- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-5.10] PCI: Fix use-after-free of slot->bus on hot remove
by Xiongfeng Wang 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.231 commit da6e6ff1f6c57f16e07af955e0e997fc90dd1e75 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAF8 CVE: CVE-2024-53194 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit c7acef99642b763ba585f4a43af999fcdbcc3dc4 upstream. Dennis reports a boot crash on recent Lenovo laptops with a USB4 dock. Since commit 0fc70886569c ("thunderbolt: Reset USB4 v2 host router") and commit 59a54c5f3dbd ("thunderbolt: Reset topology created by the boot firmware"), USB4 v2 and v1 Host Routers are reset on probe of the thunderbolt driver. The reset clears the Presence Detect State and Data Link Layer Link Active bits at the USB4 Host Router's Root Port and thus causes hot removal of the dock. The crash occurs when pciehp is unbound from one of the dock's Downstream Ports: pciehp creates a pci_slot on bind and destroys it on unbind. The pci_slot contains a pointer to the pci_bus below the Downstream Port, but a reference on that pci_bus is never acquired. The pci_bus is destroyed before the pci_slot, so a use-after-free ensues when pci_slot_release() accesses slot->bus. In principle this should not happen because pci_stop_bus_device() unbinds pciehp (and therefore destroys the pci_slot) before the pci_bus is destroyed by pci_remove_bus_device(). However the stacktrace provided by Dennis shows that pciehp is unbound from pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). To understand the significance of this, one needs to know that the PCI core uses a two step process to remove a portion of the hierarchy: It first unbinds all drivers in the sub-hierarchy in pci_stop_bus_device() and then actually removes the devices in pci_remove_bus_device(). There is no precaution to prevent driver binding in-between pci_stop_bus_device() and pci_remove_bus_device(). In Dennis' case, it seems removal of the hierarchy by pciehp races with driver binding by pci_bus_add_devices(). pciehp is bound to the Downstream Port after pci_stop_bus_device() has run, so it is unbound by pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). Because the pci_bus has already been destroyed at that point, accesses to it result in a use-after-free. One might conclude that driver binding needs to be prevented after pci_stop_bus_device() has run. However it seems risky that pci_slot points to pci_bus without holding a reference. Solely relying on correct ordering of driver unbind versus pci_bus destruction is certainly not defensive programming. If pci_slot has a need to access data in pci_bus, it ought to acquire a reference. Amend pci_create_slot() accordingly. Dennis reports that the crash is not reproducible with this change. Abridged stacktrace: pcieport 0000:00:07.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 156 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot #12 AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug+ Surprise+ Interlock- NoCompl+ IbPresDis- LLActRep+ pci_bus 0000:20: dev 00, created physical slot 12 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot(12): Card not present ... pcieport 0000:21:02.0: pciehp: pcie_disable_notification: SLOTCTRL d8 write cmd 0 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 134 Comm: irq/156-pciehp Not tainted 6.11.0-devel+ #1 RIP: 0010:dev_driver_string+0x12/0x40 pci_destroy_slot pciehp_remove pcie_port_remove_service device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del device_unregister remove_iter device_for_each_child pcie_portdrv_remove pci_device_remove device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del pci_remove_bus_device (recursive invocation) pci_remove_bus_device pciehp_unconfigure_device pciehp_disable_slot pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change pciehp_ist Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4bfd4c0e976c1776cd08e76603903b338cf25729.17285792… Reported-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6de4b45ff2b32dd91a805ec02ec8ec73ef411bf6.camel@se… Tested-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/slot.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c index ed2077e7470ae..a42e2cf774fd8 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj) up_read(&pci_bus_sem); list_del(&slot->list); + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); } @@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, goto err; } - slot->bus = parent; + slot->bus = pci_bus_get(parent); slot->number = slot_nr; slot->kobj.kset = pci_slots_kset; @@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, slot_name = make_slot_name(name); if (!slot_name) { err = -ENOMEM; + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); goto err; } -- 2.20.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] PCI: Fix use-after-free of slot->bus on hot remove
by Xiongfeng Wang 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.231 commit da6e6ff1f6c57f16e07af955e0e997fc90dd1e75 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAF8 CVE: CVE-2024-53194 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit c7acef99642b763ba585f4a43af999fcdbcc3dc4 upstream. Dennis reports a boot crash on recent Lenovo laptops with a USB4 dock. Since commit 0fc70886569c ("thunderbolt: Reset USB4 v2 host router") and commit 59a54c5f3dbd ("thunderbolt: Reset topology created by the boot firmware"), USB4 v2 and v1 Host Routers are reset on probe of the thunderbolt driver. The reset clears the Presence Detect State and Data Link Layer Link Active bits at the USB4 Host Router's Root Port and thus causes hot removal of the dock. The crash occurs when pciehp is unbound from one of the dock's Downstream Ports: pciehp creates a pci_slot on bind and destroys it on unbind. The pci_slot contains a pointer to the pci_bus below the Downstream Port, but a reference on that pci_bus is never acquired. The pci_bus is destroyed before the pci_slot, so a use-after-free ensues when pci_slot_release() accesses slot->bus. In principle this should not happen because pci_stop_bus_device() unbinds pciehp (and therefore destroys the pci_slot) before the pci_bus is destroyed by pci_remove_bus_device(). However the stacktrace provided by Dennis shows that pciehp is unbound from pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). To understand the significance of this, one needs to know that the PCI core uses a two step process to remove a portion of the hierarchy: It first unbinds all drivers in the sub-hierarchy in pci_stop_bus_device() and then actually removes the devices in pci_remove_bus_device(). There is no precaution to prevent driver binding in-between pci_stop_bus_device() and pci_remove_bus_device(). In Dennis' case, it seems removal of the hierarchy by pciehp races with driver binding by pci_bus_add_devices(). pciehp is bound to the Downstream Port after pci_stop_bus_device() has run, so it is unbound by pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). Because the pci_bus has already been destroyed at that point, accesses to it result in a use-after-free. One might conclude that driver binding needs to be prevented after pci_stop_bus_device() has run. However it seems risky that pci_slot points to pci_bus without holding a reference. Solely relying on correct ordering of driver unbind versus pci_bus destruction is certainly not defensive programming. If pci_slot has a need to access data in pci_bus, it ought to acquire a reference. Amend pci_create_slot() accordingly. Dennis reports that the crash is not reproducible with this change. Abridged stacktrace: pcieport 0000:00:07.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 156 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot #12 AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug+ Surprise+ Interlock- NoCompl+ IbPresDis- LLActRep+ pci_bus 0000:20: dev 00, created physical slot 12 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot(12): Card not present ... pcieport 0000:21:02.0: pciehp: pcie_disable_notification: SLOTCTRL d8 write cmd 0 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 134 Comm: irq/156-pciehp Not tainted 6.11.0-devel+ #1 RIP: 0010:dev_driver_string+0x12/0x40 pci_destroy_slot pciehp_remove pcie_port_remove_service device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del device_unregister remove_iter device_for_each_child pcie_portdrv_remove pci_device_remove device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del pci_remove_bus_device (recursive invocation) pci_remove_bus_device pciehp_unconfigure_device pciehp_disable_slot pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change pciehp_ist Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4bfd4c0e976c1776cd08e76603903b338cf25729.17285792… Reported-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6de4b45ff2b32dd91a805ec02ec8ec73ef411bf6.camel@se… Tested-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/slot.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c index ed2077e7470ae..a42e2cf774fd8 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj) up_read(&pci_bus_sem); list_del(&slot->list); + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); } @@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, goto err; } - slot->bus = parent; + slot->bus = pci_bus_get(parent); slot->number = slot_nr; slot->kobj.kset = pci_slots_kset; @@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, slot_name = make_slot_name(name); if (!slot_name) { err = -ENOMEM; + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); goto err; } -- 2.20.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] PCI: Fix use-after-free of slot->bus on hot remove
by Xiongfeng Wang 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.325 commit 50473dd3b2a08601a078f852ea05572de9b1f86c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAF8 CVE: CVE-2024-53194 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit c7acef99642b763ba585f4a43af999fcdbcc3dc4 upstream. Dennis reports a boot crash on recent Lenovo laptops with a USB4 dock. Since commit 0fc70886569c ("thunderbolt: Reset USB4 v2 host router") and commit 59a54c5f3dbd ("thunderbolt: Reset topology created by the boot firmware"), USB4 v2 and v1 Host Routers are reset on probe of the thunderbolt driver. The reset clears the Presence Detect State and Data Link Layer Link Active bits at the USB4 Host Router's Root Port and thus causes hot removal of the dock. The crash occurs when pciehp is unbound from one of the dock's Downstream Ports: pciehp creates a pci_slot on bind and destroys it on unbind. The pci_slot contains a pointer to the pci_bus below the Downstream Port, but a reference on that pci_bus is never acquired. The pci_bus is destroyed before the pci_slot, so a use-after-free ensues when pci_slot_release() accesses slot->bus. In principle this should not happen because pci_stop_bus_device() unbinds pciehp (and therefore destroys the pci_slot) before the pci_bus is destroyed by pci_remove_bus_device(). However the stacktrace provided by Dennis shows that pciehp is unbound from pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). To understand the significance of this, one needs to know that the PCI core uses a two step process to remove a portion of the hierarchy: It first unbinds all drivers in the sub-hierarchy in pci_stop_bus_device() and then actually removes the devices in pci_remove_bus_device(). There is no precaution to prevent driver binding in-between pci_stop_bus_device() and pci_remove_bus_device(). In Dennis' case, it seems removal of the hierarchy by pciehp races with driver binding by pci_bus_add_devices(). pciehp is bound to the Downstream Port after pci_stop_bus_device() has run, so it is unbound by pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). Because the pci_bus has already been destroyed at that point, accesses to it result in a use-after-free. One might conclude that driver binding needs to be prevented after pci_stop_bus_device() has run. However it seems risky that pci_slot points to pci_bus without holding a reference. Solely relying on correct ordering of driver unbind versus pci_bus destruction is certainly not defensive programming. If pci_slot has a need to access data in pci_bus, it ought to acquire a reference. Amend pci_create_slot() accordingly. Dennis reports that the crash is not reproducible with this change. Abridged stacktrace: pcieport 0000:00:07.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 156 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot #12 AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug+ Surprise+ Interlock- NoCompl+ IbPresDis- LLActRep+ pci_bus 0000:20: dev 00, created physical slot 12 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot(12): Card not present ... pcieport 0000:21:02.0: pciehp: pcie_disable_notification: SLOTCTRL d8 write cmd 0 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 134 Comm: irq/156-pciehp Not tainted 6.11.0-devel+ #1 RIP: 0010:dev_driver_string+0x12/0x40 pci_destroy_slot pciehp_remove pcie_port_remove_service device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del device_unregister remove_iter device_for_each_child pcie_portdrv_remove pci_device_remove device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del pci_remove_bus_device (recursive invocation) pci_remove_bus_device pciehp_unconfigure_device pciehp_disable_slot pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change pciehp_ist Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4bfd4c0e976c1776cd08e76603903b338cf25729.17285792… Reported-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6de4b45ff2b32dd91a805ec02ec8ec73ef411bf6.camel@se… Tested-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/slot.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c index 19de071ca698..ddc0e962285f 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj) up_read(&pci_bus_sem); list_del(&slot->list); + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); } @@ -260,7 +261,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, goto err; } - slot->bus = parent; + slot->bus = pci_bus_get(parent); slot->number = slot_nr; slot->kobj.kset = pci_slots_kset; @@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, slot_name = make_slot_name(name); if (!slot_name) { err = -ENOMEM; + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); goto err; } -- 2.20.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] PCI: Fix use-after-free of slot->bus on hot remove
by Xiongfeng Wang 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.64 commit e5d5c04aac71bf1476dc44b56f2206a4c2facca8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAF8 CVE: CVE-2024-53194 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit c7acef99642b763ba585f4a43af999fcdbcc3dc4 upstream. Dennis reports a boot crash on recent Lenovo laptops with a USB4 dock. Since commit 0fc70886569c ("thunderbolt: Reset USB4 v2 host router") and commit 59a54c5f3dbd ("thunderbolt: Reset topology created by the boot firmware"), USB4 v2 and v1 Host Routers are reset on probe of the thunderbolt driver. The reset clears the Presence Detect State and Data Link Layer Link Active bits at the USB4 Host Router's Root Port and thus causes hot removal of the dock. The crash occurs when pciehp is unbound from one of the dock's Downstream Ports: pciehp creates a pci_slot on bind and destroys it on unbind. The pci_slot contains a pointer to the pci_bus below the Downstream Port, but a reference on that pci_bus is never acquired. The pci_bus is destroyed before the pci_slot, so a use-after-free ensues when pci_slot_release() accesses slot->bus. In principle this should not happen because pci_stop_bus_device() unbinds pciehp (and therefore destroys the pci_slot) before the pci_bus is destroyed by pci_remove_bus_device(). However the stacktrace provided by Dennis shows that pciehp is unbound from pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). To understand the significance of this, one needs to know that the PCI core uses a two step process to remove a portion of the hierarchy: It first unbinds all drivers in the sub-hierarchy in pci_stop_bus_device() and then actually removes the devices in pci_remove_bus_device(). There is no precaution to prevent driver binding in-between pci_stop_bus_device() and pci_remove_bus_device(). In Dennis' case, it seems removal of the hierarchy by pciehp races with driver binding by pci_bus_add_devices(). pciehp is bound to the Downstream Port after pci_stop_bus_device() has run, so it is unbound by pci_remove_bus_device() instead of pci_stop_bus_device(). Because the pci_bus has already been destroyed at that point, accesses to it result in a use-after-free. One might conclude that driver binding needs to be prevented after pci_stop_bus_device() has run. However it seems risky that pci_slot points to pci_bus without holding a reference. Solely relying on correct ordering of driver unbind versus pci_bus destruction is certainly not defensive programming. If pci_slot has a need to access data in pci_bus, it ought to acquire a reference. Amend pci_create_slot() accordingly. Dennis reports that the crash is not reproducible with this change. Abridged stacktrace: pcieport 0000:00:07.0: PME: Signaling with IRQ 156 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot #12 AttnBtn- PwrCtrl- MRL- AttnInd- PwrInd- HotPlug+ Surprise+ Interlock- NoCompl+ IbPresDis- LLActRep+ pci_bus 0000:20: dev 00, created physical slot 12 pcieport 0000:00:07.0: pciehp: Slot(12): Card not present ... pcieport 0000:21:02.0: pciehp: pcie_disable_notification: SLOTCTRL d8 write cmd 0 Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 13 UID: 0 PID: 134 Comm: irq/156-pciehp Not tainted 6.11.0-devel+ #1 RIP: 0010:dev_driver_string+0x12/0x40 pci_destroy_slot pciehp_remove pcie_port_remove_service device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del device_unregister remove_iter device_for_each_child pcie_portdrv_remove pci_device_remove device_release_driver_internal bus_remove_device device_del pci_remove_bus_device (recursive invocation) pci_remove_bus_device pciehp_unconfigure_device pciehp_disable_slot pciehp_handle_presence_or_link_change pciehp_ist Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4bfd4c0e976c1776cd08e76603903b338cf25729.17285792… Reported-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/6de4b45ff2b32dd91a805ec02ec8ec73ef411bf6.camel@se… Tested-by: Dennis Wassenberg <Dennis.Wassenberg(a)secunet.com> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas(a)wunner.de> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg(a)linux.intel.com> Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/slot.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/slot.c b/drivers/pci/slot.c index 0f87cade10f7..ed645c7a4e4b 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/slot.c +++ b/drivers/pci/slot.c @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static void pci_slot_release(struct kobject *kobj) up_read(&pci_bus_sem); list_del(&slot->list); + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); } @@ -261,7 +262,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, goto err; } - slot->bus = parent; + slot->bus = pci_bus_get(parent); slot->number = slot_nr; slot->kobj.kset = pci_slots_kset; @@ -269,6 +270,7 @@ struct pci_slot *pci_create_slot(struct pci_bus *parent, int slot_nr, slot_name = make_slot_name(name); if (!slot_name) { err = -ENOMEM; + pci_bus_put(slot->bus); kfree(slot); goto err; } -- 2.20.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] wifi: ath12k: fix warning when unbinding
by Xiongfeng Wang 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm(a)redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.64 commit 223b546c6222d42147eff034433002ca5e2e7e09 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAF7 CVE: CVE-2024-53191 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit ca68ce0d9f4bcd032fd1334441175ae399642a06 upstream. If there is an error during some initialization related to firmware, the buffers dp->tx_ring[i].tx_status are released. However this is released again when the device is unbinded (ath12k_pci), and we get: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2098 at mm/slub.c:4689 free_large_kmalloc+0x4d/0x80 Call Trace: free_large_kmalloc ath12k_dp_free ath12k_core_deinit ath12k_pci_remove ... The issue is always reproducible from a VM because the MSI addressing initialization is failing. In order to fix the issue, just set the buffers to NULL after releasing in order to avoid the double free. cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Fixes: d889913205cf ("wifi: ath12k: driver for Qualcomm Wi-Fi 7 devices") Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm(a)redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241017181004.199589-3-jtornosm@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson(a)quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp.c index 907655c45a4b..8f85d6504e5f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp.c @@ -1249,8 +1249,10 @@ void ath12k_dp_free(struct ath12k_base *ab) ath12k_dp_rx_reo_cmd_list_cleanup(ab); - for (i = 0; i < ab->hw_params->max_tx_ring; i++) + for (i = 0; i < ab->hw_params->max_tx_ring; i++) { kfree(dp->tx_ring[i].tx_status); + dp->tx_ring[i].tx_status = NULL; + } ath12k_dp_rx_free(ab); /* Deinit any SOC level resource */ -- 2.20.1

2 2

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] vfio/pci: Properly hide first-in-list PCIe extended capability
by Liu Shixin 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Avihai Horon <avihaih(a)nvidia.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.325 commit 4464e5aa3aa4574063640f1082f7d7e323af8eb4 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAFO CVE: CVE-2024-53214 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit fe4bf8d0b6716a423b16495d55b35d3fe515905d ] There are cases where a PCIe extended capability should be hidden from the user. For example, an unknown capability (i.e., capability with ID greater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) or a capability that is intentionally chosen to be hidden from the user. Hiding a capability is done by virtualizing and modifying the 'Next Capability Offset' field of the previous capability so it points to the capability after the one that should be hidden. The special case where the first capability in the list should be hidden is handled differently because there is no previous capability that can be modified. In this case, the capability ID and version are zeroed while leaving the next pointer intact. This hides the capability and leaves an anchor for the rest of the capability list. However, today, hiding the first capability in the list is not done properly if the capability is unknown, as struct vfio_pci_core_device->pci_config_map is set to the capability ID during initialization but the capability ID is not properly checked later when used in vfio_config_do_rw(). This leads to the following warning [1] and to an out-of-bounds access to ecap_perms array. Fix it by checking cap_id in vfio_config_do_rw(), and if it is greater than PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX, use an alternative struct perm_bits for direct read only access instead of the ecap_perms array. Note that this is safe since the above is the only case where cap_id can exceed PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX (except for the special capabilities, which are already checked before). [1] WARNING: CPU: 118 PID: 5329 at drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c:1900 vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] CPU: 118 UID: 0 PID: 5329 Comm: simx-qemu-syste Not tainted 6.12.0+ #1 (snip) Call Trace: <TASK> ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 ? __warn+0x8d/0x140 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? report_bug+0x18f/0x1a0 ? handle_bug+0x63/0xa0 ? exc_invalid_op+0x19/0x70 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20 ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x395/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] ? vfio_pci_config_rw+0x244/0x430 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_rw+0x101/0x1b0 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_pci_core_read+0x1d/0x30 [vfio_pci_core] vfio_device_fops_read+0x27/0x40 [vfio] vfs_read+0xbd/0x340 ? vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl+0xbb/0x740 [vfio] ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa4/0x4b0 __x64_sys_pread64+0x96/0xc0 x64_sys_call+0x1c3d/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Fixes: 89e1f7d4c66d ("vfio: Add PCI device driver") Signed-off-by: Avihai Horon <avihaih(a)nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu(a)intel.com> Tested-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu(a)intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241124142739.21698-1-avihaih@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c index 86e917f1cc21..0f20e2d977d4 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c @@ -315,6 +315,10 @@ static int vfio_virt_config_read(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int pos, return count; } +static struct perm_bits direct_ro_perms = { + .readfn = vfio_direct_config_read, +}; + /* Default capability regions to read-only, no-virtualization */ static struct perm_bits cap_perms[PCI_CAP_ID_MAX + 1] = { [0 ... PCI_CAP_ID_MAX] = { .readfn = vfio_direct_config_read } @@ -1837,9 +1841,17 @@ static ssize_t vfio_config_do_rw(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, char __user *buf, cap_start = *ppos; } else { if (*ppos >= PCI_CFG_SPACE_SIZE) { - WARN_ON(cap_id > PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX); + /* + * We can get a cap_id that exceeds PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX + * if we're hiding an unknown capability at the start + * of the extended capability list. Use default, ro + * access, which will virtualize the id and next values. + */ + if (cap_id > PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_MAX) + perm = &direct_ro_perms; + else + perm = &ecap_perms[cap_id]; - perm = &ecap_perms[cap_id]; cap_start = vfio_find_cap_start(vdev, *ppos); } else { WARN_ON(cap_id > PCI_CAP_ID_MAX); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] um: net: Do not use drvdata in release
by Liu Shixin 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw(a)antgroup.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.325 commit b174ab33aaafd556a1ead72fa8e35d70b6fb1e39 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAEL CVE: CVE-2024-53183 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit d1db692a9be3b4bd3473b64fcae996afaffe8438 upstream. The drvdata is not available in release. Let's just use container_of() to get the uml_net instance. Otherwise, removing a network device will result in a crash: RIP: 0033:net_device_release+0x10/0x6f RSP: 00000000e20c7c40 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 000000006002e4e7 RBX: 00000000600f1baf RCX: 00000000624074e0 RDX: 0000000062778000 RSI: 0000000060551c80 RDI: 00000000627af028 RBP: 00000000e20c7c50 R08: 00000000603ad594 R09: 00000000e20c7b70 R10: 000000000000135a R11: 00000000603ad422 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000062c7af00 R14: 0000000062406d60 R15: 00000000627700b6 Kernel panic - not syncing: Segfault with no mm CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 29 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6-g59b723cd2adb #1 Workqueue: events mc_work_proc Stack: 627af028 62c7af00 e20c7c80 60276fcd 62778000 603f5820 627af028 00000000 e20c7cb0 603a2bcd 627af000 62770010 Call Trace: [<60276fcd>] device_release+0x70/0xba [<603a2bcd>] kobject_put+0xba/0xe7 [<60277265>] put_device+0x19/0x1c [<60281266>] platform_device_put+0x26/0x29 [<60281e5f>] platform_device_unregister+0x2c/0x2e [<6002ec9c>] net_remove+0x63/0x69 [<60031316>] ? mconsole_reply+0x0/0x50 [<600310c8>] mconsole_remove+0x160/0x1cc [<60087d40>] ? __remove_hrtimer+0x38/0x74 [<60087ff8>] ? hrtimer_try_to_cancel+0x8c/0x98 [<6006b3cf>] ? dl_server_stop+0x3f/0x48 [<6006b390>] ? dl_server_stop+0x0/0x48 [<600672e8>] ? dequeue_entities+0x327/0x390 [<60038fa6>] ? um_set_signals+0x0/0x43 [<6003070c>] mc_work_proc+0x77/0x91 [<60057664>] process_scheduled_works+0x1b3/0x2dd [<60055f32>] ? assign_work+0x0/0x58 [<60057f0a>] worker_thread+0x1e9/0x293 [<6005406f>] ? set_pf_worker+0x0/0x64 [<6005d65d>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x0/0x2d [<6005d748>] ? kthread_exit+0x0/0x3a [<60057d21>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x293 [<6005dbf1>] kthread+0x126/0x12b [<600219c5>] new_thread_handler+0x85/0xb6 Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw(a)antgroup.com> Acked-By: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov(a)cambridgegreys.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241104163203.435515-4-tiwei.btw@antgroup.com Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2(a)huawei.com> --- arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c b/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c index 3ef1b48e064a..19779e38e077 100644 --- a/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c +++ b/arch/um/drivers/net_kern.c @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static struct platform_driver uml_net_driver = { static void net_device_release(struct device *dev) { - struct uml_net *device = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct uml_net *device = container_of(dev, struct uml_net, pdev.dev); struct net_device *netdev = device->dev; struct uml_net_private *lp = netdev_priv(netdev); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] wifi: mwifiex: Fix memcpy() field-spanning write warning in mwifiex_config_scan()
by Wupeng Ma 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak(a)gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.325 commit a09760c513ae0f98c7082a1deace7fb6284ee866 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEAE6 CVE: CVE-2024-56539 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit d241a139c2e9f8a479f25c75ebd5391e6a448500 ] Replace one-element array with a flexible-array member in `struct mwifiex_ie_types_wildcard_ssid_params` to fix the following warning on a MT8173 Chromebook (mt8173-elm-hana): [ 356.775250] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 356.784543] memcpy: detected field-spanning write (size 6) of single field "wildcard_ssid_tlv->ssid" at drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c:904 (size 1) [ 356.813403] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 742 at drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/scan.c:904 mwifiex_scan_networks+0x4fc/0xf28 [mwifiex] The "(size 6)" above is exactly the length of the SSID of the network this device was connected to. The source of the warning looks like: ssid_len = user_scan_in->ssid_list[i].ssid_len; [...] memcpy(wildcard_ssid_tlv->ssid, user_scan_in->ssid_list[i].ssid, ssid_len); There is a #define WILDCARD_SSID_TLV_MAX_SIZE that uses sizeof() on this struct, but it already didn't account for the size of the one-element array, so it doesn't need to be changed. Fixes: 5e6e3a92b9a4 ("wireless: mwifiex: initial commit for Marvell mwifiex driver") Signed-off-by: Alper Nebi Yasak <alpernebiyasak(a)gmail.com> Acked-by: Brian Norris <briannorris(a)chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo(a)kernel.org> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241007222301.24154-1-alpernebiyasak@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ma Wupeng <mawupeng1(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h index 1fb76d2f5d3f..4842942c550e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/fw.h @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ struct mwifiex_ietypes_chanstats { struct mwifiex_ie_types_wildcard_ssid_params { struct mwifiex_ie_types_header header; u8 max_ssid_length; - u8 ssid[1]; + u8 ssid[]; } __packed; #define TSF_DATA_SIZE 8 -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on node blkaddr in truncate_node()
by Yifan Qiao 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Chao Yu <chao(a)kernel.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc1 commit 6babe00ccd34fc65b78ef8b99754e32b4385f23d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEDP8 CVE: CVE-2024-56692 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2534! RIP: 0010:f2fs_invalidate_blocks+0x35f/0x370 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2534 Call Trace: truncate_node+0x1ae/0x8c0 fs/f2fs/node.c:909 f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x5c2/0x870 fs/f2fs/node.c:1288 f2fs_evict_inode+0x879/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:856 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723 f2fs_handle_failed_inode+0x271/0x2e0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:986 f2fs_create+0x357/0x530 fs/f2fs/namei.c:394 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3595 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3694 [inline] path_openat+0x1c03/0x3590 fs/namei.c:3930 do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3960 do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1415 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1430 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1446 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1441 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1441 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0010:f2fs_invalidate_blocks+0x35f/0x370 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2534 The root cause is: on a fuzzed image, blkaddr in nat entry may be corrupted, then it will cause system panic when using it in f2fs_invalidate_blocks(), to avoid this, let's add sanity check on nat blkaddr in truncate_node(). Reported-by: syzbot+33379ce4ac76acf7d0c7(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/0000000000009a6cd706224ca720@googl… Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yifan Qiao <qiaoyifan4(a)huawei.com> --- fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index c63274d4b74b..97c5e521acae 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -838,6 +838,15 @@ static int truncate_node(struct dnode_of_data *dn) if (err) return err; + if (ni.blk_addr != NEW_ADDR && + !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ni.blk_addr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) { + f2fs_err(sbi, + "nat entry is corrupted, run fsck to fix it, ino:%u, " + "nid:%u, blkaddr:%u", ni.ino, ni.nid, ni.blk_addr); + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK); + return -EFSCORRUPTED; + } + /* Deallocate node address */ f2fs_invalidate_blocks(sbi, ni.blk_addr); dec_valid_node_count(sbi, dn->inode, dn->nid == dn->inode->i_ino); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] f2fs: fix to do sanity check on node blkaddr in truncate_node()
by Yifan Qiao 03 Jan '25

03 Jan '25

From: Chao Yu <chao(a)kernel.org> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.13-rc1 commit 6babe00ccd34fc65b78ef8b99754e32b4385f23d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBEDP8 CVE: CVE-2024-56692 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- syzbot reports a f2fs bug as below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/segment.c:2534! RIP: 0010:f2fs_invalidate_blocks+0x35f/0x370 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2534 Call Trace: truncate_node+0x1ae/0x8c0 fs/f2fs/node.c:909 f2fs_remove_inode_page+0x5c2/0x870 fs/f2fs/node.c:1288 f2fs_evict_inode+0x879/0x15c0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:856 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:723 f2fs_handle_failed_inode+0x271/0x2e0 fs/f2fs/inode.c:986 f2fs_create+0x357/0x530 fs/f2fs/namei.c:394 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3595 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3694 [inline] path_openat+0x1c03/0x3590 fs/namei.c:3930 do_filp_open+0x235/0x490 fs/namei.c:3960 do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1415 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1430 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1446 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1441 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x2a0 fs/open.c:1441 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0010:f2fs_invalidate_blocks+0x35f/0x370 fs/f2fs/segment.c:2534 The root cause is: on a fuzzed image, blkaddr in nat entry may be corrupted, then it will cause system panic when using it in f2fs_invalidate_blocks(), to avoid this, let's add sanity check on nat blkaddr in truncate_node(). Reported-by: syzbot+33379ce4ac76acf7d0c7(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/0000000000009a6cd706224ca720@googl… Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yifan Qiao <qiaoyifan4(a)huawei.com> --- fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c index 62af4c40eae2..7a4426aeca52 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c @@ -838,6 +838,15 @@ static int truncate_node(struct dnode_of_data *dn) if (err) return err; + if (ni.blk_addr != NEW_ADDR && + !f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(sbi, ni.blk_addr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) { + f2fs_err(sbi, + "nat entry is corrupted, run fsck to fix it, ino:%u, " + "nid:%u, blkaddr:%u", ni.ino, ni.nid, ni.blk_addr); + set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK); + return -EFSCORRUPTED; + } + /* Deallocate node address */ f2fs_invalidate_blocks(sbi, ni.blk_addr); dec_valid_node_count(sbi, dn->inode, dn->nid == dn->inode->i_ino); -- 2.39.2

2 1