From: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de
mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.13-rc5 commit 9a90ed065a155d13db0d0ffeaad5cc54e51c90c6 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I9JNPZ CVE: NA
Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?i...
------------------------------------------------------
There are machines out there with added value crap^WBIOS which provide an SMI handler for the local APIC thermal sensor interrupt. Out of reset, the BSP on those machines has something like 0x200 in that APIC register (timestamps left in because this whole issue is timing sensitive):
[ 0.033858] read lvtthmr: 0x330, val: 0x200
which means:
- bit 16 - the interrupt mask bit is clear and thus that interrupt is enabled - bits [10:8] have 010b which means SMI delivery mode.
Now, later during boot, when the kernel programs the local APIC, it soft-disables it temporarily through the spurious vector register:
setup_local_APIC:
...
/* * If this comes from kexec/kcrash the APIC might be enabled in * SPIV. Soft disable it before doing further initialization. */ value = apic_read(APIC_SPIV); value &= ~APIC_SPIV_APIC_ENABLED; apic_write(APIC_SPIV, value);
which means (from the SDM):
"10.4.7.2 Local APIC State After It Has Been Software Disabled
...
* The mask bits for all the LVT entries are set. Attempts to reset these bits will be ignored."
And this happens too:
[ 0.124111] APIC: Switch to symmetric I/O mode setup [ 0.124117] lvtthmr 0x200 before write 0xf to APIC 0xf0 [ 0.124118] lvtthmr 0x10200 after write 0xf to APIC 0xf0
This results in CPU 0 soft lockups depending on the placement in time when the APIC soft-disable happens. Those soft lockups are not 100% reproducible and the reason for that can only be speculated as no one tells you what SMM does. Likely, it confuses the SMM code that the APIC is disabled and the thermal interrupt doesn't doesn't fire at all, leading to CPU 0 stuck in SMM forever...
Now, before
4f432e8bb15b ("x86/mce: Get rid of mcheck_intel_therm_init()")
due to how the APIC_LVTTHMR was read before APIC initialization in mcheck_intel_therm_init(), it would read the value with the mask bit 16 clear and then intel_init_thermal() would replicate it onto the APs and all would be peachy - the thermal interrupt would remain enabled.
But that commit moved that reading to a later moment in intel_init_thermal(), resulting in reading APIC_LVTTHMR on the BSP too late and with its interrupt mask bit set.
Thus, revert back to the old behavior of reading the thermal LVT register before the APIC gets initialized.
Fixes: 4f432e8bb15b ("x86/mce: Get rid of mcheck_intel_therm_init()") Reported-by: James Feeney james@nurealm.net Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov bp@suse.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Zhang Rui rui.zhang@intel.com Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YKIqDdFNaXYd39wz@zn.tnic Signed-off-by: liwei liwei728@huawei.com --- arch/x86/include/asm/thermal.h | 4 +++- arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 9 +++++++++ drivers/thermal/intel/therm_throt.c | 15 +++++++++++---- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/thermal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/thermal.h index ddbdefd5b94f..91a7b6687c3b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thermal.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thermal.h @@ -3,11 +3,13 @@ #define _ASM_X86_THERMAL_H
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_THERMAL_VECTOR +void therm_lvt_init(void); void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); bool x86_thermal_enabled(void); void intel_thermal_interrupt(void); #else -static inline void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { } +static inline void therm_lvt_init(void) { } +static inline void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { } #endif
#endif /* _ASM_X86_THERMAL_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c index 767eda3da5db..ab1fc9a65cac 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ #include <asm/pci-direct.h> #include <asm/prom.h> #include <asm/proto.h> +#include <asm/thermal.h> #include <asm/unwind.h> #include <asm/vsyscall.h> #include <linux/vmalloc.h> @@ -1100,6 +1101,14 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
x86_init.timers.wallclock_init();
+ /* + * This needs to run before setup_local_APIC() which soft-disables the + * local APIC temporarily and that masks the thermal LVT interrupt, + * leading to softlockups on machines which have configured SMI + * interrupt delivery. + */ + therm_lvt_init(); + mcheck_init();
register_refined_jiffies(CLOCK_TICK_RATE); diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/therm_throt.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/therm_throt.c index 8cc35a9f3862..2b06b9e59dcf 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/therm_throt.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/therm_throt.c @@ -637,6 +637,17 @@ bool x86_thermal_enabled(void) return atomic_read(&therm_throt_en); }
+void __init therm_lvt_init(void) +{ + /* + * This function is only called on boot CPU. Save the init thermal + * LVT value on BSP and use that value to restore APs' thermal LVT + * entry BIOS programmed later + */ + if (intel_thermal_supported(&boot_cpu_data)) + lvtthmr_init = apic_read(APIC_LVTTHMR); +} + void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id(); @@ -646,10 +657,6 @@ void intel_init_thermal(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) if (!intel_thermal_supported(c)) return;
- /* On the BSP? */ - if (c == &boot_cpu_data) - lvtthmr_init = apic_read(APIC_LVTTHMR); - /* * First check if its enabled already, in which case there might * be some SMM goo which handles it, so we can't even put a handler
反馈: 您发送到kernel@openeuler.org的补丁/补丁集,已成功转换为PR! PR链接地址: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6704 邮件列表地址:https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/5...
FeedBack: The patch(es) which you have sent to kernel@openeuler.org mailing list has been converted to a pull request successfully! Pull request link: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/pulls/6704 Mailing list address: https://mailweb.openeuler.org/hyperkitty/list/kernel@openeuler.org/message/5...