z) 33 { 34 if (!mem_reliable_is_enabled()) 35 return false; 36 37 if (!current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) 38 return false; 39 40 /* user tasks can only alloc memory from non-mirrored region */ > 41 if (!(gfp & ___GFP_RELIABILITY) && (gfp & __GFP_HIGHMEM) && 42 (gfp & __GFP_MOVABLE)) { 43 if (zonelist_zone_idx(z) < ZONE_MOVABLE) 44 return true; 45 } 46 47 return false; 48 } 49 #else 50 #define reliable_enabled 0 51 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1755/1755] include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

Hi Zhang, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: fa8b6133306cb8ffc12abaab905aada1ef1a56fe commit: 1811840c2cdebd0820818392a8217ffbd1be5c67 [1755/1755] mm/sharepool: Fix sharepool node id invalid when using sp_alloc config: arm64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181209.tuA1NpUP-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181209.tuA1NpUP-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510181209.tuA1NpUP-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/fork.c:741:20: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 741 | void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { } | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c:826:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'arch_dup_task_struct' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 826 | int __weak arch_dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *dst, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c: In function 'dup_task_struct': kernel/fork.c:845:27: warning: variable 'stack_vm_area' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 845 | struct vm_struct *stack_vm_area; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/sched/signal.h:7, from include/linux/sched/cputime.h:5, from kernel/fork.c:23: include/linux/signal.h: In function 'sigemptyset': include/linux/signal.h:180:29: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] 180 | case 2: set->sig[1] = 0; | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~ include/linux/signal.h:181:9: note: here 181 | case 1: set->sig[0] = 0; | ^~~~ In file included from kernel/fork.c:31: include/linux/mempolicy.h: At top level: >> include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 329 | static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, | ^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:36, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:5, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:37, from include/linux/bitops.h:19, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/asm-generic/bug.h:18, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bug.h:37, from include/linux/bug.h:5, from include/linux/mmdebug.h:5, from include/linux/gfp.h:5, from include/linux/slab.h:15, from kernel/fork.c:14: In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from '__mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1074:3, inlined from 'mmput_async_fn' at kernel/fork.c:1104:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:82, from include/linux/mmzone.h:9, from include/linux/gfp.h:6: kernel/fork.c: In function 'mmput_async_fn': kernel/fork.c:939:44: note: object 'mmlist_lock' of size 4 939 | __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mmlist_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from '__mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1074:3, inlined from 'mmput_async_fn' at kernel/fork.c:1104:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c: In function 'mmput_async_fn': kernel/fork.c:939:44: note: object 'mmlist_lock' of size 4 939 | __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mmlist_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from '__mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1074:3, inlined from 'mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1094:3, inlined from 'mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1086:6: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c: In function 'mmput': kernel/fork.c:939:44: note: object 'mmlist_lock' of size 4 939 | __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mmlist_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from '__mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1074:3, inlined from 'mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1094:3, inlined from 'mmput' at kernel/fork.c:1086:6: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/fork.c: In function 'mmput': kernel/fork.c:939:44: note: object 'mmlist_lock' of size 4 939 | __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(mmlist_lock); -- kernel/exit.c:1677:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'abort' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1677 | __weak void abort(void) | ^~~~~ In file included from kernel/exit.c:37: >> include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 329 | static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, | ^~~~~~~~~~ -- In file included from include/linux/shmem_fs.h:7, from kernel/umh.c:29: >> include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 329 | static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, | ^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:36, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:5, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:37, from include/linux/bitops.h:19, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/linux/list.h:9, from include/linux/module.h:10, from kernel/umh.c:4: In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from 'proc_cap_handler' at kernel/umh.c:668:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:82, from include/linux/seqlock.h:36, from include/linux/time.h:6, from include/linux/stat.h:19, from include/linux/module.h:11: kernel/umh.c: In function 'proc_cap_handler': kernel/umh.c:41:24: note: object 'umh_sysctl_lock' of size 4 41 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(umh_sysctl_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from 'proc_cap_handler' at kernel/umh.c:668:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/umh.c: In function 'proc_cap_handler': kernel/umh.c:41:24: note: object 'umh_sysctl_lock' of size 4 41 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(umh_sysctl_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from 'proc_cap_handler' at kernel/umh.c:701:3: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/umh.c: In function 'proc_cap_handler': kernel/umh.c:41:24: note: object 'umh_sysctl_lock' of size 4 41 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(umh_sysctl_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from 'proc_cap_handler' at kernel/umh.c:701:3: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/umh.c: In function 'proc_cap_handler': kernel/umh.c:41:24: note: object 'umh_sysctl_lock' of size 4 41 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(umh_sysctl_lock); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, -- In file included from kernel/workqueue.c:39: >> include/linux/mempolicy.h:329:13: warning: '__do_mbind' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 329 | static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, | ^~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic.h:36, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/asm-generic/bitops/atomic.h:5, from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:37, from include/linux/bitops.h:19, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from kernel/workqueue.c:28: In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from 'pool_mayday_timeout' at kernel/workqueue.c:2003:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/spinlock.h:82, from include/linux/ipc.h:5, from include/uapi/linux/sem.h:5, from include/linux/sem.h:5, from include/linux/sched.h:15, from kernel/workqueue.c:29: kernel/workqueue.c: In function 'pool_mayday_timeout': kernel/workqueue.c:302:24: note: object 'wq_mayday_lock' of size 4 302 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, inlined from 'spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:329:2, inlined from 'pool_mayday_timeout' at kernel/workqueue.c:2003:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/workqueue.c: In function 'pool_mayday_timeout': kernel/workqueue.c:302:24: note: object 'wq_mayday_lock' of size 4 302 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_irq' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:129:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_irq' at include/linux/spinlock.h:354:2, inlined from 'rescuer_thread' at kernel/workqueue.c:2461:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/workqueue.c: In function 'rescuer_thread': kernel/workqueue.c:302:24: note: object 'wq_mayday_lock' of size 4 302 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock_irq' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:129:2, inlined from 'spin_lock_irq' at include/linux/spinlock.h:354:2, inlined from 'rescuer_thread' at kernel/workqueue.c:2461:2: arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:259:9: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'spinlock_t[1]' {aka 'struct spinlock[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 259 | asm volatile( \ | ^~~ arch/arm64/include/asm/atomic_ll_sc.h:283:1: note: in expansion of macro '__CMPXCHG_CASE' 283 | __CMPXCHG_CASE(w, , acq_4, , a, , "memory") | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/workqueue.c: In function 'rescuer_thread': kernel/workqueue.c:302:24: note: object 'wq_mayday_lock' of size 4 302 | static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(wq_mayday_lock); /* protects wq->maydays list */ | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/spinlock_types.h:81:44: note: in definition of macro 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK' 81 | #define DEFINE_SPINLOCK(x) spinlock_t x = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(x) | ^ In function '__cmpxchg_case_acq_4', inlined from '__cmpxchg_acq' at arch/arm64/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:141:1, inlined from 'queued_spin_lock' at include/asm-generic/qspinlock.h:85:8, inlined from 'do_raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock.h:180:2, inlined from '__raw_spin_lock' at include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143:2, .. vim +/__do_mbind +329 include/linux/mempolicy.h 328 > 329 static long __do_mbind(unsigned long start, unsigned long len, -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1343/1343] fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 18 Oct '25

18 Oct '25

Hi Theodore, First bad commit (maybe != root cause): tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: 045418106c25769e424b67183bab8f2333dc6278 commit: 41298197ead9e85ee2ec1d52122f03fd1863cff2 [1343/1343] ext4: convert BUG_ON's to WARN_ON's in mballoc.c config: x86_64-randconfig-101-20241223 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510180854.b1yio4sf-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510180854.b1yio4sf-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510180854.b1yio4sf-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4734: warning: Function parameter or member 'bh' not described in 'ext4_free_blocks' >> fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0