- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[PATCH OLK-6.6] enic: fix tx_hang_reset use-after-free on device removal
by Jinjiang Tu 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

From: Satish Kharat <satishkh(a)cisco.com> stable inclusion from stable-v6.12.104 commit 8619865f34fb3b130b567855382a5c4aadd522b9 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/18260 CVE: CVE-2026-74725 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit ec680ea4ba1bca92a767fb7e7869758bfdd886e3 ] enic_remove() cancels the reset and change_mtu_work items but does not cancel tx_hang_reset. A TX timeout that fires while the device is being removed can schedule enic_tx_hang_reset() so that it runs after free_netdev(), resulting in a use-after-free. cancel_work_sync() alone is not sufficient here: the still-live watchdog and notify paths can re-schedule these work items in the window between the cancel and unregister_netdev(). Use disable_work_sync(), which cancels the work and blocks any subsequent schedule_work() from requeuing it, and apply it to the reset and change_mtu_work items as well so the same requeue race is closed for all teardown work. Fixes: 937317c7c109 ("enic: do hang reset only in case of tx timeout") Signed-off-by: Satish Kharat <satishkh(a)cisco.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260728062730.2394873-1-satishkh@cisco.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jinjiang Tu <tujinjiang(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c index 48701032c20c..11cf6709b7c4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cisco/enic/enic_main.c @@ -3016,8 +3016,9 @@ static void enic_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev) if (netdev) { struct enic *enic = netdev_priv(netdev); - cancel_work_sync(&enic->reset); - cancel_work_sync(&enic->change_mtu_work); + disable_work_sync(&enic->reset); + disable_work_sync(&enic->tx_hang_reset); + disable_work_sync(&enic->change_mtu_work); unregister_netdev(netdev); enic_dev_deinit(enic); vnic_dev_close(enic->vdev); -- 2.43.0

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] dm-ioctl: fix a possible overflow in list_version_get_info
by Zhou Minqiang 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

mainline inclusion from mainline-v7.2-rc3 commit 76c6f845dc0c614304a6e6ee619b552f97cf24b3 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/17390 CVE: CVE-2026-72106 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- commit 76c6f845dc0c614304a6e6ee619b552f97cf24b3 upstream. sizeof(tt->version) is 12 bytes, but the code writes 16 bytes into the output buffer - info->vers->version[0], info->vers->version[1], info->vers->version[2] and info->vers->next. This can cause buffer overflow. Fix this buffer overflow by replacing "sizeof(tt->version)" with "sizeof(struct dm_target_versions)". Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka(a)redhat.com> Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4.6 Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Conflicts: drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c [ctx conflicts] Signed-off-by: Zhou Minqiang <zhouminqiang2(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c index 3bb9c0dced6e..2665e893cf22 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c @@ -585,9 +585,7 @@ static void list_version_get_info(struct target_type *tt, void *param) struct vers_iter *info = param; /* Check space - it might have changed since the first iteration */ - if ((char *)info->vers + sizeof(tt->version) + strlen(tt->name) + 1 > - info->end) { - + if ((char *)info->vers + sizeof(struct dm_target_versions) + strlen(tt->name) + 1 > info->end) { info->flags = DM_BUFFER_FULL_FLAG; return; } -- 2.52.0

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/3] CVE-2026-74730
by Zhou Minqiang 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

CVE-2026-74730 Zhou Minqiang (3): nfs4: take a reference on the nfs_client when running FREE_STATEID NFS: Pin the 'struct nfs_server' during a FREE_STATEID call NFS: Decrement refcounts if allocating nfs_free_stateid_data fails fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.52.0

2 4

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS 0/3] CVE-2026-74730
by Zhou Minqiang 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

CVE-2026-74730 Zhou Minqiang (3): nfs4: take a reference on the nfs_client when running FREE_STATEID NFS: Pin the 'struct nfs_server' during a FREE_STATEID call NFS: Decrement refcounts if allocating nfs_free_stateid_data fails fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.52.0

2 4

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/3] md/raid1,raid10: fix deadlock and bio accounting in read error path
by Zhou Minqiang 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

Splitting a bio while executing in the raid1 thread can lead to recursion, as task->bio_list is NULL in this context. In addition, resubmitting an md_cloned_bio after splitting may lead to a deadlock if the array is suspended before the md driver calls percpu_ref_tryget_live(&mddev->active_io) on it's path to pers->make_request(). Avoid splitting the bio in this context and require that it is either read in full or not at all. This prevents recursion and avoids potential deadlocks during array suspension. Zhou Minqiang (3): md/raid1,raid10: fix deadlock in read error recovery path md/raid1,raid10: fix error-path detection with md_cloned_bio() md/raid1,raid10: fix bio accounting for split md cloned bios drivers/md/md.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- drivers/md/md.h | 5 +++++ drivers/md/raid1.c | 15 +++++++++++---- drivers/md/raid10.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- 2.52.0

2 4

[PATCH OLK-6.6] bpf: Fix NMI/tracepoint re-entry deadlock on lru locks
by Chen Yuxi 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

From: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko(a)meta.com> mainline inclusion from mainline-v7.2-rc1 commit 89edbdfc5d0308cef57b71359331de5c4ddbf763 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/17962 CVE: CVE-2026-74337 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?… -------------------------------- NMI and tracepoint BPF programs can re-enter the per-CPU or global LRU lock that bpf_lru_pop_free()/push_free() already hold on the same CPU, AA-deadlocking. Lockdep reports "inconsistent {INITIAL USE} -> {IN-NMI}" on &l->lock (syzbot c69a0a2c816716f1e0d5) and "possible recursive locking detected" on &loc_l->lock (syzbot 18b26edb69b2e19f3b33). Prior trylock and rqspinlock based fixes (see links) were nacked because compromised on reliability. This patch converts every LRU lock site to rqspinlock_t and adds a recovery path for some failure windows to avoid node leaks. Failure recovery: - *_pop_free top-level: return NULL; prealloc_lru_pop() already treats that as no-free-element (-ENOMEM). - Cross-CPU steal: skip the victim's locked loc_l, try next CPU. - Post-steal local lock fail: publish stolen node to lockless per-CPU free_llist; next pop on this CPU picks it up. - push_free fail: mark node pending_free=1. __local_list_flush(), __local_list_pop_pending() reclaim the node from pending_list. __bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive() reclaims the node from inactive list. Nodes from active list are reclaimed by __bpf_lru_list_shrink() or after __bpf_lru_list_rotate_active() demotes it to the inactive. Fixes: 3a08c2fd7634 ("bpf: LRU List") Reported-by: syzbot+c69a0a2c816716f1e0d5(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c69a0a2c816716f1e0d5 Reported-by: syzbot+18b26edb69b2e19f3b33(a)syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=18b26edb69b2e19f3b33 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEYO4R+m+SpVc2gNj_x31R6fo1uJvj2bK2YS1P09GW… Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAPPBnEZmFA3ab8Uc=PEm0bdojZy=7T_F5_+eyZSHyZR3MB… Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20251030030010.95352-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260119142120.28170-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev/ Signed-off-by: Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko(a)meta.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260607-lru_map_spin-v3-1-bcd9332e911b@meta.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Conflicts: kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c, kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h [Since hulk-6.6 does not include rqspinlock, this patch does not use the method from mainline, and instead adopts the re-entry rejection form.] Signed-off-by: Chen Yuxi <chenyuxi19(a)huawei.com> --- kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h | 33 ++++- 2 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c index 2d6e1c98d8ad..aac697d1d593 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ #include <linux/cpumask.h> #include <linux/spinlock.h> #include <linux/percpu.h> +#include <linux/llist.h> #include "bpf_lru_list.h" @@ -13,29 +14,75 @@ #define PERCPU_FREE_TARGET (4) #define PERCPU_NR_SCANS PERCPU_FREE_TARGET -/* Helpers to get the local list index */ -#define LOCAL_LIST_IDX(t) ((t) - BPF_LOCAL_LIST_T_OFFSET) -#define LOCAL_FREE_LIST_IDX LOCAL_LIST_IDX(BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_FREE) -#define LOCAL_PENDING_LIST_IDX LOCAL_LIST_IDX(BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_PENDING) #define IS_LOCAL_LIST_TYPE(t) ((t) >= BPF_LOCAL_LIST_T_OFFSET) -static int get_next_cpu(int cpu) +/* + * Per-CPU spinlock that rejects same-CPU re-entry. + * + * Same-CPU re-entry would AA-deadlock a plain raw spinlock, so an owner + * mark rejects it and lets the caller run its recovery path; cross-CPU + * contention blocks on the raw spinlock. + */ +static int bpf_lru_spin_lock_init(struct bpf_lru_spin_lock *l) { - cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask); - if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) - cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask); - return cpu; + raw_spin_lock_init(&l->lock); + l->nest = alloc_percpu(int); + if (!l->nest) + return -ENOMEM; + return 0; +} + +static void bpf_lru_spin_lock_destroy(struct bpf_lru_spin_lock *l) +{ + free_percpu(l->nest); +} + +static int bpf_lru_spin_lock(struct bpf_lru_spin_lock *l) +{ + preempt_disable(); + if (this_cpu_inc_return(*l->nest) != 1) { + this_cpu_dec(*l->nest); + preempt_enable(); + return -EBUSY; + } + raw_spin_lock(&l->lock); + return 0; +} + +static void bpf_lru_spin_unlock(struct bpf_lru_spin_lock *l) +{ + raw_spin_unlock(&l->lock); + this_cpu_dec(*l->nest); + preempt_enable(); } -/* Local list helpers */ -static struct list_head *local_free_list(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l) +static int bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(struct bpf_lru_spin_lock *l, + unsigned long *flags) { - return &loc_l->lists[LOCAL_FREE_LIST_IDX]; + preempt_disable(); + if (this_cpu_inc_return(*l->nest) != 1) { + this_cpu_dec(*l->nest); + preempt_enable(); + return -EBUSY; + } + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, *flags); + return 0; } -static struct list_head *local_pending_list(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l) +static void bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(struct bpf_lru_spin_lock *l, + unsigned long flags) { - return &loc_l->lists[LOCAL_PENDING_LIST_IDX]; + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); + this_cpu_dec(*l->nest); + preempt_enable(); +} + +static int get_next_cpu(int cpu) +{ + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, cpu_possible_mask); + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) + cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_possible_mask); + return cpu; } /* bpf_lru_node helpers */ @@ -80,6 +127,7 @@ static void __bpf_lru_node_move_to_free(struct bpf_lru_list *l, bpf_lru_list_count_dec(l, node->type); node->type = tgt_free_type; + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 0); list_move(&node->list, free_list); } @@ -95,6 +143,9 @@ static void __bpf_lru_node_move_in(struct bpf_lru_list *l, bpf_lru_list_count_inc(l, tgt_type); node->type = tgt_type; bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); + /* Reset pending_free only when moving to the free list */ + if (tgt_type == BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE) + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 0); list_move(&node->list, &l->lists[tgt_type]); } @@ -220,9 +271,11 @@ __bpf_lru_list_shrink_inactive(struct bpf_lru *lru, unsigned int i = 0; list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(node, tmp_node, inactive, list) { - if (bpf_lru_node_is_ref(node)) { + if (bpf_lru_node_is_ref(node) && + !READ_ONCE(node->pending_free)) { __bpf_lru_node_move(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_ACTIVE); - } else if (lru->del_from_htab(lru->del_arg, node)) { + } else if (READ_ONCE(node->pending_free) || + lru->del_from_htab(lru->del_arg, node)) { __bpf_lru_node_move_to_free(l, node, free_list, tgt_free_type); if (++nshrinked == tgt_nshrink) @@ -281,7 +334,8 @@ static unsigned int __bpf_lru_list_shrink(struct bpf_lru *lru, list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(node, tmp_node, force_shrink_list, list) { - if (lru->del_from_htab(lru->del_arg, node)) { + if (READ_ONCE(node->pending_free) || + lru->del_from_htab(lru->del_arg, node)) { __bpf_lru_node_move_to_free(l, node, free_list, tgt_free_type); return 1; @@ -298,8 +352,10 @@ static void __local_list_flush(struct bpf_lru_list *l, struct bpf_lru_node *node, *tmp_node; list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(node, tmp_node, - local_pending_list(loc_l), list) { - if (bpf_lru_node_is_ref(node)) + &loc_l->pending_list, list) { + if (READ_ONCE(node->pending_free)) + __bpf_lru_node_move_in(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE); + else if (bpf_lru_node_is_ref(node)) __bpf_lru_node_move_in(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_ACTIVE); else __bpf_lru_node_move_in(l, node, @@ -315,9 +371,12 @@ static void bpf_lru_list_push_free(struct bpf_lru_list *l, if (WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_LOCAL_LIST_TYPE(node->type))) return; - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, flags); + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, &flags)) { + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 1); + return; + } __bpf_lru_node_move(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); } static void bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local(struct bpf_lru *lru, @@ -326,8 +385,10 @@ static void bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local(struct bpf_lru *lru, struct bpf_lru_list *l = &lru->common_lru.lru_list; struct bpf_lru_node *node, *tmp_node; unsigned int nfree = 0; + LIST_HEAD(tmp_free); - raw_spin_lock(&l->lock); + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock(&l->lock)) + return; __local_list_flush(l, loc_l); @@ -335,7 +396,7 @@ static void bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local(struct bpf_lru *lru, list_for_each_entry_safe(node, tmp_node, &l->lists[BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE], list) { - __bpf_lru_node_move_to_free(l, node, local_free_list(loc_l), + __bpf_lru_node_move_to_free(l, node, &tmp_free, BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_FREE); if (++nfree == lru->target_free) break; @@ -343,10 +404,19 @@ static void bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local(struct bpf_lru *lru, if (nfree < lru->target_free) __bpf_lru_list_shrink(lru, l, lru->target_free - nfree, - local_free_list(loc_l), + &tmp_free, BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_FREE); - raw_spin_unlock(&l->lock); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock(&l->lock); + + /* + * Transfer the harvested nodes from the temporary list_head into + * the lockless per-CPU free llist. + */ + list_for_each_entry_safe(node, tmp_node, &tmp_free, list) { + list_del(&node->list); + llist_add(&node->llist, &loc_l->free_llist); + } } static void __local_list_add_pending(struct bpf_lru *lru, @@ -358,22 +428,21 @@ static void __local_list_add_pending(struct bpf_lru *lru, *(u32 *)((void *)node + lru->hash_offset) = hash; node->cpu = cpu; node->type = BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_PENDING; + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 0); bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); - list_add(&node->list, local_pending_list(loc_l)); + list_add(&node->list, &loc_l->pending_list); } static struct bpf_lru_node * __local_list_pop_free(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l) { - struct bpf_lru_node *node; + struct llist_node *llnode; - node = list_first_entry_or_null(local_free_list(loc_l), - struct bpf_lru_node, - list); - if (node) - list_del(&node->list); + llnode = llist_del_first(&loc_l->free_llist); + if (!llnode) + return NULL; - return node; + return container_of(llnode, struct bpf_lru_node, llist); } static struct bpf_lru_node * @@ -384,10 +453,10 @@ __local_list_pop_pending(struct bpf_lru *lru, struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l) ignore_ref: /* Get from the tail (i.e. older element) of the pending list. */ - list_for_each_entry_reverse(node, local_pending_list(loc_l), - list) { + list_for_each_entry_reverse(node, &loc_l->pending_list, list) { if ((!bpf_lru_node_is_ref(node) || force) && - lru->del_from_htab(lru->del_arg, node)) { + (READ_ONCE(node->pending_free) || + lru->del_from_htab(lru->del_arg, node))) { list_del(&node->list); return node; } @@ -412,7 +481,8 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_percpu_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, l = per_cpu_ptr(lru->percpu_lru, cpu); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, flags); + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, &flags)) + return NULL; __bpf_lru_list_rotate(lru, l); @@ -428,7 +498,7 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_percpu_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, __bpf_lru_node_move(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_INACTIVE); } - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); return node; } @@ -445,7 +515,8 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_common_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, loc_l = per_cpu_ptr(clru->local_list, cpu); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&loc_l->lock, flags); + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&loc_l->lock, &flags)) + return NULL; node = __local_list_pop_free(loc_l); if (!node) { @@ -456,17 +527,22 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_common_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, if (node) __local_list_add_pending(lru, loc_l, cpu, node, hash); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); if (node) return node; - /* No free nodes found from the local free list and + /* + * No free nodes found from the local free list and * the global LRU list. * * Steal from the local free/pending list of the * current CPU and remote CPU in RR. It starts * with the loc_l->next_steal CPU. + * + * Acquire the victim's lock before touching either list. On + * acquisition failure (rqspinlock AA or timeout) skip the victim + * and try the next CPU. */ first_steal = loc_l->next_steal; @@ -474,24 +550,36 @@ static struct bpf_lru_node *bpf_common_lru_pop_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, do { steal_loc_l = per_cpu_ptr(clru->local_list, steal); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&steal_loc_l->lock, flags); - - node = __local_list_pop_free(steal_loc_l); - if (!node) - node = __local_list_pop_pending(lru, steal_loc_l); - - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&steal_loc_l->lock, flags); + if (!bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&steal_loc_l->lock, &flags)) { + node = __local_list_pop_free(steal_loc_l); + if (!node) + node = __local_list_pop_pending(lru, steal_loc_l); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&steal_loc_l->lock, flags); + } steal = get_next_cpu(steal); } while (!node && steal != first_steal); loc_l->next_steal = steal; - if (node) { - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&loc_l->lock, flags); - __local_list_add_pending(lru, loc_l, cpu, node, hash); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); + if (!node) + return NULL; + + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&loc_l->lock, &flags)) { + /* + * The local pending lock can't be acquired (rqspinlock AA + * or timeout). Return the stolen node to the per-CPU + * free_llist instead of orphaning it; the next pop_free on + * this CPU will pick it up. + */ + node->type = BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_FREE; + bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 0); + llist_add(&node->llist, &loc_l->free_llist); + return NULL; } + __local_list_add_pending(lru, loc_l, cpu, node, hash); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); return node; } @@ -519,18 +607,23 @@ static void bpf_common_lru_push_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, loc_l = per_cpu_ptr(lru->common_lru.local_list, node->cpu); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&loc_l->lock, flags); + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&loc_l->lock, &flags)) { + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 1); + return; + } if (unlikely(node->type != BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_PENDING)) { - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); goto check_lru_list; } node->type = BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T_FREE; bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); - list_move(&node->list, local_free_list(loc_l)); + list_del(&node->list); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&loc_l->lock, flags); + + llist_add(&node->llist, &loc_l->free_llist); return; } @@ -546,11 +639,14 @@ static void bpf_percpu_lru_push_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, l = per_cpu_ptr(lru->percpu_lru, node->cpu); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, flags); + if (bpf_lru_spin_lock_irqsave(&l->lock, &flags)) { + WRITE_ONCE(node->pending_free, 1); + return; + } __bpf_lru_node_move(l, node, BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); + bpf_lru_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&l->lock, flags); } void bpf_lru_push_free(struct bpf_lru *lru, struct bpf_lru_node *node) @@ -573,6 +669,7 @@ static void bpf_common_lru_populate(struct bpf_lru *lru, void *buf, node = (struct bpf_lru_node *)(buf + node_offset); node->type = BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE; + node->pending_free = 0; bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_add(&node->list, &l->lists[BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE]); buf += elem_size; @@ -602,6 +699,7 @@ static void bpf_percpu_lru_populate(struct bpf_lru *lru, void *buf, node = (struct bpf_lru_node *)(buf + node_offset); node->cpu = cpu; node->type = BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE; + node->pending_free = 0; bpf_lru_node_clear_ref(node); list_add(&node->list, &l->lists[BPF_LRU_LIST_T_FREE]); i++; @@ -624,19 +722,17 @@ void bpf_lru_populate(struct bpf_lru *lru, void *buf, u32 node_offset, nr_elems); } -static void bpf_lru_locallist_init(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l, int cpu) +static int bpf_lru_locallist_init(struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l, int cpu) { - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < NR_BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T; i++) - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&loc_l->lists[i]); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&loc_l->pending_list); + init_llist_head(&loc_l->free_llist); loc_l->next_steal = cpu; - raw_spin_lock_init(&loc_l->lock); + return bpf_lru_spin_lock_init(&loc_l->lock); } -static void bpf_lru_list_init(struct bpf_lru_list *l) +static int bpf_lru_list_init(struct bpf_lru_list *l) { int i; @@ -648,13 +744,15 @@ static void bpf_lru_list_init(struct bpf_lru_list *l) l->next_inactive_rotation = &l->lists[BPF_LRU_LIST_T_INACTIVE]; - raw_spin_lock_init(&l->lock); + return bpf_lru_spin_lock_init(&l->lock); } int bpf_lru_init(struct bpf_lru *lru, bool percpu, u32 hash_offset, del_from_htab_func del_from_htab, void *del_arg) { - int cpu; + int cpu, err; + + lru->percpu = percpu; if (percpu) { lru->percpu_lru = alloc_percpu(struct bpf_lru_list); @@ -665,7 +763,9 @@ int bpf_lru_init(struct bpf_lru *lru, bool percpu, u32 hash_offset, struct bpf_lru_list *l; l = per_cpu_ptr(lru->percpu_lru, cpu); - bpf_lru_list_init(l); + err = bpf_lru_list_init(l); + if (err) + goto out; } lru->nr_scans = PERCPU_NR_SCANS; } else { @@ -679,25 +779,47 @@ int bpf_lru_init(struct bpf_lru *lru, bool percpu, u32 hash_offset, struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l; loc_l = per_cpu_ptr(clru->local_list, cpu); - bpf_lru_locallist_init(loc_l, cpu); + err = bpf_lru_locallist_init(loc_l, cpu); + if (err) + goto out; } - bpf_lru_list_init(&clru->lru_list); + err = bpf_lru_list_init(&clru->lru_list); + if (err) + goto out; lru->nr_scans = LOCAL_NR_SCANS; } - lru->percpu = percpu; lru->del_from_htab = del_from_htab; lru->del_arg = del_arg; lru->hash_offset = hash_offset; return 0; +out: + bpf_lru_destroy(lru); + return err; } void bpf_lru_destroy(struct bpf_lru *lru) { - if (lru->percpu) + int cpu; + + if (lru->percpu) { + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + struct bpf_lru_list *l; + + l = per_cpu_ptr(lru->percpu_lru, cpu); + bpf_lru_spin_lock_destroy(&l->lock); + } free_percpu(lru->percpu_lru); - else + } else { + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { + struct bpf_lru_locallist *loc_l; + + loc_l = per_cpu_ptr(lru->common_lru.local_list, cpu); + bpf_lru_spin_lock_destroy(&loc_l->lock); + } + bpf_lru_spin_lock_destroy(&lru->common_lru.lru_list.lock); free_percpu(lru->common_lru.local_list); + } } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h index fe2661a58ea9..6830147c7a6a 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h @@ -6,11 +6,12 @@ #include <linux/cache.h> #include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/llist.h> +#include <linux/percpu.h> #include <linux/spinlock_types.h> #define NR_BPF_LRU_LIST_T (3) #define NR_BPF_LRU_LIST_COUNT (2) -#define NR_BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T (2) #define BPF_LOCAL_LIST_T_OFFSET NR_BPF_LRU_LIST_T enum bpf_lru_list_type { @@ -22,10 +23,31 @@ enum bpf_lru_list_type { }; struct bpf_lru_node { - struct list_head list; + /* + * A node is in at most one list at a time. The free path on the + * per-CPU locallist uses an llist, so share storage via a union. + */ + union { + struct list_head list; + struct llist_node llist; + }; u16 cpu; u8 type; u8 ref; + /* + * Marks nodes whose *_push_free() lock acquire failed; reclaimed + * by flush/shrink which honor the flag instead of del_from_htab(). + */ + u8 pending_free; +}; + +/* + * Mutually-exclusive per-CPU spinlock with re-entry rejection + * (see implementation in bpf_lru_list.c). + */ +struct bpf_lru_spin_lock { + raw_spinlock_t lock; + int __percpu *nest; }; struct bpf_lru_list { @@ -34,13 +56,14 @@ struct bpf_lru_list { /* The next inactive list rotation starts from here */ struct list_head *next_inactive_rotation; - raw_spinlock_t lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; + struct bpf_lru_spin_lock lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; }; struct bpf_lru_locallist { - struct list_head lists[NR_BPF_LRU_LOCAL_LIST_T]; + struct list_head pending_list; + struct llist_head free_llist; u16 next_steal; - raw_spinlock_t lock; + struct bpf_lru_spin_lock lock; }; struct bpf_common_lru { -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH openEuler-1.0-LTS] perf: Fix refcount race between perf_event_open() and perf_mmap_close()
by Luo Gengkun 08 Sep '26

08 Sep '26

hulk inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/18563 -------------------------------- perf_event_set_output() can succeed and add the event to a ring buffer's event_list, making it visible to concurrent perf_mmap_close(). The latter raises the event refcount via atomic_long_inc_not_zero() during its RCU-protected iteration of rb->event_list. If a subsequent check in sys_perf_event_open() fails, the error path calls free_event() which expects refcount==1. When perf_mmap_close() has already incremented it to 2, free_event() triggers a WARN. Fixes: 9bb5d40cd93c ("perf: Fix mmap() accounting hole") Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun <luogengkun2(a)huawei.com> --- kernel/events/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c index ff875ddf4aeb..292419dc2ec5 100644 --- a/kernel/events/core.c +++ b/kernel/events/core.c @@ -11149,7 +11149,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open, * and that will take care of freeing the event. */ if (!event_file) - free_event(event); + put_event(event); err_cred: if (task) mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex); -- 2.34.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10] drm/dp/mst: fix buffer overflows in sideband chunk accumulation
by Hongtao Zhang 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

From: Ashutosh Desai <ashutoshdesai993(a)gmail.com> stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.266 commit ef2ecb6cf268debf3890df99fea01b6452dcf78e category: bugfix bugzilla: https://atomgit.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/17183 CVE: CVE-2026-68278 Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id… -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 55bd5e685bda455b9b50c835f8c8442d52a344a3 ] drm_dp_sideband_append_payload() has three related bugs when processing device-provided sideband reply data: 1. Zero-length curchunk_len underflow: msg_len is a 6-bit field taken directly from the DP sideband header. If a device sends msg_len=0, curchunk_len is set to zero. The condition (curchunk_idx >= curchunk_len) is immediately true, and curchunk_len-1 wraps to 255 (u8 underflow). drm_dp_msg_data_crc4() reads 255 bytes from chunk[48], then memcpy() writes 255 bytes into msg[], both far out of bounds. 2. chunk[48] overflow: curchunk_len can reach 63 (6-bit field). chunk[] is only 48 bytes. Multi-iteration payload assembly appends 16-byte blocks until curchunk_idx reaches curchunk_len, writing up to 15 bytes past the end of chunk[] into msg[]. 3. msg[256] overflow: each chunk contributes (curchunk_len-1) bytes to msg[]. No check ensures curlen + (curchunk_len-1) stays within msg[256], so the memcpy can spill into adjacent struct fields. All three are reachable from any DP MST device that can forge sideband reply messages on a physical connection. Fixes: ad7f8a1f9ced ("drm/helper: add Displayport multi-stream helper (v0.6)") Cc: <stable(a)vger.kernel.org> # v3.17+ Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Desai <ashutoshdesai993(a)gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude(a)redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude(a)redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260410041901.2438960-1-ashutoshdesai993@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh(a)linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Hulk Robot <hulkrobot(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Zhang Hongtao <zhanghongtao35(a)huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c index e71d76daee748..0802ae9a43d0a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c @@ -778,6 +778,12 @@ static bool drm_dp_sideband_append_payload(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx *msg, { u8 crc4; + /* curchunk_len must be >= 1 (min 1 CRC byte) and fit in chunk[] */ + if (!msg->curchunk_len || + msg->curchunk_len > ARRAY_SIZE(msg->chunk) || + msg->curchunk_idx + replybuflen > ARRAY_SIZE(msg->chunk)) + return false; + memcpy(&msg->chunk[msg->curchunk_idx], replybuf, replybuflen); msg->curchunk_idx += replybuflen; @@ -788,6 +794,9 @@ static bool drm_dp_sideband_append_payload(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx *msg, print_hex_dump(KERN_DEBUG, "wrong crc", DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, 16, 1, msg->chunk, msg->curchunk_len, false); + /* Guard against accumulated msg[] overflow */ + if (msg->curlen + msg->curchunk_len - 1 > ARRAY_SIZE(msg->msg)) + return false; /* copy chunk into bigger msg */ memcpy(&msg->msg[msg->curlen], msg->chunk, msg->curchunk_len - 1); msg->curlen += msg->curchunk_len - 1; -- 2.43.0

2 1

[PATCH OLK-5.10 0/1] CVE-2026-74549
by Yongqiang Liu 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

Guenter Roeck (1): hwmon: (nct6775-core) Prevent access to unsupported weight registers drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0

2 2

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/1] CVE-2026-72397
by Yongqiang Liu 07 Sep '26

07 Sep '26

Abdurrahman Hussain (1): hwmon: (pmbus/core) honor vrm_version in pmbus_data2reg_vid() drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus_core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0

2 2