- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1312/1312] drivers/scsi/huawei/hifc/.tmp_hifc_lld.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .init.text
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Chenguangli, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: b5504db0db8375a77340b5bb54c17cfb75d3c754 commit: 7fc993d55d1b54ae40e29dfac825a18d04d644c6 [1312/1312] scsi/hifc: add hifc driver FC service module config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20241128 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011830.EPRXYtU4-lkp@…) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011830.EPRXYtU4-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011830.EPRXYtU4-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/scsi/huawei/hifc/hifc_lld.c:333:7: warning: no previous prototype for 'hifc_get_ppf_hwdev_by_pdev' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 333 | void *hifc_get_ppf_hwdev_by_pdev(struct pci_dev *pdev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/scsi/huawei/hifc/hifc_lld.c:362:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'hifc_event_process' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 362 | void hifc_event_process(void *adapter, struct hifc_event_info *event) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> drivers/scsi/huawei/hifc/.tmp_hifc_lld.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .init.text Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FB_BACKLIGHT Depends on [n]: HAS_IOMEM [=y] && FB [=n] Selected by [m]: - DRM_NOUVEAU [=m] && HAS_IOMEM [=y] && DRM [=y] && PCI [=y] && MMU [=y] && DRM_NOUVEAU_BACKLIGHT [=y] -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2441/2441] mm/kasan/common.c:471:16: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: a2b4d661a5ca59dd7cf972c1cce8b98422102ab7 commit: d5ddd7080c7442f22d6b92d6fed0dacc606013d1 [2441/2441] kasan: sanitize objects when metadata doesn't fit config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011647.JJxaTRfd-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011647.JJxaTRfd-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011647.JJxaTRfd-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from mm/kasan/common.c:40: mm/kasan/kasan.h: In function 'quarantine_put': mm/kasan/kasan.h:198:84: warning: 'return' with a value, in function returning void [-Wreturn-mismatch] 198 | static inline void quarantine_put(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object) { return false; } | ^~~~~ mm/kasan/kasan.h:198:20: note: declared here 198 | static inline void quarantine_put(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object) { return false; } | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/kasan/common.c: In function '__kasan_slab_free': >> mm/kasan/common.c:471:16: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be 471 | return quarantine_put(cache, object); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/kasan/common.c:472:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] 472 | } | ^ vim +471 mm/kasan/common.c 431 432 static bool __kasan_slab_free(struct kmem_cache *cache, void *object, 433 unsigned long ip, bool quarantine) 434 { 435 s8 shadow_byte; 436 u8 tag; 437 void *tagged_object; 438 unsigned long rounded_up_size; 439 440 tag = get_tag(object); 441 tagged_object = object; 442 object = reset_tag(object); 443 444 if (is_kfence_address(object)) 445 return false; 446 447 if (unlikely(nearest_obj(cache, virt_to_head_page(object), object) != 448 object)) { 449 kasan_report_invalid_free(tagged_object, ip); 450 return true; 451 } 452 453 /* RCU slabs could be legally used after free within the RCU period */ 454 if (unlikely(cache->flags & SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU)) 455 return false; 456 457 shadow_byte = READ_ONCE(*(s8 *)kasan_mem_to_shadow(object)); 458 if (shadow_invalid(tag, shadow_byte)) { 459 kasan_report_invalid_free(tagged_object, ip); 460 return true; 461 } 462 463 rounded_up_size = round_up(cache->object_size, KASAN_SHADOW_SCALE_SIZE); 464 kasan_poison_shadow(object, rounded_up_size, KASAN_KMALLOC_FREE); 465 466 if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KASAN_GENERIC) && !quarantine)) 467 return false; 468 469 kasan_set_free_info(cache, object, tag); 470 > 471 return quarantine_put(cache, object); 472 } 473 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1298/1298] drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .exit.text
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Joel, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: b5504db0db8375a77340b5bb54c17cfb75d3c754 commit: c3bc8fd637a9623f5c507bd18f9677effbddf584 [1298/1298] tracing: Centralize preemptirq tracepoints and unify their usage config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20241118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011608.l2EWWbUS-lkp@…) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011608.l2EWWbUS-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011608.l2EWWbUS-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c: In function 'ish_resume_handler': drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:227:13: warning: variable 'ret' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] 227 | int ret; | ^~~ In file included from drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:16: drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c: At top level: include/linux/module.h:138:14: warning: 'cleanup_module' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'ish_driver_exit': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes] 138 | void cleanup_module(void) __attribute__((alias(#exitfn))); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/device.h:1558:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_exit' 1558 | module_exit(__driver##_exit); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/pci.h:1279:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_driver' 1279 | module_driver(__pci_driver, pci_register_driver, pci_unregister_driver) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:323:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_pci_driver' 323 | module_pci_driver(ish_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:19: drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:323:19: note: 'cleanup_module' target declared here 323 | module_pci_driver(ish_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/device.h:1554:20: note: in definition of macro 'module_driver' 1554 | static void __exit __driver##_exit(void) \ | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:323:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_pci_driver' 323 | module_pci_driver(ish_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/module.h:132:13: warning: 'init_module' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'ish_driver_init': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes] 132 | int init_module(void) __attribute__((alias(#initfn))); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/device.h:1553:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_init' 1553 | module_init(__driver##_init); \ | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/pci.h:1279:9: note: in expansion of macro 'module_driver' 1279 | module_driver(__pci_driver, pci_register_driver, pci_unregister_driver) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:323:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_pci_driver' 323 | module_pci_driver(ish_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:323:19: note: 'init_module' target declared here 323 | module_pci_driver(ish_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/device.h:1549:19: note: in definition of macro 'module_driver' 1549 | static int __init __driver##_init(void) \ | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:323:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_pci_driver' 323 | module_pci_driver(ish_driver); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:54: warning: Function parameter or member '2' not described in '__printf' drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:54: warning: Function parameter or member '3' not described in '__printf' drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:54: warning: Excess function parameter 'dev' description in '__printf' drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.c:54: warning: Excess function parameter 'format' description in '__printf' >> drivers/hid/intel-ish-hid/ipc/pci-ish.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .exit.text -- In file included from drivers/mmc/core/core.c:13: include/linux/module.h:132:13: warning: 'init_module' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'mmc_init': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes] 132 | int init_module(void) __attribute__((alias(#initfn))); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/module.h:115:41: note: in expansion of macro 'module_init' 115 | #define subsys_initcall(fn) module_init(fn) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/mmc/core/core.c:2871:1: note: in expansion of macro 'subsys_initcall' 2871 | subsys_initcall(mmc_init); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/mmc/core/core.c:2839:19: note: 'init_module' target declared here 2839 | static int __init mmc_init(void) | ^~~~~~~~ include/linux/module.h:138:14: warning: 'cleanup_module' specifies less restrictive attribute than its target 'mmc_exit': 'cold' [-Wmissing-attributes] 138 | void cleanup_module(void) __attribute__((alias(#exitfn))); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/mmc/core/core.c:2872:1: note: in expansion of macro 'module_exit' 2872 | module_exit(mmc_exit); | ^~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/mmc/core/core.c:2864:20: note: 'cleanup_module' target declared here 2864 | static void __exit mmc_exit(void) | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/mmc/core/core.c:1343: warning: Function parameter or member 'mmc' not described in 'mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc' drivers/mmc/core/core.c:1343: warning: Function parameter or member 'ios' not described in 'mmc_regulator_set_vqmmc' drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_hw_reset()+0xf9: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_sw_reset()+0xf9: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_wait_for_req_done()+0x13b: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_do_erase()+0xe8: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_of_parse_voltage()+0x60: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_execute_tuning()+0x79: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: mmc_set_uhs_voltage()+0x41: sibling call from callable instruction with modified stack frame >> drivers/mmc/core/core.o: warning: objtool: missing symbol for section .exit.text -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2441/2441] mm/swapfile.o: warning: objtool: free_swap_and_cache()+0xfc: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Ryan, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: a2b4d661a5ca59dd7cf972c1cce8b98422102ab7 commit: 1d94cc3410041f99602b68b4d1d79e57fbebf6ca [2441/2441] mm: swap: fix race between free_swap_and_cache() and swapoff() config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-001-20241118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011634.AmMCv17V-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011634.AmMCv17V-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011634.AmMCv17V-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/swapfile.o: warning: objtool: free_swap_and_cache()+0xfc: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1474/1474] drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dmub/src/dmub_srv.c:484:77: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: df4c334beecb4cf58e4e8d63b491aa5ac0a84f46 commit: 2991f29868ddf9a3dd2dd132323ae2a4558b7bb0 [1474/1474] drm/amd/display: Change the DMCUB mailbox memory location from FB to inbox config: x86_64-randconfig-121-20241118 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011624.BbzK9R6O-lkp@…) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011624.BbzK9R6O-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011624.BbzK9R6O-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dmub/src/dmub_srv.c:484:77: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer vim +484 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dmub/src/dmub_srv.c 457 458 enum dmub_status dmub_srv_calc_mem_info(struct dmub_srv *dmub, 459 const struct dmub_srv_memory_params *params, 460 struct dmub_srv_fb_info *out) 461 { 462 uint8_t *cpu_base; 463 uint64_t gpu_base; 464 uint32_t i; 465 466 if (!dmub->sw_init) 467 return DMUB_STATUS_INVALID; 468 469 memset(out, 0, sizeof(*out)); 470 471 if (params->region_info->num_regions != DMUB_NUM_WINDOWS) 472 return DMUB_STATUS_INVALID; 473 474 cpu_base = (uint8_t *)params->cpu_fb_addr; 475 gpu_base = params->gpu_fb_addr; 476 477 for (i = 0; i < DMUB_NUM_WINDOWS; ++i) { 478 const struct dmub_region *reg = 479 &params->region_info->regions[i]; 480 481 out->fb[i].cpu_addr = cpu_base + reg->base; 482 out->fb[i].gpu_addr = gpu_base + reg->base; 483 > 484 if (i == DMUB_WINDOW_4_MAILBOX && params->cpu_inbox_addr != 0) { 485 out->fb[i].cpu_addr = (uint8_t *)params->cpu_inbox_addr + reg->base; 486 out->fb[i].gpu_addr = params->gpu_inbox_addr + reg->base; 487 } 488 489 out->fb[i].size = reg->top - reg->base; 490 } 491 492 out->num_fb = DMUB_NUM_WINDOWS; 493 494 return DMUB_STATUS_OK; 495 } 496 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1294/1294] drivers/gpio/gpio-phytium-platform.c:30:36: warning: 'phytium_gpio_acpi_match' defined but not used
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Tian, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: b5504db0db8375a77340b5bb54c17cfb75d3c754 commit: 00711bad7e372a30c4975ba43811ffa666aff0e1 [1294/1294] gpio: add phytium gpio driver config: arm64-randconfig-001-20241114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011639.nWeLS0HH-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011639.nWeLS0HH-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011639.nWeLS0HH-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/gpio/gpio-phytium-platform.c:30:36: warning: 'phytium_gpio_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 30 | static const struct acpi_device_id phytium_gpio_acpi_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Kconfig warnings: (for reference only) WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=n] && !S390 && (HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_PERF [=n] || HAVE_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH [=y]) Selected by [y]: - SDEI_WATCHDOG [=y] && <choice> && ARM_SDE_INTERFACE [=y] && !HARDLOCKUP_CHECK_TIMESTAMP [=n] vim +/phytium_gpio_acpi_match +30 drivers/gpio/gpio-phytium-platform.c 29 > 30 static const struct acpi_device_id phytium_gpio_acpi_match[] = { 31 { "PHYT0001", 0 }, 32 { } 33 }; 34 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, phytium_gpio_acpi_match); 35 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2430/2430] mm/hugetlb.c:6315:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'hugetlb_alloc_hugepage_nodemask'
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Chen, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: a2b4d661a5ca59dd7cf972c1cce8b98422102ab7 commit: 8deff3a60ce1a9dffb552210f065fc9ed6a55f84 [2430/2430] mm/sharepool: Add mg_sp_alloc_nodemask config: arm64-randconfig-002-20241114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011502.CoFCt6aY-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011502.CoFCt6aY-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011502.CoFCt6aY-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> mm/hugetlb.c:6315:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'hugetlb_alloc_hugepage_nodemask' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 6315 | struct page *hugetlb_alloc_hugepage_nodemask(int nid, int flag, nodemask_t *nodemask) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/hugetlb_alloc_hugepage_nodemask +6315 mm/hugetlb.c 6311 6312 /* 6313 * Allocate hugepage without reserve 6314 */ > 6315 struct page *hugetlb_alloc_hugepage_nodemask(int nid, int flag, nodemask_t *nodemask) 6316 { 6317 struct hstate *h = &default_hstate; 6318 gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h); 6319 struct page *page = NULL; 6320 6321 if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE) 6322 nid = numa_mem_id(); 6323 6324 if (nid < 0 || nid >= MAX_NUMNODES) 6325 return NULL; 6326 6327 if (flag & ~HUGETLB_ALLOC_MASK) 6328 return NULL; 6329 6330 if (enable_charge_mighp) 6331 gfp_mask |= __GFP_ACCOUNT; 6332 6333 if (flag & HUGETLB_ALLOC_NORECLAIM) 6334 gfp_mask &= ~__GFP_RECLAIM; 6335 6336 if (flag & HUGETLB_ALLOC_NORMAL) 6337 page = hugetlb_alloc_hugepage_normal(h, gfp_mask, nid); 6338 else if (flag & HUGETLB_ALLOC_BUDDY) 6339 page = alloc_migrate_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask); 6340 else 6341 page = alloc_huge_page_nodemask(h, nid, nodemask, gfp_mask); 6342 6343 return page; 6344 } 6345 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2430/2430] arch/arm64/mm/quick_kexec.c:21:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'reserve_quick_kexec'
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Kefeng, FYI, the error/warning was bisected to this commit, please ignore it if it's irrelevant. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: a2b4d661a5ca59dd7cf972c1cce8b98422102ab7 commit: d61f4ca086e99bb481961b1120e10e7a4296c392 [2430/2430] arm64: quick_kexec: Move to stand-alone file config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241114 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011507.pSC7pXCi-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011507.pSC7pXCi-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011507.pSC7pXCi-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/arm64/mm/quick_kexec.c:21:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'reserve_quick_kexec' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 21 | void __init reserve_quick_kexec(void) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> arch/arm64/mm/quick_kexec.c:47:13: warning: no previous prototype for 'request_quick_kexec_res' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 47 | void __init request_quick_kexec_res(struct resource *res) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reserve_quick_kexec +21 arch/arm64/mm/quick_kexec.c 20 > 21 void __init reserve_quick_kexec(void) 22 { 23 unsigned long long mem_start, mem_len; 24 25 mem_len = quick_kexec_res.end; 26 if (mem_len == 0) 27 return; 28 29 /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */ 30 mem_start = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma_phys_limit, 31 mem_len, SZ_2M); 32 if (mem_start == 0) { 33 pr_warn("cannot allocate quick kexec mem (size:0x%llx)\n", 34 mem_len); 35 quick_kexec_res.end = 0; 36 return; 37 } 38 39 memblock_reserve(mem_start, mem_len); 40 pr_info("quick kexec mem reserved: 0x%016llx - 0x%016llx (%lld MB)\n", 41 mem_start, mem_start + mem_len, mem_len >> 20); 42 43 quick_kexec_res.start = mem_start; 44 quick_kexec_res.end = mem_start + mem_len - 1; 45 } 46 > 47 void __init request_quick_kexec_res(struct resource *res) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1474/1474] kernel/livepatch/core.c:216:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_skip_resolve'
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi laokz, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: df4c334beecb4cf58e4e8d63b491aa5ac0a84f46 commit: b8f3220637be1736c165c289c634f27841ac4e01 [1474/1474] livepatch: add arch hook before doing klp_resolve_symbols config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011403.Lq5H9rrB-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011403.Lq5H9rrB-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011403.Lq5H9rrB-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/livepatch/core.c:97:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_init_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int __weak arch_klp_init_func(struct klp_object *obj, struct klp_func *func) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:97:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit int __weak arch_klp_init_func(struct klp_object *obj, struct klp_func *func) ^ static >> kernel/livepatch/core.c:216:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_skip_resolve' [-Wmissing-prototypes] bool __weak arch_klp_skip_resolve(unsigned int type) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:216:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit bool __weak arch_klp_skip_resolve(unsigned int type) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:1767:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_check_activeness_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int __weak arch_klp_check_activeness_func(struct klp_func *func, int enable, ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:1767:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit int __weak arch_klp_check_activeness_func(struct klp_func *func, int enable, ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2022:14: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_mem_alloc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak *arch_klp_mem_alloc(size_t size) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2022:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak *arch_klp_mem_alloc(size_t size) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2027:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_mem_free' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_mem_free(void *mem) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2027:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_mem_free(void *mem) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2032:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_code_modify_prepare' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_prepare(void) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2032:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_prepare(void) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2036:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_code_modify_post_process' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_post_process(void) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2036:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_post_process(void) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2049:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_check_breakpoint' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int __weak arch_klp_check_breakpoint(struct arch_klp_data *arch_data, void *old_func) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2049:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit int __weak arch_klp_check_breakpoint(struct arch_klp_data *arch_data, void *old_func) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2063:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_set_brk_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_set_brk_func(struct klp_func_node *func_node, void *new_func) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2063:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_set_brk_func(struct klp_func_node *func_node, void *new_func) ^ static 9 warnings generated. vim +/arch_klp_skip_resolve +216 kernel/livepatch/core.c 214 215 #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH_WO_FTRACE > 216 bool __weak arch_klp_skip_resolve(unsigned int type) 217 { 218 return false; 219 } 220 #endif 221 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-6.6 1474/1474] kernel/livepatch/core.c:97:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_init_func'
by kernel test robot 01 Dec '24

01 Dec '24

Hi Zheng, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-6.6 head: df4c334beecb4cf58e4e8d63b491aa5ac0a84f46 commit: eabc33c6f2c91168537f10e9275b0921c9f78c45 [1474/1474] livepatch/ppc64: Implement livepatch without ftrace for ppc64be config: arm64-randconfig-003-20241117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011224.cLtYmSDE-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241201/202412011224.cLtYmSDE-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412011224.cLtYmSDE-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/livepatch/core.c:97:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_init_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int __weak arch_klp_init_func(struct klp_object *obj, struct klp_func *func) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:97:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit int __weak arch_klp_init_func(struct klp_object *obj, struct klp_func *func) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:1756:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_check_activeness_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int __weak arch_klp_check_activeness_func(struct klp_func *func, int enable, ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:1756:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit int __weak arch_klp_check_activeness_func(struct klp_func *func, int enable, ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2011:14: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_mem_alloc' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak *arch_klp_mem_alloc(size_t size) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2011:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak *arch_klp_mem_alloc(size_t size) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2016:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_mem_free' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_mem_free(void *mem) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2016:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_mem_free(void *mem) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2021:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_code_modify_prepare' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_prepare(void) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2021:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_prepare(void) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2025:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_code_modify_post_process' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_post_process(void) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2025:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_code_modify_post_process(void) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2038:12: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_check_breakpoint' [-Wmissing-prototypes] int __weak arch_klp_check_breakpoint(struct arch_klp_data *arch_data, void *old_func) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2038:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit int __weak arch_klp_check_breakpoint(struct arch_klp_data *arch_data, void *old_func) ^ static kernel/livepatch/core.c:2052:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_klp_set_brk_func' [-Wmissing-prototypes] void __weak arch_klp_set_brk_func(struct klp_func_node *func_node, void *new_func) ^ kernel/livepatch/core.c:2052:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit void __weak arch_klp_set_brk_func(struct klp_func_node *func_node, void *new_func) ^ static 8 warnings generated. vim +/arch_klp_init_func +97 kernel/livepatch/core.c 96 > 97 int __weak arch_klp_init_func(struct klp_object *obj, struct klp_func *func) 98 { 99 return 0; 100 } 101 #endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH_FTRACE */ 102 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0