- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-6.6 v2] blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
by Li Nan 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc5 commit 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9UABH CVE: CVE-2024-36908 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0 The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns. Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419093257.3004211-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> Conflict: block/blk-iocost.c Mainline checks 'pd.online', but there is no member online of pd in 5.10. Check 'iocg->online' instead. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> --- v2: fix bugzilla block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index 6a3e8a21c0fc..3b9710ce77e5 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -1439,8 +1439,11 @@ static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay, lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->ioc->lock); lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->waitq.lock); - /* make sure that nobody messed with @iocg */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list)); + /* + * make sure that nobody messed with @iocg. Check iocg->online + * to avoid warn when removing blkcg or disk. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list) && iocg->online); WARN_ON_ONCE(iocg->inuse > 1); iocg->abs_vdebt -= min(abs_vpay, iocg->abs_vdebt); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6] blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
by Li Nan 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc5 commit 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6 category: bugfix bugzilla: 189809 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0 The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns. Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419093257.3004211-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> Conflict: block/blk-iocost.c Mainline checks 'pd.online', but there is no member online of pd in 5.10. Check 'iocg->online' instead. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> --- block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index 6a3e8a21c0fc..3b9710ce77e5 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -1439,8 +1439,11 @@ static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay, lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->ioc->lock); lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->waitq.lock); - /* make sure that nobody messed with @iocg */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list)); + /* + * make sure that nobody messed with @iocg. Check iocg->online + * to avoid warn when removing blkcg or disk. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list) && iocg->online); WARN_ON_ONCE(iocg->inuse > 1); iocg->abs_vdebt -= min(abs_vpay, iocg->abs_vdebt); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
by Li Nan 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc5 commit 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9UABH CVE: CVE-2024-36908 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0 The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns. Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419093257.3004211-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> Conflict: block/blk-iocost.c Mainline checks 'pd.online', but there is no member online of pd in 5.10. Check 'iocg->online' instead. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> --- block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index edab843d547a..2b3bbae302e2 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -1401,8 +1401,11 @@ static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay, lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->ioc->lock); lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->waitq.lock); - /* make sure that nobody messed with @iocg */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list)); + /* + * make sure that nobody messed with @iocg. Check iocg->online + * to avoid warn when removing blkcg or disk. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list) && iocg->online); WARN_ON_ONCE(iocg->inuse > 1); iocg->abs_vdebt -= min(abs_vpay, iocg->abs_vdebt); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] blk-iocost: do not WARN if iocg was already offlined
by Li Nan 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.9-rc5 commit 01bc4fda9ea0a6b52f12326486f07a4910666cf6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9UABH CVE: CVE-2024-36908 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- In iocg_pay_debt(), warn is triggered if 'active_list' is empty, which is intended to confirm iocg is active when it has debt. However, warn can be triggered during a blkcg or disk removal, if iocg_waitq_timer_fn() is run at that time: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2344971 at block/blk-iocost.c:1402 iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 Call trace: iocg_pay_debt+0x14c/0x190 iocg_kick_waitq+0x438/0x4c0 iocg_waitq_timer_fn+0xd8/0x130 __run_hrtimer+0x144/0x45c __hrtimer_run_queues+0x16c/0x244 hrtimer_interrupt+0x2cc/0x7b0 The warn in this situation is meaningless. Since this iocg is being removed, the state of the 'active_list' is irrelevant, and 'waitq_timer' is canceled after removing 'active_list' in ioc_pd_free(), which ensures iocg is freed after iocg_waitq_timer_fn() returns. Therefore, add the check if iocg was already offlined to avoid warn when removing a blkcg or disk. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3(a)huawei.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj(a)kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240419093257.3004211-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe(a)kernel.dk> Conflict: block/blk-iocost.c Mainline checks 'pd.online', but there is no member online of pd in 5.10. Check 'iocg->online' instead. Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122(a)huawei.com> --- block/blk-iocost.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c index edab843d547a..2b3bbae302e2 100644 --- a/block/blk-iocost.c +++ b/block/blk-iocost.c @@ -1401,8 +1401,11 @@ static void iocg_pay_debt(struct ioc_gq *iocg, u64 abs_vpay, lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->ioc->lock); lockdep_assert_held(&iocg->waitq.lock); - /* make sure that nobody messed with @iocg */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list)); + /* + * make sure that nobody messed with @iocg. Check iocg->online + * to avoid warn when removing blkcg or disk. + */ + WARN_ON_ONCE(list_empty(&iocg->active_list) && iocg->online); WARN_ON_ONCE(iocg->inuse > 1); iocg->abs_vdebt -= min(abs_vpay, iocg->abs_vdebt); -- 2.39.2

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] net/smc: avoid data corruption caused by decline
by Liu Jian 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda(a)linux.alibaba.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.203 commit 5ada292b5c504720a0acef8cae9acc62a694d19c category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9R4L7 CVE: CVE-2023-52775 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit e6d71b437abc2f249e3b6a1ae1a7228e09c6e563 ] We found a data corruption issue during testing of SMC-R on Redis applications. The benchmark has a low probability of reporting a strange error as shown below. "Error: Protocol error, got "\xe2" as reply type byte" Finally, we found that the retrieved error data was as follows: 0xE2 0xD4 0xC3 0xD9 0x04 0x00 0x2C 0x20 0xA6 0x56 0x00 0x16 0x3E 0x0C 0xCB 0x04 0x02 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x20 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0xE2 It is quite obvious that this is a SMC DECLINE message, which means that the applications received SMC protocol message. We found that this was caused by the following situations: client server ¦ clc proposal -------------> ¦ clc accept <------------- ¦ clc confirm -------------> wait llc confirm send llc confirm ¦failed llc confirm ¦ x------ (after 2s)timeout wait llc confirm rsp wait decline (after 1s) timeout (after 2s) timeout ¦ decline --------------> ¦ decline <-------------- As a result, a decline message was sent in the implementation, and this message was read from TCP by the already-fallback connection. This patch double the client timeout as 2x of the server value, With this simple change, the Decline messages should never cross or collide (during Confirm link timeout). This issue requires an immediate solution, since the protocol updates involve a more long-term solution. Fixes: 0fb0b02bd6fd ("net/smc: adapt SMC client code to use the LLC flow") Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda(a)linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wen Gu <guwen(a)linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia(a)linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem(a)davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: sanglipeng <sanglipeng1(a)jd.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Jian <liujian56(a)huawei.com> --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index 41cbc7c89c9d..f277e5fc8056 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -396,8 +396,12 @@ static int smcr_clnt_conf_first_link(struct smc_sock *smc) struct smc_llc_qentry *qentry; int rc; - /* receive CONFIRM LINK request from server over RoCE fabric */ - qentry = smc_llc_wait(link->lgr, NULL, SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME, + /* Receive CONFIRM LINK request from server over RoCE fabric. + * Increasing the client's timeout by twice as much as the server's + * timeout by default can temporarily avoid decline messages of + * both sides crossing or colliding + */ + qentry = smc_llc_wait(link->lgr, NULL, 2 * SMC_LLC_WAIT_TIME, SMC_LLC_CONFIRM_LINK); if (!qentry) { struct smc_clc_msg_decline dclc; -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] PCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal
by Jialin Zhang 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> stable inclusion from stable-v4.19.312 commit 9a87375bb586515c0af63d5dcdcd58ec4acf20a6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9Q91J CVE: CVE-2024-35809 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 9d5286d4e7f68beab450deddbb6a32edd5ecf4bf ] A race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove() callback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an unhandled page fault [1]. The problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running after pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn't really guarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks will not be running when it returns. However, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when pm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM status of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without waiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for .runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it arguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly prohibited). Thus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs to protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after pm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after pm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it has started earlier.] One way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier() after pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the runtime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from being invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should it be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in pci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the driver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which will prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr driver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240229062201.49500-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical… # [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5761426.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng(a)canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Tested-by: Ricky Wu <ricky_wu(a)realtek.com> Acked-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng(a)canonical.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Conflicts: drivers/pci/pci-driver.c [The conflict occurs because commit 064300ccb0e2("PCI: Drop pci_device_remove() test of pci_dev->driver") is not merged] Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c index 9329f4881d42..dc33bad9f106 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -442,6 +442,13 @@ static int pci_device_remove(struct device *dev) if (drv) { if (drv->remove) { pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + /* + * If the driver provides a .runtime_idle() callback and it has + * started to run already, it may continue to run in parallel + * with the code below, so wait until all of the runtime PM + * activity has completed. + */ + pm_runtime_barrier(dev); drv->remove(pci_dev); pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1] PCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal
by Jialin Zhang 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit bbe068b24409ef740657215605284fc7cdddd491 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9Q91J CVE: CVE-2024-35809 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 9d5286d4e7f68beab450deddbb6a32edd5ecf4bf ] A race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove() callback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an unhandled page fault [1]. The problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running after pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn't really guarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks will not be running when it returns. However, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when pm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM status of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without waiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for .runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it arguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly prohibited). Thus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs to protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after pm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after pm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it has started earlier.] One way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier() after pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the runtime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from being invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should it be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in pci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the driver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which will prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr driver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240229062201.49500-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical… # [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5761426.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng(a)canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Tested-by: Ricky Wu <ricky_wu(a)realtek.com> Acked-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng(a)canonical.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Conflicts: drivers/pci/pci-driver.c [The conflict occurs because commit 39f7310eaa79("PCI: Drop pci_device_remove() test of pci_dev->driver") is not merged] Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c index 79aa5a4b61c5..b740a7dc7fcd 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -447,6 +447,13 @@ static int pci_device_remove(struct device *dev) if (drv) { if (drv->remove) { pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + /* + * If the driver provides a .runtime_idle() callback and it has + * started to run already, it may continue to run in parallel + * with the code below, so wait until all of the runtime PM + * activity has completed. + */ + pm_runtime_barrier(dev); drv->remove(pci_dev); pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] PCI/PM: Drain runtime-idle callbacks before driver removal
by Jialin Zhang 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.215 commit bbe068b24409ef740657215605284fc7cdddd491 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I9Q91J CVE: CVE-2024-35809 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 9d5286d4e7f68beab450deddbb6a32edd5ecf4bf ] A race condition between the .runtime_idle() callback and the .remove() callback in the rtsx_pcr PCI driver leads to a kernel crash due to an unhandled page fault [1]. The problem is that rtsx_pci_runtime_idle() is not expected to be running after pm_runtime_get_sync() has been called, but the latter doesn't really guarantee that. It only guarantees that the suspend and resume callbacks will not be running when it returns. However, if a .runtime_idle() callback is already running when pm_runtime_get_sync() is called, the latter will notice that the runtime PM status of the device is RPM_ACTIVE and it will return right away without waiting for the former to complete. In fact, it cannot wait for .runtime_idle() to complete because it may be called from that callback (it arguably does not make much sense to do that, but it is not strictly prohibited). Thus in general, whoever is providing a .runtime_idle() callback needs to protect it from running in parallel with whatever code runs after pm_runtime_get_sync(). [Note that .runtime_idle() will not start after pm_runtime_get_sync() has returned, but it may continue running then if it has started earlier.] One way to address that race condition is to call pm_runtime_barrier() after pm_runtime_get_sync() (not before it, because a nonzero value of the runtime PM usage counter is necessary to prevent runtime PM callbacks from being invoked) to wait for the .runtime_idle() callback to complete should it be running at that point. A suitable place for doing that is in pci_device_remove() which calls pm_runtime_get_sync() before removing the driver, so it may as well call pm_runtime_barrier() subsequently, which will prevent the race in question from occurring, not just in the rtsx_pcr driver, but in any PCI drivers providing .runtime_idle() callbacks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240229062201.49500-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical… # [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5761426.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng(a)canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki(a)intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas(a)google.com> Tested-by: Ricky Wu <ricky_wu(a)realtek.com> Acked-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng(a)canonical.com> Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Conflicts: drivers/pci/pci-driver.c [The conflict occurs because commit 39f7310eaa79("PCI: Drop pci_device_remove() test of pci_dev->driver") is not merged] Signed-off-by: Jialin Zhang <zhangjialin11(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c index 6eaaf4231635..606e4a083337 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c @@ -447,6 +447,13 @@ static int pci_device_remove(struct device *dev) if (drv) { if (drv->remove) { pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + /* + * If the driver provides a .runtime_idle() callback and it has + * started to run already, it may continue to run in parallel + * with the code below, so wait until all of the runtime PM + * activity has completed. + */ + pm_runtime_barrier(dev); drv->remove(pci_dev); pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev); } -- 2.25.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/2] CVE
by liwei 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

CVE-2024-35830 CVE-2024-36919 Alexander Stein (1): media: tc358743: register v4l2 async device only after successful setup Saurav Kashyap (1): scsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c | 7 ++++--- drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

2 3

[PATCH openEuler-22.03-LTS-SP1 0/2] CVE
by liwei 08 Jun '24

08 Jun '24

CVE-2024-35830 CVE-2024-36919 Alexander Stein (1): media: tc358743: register v4l2 async device only after successful setup Saurav Kashyap (1): scsi: bnx2fc: Remove spin_lock_bh while releasing resources after upload drivers/media/i2c/tc358743.c | 7 ++++--- drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

2 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

Kernel