On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:24 PM Yunsheng Lin linyunsheng@huawei.com wrote:
@@ -176,8 +207,23 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc) static inline void qdisc_run_end(struct Qdisc *qdisc) { write_seqcount_end(&qdisc->running);
if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK)
if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) { spin_unlock(&qdisc->seqlock);
/* qdisc_run_end() is protected by RCU lock, and
* qdisc reset will do a synchronize_net() after
* setting __QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED, so testing
* the below two bits separately should be fine.
Hmm, why synchronize_net() after setting this bit is fine? It could still be flipped right after you test RESCHEDULE bit.
* For qdisc_run() in net_tx_action() case, we
* really should provide rcu protection explicitly
* for document purposes or PREEMPT_RCU.
*/
if (unlikely(test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_NEED_RESCHEDULE,
&qdisc->state) &&
!test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED,
&qdisc->state)))
Why do you want to test __QDISC_STATE_DEACTIVATED bit at all? dev_deactivate_many() will wait for those scheduled but being deactivated, so what's the problem of scheduling it even with this bit?
Thanks.