From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" matttbe@kernel.org

stable inclusion from stable-v6.6.48 commit 9a9afbbc3fbfca4975eea4aa5b18556db5a0c0b8 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IAOY17 CVE: CVE-2024-44974

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=...

-------------------------------------------------

commit 48e50dcbcbaaf713d82bf2da5c16aeced94ad07d upstream.

select_local_address() and select_signal_address() both select an endpoint entry from the list inside an RCU protected section, but return a reference to it, to be read later on. If the entry is dereferenced after the RCU unlock, reading info could cause a Use-after-Free.

A simple solution is to copy the required info while inside the RCU protected section to avoid any risk of UaF later. The address ID might need to be modified later to handle the ID0 case later, so a copy seems OK to deal with.

Reported-by: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/45cd30d3-7710-491c-ae4d-a1368c00beb1@redhat.com Fixes: 01cacb00b35c ("mptcp: add netlink-based PM") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau martineau@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) matttbe@kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-14-38035d40de5b... Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski kuba@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Liu Jian liujian56@huawei.com --- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index b81fa77ce054..aa56696cdc78 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c @@ -148,11 +148,13 @@ static bool lookup_subflow_by_daddr(const struct list_head *list, return false; }

-static struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry * +static bool select_local_address(const struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, - const struct mptcp_sock *msk) + const struct mptcp_sock *msk, + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *new_entry) { - struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry, *ret = NULL; + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry; + bool found = false;

msk_owned_by_me(msk);

@@ -164,17 +166,21 @@ select_local_address(const struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, if (!test_bit(entry->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap)) continue;

- ret = entry; + *new_entry = *entry; + found = true; break; } rcu_read_unlock(); - return ret; + + return found; }

-static struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry * -select_signal_address(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_sock *msk) +static bool +select_signal_address(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_sock *msk, + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *new_entry) { - struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry, *ret = NULL; + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry; + bool found = false;

rcu_read_lock(); /* do not keep any additional per socket state, just signal @@ -189,11 +195,13 @@ select_signal_address(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_sock *msk) if (!(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SIGNAL)) continue;

- ret = entry; + *new_entry = *entry; + found = true; break; } rcu_read_unlock(); - return ret; + + return found; }

unsigned int mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_signal_max(const struct mptcp_sock *msk) @@ -520,9 +528,10 @@ __lookup_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet, const struct mptcp_addr_info *info,

static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk) { - struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *local, *signal_and_subflow = NULL; struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk; + struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry local; unsigned int add_addr_signal_max; + bool signal_and_subflow = false; unsigned int local_addr_max; struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet; unsigned int subflows_max; @@ -573,23 +582,22 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk) if (msk->pm.addr_signal & BIT(MPTCP_ADD_ADDR_SIGNAL)) return;

- local = select_signal_address(pernet, msk); - if (!local) + if (!select_signal_address(pernet, msk, &local)) goto subflow;

/* If the alloc fails, we are on memory pressure, not worth * continuing, and trying to create subflows. */ - if (!mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(msk, &local->addr)) + if (!mptcp_pm_alloc_anno_list(msk, &local.addr)) return;

- __clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); + __clear_bit(local.addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); msk->pm.add_addr_signaled++; - mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &local->addr, false); + mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, &local.addr, false); mptcp_pm_nl_addr_send_ack(msk);

- if (local->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW) - signal_and_subflow = local; + if (local.flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW) + signal_and_subflow = true; }

subflow: @@ -600,26 +608,22 @@ static void mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct mptcp_sock *msk) bool fullmesh; int i, nr;

- if (signal_and_subflow) { - local = signal_and_subflow; - signal_and_subflow = NULL; - } else { - local = select_local_address(pernet, msk); - if (!local) - break; - } + if (signal_and_subflow) + signal_and_subflow = false; + else if (!select_local_address(pernet, msk, &local)) + break;

- fullmesh = !!(local->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH); + fullmesh = !!(local.flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH);

msk->pm.local_addr_used++; - __clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); - nr = fill_remote_addresses_vec(msk, &local->addr, fullmesh, addrs); + __clear_bit(local.addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap); + nr = fill_remote_addresses_vec(msk, &local.addr, fullmesh, addrs); if (nr == 0) continue;

spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) - __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local->addr, &addrs[i]); + __mptcp_subflow_connect(sk, &local.addr, &addrs[i]); spin_lock_bh(&msk->pm.lock); } mptcp_pm_nl_check_work_pending(msk);