- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-5.10 2/2] Add support for extended topology detection,of Zhaoxin CPUs
by LeoLiuoc 09 Jul '21

09 Jul '21

Newer Zhaoxin CPUs support get extended topology from CPUID leaf B/1F, So add support for it. Signed-off-by: LeoLiu-oc <LeoLiu-oc(a)zhaoxin.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c | 8 +++++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c index 3d1e87b6a657..dacac9135681 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c @@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ static void early_init_centaur(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) if (edx & (1U << 28)) c->x86_coreid_bits = get_count_order((ebx >> 16) & 0xff); } + + if (detect_extended_topology_early(c) < 0) + detect_ht_early(c); } static void init_centaur(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) @@ -140,11 +143,14 @@ static void init_centaur(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) clear_cpu_cap(c, 0*32+31); #endif early_init_centaur(c); + detect_extended_topology(c); init_intel_cacheinfo(c); - detect_num_cpu_cores(c); + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY)) { + detect_num_cpu_cores(c); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 detect_ht(c); #endif + } if (c->cpuid_level > 9) { unsigned int eax = cpuid_eax(10); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c index 05fa4ef63490..2126b10de796 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c @@ -79,16 +79,21 @@ static void early_init_zhaoxin(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) c->x86_coreid_bits = get_count_order((ebx >> 16) & 0xff); } + if (detect_extended_topology_early(c) < 0) + detect_ht_early(c); } static void init_zhaoxin(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { early_init_zhaoxin(c); + detect_extended_topology(c); init_intel_cacheinfo(c); - detect_num_cpu_cores(c); + if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_XTOPOLOGY)) { + detect_num_cpu_cores(c); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 detect_ht(c); #endif + } if (c->cpuid_level > 9) { unsigned int eax = cpuid_eax(10); -- 2.20.1

1 0

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/2] New Zhaoxin CPU vendor ID/FMS patch
by LeoLiuoc 09 Jul '21

09 Jul '21

This set of patches is to add support for Zhaoxin Family 7 CPUs. With these patches, the kernel can identify Zhaoxin CPUs topology information. LeoLiu-oc (2): Get locgical processors numbers bits per package Add support for extended topology detection of Zhaoxin CPUs arch/x86/kernel/cpu/centaur.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/zhaoxin.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.20.1

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] NFSv4.1: fix kabi for struct rpc_xprt
by Yang Yingliang 09 Jul '21

09 Jul '21

From: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- commit a2ff6d97547e ("NFSv4.1: Don't rebind to the same source port when reconnecting to the server") add new member into struct rpc_xprt, which will break KABI. This patch try to fix it. Signed-off-by: ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong2(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h index 36a944dda1957..ccfacca1eba9d 100644 --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/xprt.h @@ -200,8 +200,12 @@ struct rpc_xprt { unsigned int min_reqs; /* min number of slots */ unsigned int num_reqs; /* total slots */ unsigned long state; /* transport state */ +#ifdef __GENKSYMS__ + unsigned char resvport : 1; /* use a reserved port */ +#else unsigned char resvport : 1, /* use a reserved port */ reuseport : 1; /* reuse port on reconnect */ +#endif atomic_t swapper; /* we're swapping over this transport */ unsigned int bind_index; /* bind function index */ -- 2.25.1

1 0

[PATCH kernel-4.19] usb: gadget: rndis: Fix info leak of rndis
by Yang Yingliang 08 Jul '21

08 Jul '21

From: Wang Hai <wanghai38(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: 172330 CVE: NA -------------------------------- We can construct some special USB packets that cause kernel info leak by the following steps of rndis. 1. construct the packet to make rndis call gen_ndis_set_resp(). In gen_ndis_set_resp(), BufOffset comes from the USB packet and it is not checked so that BufOffset can be any value. Therefore, if OID is RNDIS_OID_GEN_CURRENT_PACKET_FILTER, then *params->filter can get data at any address. 2. construct the packet to make rndis call rndis_query_response(). In rndis_query_response(), if OID is RNDIS_OID_GEN_CURRENT_PACKET_FILTER, then the data of *params->filter is fetched and returned, resulting in info leak. Therefore, we need to check the BufOffset to prevent info leak. Here, buf size is USB_COMP_EP0_BUFSIZ, as long as "8 + BufOffset + BufLength" is less than USB_COMP_EP0_BUFSIZ, it will be considered legal. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c | 2 +- drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c index d85bb3ba8263f..ef545934ce086 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c @@ -2143,7 +2143,7 @@ int composite_dev_prepare(struct usb_composite_driver *composite, if (!cdev->req) return -ENOMEM; - cdev->req->buf = kmalloc(USB_COMP_EP0_BUFSIZ, GFP_KERNEL); + cdev->req->buf = kzalloc(USB_COMP_EP0_BUFSIZ, GFP_KERNEL); if (!cdev->req->buf) goto fail; diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c index 04c142c130759..7686b55ccf133 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/rndis.c @@ -506,6 +506,10 @@ static int gen_ndis_set_resp(struct rndis_params *params, u32 OID, switch (OID) { case RNDIS_OID_GEN_CURRENT_PACKET_FILTER: + if (buf_len < 2) { + pr_err("%s:Not support for buf_len < 2\n", __func__); + break; + } /* these NDIS_PACKET_TYPE_* bitflags are shared with * cdc_filter; it's not RNDIS-specific @@ -592,6 +596,7 @@ static int rndis_query_response(struct rndis_params *params, rndis_query_msg_type *buf) { rndis_query_cmplt_type *resp; + u32 BufOffset, BufLength; rndis_resp_t *r; /* pr_debug("%s: OID = %08X\n", __func__, cpu_to_le32(buf->OID)); */ @@ -612,12 +617,25 @@ static int rndis_query_response(struct rndis_params *params, resp->MessageType = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_MSG_QUERY_C); resp->RequestID = buf->RequestID; /* Still LE in msg buffer */ + BufOffset = le32_to_cpu(buf->InformationBufferOffset); + BufLength = le32_to_cpu(buf->InformationBufferLength); + + /* + * If the address of the buf to be accessed exceeds the valid + * range of the buf, then return RNDIS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED. + */ + if (8 + BufOffset + BufLength >= USB_COMP_EP0_BUFSIZ) { + resp->Status = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED); + resp->MessageLength = cpu_to_le32(sizeof(*resp)); + resp->InformationBufferLength = cpu_to_le32(0); + resp->InformationBufferOffset = cpu_to_le32(0); + params->resp_avail(params->v); + return 0; + } if (gen_ndis_query_resp(params, le32_to_cpu(buf->OID), - le32_to_cpu(buf->InformationBufferOffset) - + 8 + (u8 *)buf, - le32_to_cpu(buf->InformationBufferLength), - r)) { + BufOffset + 8 + (u8 *)buf, BufLength, + r)) { /* OID not supported */ resp->Status = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED); resp->MessageLength = cpu_to_le32(sizeof *resp); @@ -660,6 +678,17 @@ static int rndis_set_response(struct rndis_params *params, resp->MessageType = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_MSG_SET_C); resp->MessageLength = cpu_to_le32(16); resp->RequestID = buf->RequestID; /* Still LE in msg buffer */ + + /* + * If the address of the buf to be accessed exceeds the valid + * range of the buf, then return RNDIS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED. + */ + if (8 + BufOffset + BufLength >= USB_COMP_EP0_BUFSIZ) { + resp->Status = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED); + params->resp_avail(params->v); + return 0; + } + if (gen_ndis_set_resp(params, le32_to_cpu(buf->OID), ((u8 *)buf) + 8 + BufOffset, BufLength, r)) resp->Status = cpu_to_le32(RNDIS_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED); -- 2.25.1

1 0

【Meeting Notice】openEuler kernel 双周例会 Time: 2021-07-09 14:00-18:00
by Meeting Book 08 Jul '21

08 Jul '21

1 0

【kernel-sig例会议题申报】openEuler 21.09新特性简述
by Zheng Zengkai 08 Jul '21

08 Jul '21

*背景：* openEuler 21.09版本已启动开发，欢迎openEuler kernel开发者贡献补丁。申报一个议题： openEuler 21.09版本当前计划合入的特性简述。

1 0

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/2] Add config switch and kernel parameter for CPU0
by Zheng Zengkai 05 Jul '21

05 Jul '21

Add config switch and kernel parameter for CPU0 hotplug. Besides, disable config ARM64_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0 in openeuler_defconfig by default. Zheng Zengkai (2): arm64: Add config switch and kernel parameter for CPU0 hotplug config: disable config ARM64_BOOTPARAM_HOTPLUG_CPU0 by default .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++++++ arch/arm64/Kconfig | 28 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/configs/openeuler_defconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 18 +++++++++++- 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.20.1

1 2

[PATCH kernel-4.19] once: Fix panic when module unload
by Yang Yingliang 05 Jul '21

05 Jul '21

From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: 172153 CVE: NA ------------------------------------------------- DO_ONCE DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(___once_key); __do_once_done once_disable_jump(once_key); INIT_WORK(&w->work, once_deferred); struct once_work *w; w->key = key; schedule_work(&w->work); module unload //*the key is destroy* process_one_work once_deferred BUG_ON(!static_key_enabled(work->key)); static_key_count((struct static_key *)x) //*access key, crash* When module uses DO_ONCE mechanism, it could crash due to the above concurrency problem, we could reproduce it with link[1]. Fix it by add/put module refcount in the once work process. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/eaa6c371-465e-57eb-6be9-f4b16b9d7cbf@huawei.… Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes(a)stressinduktion.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel(a)iogearbox.net> Cc: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet(a)google.com> Reported-by: Minmin chen <chenmingmin(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- lib/once.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/once.c b/lib/once.c index 8b7d6235217ee..959f8db41ccfa 100644 --- a/lib/once.c +++ b/lib/once.c @@ -3,10 +3,12 @@ #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/once.h> #include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/module.h> struct once_work { struct work_struct work; struct static_key_true *key; + struct module *module; }; static void once_deferred(struct work_struct *w) @@ -16,11 +18,24 @@ static void once_deferred(struct work_struct *w) work = container_of(w, struct once_work, work); BUG_ON(!static_key_enabled(work->key)); static_branch_disable(work->key); + module_put(work->module); kfree(work); } +static struct module *find_module_by_key(struct static_key_true *key) +{ + struct module *mod; + + preempt_disable(); + mod = __module_address((unsigned long)key); + preempt_enable(); + + return mod; +} + static void once_disable_jump(struct static_key_true *key) { + struct module *mod = find_module_by_key(key); struct once_work *w; w = kmalloc(sizeof(*w), GFP_ATOMIC); @@ -29,6 +44,8 @@ static void once_disable_jump(struct static_key_true *key) INIT_WORK(&w->work, once_deferred); w->key = key; + w->module = mod; + __module_get(mod); schedule_work(&w->work); } -- 2.25.1

1 0

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 01/11] bpf: fix up selftests after backports were fixed
by Yang Yingliang 05 Jul '21

05 Jul '21

From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait(a)windriver.com> stable inclusion from linux-4.19.193 commit b190383c714a379002b00bc8de43371e78d291d8 -------------------------------- After the backport of the changes to fix CVE 2019-7308, the selftests also need to be fixed up, as was done originally in mainline 80c9b2fae87b ("bpf: add various test cases to selftests"). This is a backport of upstream commit 80c9b2fae87b ("bpf: add various test cases to selftests") adapted to 4.19 in order to fix the selftests that began to fail after CVE-2019-7308 fixes. Suggested-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden(a)amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait(a)windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 9db5a7378f40f..fef1c9e3c4b81 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -2448,6 +2448,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .result = REJECT, .errstr = "invalid stack off=-79992 size=8", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", }, { "PTR_TO_STACK store/load - out of bounds high", @@ -2844,6 +2845,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", + .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, }, { @@ -7457,6 +7460,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7481,6 +7485,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7507,6 +7512,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7532,6 +7538,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7580,6 +7587,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7651,6 +7659,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7702,6 +7711,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7729,6 +7739,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7755,6 +7766,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7784,6 +7796,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R7 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7814,6 +7827,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 4 }, .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -7842,6 +7856,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "unbounded min value", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, }, @@ -7894,6 +7909,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -8266,6 +8282,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "pointer offset 1073741822", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range", .result = REJECT }, { @@ -8287,6 +8304,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { }, .fixup_map1 = { 3 }, .errstr = "pointer offset -1073741822", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range", .result = REJECT }, { @@ -8458,6 +8476,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_EXIT_INSN() }, .errstr = "fp pointer offset 1073741822", + .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range", .result = REJECT }, { -- 2.25.1

1 10

[PATCH kernel-4.19 1/2] SUNRPC: Fix the batch tasks count wraparound.
by Yang Yingliang 05 Jul '21

05 Jul '21

From: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5(a)huawei.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.14 commit fcb170a9d825d7db4a3fb870b0300f5a40a8d096 category: bugfix bugzilla: 51898 CVE: NA --------------------------- The 'queue->nr' will wraparound from 0 to 255 when only current priority queue has tasks. This maybe lead a deadlock same as commit dfe1fe75e00e ("NFSv4: Fix deadlock between nfs4_evict_inode() and nfs4_opendata_get_inode()"): Privileged delegreturn task is queued to privileged list because all the slots are assigned. When non-privileged task complete and release the slot, a non-privileged maybe picked out. It maybe allocate slot failed when the session on draining. If the 'queue->nr' has wraparound to 255, and no enough slot to service it, then the privileged delegreturn will lost to wake up. So we should avoid the wraparound on 'queue->nr'. Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci(a)huawei.com> Fixes: 5fcdfacc01f3 ("NFSv4: Return delegations synchronously in evict_inode") Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <zhangxiaoxu5(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust(a)hammerspace.com> Reviewed-by: Yue Haibing <yuehaibing(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang(a)huawei.com> --- net/sunrpc/sched.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/sched.c b/net/sunrpc/sched.c index 8d204d5a76187..8cffcf58e6386 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/sched.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/sched.c @@ -506,7 +506,8 @@ static struct rpc_task *__rpc_find_next_queued_priority(struct rpc_wait_queue *q * Service a batch of tasks from a single owner. */ q = &queue->tasks[queue->priority]; - if (!list_empty(q) && --queue->nr) { + if (!list_empty(q) && queue->nr) { + queue->nr--; task = list_first_entry(q, struct rpc_task, u.tk_wait.list); goto out; } -- 2.25.1

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel