- Kernel - mailweb.openeuler.org

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1365/1365] drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.
by kernel test robot 04 Feb '25

04 Feb '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b8815fbbe89b0d15fa3296c3e57d2197a92f5bc0 [1365/1365] ACPI: CPPC: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init failed in CPU Hotplug situation config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20250103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250204/202502042318.pGS3sedi-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202502042318.pGS3sedi-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed. vim +614 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c 576 577 int acpi_get_psd_map(struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data) 578 { 579 struct cpc_desc **cpc_pptr, *cpc_ptr; 580 int parsed_core_num = 0; 581 int i, ret; 582 583 cpc_pptr = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); 584 if (!cpc_pptr) 585 return -ENOMEM; 586 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 587 cpc_pptr[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpc_desc), GFP_KERNEL); 588 if (!cpc_pptr[i]) { 589 ret = -ENOMEM; 590 goto out; 591 } 592 } 593 594 /* 595 * We can not use acpi_get_devices() to walk the processor devices 596 * because some processor device is not present. 597 */ 598 ret = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, 599 ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_parse_cpc, NULL, 600 cpc_pptr, (void **)&parsed_core_num); 601 if (ret) 602 goto out; 603 if (parsed_core_num != num_possible_cpus()) { 604 ret = -EINVAL; 605 goto out; 606 } 607 608 ret = __acpi_get_psd_map(all_cpu_data, cpc_pptr); 609 610 out: 611 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 612 cpc_ptr = cpc_pptr[i]; 613 if (cpc_ptr) > 614 kfree(cpc_ptr); 615 } 616 kfree(cpc_pptr); 617 618 return ret; 619 } 620 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_psd_map); 621 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1407/1407] include/linux/thread_info.h:59:17: warning: 'b' may be used uninitialized
by kernel test robot 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi Yu, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b9f356e64a7eda411ba8b63df9d4c5e204f16025 [1407/1407] block-io-hierarchy: core hierarchy iodump implementation config: arm64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290356.I10Fs5vR-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290356.I10Fs5vR-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501290356.I10Fs5vR-lkp@intel.com/ Note: it may well be a FALSE warning. FWIW you are at least aware of it now. http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/asm-generic/preempt.h:5, from ./arch/arm64/include/generated/asm/preempt.h:1, from include/linux/preempt.h:81, from include/linux/spinlock.h:51, from include/linux/wait.h:9, from include/linux/wait_bit.h:8, from include/linux/fs.h:7, from include/linux/seq_file.h:11, from block/blk-io-hierarchy/iodump.c:14: In function 'check_object_size', inlined from 'check_copy_size' at include/linux/thread_info.h:90:2, inlined from 'copy_from_user' at include/linux/uaccess.h:143:6, inlined from 'threshold_store' at block/blk-io-hierarchy/iodump.c:240:6: >> include/linux/thread_info.h:59:17: warning: 'b' may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] 59 | __check_object_size(ptr, n, to_user); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/thread_info.h: In function 'threshold_store': include/linux/thread_info.h:52:13: note: by argument 1 of type 'const void *' to '__check_object_size' declared here 52 | extern void __check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ block/blk-io-hierarchy/iodump.c:234:14: note: 'b' declared here 234 | char b[MAX_BUF_LEN + 1]; | ^ vim +/b +59 include/linux/thread_info.h 0f60a8efe4005a Kees Cook 2016-07-12 50 f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 51 #ifdef CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 52 extern void __check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 53 bool to_user); f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 54 a85d6b8242dc78 Kees Cook 2016-09-07 55 static __always_inline void check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 56 bool to_user) f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 57 { 81409e9e280588 Kees Cook 2016-08-31 58 if (!__builtin_constant_p(n)) f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 @59 __check_object_size(ptr, n, to_user); f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 60 } f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 61 #else f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 62 static inline void check_object_size(const void *ptr, unsigned long n, f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 63 bool to_user) f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 64 { } f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 65 #endif /* CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY */ f5509cc18daa7f Kees Cook 2016-06-07 66 :::::: The code at line 59 was first introduced by commit :::::: f5509cc18daa7f82bcc553be70df2117c8eedc16 mm: Hardened usercopy :::::: TO: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> :::::: CC: Kees Cook <keescook(a)chromium.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2720/2720] drivers/block/null_blk/main.o: warning: objtool: local_lock_release()+0x16c: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi Damien, First bad commit (maybe != root cause): tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 683824f7f33a10565e9afcc9358ed8004d851077 commit: 35959f33a5dde63a001111516adda66dbe7a7027 [2720/2720] null_blk: Move driver into its own directory config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20250124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290314.CKmch30j-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290314.CKmch30j-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501290314.CKmch30j-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/block/null_blk/main.o: warning: objtool: local_lock_release()+0x16c: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1407/1407] include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h:106:27: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u32[1]' {aka 'unsigned int[1]'}
by kernel test robot 29 Jan '25

29 Jan '25

Hi Steven, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: a6a7981cbf66d4951425d33cdce6ef39206eba83 [1407/1407] Net: ethernet: Support 3snic 3s9xx network card config: arm64-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290212.Q2TSAA3o-lkp@…) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250129/202501290212.Q2TSAA3o-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501290212.Q2TSAA3o-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:492:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'sss_nic_get_io_stats_size' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 492 | u32 sss_nic_get_io_stats_size(const struct sss_nic_dev *nic_dev) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from arch/arm64/include/asm/bitops.h:39, from include/linux/bitops.h:20, from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:6: In function 'test_bit', inlined from 'sss_nic_add_ethtool_link_mode' at drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:764:7: >> include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h:106:27: warning: array subscript 'long unsigned int[0]' is partly outside array bounds of 'u32[1]' {aka 'unsigned int[1]'} [-Warray-bounds=] 106 | return 1UL & (addr[BIT_WORD(nr)] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1))); | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c: In function 'sss_nic_add_ethtool_link_mode': drivers/net/ethernet/3snic/sssnic/nic/sss_nic_ethtool_stats_api.c:759:40: note: object 'hw_mode' of size 4 759 | u32 hw_mode, u32 op) | ~~~~^~~~~~~ vim +106 include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 98 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 99 /** 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 100 * test_bit - Determine whether a bit is set 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 101 * @nr: bit number to test 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 102 * @addr: Address to start counting from 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 103 */ 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 104 static inline int test_bit(int nr, const volatile unsigned long *addr) 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 105 { d05be13bcc6ec61 Jiri Slaby 2007-10-18 @106 return 1UL & (addr[BIT_WORD(nr)] >> (nr & (BITS_PER_LONG-1))); 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 107 } 4117b02132d1cf9 Akinobu Mita 2006-03-26 108 :::::: The code at line 106 was first introduced by commit :::::: d05be13bcc6ec615fb2e9556a9b85d52800669b6 define first set of BIT* macros :::::: TO: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby(a)gmail.com> :::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds(a)woody.linux-foundation.org> -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:OLK-5.10 2720/2720] kernel/sched/core.o: warning: objtool: preempt_count_add()+0xdc: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git OLK-5.10 head: 683824f7f33a10565e9afcc9358ed8004d851077 commit: 2fe77d25dac03b271f454e3f0c006616fdce4e55 [2720/2720] sched: Core-wide rq->lock config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20250124 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501282335.hXkI4N24-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501282335.hXkI4N24-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501282335.hXkI4N24-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/sched/core.o: warning: objtool: preempt_count_add()+0xdc: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1343/1343] fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction
by kernel test robot 28 Jan '25

28 Jan '25

Hi Theodore, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: 41298197ead9e85ee2ec1d52122f03fd1863cff2 [1343/1343] ext4: convert BUG_ON's to WARN_ON's in mballoc.c config: x86_64-randconfig-101-20241223 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501280034.3ctUnk1s-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250128/202501280034.3ctUnk1s-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501280034.3ctUnk1s-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12: In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16: In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:26: In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:14: include/linux/pagemap.h:425:21: warning: cast from 'int (*)(struct file *, struct page *)' to 'filler_t *' (aka 'int (*)(void *, struct page *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict] 425 | filler_t *filler = (filler_t *)mapping->a_ops->readpage; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1 warning generated. fs/ext4/mballoc.c:4734: warning: Function parameter or member 'bh' not described in 'ext4_free_blocks' >> fs/ext4/mballoc.o: warning: objtool: ext4_mb_complex_scan_group()+0x11a4: unreachable instruction -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1334/1334] kernel/hung_task.c:148:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace'
by kernel test robot 27 Jan '25

27 Jan '25

Hi Guilherme, FYI, the error/warning still remains. tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: 190aae97bcddbed131a203f829257b168f5058ce [1334/1334] kernel/hung_task.c: introduce sysctl to print all traces when a hung task is detected config: x86_64-randconfig-103-20241218 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250127/202501272153.j77d8naO-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250127/202501272153.j77d8naO-lkp@…) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501272153.j77d8naO-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> kernel/hung_task.c:148:7: error: use of undeclared identifier 'sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace' 148 | if (sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace) | ^ kernel/hung_task.c:235:5: warning: no previous prototype for function 'proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 235 | int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^ kernel/hung_task.c:235:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit 235 | int proc_dohung_task_timeout_secs(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^ | static 1 warning and 1 error generated. vim +/sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace +148 kernel/hung_task.c 94 95 static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout) 96 { 97 unsigned long switch_count = t->nvcsw + t->nivcsw; 98 99 /* 100 * Ensure the task is not frozen. 101 * Also, skip vfork and any other user process that freezer should skip. 102 */ 103 if (unlikely(t->flags & (PF_FROZEN | PF_FREEZER_SKIP))) 104 return; 105 106 /* 107 * When a freshly created task is scheduled once, changes its state to 108 * TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE without having ever been switched out once, it 109 * musn't be checked. 110 */ 111 if (unlikely(!switch_count)) 112 return; 113 114 if (switch_count != t->last_switch_count) { 115 t->last_switch_count = switch_count; 116 t->last_switch_time = jiffies; 117 return; 118 } 119 if (time_is_after_jiffies(t->last_switch_time + timeout * HZ)) 120 return; 121 122 trace_sched_process_hang(t); 123 124 if (sysctl_hung_task_panic) { 125 console_verbose(); 126 hung_task_show_lock = true; 127 hung_task_call_panic = true; 128 } 129 130 /* 131 * Ok, the task did not get scheduled for more than 2 minutes, 132 * complain: 133 */ 134 if (sysctl_hung_task_warnings) { 135 if (sysctl_hung_task_warnings > 0) 136 sysctl_hung_task_warnings--; 137 pr_err("INFO: task %s:%d blocked for more than %ld seconds.\n", 138 t->comm, t->pid, timeout); 139 pr_err(" %s %s %.*s\n", 140 print_tainted(), init_utsname()->release, 141 (int)strcspn(init_utsname()->version, " "), 142 init_utsname()->version); 143 pr_err("\"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs\"" 144 " disables this message.\n"); 145 sched_show_task(t); 146 hung_task_show_lock = true; 147 > 148 if (sysctl_hung_task_all_cpu_backtrace) 149 hung_task_show_all_bt = true; 150 } 151 152 touch_nmi_watchdog(); 153 } 154 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1365/1365] drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.
by kernel test robot 27 Jan '25

27 Jan '25

tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: da51139d17e9d53d61a9877d9042e43b85d71ee1 commit: b8815fbbe89b0d15fa3296c3e57d2197a92f5bc0 [1365/1365] ACPI: CPPC: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init failed in CPU Hotplug situation config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20250103 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250127/202501272114.s699yjVJ-lkp@…) compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project ab51eccf88f5321e7c60591c5546b254b6afab99) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501272114.s699yjVJ-lkp@intel.com/ cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:614:3-8: WARNING: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed. vim +614 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c 576 577 int acpi_get_psd_map(struct cppc_cpudata **all_cpu_data) 578 { 579 struct cpc_desc **cpc_pptr, *cpc_ptr; 580 int parsed_core_num = 0; 581 int i, ret; 582 583 cpc_pptr = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL); 584 if (!cpc_pptr) 585 return -ENOMEM; 586 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 587 cpc_pptr[i] = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpc_desc), GFP_KERNEL); 588 if (!cpc_pptr[i]) { 589 ret = -ENOMEM; 590 goto out; 591 } 592 } 593 594 /* 595 * We can not use acpi_get_devices() to walk the processor devices 596 * because some processor device is not present. 597 */ 598 ret = acpi_walk_namespace(ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE, ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT, 599 ACPI_UINT32_MAX, acpi_parse_cpc, NULL, 600 cpc_pptr, (void **)&parsed_core_num); 601 if (ret) 602 goto out; 603 if (parsed_core_num != num_possible_cpus()) { 604 ret = -EINVAL; 605 goto out; 606 } 607 608 ret = __acpi_get_psd_map(all_cpu_data, cpc_pptr); 609 610 out: 611 for_each_possible_cpu(i) { 612 cpc_ptr = cpc_pptr[i]; 613 if (cpc_ptr) > 614 kfree(cpc_ptr); 615 } 616 kfree(cpc_pptr); 617 618 return ret; 619 } 620 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_psd_map); 621 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

1 0

[PATCH OLK-6.6] nfsd: fix nfs4_openowner leak when concurrent nfsd4_open occur
by Li Lingfeng 27 Jan '25

27 Jan '25

From: Yang Erkun <yangerkun(a)huawei.com> HULK inclusion category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/IBJCOJ CVE: CVE-2024-56779 -------------------------------- The action force umount(umount -f) will attempt to kill all rpc_task even umount operation may ultimately fail if some files remain open. Consequently, if an action attempts to open a file, it can potentially send two rpc_task to nfs server. NFS CLIENT thread1 thread2 open("file") ... nfs4_do_open _nfs4_do_open _nfs4_open_and_get_state _nfs4_proc_open nfs4_run_open_task /* rpc_task1 */ rpc_run_task rpc_wait_for_completion_task umount -f nfs_umount_begin rpc_killall_tasks rpc_signal_task rpc_task1 been wakeup and return -512 _nfs4_do_open // while loop ... nfs4_run_open_task /* rpc_task2 */ rpc_run_task rpc_wait_for_completion_task While processing an open request, nfsd will first attempt to find or allocate an nfs4_openowner. If it finds an nfs4_openowner that is not marked as NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED, this nfs4_openowner will released. Since two rpc_task can attempt to open the same file simultaneously from the client to server, and because two instances of nfsd can run concurrently, this situation can lead to lots of memory leak. Additionally, when we echo 0 to /proc/fs/nfsd/threads, warning will be triggered. NFS SERVER nfsd1 nfsd2 echo 0 > /proc/fs/nfsd/threads nfsd4_open nfsd4_process_open1 find_or_alloc_open_stateowner // alloc oo1, stateid1 nfsd4_open nfsd4_process_open1 find_or_alloc_open_stateowner // find oo1, without NFS4_OO_CONFIRMED release_openowner unhash_openowner_locked list_del_init(&oo->oo_perclient) // cannot find this oo // from client, LEAK!!! alloc_stateowner // alloc oo2 nfsd4_process_open2 init_open_stateid // associate oo1 // with stateid1, stateid1 LEAK!!! nfs4_get_vfs_file // alloc nfsd_file1 and nfsd_file_mark1 // all LEAK!!! nfsd4_process_open2 ... write_threads ... nfsd_destroy_serv nfsd_shutdown_net nfs4_state_shutdown_net nfs4_state_destroy_net destroy_client __destroy_client // won't find oo1!!! nfsd_shutdown_generic nfsd_file_cache_shutdown kmem_cache_destroy for nfsd_file_slab and nfsd_file_mark_slab // bark since nfsd_file1 // and nfsd_file_mark1 // still alive ======================================================================= BUG nfsd_file (Not tainted): Objects remaining in nfsd_file on __kmem_cache_shutdown() ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Slab 0xffd4000004438a80 objects=34 used=1 fp=0xff11000110e2ad28 flags=0x17ffffc0000240(workingset|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 757 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.12.0-rc6+ #19 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.1-2.fc37 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x53/0x70 slab_err+0xb0/0xf0 __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x15c/0x310 kmem_cache_destroy+0x66/0x160 nfsd_file_cache_shutdown+0xac/0x210 [nfsd] nfsd_destroy_serv+0x251/0x2a0 [nfsd] nfsd_svc+0x125/0x1e0 [nfsd] write_threads+0x16a/0x2a0 [nfsd] nfsctl_transaction_write+0x74/0xa0 [nfsd] vfs_write+0x1ae/0x6d0 ksys_write+0xc1/0x160 do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint Object 0xff11000110e2ac38 @offset=3128 Allocated in nfsd_file_do_acquire+0x20f/0xa30 [nfsd] age=1635 cpu=3 pid=800 nfsd_file_do_acquire+0x20f/0xa30 [nfsd] nfsd_file_acquire_opened+0x5f/0x90 [nfsd] nfs4_get_vfs_file+0x4c9/0x570 [nfsd] nfsd4_process_open2+0x713/0x1070 [nfsd] nfsd4_open+0x74b/0x8b0 [nfsd] nfsd4_proc_compound+0x70b/0xc20 [nfsd] nfsd_dispatch+0x1b4/0x3a0 [nfsd] svc_process_common+0x5b8/0xc50 [sunrpc] svc_process+0x2ab/0x3b0 [sunrpc] svc_handle_xprt+0x681/0xa20 [sunrpc] nfsd+0x183/0x220 [nfsd] kthread+0x199/0x1e0 ret_from_fork+0x31/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Add nfs4_openowner_unhashed to help found unhashed nfs4_openowner, and break nfsd4_open process to fix this problem. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun <yangerkun(a)huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Li Lingfeng <lilingfeng3(a)huawei.com> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 901fc68636cd..dfa2aa91fcac 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -1625,6 +1625,12 @@ static void release_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp) free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist); } +static bool nfs4_openowner_unhashed(struct nfs4_openowner *oo) +{ + return list_empty(&oo->oo_owner.so_strhash) && + list_empty(&oo->oo_perclient); +} + static void unhash_openowner_locked(struct nfs4_openowner *oo) { struct nfs4_client *clp = oo->oo_owner.so_client; @@ -4632,6 +4638,12 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_file *fp, struct nfsd4_open *open) spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock); spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock); + if (nfs4_openowner_unhashed(oo)) { + mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex); + stp = NULL; + goto out_unlock; + } + retstp = nfsd4_find_existing_open(fp, open); if (retstp) goto out_unlock; @@ -5751,6 +5763,11 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nf if (!stp) { stp = init_open_stateid(fp, open); + if (!stp) { + status = nfserr_jukebox; + goto out; + } + if (!open->op_stp) new_stp = true; } -- 2.31.1

2 1

[PATCH OLK-6.6 0/7] Support MATA monitor feature for MPAM
by Zeng Heng 26 Jan '25

26 Jan '25

Support MATA monitor feature for MPAM Zeng Heng (7): arm64/mpam: Support MATA monitor feature for MPAM arm64/mpam: Add judgment to distinguish MSMON_MBWU_CAPTURE definition arm64/mpam: fix MBA granularity conversion formula arm64/mpam: fix bug in percent_to_mbw_max() arm64/mpam: Fix out-of-bound access of mbwu_state array arm64/mpam: Fix out-of-bound access of cfg array arm64/mpam: Improve conversion accuracy between percent and fixed-point fraction arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c | 53 ++++++++++ drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_devices.c | 31 ++++-- drivers/platform/mpam/mpam_resctrl.c | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++----- fs/resctrl/internal.h | 15 --- fs/resctrl/monitor.c | 47 +-------- include/linux/resctrl.h | 17 ++++ 6 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

2 8