- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS v2] watchdog: cpu5wdt.c: Fix use-after-free bug caused by cpu5wdt_trigger
by Xiongfeng Wang 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Duoming Zhou <duoming(a)zju.edu.cn> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.10-rc1 commit 573601521277119f2e2ba5f28ae6e87fc594f4d4 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IA7D7P CVE: CVE-2024-38630 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- When the cpu5wdt module is removing, the origin code uses del_timer() to de-activate the timer. If the timer handler is running, del_timer() could not stop it and will return directly. If the port region is released by release_region() and then the timer handler cpu5wdt_trigger() calls outb() to write into the region that is released, the use-after-free bug will happen. Change del_timer() to timer_shutdown_sync() in order that the timer handler could be finished before the port region is released. Fixes: e09d9c3e9f85 ("watchdog: cpu5wdt.c: add missing del_timer call") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming(a)zju.edu.cn> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240324140444.119584-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux(a)roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim(a)linux-watchdog.org> conflict: drivers/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c [wxf: use del_timer_sync() rather than timer_shutdown_sync(), because the later function is not introduced.] Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c index 6cfb102c397c..5d1dd4d72c0f 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c +++ b/drivers/watchdog/cpu5wdt.c @@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void cpu5wdt_exit(void) if (cpu5wdt_device.queue) { cpu5wdt_device.queue = 0; wait_for_completion(&cpu5wdt_device.stop); - del_timer(&cpu5wdt_device.timer); + del_timer_sync(&cpu5wdt_device.timer); } misc_deregister(&cpu5wdt_misc); -- 2.20.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()
by Pu Lehui 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.33 commit f28bdc2ee5d9300cc77bd3d97b5b3cdd14960fd8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IA6SHC CVE: CVE-2024-38589 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e03e7f20ebf7e1611d40d1fdc1bde900fd3335f6 ] syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5129 Comm: syz-executor350 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515142934.3708038-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- net/netrom/nr_route.c | 19 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c index 70480869ad1c..bd2b17b219ae 100644 --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c @@ -285,22 +285,14 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic, return 0; } -static inline void __nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) +static void nr_remove_node_locked(struct nr_node *nr_node) { + lockdep_assert_held(&nr_node_list_lock); + hlist_del_init(&nr_node->node_node); nr_node_put(nr_node); } -#define nr_remove_node_locked(__node) \ - __nr_remove_node(__node) - -static void nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) -{ - spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); - __nr_remove_node(nr_node); - spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); -} - static inline void __nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh) { hlist_del_init(&nr_neigh->neigh_node); @@ -339,6 +331,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n return -EINVAL; } + spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_lock(nr_node); for (i = 0; i < nr_node->count; i++) { if (nr_node->routes[i].neighbour == nr_neigh) { @@ -352,7 +345,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node->count--; if (nr_node->count == 0) { - nr_remove_node(nr_node); + nr_remove_node_locked(nr_node); } else { switch (i) { case 0: @@ -367,12 +360,14 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node_put(nr_node); } nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); return 0; } } nr_neigh_put(nr_neigh); nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_put(nr_node); return -EINVAL; -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] netfilter: nf_tables: flush pending destroy work before exit_net release
by Dong Chenchen 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)netfilter.org> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit 46c4481938e2ca62343b16ea83ab28f4c1733d31 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9QG95 CVE: CVE-2024-35899 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit 24cea9677025e0de419989ecb692acd4bb34cac2 upstream. Similar to 2c9f0293280e ("netfilter: nf_tables: flush pending destroy work before netlink notifier") to address a race between exit_net and the destroy workqueue. The trace below shows an element to be released via destroy workqueue while exit_net path (triggered via module removal) has already released the set that is used in such transaction. [ 1360.547789] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.547861] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888140500cc0 by task kworker/4:1/152465 [ 1360.547870] CPU: 4 PID: 152465 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.8.0+ #359 [ 1360.547882] Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work [nf_tables] [ 1360.547984] Call Trace: [ 1360.547991] <TASK> [ 1360.547998] dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 [ 1360.548014] print_report+0xc4/0x610 [ 1360.548026] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xba/0x160 [ 1360.548040] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548054] ? nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548176] kasan_report+0xae/0xe0 [ 1360.548189] ? nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548312] nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548447] ? __pfx_nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548577] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x18/0x30 [ 1360.548591] process_one_work+0x2f1/0x670 [ 1360.548610] worker_thread+0x4d3/0x760 [ 1360.548627] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548640] kthread+0x16b/0x1b0 [ 1360.548653] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548665] ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50 [ 1360.548679] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548690] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 1360.548707] </TASK> [ 1360.548719] Allocated by task 192061: [ 1360.548726] kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 [ 1360.548739] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 [ 1360.548750] __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 [ 1360.548760] __kmalloc_node+0x1f1/0x450 [ 1360.548771] nf_tables_newset+0x10c7/0x1b50 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548883] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0xbc4/0xdc0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.548909] nfnetlink_rcv+0x1a8/0x1e0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.548927] netlink_unicast+0x367/0x4f0 [ 1360.548935] netlink_sendmsg+0x34b/0x610 [ 1360.548944] ____sys_sendmsg+0x4d4/0x510 [ 1360.548953] ___sys_sendmsg+0xc9/0x120 [ 1360.548961] __sys_sendmsg+0xbe/0x140 [ 1360.548971] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x120 [ 1360.548982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d [ 1360.548994] Freed by task 192222: [ 1360.548999] kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 [ 1360.549009] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 [ 1360.549019] kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 [ 1360.549028] poison_slab_object+0x100/0x180 [ 1360.549036] __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30 [ 1360.549042] kfree+0xb6/0x260 [ 1360.549049] __nft_release_table+0x473/0x6a0 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549131] nf_tables_exit_net+0x170/0x240 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549221] ops_exit_list+0x50/0xa0 [ 1360.549229] free_exit_list+0x101/0x140 [ 1360.549236] unregister_pernet_operations+0x107/0x160 [ 1360.549245] unregister_pernet_subsys+0x1c/0x30 [ 1360.549254] nf_tables_module_exit+0x43/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549345] __do_sys_delete_module+0x253/0x370 [ 1360.549352] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x120 [ 1360.549360] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d (gdb) list *__nft_release_table+0x473 0x1e033 is in __nft_release_table (net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:11354). 11349 list_for_each_entry_safe(flowtable, nf, &table->flowtables, list) { 11350 list_del(&flowtable->list); 11351 nft_use_dec(&table->use); 11352 nf_tables_flowtable_destroy(flowtable); 11353 } 11354 list_for_each_entry_safe(set, ns, &table->sets, list) { 11355 list_del(&set->list); 11356 nft_use_dec(&table->use); 11357 if (set->flags & (NFT_SET_MAP | NFT_SET_OBJECT)) 11358 nft_map_deactivate(&ctx, set); (gdb) [ 1360.549372] Last potentially related work creation: [ 1360.549376] kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 [ 1360.549384] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x9b/0xb0 [ 1360.549392] __queue_work+0x3fb/0x780 [ 1360.549399] queue_work_on+0x4f/0x60 [ 1360.549407] nft_rhash_remove+0x33b/0x340 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549516] nf_tables_commit+0x1c6a/0x2620 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549625] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0x728/0xdc0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.549647] nfnetlink_rcv+0x1a8/0x1e0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.549671] netlink_unicast+0x367/0x4f0 [ 1360.549680] netlink_sendmsg+0x34b/0x610 [ 1360.549690] ____sys_sendmsg+0x4d4/0x510 [ 1360.549697] ___sys_sendmsg+0xc9/0x120 [ 1360.549706] __sys_sendmsg+0xbe/0x140 [ 1360.549715] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x120 [ 1360.549725] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d Fixes: 0935d5588400 ("netfilter: nf_tables: asynchronous release") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2(a)huawei.com> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 8ffaafc06581..5cd244528e20 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -9851,6 +9851,7 @@ static void __exit nf_tables_module_exit(void) unregister_netdevice_notifier(&nf_tables_flowtable_notifier); nft_chain_filter_fini(); nft_chain_route_fini(); + nf_tables_trans_destroy_flush_work(); unregister_pernet_subsys(&nf_tables_net_ops); cancel_work_sync(&trans_gc_work); cancel_work_sync(&trans_destroy_work); -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] um: Add winch to winch_handlers before registering winch IRQ
by Chen Zhongjin 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.10-rc1 commit a0fbbd36c156b9f7b2276871d499c9943dfe5101 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IA7YJR CVE: CVE-2024-39292 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- Registering a winch IRQ is racy, an interrupt may occur before the winch is added to the winch_handlers list. If that happens, register_winch_irq() adds to that list a winch that is scheduled to be (or has already been) freed, causing a panic later in winch_cleanup(). Avoid the race by adding the winch to the winch_handlers list before registering the IRQ, and rolling back if um_request_irq() fails. Fixes: 42a359e31a0e ("uml: SIGIO support cleanup") Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes(a)sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard(a)nod.at> --- arch/um/drivers/line.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/line.c b/arch/um/drivers/line.c index 14ad9f495fe6..37e96ba0f5fb 100644 --- a/arch/um/drivers/line.c +++ b/arch/um/drivers/line.c @@ -668,24 +668,26 @@ void register_winch_irq(int fd, int tty_fd, int pid, struct tty_port *port, goto cleanup; } - *winch = ((struct winch) { .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(winch->list), - .fd = fd, + *winch = ((struct winch) { .fd = fd, .tty_fd = tty_fd, .pid = pid, .port = port, .stack = stack }); + spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock); + list_add(&winch->list, &winch_handlers); + spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock); + if (um_request_irq(WINCH_IRQ, fd, IRQ_READ, winch_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, "winch", winch) < 0) { printk(KERN_ERR "register_winch_irq - failed to register " "IRQ\n"); + spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock); + list_del(&winch->list); + spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock); goto out_free; } - spin_lock(&winch_handler_lock); - list_add(&winch->list, &winch_handlers); - spin_unlock(&winch_handler_lock); - return; out_free: -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] netfilter: nf_tables: flush pending destroy work before exit_net release
by Dong Chenchen 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)netfilter.org> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit 46c4481938e2ca62343b16ea83ab28f4c1733d31 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9QG95 CVE: CVE-2024-35899 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- commit 24cea9677025e0de419989ecb692acd4bb34cac2 upstream. Similar to 2c9f0293280e ("netfilter: nf_tables: flush pending destroy work before netlink notifier") to address a race between exit_net and the destroy workqueue. The trace below shows an element to be released via destroy workqueue while exit_net path (triggered via module removal) has already released the set that is used in such transaction. [ 1360.547789] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.547861] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888140500cc0 by task kworker/4:1/152465 [ 1360.547870] CPU: 4 PID: 152465 Comm: kworker/4:1 Not tainted 6.8.0+ #359 [ 1360.547882] Workqueue: events nf_tables_trans_destroy_work [nf_tables] [ 1360.547984] Call Trace: [ 1360.547991] <TASK> [ 1360.547998] dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 [ 1360.548014] print_report+0xc4/0x610 [ 1360.548026] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xba/0x160 [ 1360.548040] ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548054] ? nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548176] kasan_report+0xae/0xe0 [ 1360.548189] ? nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548312] nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x3f5/0x590 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548447] ? __pfx_nf_tables_trans_destroy_work+0x10/0x10 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548577] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x18/0x30 [ 1360.548591] process_one_work+0x2f1/0x670 [ 1360.548610] worker_thread+0x4d3/0x760 [ 1360.548627] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548640] kthread+0x16b/0x1b0 [ 1360.548653] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548665] ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50 [ 1360.548679] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 1360.548690] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 1360.548707] </TASK> [ 1360.548719] Allocated by task 192061: [ 1360.548726] kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 [ 1360.548739] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 [ 1360.548750] __kasan_kmalloc+0x8f/0xa0 [ 1360.548760] __kmalloc_node+0x1f1/0x450 [ 1360.548771] nf_tables_newset+0x10c7/0x1b50 [nf_tables] [ 1360.548883] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0xbc4/0xdc0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.548909] nfnetlink_rcv+0x1a8/0x1e0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.548927] netlink_unicast+0x367/0x4f0 [ 1360.548935] netlink_sendmsg+0x34b/0x610 [ 1360.548944] ____sys_sendmsg+0x4d4/0x510 [ 1360.548953] ___sys_sendmsg+0xc9/0x120 [ 1360.548961] __sys_sendmsg+0xbe/0x140 [ 1360.548971] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x120 [ 1360.548982] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d [ 1360.548994] Freed by task 192222: [ 1360.548999] kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 [ 1360.549009] kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30 [ 1360.549019] kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60 [ 1360.549028] poison_slab_object+0x100/0x180 [ 1360.549036] __kasan_slab_free+0x14/0x30 [ 1360.549042] kfree+0xb6/0x260 [ 1360.549049] __nft_release_table+0x473/0x6a0 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549131] nf_tables_exit_net+0x170/0x240 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549221] ops_exit_list+0x50/0xa0 [ 1360.549229] free_exit_list+0x101/0x140 [ 1360.549236] unregister_pernet_operations+0x107/0x160 [ 1360.549245] unregister_pernet_subsys+0x1c/0x30 [ 1360.549254] nf_tables_module_exit+0x43/0x80 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549345] __do_sys_delete_module+0x253/0x370 [ 1360.549352] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x120 [ 1360.549360] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d (gdb) list *__nft_release_table+0x473 0x1e033 is in __nft_release_table (net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:11354). 11349 list_for_each_entry_safe(flowtable, nf, &table->flowtables, list) { 11350 list_del(&flowtable->list); 11351 nft_use_dec(&table->use); 11352 nf_tables_flowtable_destroy(flowtable); 11353 } 11354 list_for_each_entry_safe(set, ns, &table->sets, list) { 11355 list_del(&set->list); 11356 nft_use_dec(&table->use); 11357 if (set->flags & (NFT_SET_MAP | NFT_SET_OBJECT)) 11358 nft_map_deactivate(&ctx, set); (gdb) [ 1360.549372] Last potentially related work creation: [ 1360.549376] kasan_save_stack+0x20/0x40 [ 1360.549384] __kasan_record_aux_stack+0x9b/0xb0 [ 1360.549392] __queue_work+0x3fb/0x780 [ 1360.549399] queue_work_on+0x4f/0x60 [ 1360.549407] nft_rhash_remove+0x33b/0x340 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549516] nf_tables_commit+0x1c6a/0x2620 [nf_tables] [ 1360.549625] nfnetlink_rcv_batch+0x728/0xdc0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.549647] nfnetlink_rcv+0x1a8/0x1e0 [nfnetlink] [ 1360.549671] netlink_unicast+0x367/0x4f0 [ 1360.549680] netlink_sendmsg+0x34b/0x610 [ 1360.549690] ____sys_sendmsg+0x4d4/0x510 [ 1360.549697] ___sys_sendmsg+0xc9/0x120 [ 1360.549706] __sys_sendmsg+0xbe/0x140 [ 1360.549715] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x120 [ 1360.549725] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x55/0x5d Fixes: 0935d5588400 ("netfilter: nf_tables: asynchronous release") Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo(a)netfilter.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2(a)huawei.com> --- net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c index 8ffaafc06581..5cd244528e20 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c @@ -9851,6 +9851,7 @@ static void __exit nf_tables_module_exit(void) unregister_netdevice_notifier(&nf_tables_flowtable_notifier); nft_chain_filter_fini(); nft_chain_route_fini(); + nf_tables_trans_destroy_flush_work(); unregister_pernet_subsys(&nf_tables_net_ops); cancel_work_sync(&trans_gc_work); cancel_work_sync(&trans_destroy_work); -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] ipv6: fix race condition between ipv6_get_ifaddr and ipv6_del_addr
by Dong Chenchen 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Jiri Benc <jbenc(a)redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.216 commit 3fb02ec57ead2891a2306af8c51a306bc5945e70 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9QRPL CVE: CVE-2024-35969 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 7633c4da919ad51164acbf1aa322cc1a3ead6129 ] Although ipv6_get_ifaddr walks inet6_addr_lst under the RCU lock, it still means hlist_for_each_entry_rcu can return an item that got removed from the list. The memory itself of such item is not freed thanks to RCU but nothing guarantees the actual content of the memory is sane. In particular, the reference count can be zero. This can happen if ipv6_del_addr is called in parallel. ipv6_del_addr removes the entry from inet6_addr_lst (hlist_del_init_rcu(&ifp->addr_lst)) and drops all references (__in6_ifa_put(ifp) + in6_ifa_put(ifp)). With bad enough timing, this can happen: 1. In ipv6_get_ifaddr, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu returns an entry. 2. Then, the whole ipv6_del_addr is executed for the given entry. The reference count drops to zero and kfree_rcu is scheduled. 3. ipv6_get_ifaddr continues and tries to increments the reference count (in6_ifa_hold). 4. The rcu is unlocked and the entry is freed. 5. The freed entry is returned. Prevent increasing of the reference count in such case. The name in6_ifa_hold_safe is chosen to mimic the existing fib6_info_hold_safe. [ 41.506330] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. [ 41.506760] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 595 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.507413] Modules linked in: veth bridge stp llc [ 41.507821] CPU: 0 PID: 595 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2.main-00208-g49563be82afa #14 [ 41.508479] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) [ 41.509163] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.509586] Code: ad ff 90 0f 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d c0 30 ad 01 00 75 a0 c6 05 b7 30 ad 01 01 90 48 c7 c7 38 cc 7a 8c e8 cc 18 ad ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d 98 30 ad 01 00 0f 85 75 ff ff ff [ 41.510956] RSP: 0018:ffffbda3c026baf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 41.511368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e9c46914800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 41.511910] RDX: ffff9e9c7ec29c00 RSI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 RDI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 [ 41.512445] RBP: ffff9e9c43660c9c R08: 0000000000009ffb R09: 00000000ffffdfff [ 41.512998] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff8ca58a40 R12: ffff9e9c4339a000 [ 41.513534] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9e9c438a0000 R15: ffffbda3c026bb48 [ 41.514086] FS: 00007fbc4cda1740(0000) GS:ffff9e9c7ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 41.514726] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 41.515176] CR2: 000056233b337d88 CR3: 000000000376e006 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 41.515713] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 41.516252] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 41.516799] Call Trace: [ 41.517037] <TASK> [ 41.517249] ? __warn+0x7b/0x120 [ 41.517535] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.517923] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190 [ 41.518240] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 [ 41.518541] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 41.520972] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 41.521325] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.521708] ipv6_get_ifaddr+0xda/0xe0 [ 41.522035] inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x342/0x3f0 [ 41.522376] ? __pfx_inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x10/0x10 [ 41.522758] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x334/0x3d0 [ 41.523102] ? netlink_unicast+0x30f/0x390 [ 41.523445] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [ 41.523832] netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 [ 41.524157] netlink_unicast+0x23b/0x390 [ 41.524484] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f2/0x440 [ 41.524826] __sys_sendto+0x1d8/0x1f0 [ 41.525145] __x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30 [ 41.525467] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x1b0 [ 41.525794] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a [ 41.526213] RIP: 0033:0x7fbc4cfcea9a [ 41.526528] Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 7e c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 48 83 ec 30 44 89 [ 41.527942] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf54012a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c [ 41.528593] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcf5401368 RCX: 00007fbc4cfcea9a [ 41.529173] RDX: 000000000000002c RSI: 00007fbc4b9d9bd0 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 41.529786] RBP: 00007fbc4bafb040 R08: 00007ffcf54013e0 R09: 000000000000000c [ 41.530375] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 41.530977] R13: ffffffffc4653600 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fbc4ca85d1b [ 41.531573] </TASK> Fixes: 5c578aedcb21d ("IPv6: convert addrconf hash list to RCU") Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8ab821e36073a4a406c50ec83c9e8dc586c539e4.17125858… Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2(a)huawei.com> --- include/net/addrconf.h | 4 ++++ net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/addrconf.h b/include/net/addrconf.h index edba74a53683..a24c65e9a994 100644 --- a/include/net/addrconf.h +++ b/include/net/addrconf.h @@ -429,6 +429,10 @@ static inline void in6_ifa_hold(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp) refcount_inc(&ifp->refcnt); } +static inline bool in6_ifa_hold_safe(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp) +{ + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&ifp->refcnt); +} /* * compute link-local solicited-node multicast address diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c index 5e42149b954f..821aa81dec47 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c @@ -2033,9 +2033,10 @@ struct inet6_ifaddr *ipv6_get_ifaddr(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *add if (ipv6_addr_equal(&ifp->addr, addr)) { if (!dev || ifp->idev->dev == dev || !(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST) || strict)) { - result = ifp; - in6_ifa_hold(ifp); - break; + if (in6_ifa_hold_safe(ifp)) { + result = ifp; + break; + } } } } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] ipv6: fix race condition between ipv6_get_ifaddr and ipv6_del_addr
by Dong Chenchen 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Jiri Benc <jbenc(a)redhat.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.216 commit 3fb02ec57ead2891a2306af8c51a306bc5945e70 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9QRPL CVE: CVE-2024-35969 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 7633c4da919ad51164acbf1aa322cc1a3ead6129 ] Although ipv6_get_ifaddr walks inet6_addr_lst under the RCU lock, it still means hlist_for_each_entry_rcu can return an item that got removed from the list. The memory itself of such item is not freed thanks to RCU but nothing guarantees the actual content of the memory is sane. In particular, the reference count can be zero. This can happen if ipv6_del_addr is called in parallel. ipv6_del_addr removes the entry from inet6_addr_lst (hlist_del_init_rcu(&ifp->addr_lst)) and drops all references (__in6_ifa_put(ifp) + in6_ifa_put(ifp)). With bad enough timing, this can happen: 1. In ipv6_get_ifaddr, hlist_for_each_entry_rcu returns an entry. 2. Then, the whole ipv6_del_addr is executed for the given entry. The reference count drops to zero and kfree_rcu is scheduled. 3. ipv6_get_ifaddr continues and tries to increments the reference count (in6_ifa_hold). 4. The rcu is unlocked and the entry is freed. 5. The freed entry is returned. Prevent increasing of the reference count in such case. The name in6_ifa_hold_safe is chosen to mimic the existing fib6_info_hold_safe. [ 41.506330] refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. [ 41.506760] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 595 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.507413] Modules linked in: veth bridge stp llc [ 41.507821] CPU: 0 PID: 595 Comm: python3 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc2.main-00208-g49563be82afa #14 [ 41.508479] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) [ 41.509163] RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.509586] Code: ad ff 90 0f 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d c0 30 ad 01 00 75 a0 c6 05 b7 30 ad 01 01 90 48 c7 c7 38 cc 7a 8c e8 cc 18 ad ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 90 c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d 98 30 ad 01 00 0f 85 75 ff ff ff [ 41.510956] RSP: 0018:ffffbda3c026baf0 EFLAGS: 00010282 [ 41.511368] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9e9c46914800 RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 41.511910] RDX: ffff9e9c7ec29c00 RSI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 RDI: ffff9e9c7ec1c900 [ 41.512445] RBP: ffff9e9c43660c9c R08: 0000000000009ffb R09: 00000000ffffdfff [ 41.512998] R10: 00000000ffffdfff R11: ffffffff8ca58a40 R12: ffff9e9c4339a000 [ 41.513534] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff9e9c438a0000 R15: ffffbda3c026bb48 [ 41.514086] FS: 00007fbc4cda1740(0000) GS:ffff9e9c7ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 41.514726] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 41.515176] CR2: 000056233b337d88 CR3: 000000000376e006 CR4: 0000000000370ef0 [ 41.515713] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 41.516252] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 41.516799] Call Trace: [ 41.517037] <TASK> [ 41.517249] ? __warn+0x7b/0x120 [ 41.517535] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.517923] ? report_bug+0x164/0x190 [ 41.518240] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 [ 41.518541] ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70 [ 41.520972] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 41.521325] ? refcount_warn_saturate+0xa5/0x130 [ 41.521708] ipv6_get_ifaddr+0xda/0xe0 [ 41.522035] inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x342/0x3f0 [ 41.522376] ? __pfx_inet6_rtm_getaddr+0x10/0x10 [ 41.522758] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x334/0x3d0 [ 41.523102] ? netlink_unicast+0x30f/0x390 [ 41.523445] ? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [ 41.523832] netlink_rcv_skb+0x53/0x100 [ 41.524157] netlink_unicast+0x23b/0x390 [ 41.524484] netlink_sendmsg+0x1f2/0x440 [ 41.524826] __sys_sendto+0x1d8/0x1f0 [ 41.525145] __x64_sys_sendto+0x1f/0x30 [ 41.525467] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x1b0 [ 41.525794] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0x7a [ 41.526213] RIP: 0033:0x7fbc4cfcea9a [ 41.526528] Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 7e c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 48 83 ec 30 44 89 [ 41.527942] RSP: 002b:00007ffcf54012a8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c [ 41.528593] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffcf5401368 RCX: 00007fbc4cfcea9a [ 41.529173] RDX: 000000000000002c RSI: 00007fbc4b9d9bd0 RDI: 0000000000000005 [ 41.529786] RBP: 00007fbc4bafb040 R08: 00007ffcf54013e0 R09: 000000000000000c [ 41.530375] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 41.530977] R13: ffffffffc4653600 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 00007fbc4ca85d1b [ 41.531573] </TASK> Fixes: 5c578aedcb21d ("IPv6: convert addrconf hash list to RCU") Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc(a)redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8ab821e36073a4a406c50ec83c9e8dc586c539e4.17125858… Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dong Chenchen <dongchenchen2(a)huawei.com> --- include/net/addrconf.h | 4 ++++ net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/addrconf.h b/include/net/addrconf.h index edba74a53683..a24c65e9a994 100644 --- a/include/net/addrconf.h +++ b/include/net/addrconf.h @@ -429,6 +429,10 @@ static inline void in6_ifa_hold(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp) refcount_inc(&ifp->refcnt); } +static inline bool in6_ifa_hold_safe(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp) +{ + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&ifp->refcnt); +} /* * compute link-local solicited-node multicast address diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c index a2bdefcd2b30..23c20dc39ca8 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c @@ -2031,9 +2031,10 @@ struct inet6_ifaddr *ipv6_get_ifaddr(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *add if (ipv6_addr_equal(&ifp->addr, addr)) { if (!dev || ifp->idev->dev == dev || !(ifp->scope&(IFA_LINK|IFA_HOST) || strict)) { - result = ifp; - in6_ifa_hold(ifp); - break; + if (in6_ifa_hold_safe(ifp)) { + result = ifp; + break; + } } } } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()
by Pu Lehui 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.316 commit b9d663fbf74290cb68fbc66ae4367bd56837ad1d category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IA6SHC CVE: CVE-2024-38589 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e03e7f20ebf7e1611d40d1fdc1bde900fd3335f6 ] syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5129 Comm: syz-executor350 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515142934.3708038-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- net/netrom/nr_route.c | 19 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c index b76aa668a94b..ee2e35cd7352 100644 --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c @@ -286,22 +286,14 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic, return 0; } -static inline void __nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) +static void nr_remove_node_locked(struct nr_node *nr_node) { + lockdep_assert_held(&nr_node_list_lock); + hlist_del_init(&nr_node->node_node); nr_node_put(nr_node); } -#define nr_remove_node_locked(__node) \ - __nr_remove_node(__node) - -static void nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) -{ - spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); - __nr_remove_node(nr_node); - spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); -} - static inline void __nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh) { hlist_del_init(&nr_neigh->neigh_node); @@ -340,6 +332,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n return -EINVAL; } + spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_lock(nr_node); for (i = 0; i < nr_node->count; i++) { if (nr_node->routes[i].neighbour == nr_neigh) { @@ -353,7 +346,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node->count--; if (nr_node->count == 0) { - nr_remove_node(nr_node); + nr_remove_node_locked(nr_node); } else { switch (i) { case 0: @@ -367,12 +360,14 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node_put(nr_node); } nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); return 0; } } nr_neigh_put(nr_neigh); nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_put(nr_node); return -EINVAL; -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()
by Pu Lehui 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.219 commit b117e5b4f27c2c9076561b6be450a9619f0b79de category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IA6SHC CVE: CVE-2024-38589 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e03e7f20ebf7e1611d40d1fdc1bde900fd3335f6 ] syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5129 Comm: syz-executor350 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515142934.3708038-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- net/netrom/nr_route.c | 19 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c index 78da5eab252a..103814bf97c8 100644 --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c @@ -284,22 +284,14 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic, return 0; } -static inline void __nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) +static void nr_remove_node_locked(struct nr_node *nr_node) { + lockdep_assert_held(&nr_node_list_lock); + hlist_del_init(&nr_node->node_node); nr_node_put(nr_node); } -#define nr_remove_node_locked(__node) \ - __nr_remove_node(__node) - -static void nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) -{ - spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); - __nr_remove_node(nr_node); - spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); -} - static inline void __nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh) { hlist_del_init(&nr_neigh->neigh_node); @@ -338,6 +330,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n return -EINVAL; } + spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_lock(nr_node); for (i = 0; i < nr_node->count; i++) { if (nr_node->routes[i].neighbour == nr_neigh) { @@ -351,7 +344,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node->count--; if (nr_node->count == 0) { - nr_remove_node(nr_node); + nr_remove_node_locked(nr_node); } else { switch (i) { case 0: @@ -365,12 +358,14 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node_put(nr_node); } nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); return 0; } } nr_neigh_put(nr_neigh); nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_put(nr_node); return -EINVAL; -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] netrom: fix possible dead-lock in nr_rt_ioctl()
by Pu Lehui 26 Jun '24

26 Jun '24

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.219 commit b117e5b4f27c2c9076561b6be450a9619f0b79de category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IA6SHC CVE: CVE-2024-38589 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e03e7f20ebf7e1611d40d1fdc1bde900fd3335f6 ] syzbot loves netrom, and found a possible deadlock in nr_rt_ioctl [1] Make sure we always acquire nr_node_list_lock before nr_node_lock(nr_node) [1] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor350/5129 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] ffff8880186e2070 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_remove_node net/netrom/nr_route.c:299 [inline] nr_del_node+0x4b4/0x820 net/netrom/nr_route.c:355 nr_rt_ioctl+0xa95/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:683 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&nr_node->node_lock){+...}-{2:2}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); lock(nr_node_list_lock); lock(&nr_node->node_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor350/5129: #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:462 [inline] #0: ffffffff8f7053b8 (nr_node_list_lock){+...}-{2:2}, at: nr_rt_ioctl+0x10a/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 5129 Comm: syz-executor350 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc7-syzkaller-02147-g654de42f3fc6 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 04/02/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:114 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline] validate_chain+0x18cb/0x58e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869 __lock_acquire+0x1346/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754 __raw_spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:126 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x35/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:178 spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:356 [inline] nr_node_lock include/net/netrom.h:152 [inline] nr_dec_obs net/netrom/nr_route.c:464 [inline] nr_rt_ioctl+0x1bb/0x1090 net/netrom/nr_route.c:697 sock_do_ioctl+0x158/0x460 net/socket.c:1222 sock_ioctl+0x629/0x8e0 net/socket.c:1341 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xfc/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:890 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf5/0x240 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller(a)googlegroups.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515142934.3708038-1-edumazet@google.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui(a)huawei.com> --- net/netrom/nr_route.c | 19 +++++++------------ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c index 78da5eab252a..103814bf97c8 100644 --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c @@ -284,22 +284,14 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic, return 0; } -static inline void __nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) +static void nr_remove_node_locked(struct nr_node *nr_node) { + lockdep_assert_held(&nr_node_list_lock); + hlist_del_init(&nr_node->node_node); nr_node_put(nr_node); } -#define nr_remove_node_locked(__node) \ - __nr_remove_node(__node) - -static void nr_remove_node(struct nr_node *nr_node) -{ - spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); - __nr_remove_node(nr_node); - spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); -} - static inline void __nr_remove_neigh(struct nr_neigh *nr_neigh) { hlist_del_init(&nr_neigh->neigh_node); @@ -338,6 +330,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n return -EINVAL; } + spin_lock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_lock(nr_node); for (i = 0; i < nr_node->count; i++) { if (nr_node->routes[i].neighbour == nr_neigh) { @@ -351,7 +344,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node->count--; if (nr_node->count == 0) { - nr_remove_node(nr_node); + nr_remove_node_locked(nr_node); } else { switch (i) { case 0: @@ -365,12 +358,14 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n nr_node_put(nr_node); } nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); return 0; } } nr_neigh_put(nr_neigh); nr_node_unlock(nr_node); + spin_unlock_bh(&nr_node_list_lock); nr_node_put(nr_node); return -EINVAL; -- 2.34.1

2 1